Pfizer has petitioned the court to dismiss a lawsuit brought forth by a whistleblower alleging criminal misconduct. Pfizer says the courts should dismiss the lawsuit because the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the “vaccine” knowing the clinical trials were fraudulent.
Not to mention, the United States government has already said Big Pharma companies won’t be held liable for the damages, up to and including death, their “vaccines” cause. So why would they side with a whistleblower?
Also, keep in mind, that Pfizer’s CEO says if you don’t like his product, you’re the criminal, not them for injecting several hundred million people with a concoction tested using fraudulent safety trials. Over 12.1 billion shots have been administered worldwide, and surely a large chunk of those are Pfizer’s.
The lawyer for whistleblower Brook Jackson told The Defender that in its argument, Pfizer essentially admitted to wrongdoing but says there should be no consequences because the United States government’s FDA gave its blessing to the fraudulent clinical trials.
Under the False Claims Act, which is the means through which Jackson’s lawsuit was filed, whistleblowers can be rewarded for confidentially disclosing fraud that results in financial losses for the federal government.
A possible roadblock to this, and Pfizer’s latest defense, is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded the scope of a legal principle known as “materiality.” This resulted in a series of federal court decisions in which fraud claims brought under the False Claims Act were dismissed.
“As interpreted by the Supreme Court, if the government continued paying a contractor despite the contractor’s fraudulent activity, the fraud was not considered ‘material’ to the contract,” reports The Defender. –Natural News
Attorney Robert Barnes says that Pfizer’s argument maintains that the company can get away with fraud as long as the government continues writing checks despite knowing about it. “Pfizer, one of the most criminally fined drug companies in the world, wants to weaken the laws that hold them accountable,” Barnes told The Defender.
“This case will determine if Big Pharma can rip off the American people using a dangerous drug that harms millions without any legal remedy because they claim the government was in on the scam,” Barnes says.
“This case will determine if Big Pharma can rip off the American people using a dangerous drug that harms millions without any legal remedy because they claim the government was in on the scam,” Barnes says. “Brook [Jackson] brought a Qui Tam action and a retaliatory discharge case against Pfizer and others for fraud on the people concerning Pfizer’s false certifications to the U.S. Department of Defense about the safety and efficacy of their COVID-19 vaccine.”
A Qui Tam case, by the way, allows individuals and other entities with evidence of fraud against federal programs or contracts to sue the wrongdoer on behalf of the United States government.
That’s where all of this gets sticky. The government knew about it. It’s obvious because they already gave immunity to big pharma companies while they were rolling out the vaccines. No matter what the clinical trials said, they had every intention of forcing these injections into as many living humans as possible. The goal is to inject people regardless of the outcomes.
“[Jackson] was part of the clinical trials, witnessed extraordinary malfeasance, blew the whistle, and was quickly fired after she blew the whistle,” Barnes added.
This is fraud by both the government and Pfizer. What’s that term when corporations are controlled by the government and opposition is not allowed? Oh yeah, that’s called fascism. A merger of state and corporate power to rule over everyone else and forces products on people. Interesting that some still believe the fairy tale that they are “free.”