WHO Chief Scientist: There Is NO EVIDENCE That The Vaccine Will Prevent Infection

by | Dec 29, 2020 | Headline News | 9 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    A World Health Organization chief scientist has said that there is no evidence that any of the approved vaccines will prevent a person from getting infected with COVID-19.  This scamdemic is never-ending and the hoax is becoming more apparent by the day.

    The comments were made by WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan during what appears to have been a virtual press conference held Monday. Swaminathan said there is “no evidence to be confident shots prevent transmission” and that people who receive the vaccine should continue wearing masks and following all social distancing and travel guidelines. She’s not the only tyrant to suggest the vaccine is worthless, yet you should get it anyway and still wear your ritualistic shame muzzle signaling your submission to the New World Order cult. 


    Fauci: Take The Vaccine, Or Wear The Submission Muzzle Forever

    “At the moment, I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines, to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from getting the infection and passing it on,” she said.

    Of course, a close look at the research released by Pfizer and Moderna shows the studies haven’t actually tested whether the vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus; the goal of the trials was to see whether vaccinated patients presented with COVID symptoms at a rate that was substantially less frequent than individuals who hadn’t been vaccinated. That’s pretty much it, according to a report by ZeroHedge Though the data might hint at lowering transmission rates, that’s still to be determined, apparently.

    Are there still people lining up to get this thing? If they can only get only 5% of the population to agree to take this vaccine, it will eventually disappear, but not without a massive propaganda push to get the public injected.

    The time to stand against this tyranny is now. Forcing something (anything, not just a vaccine) into another person’s body is one the biggest human rights violations you can commit. Wake up and stand on some kind of morals, because as we’ve seen, the ruling class will not.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. So, a W.e H.arm O.thers scientist says that there is no evidence that the vaccine will prevent infection.Well,I don’t mean to nitpick,but,there is also NO evidence that we have a raging pandemic on our hands for which a vaccination would be needed for in the first place.?

      2. There is however plenty of evidence which shows that this heavily hyped toxic DNA altering vaccine will make a ton of money for Gill Bates and Big Pharma at the expense of the lives of the masked masses of sheep.


        • GC – Ditto, I suspect the more the sheep, I mean people see others not wearing masks the more they will be inclined not to wear them either. Everyone knows by now, even the sheep, that the mask serves no purpose other than social compliance. There’s more good news, at least half of the population say they will not be receiving the vaccine.

      4. With Trump set to retire with Bush Jr. in Ecuador to play golf, the rest of us will be wearing masks on a required basis all day everyday even to take a dump. Turn off there lights and heat people.

      5. The human body is being genetically modified, to produce the antigenic proteins, in particular.

        It may or may not catch the virus.

        The vaccine (if you want to define it, as such) will not prevent infection.

        Hairsplitting is prone to disinfo, imhblo, but it might be cutesy to try on a leftist, ie. Will it prevent an infection?

        “Are there still *people lining up to get this thing?”

        Liberal demographics are the most vociferous, by far. I will agree to them being hominids or humanoids.

      6. I’m not at all a vaccine fan either, and I’m a gun-owning survivalist, but I can NOT for the life of me figure out why, in a country already loaded with gazillions of rules, some of you freak out about a simple mask. You’re forced to stop at stop signs, pay taxes, wear a seat belt, and you’re not allowed to drive drunk, rob banks, run around naked or shoot people. Yet you fixate on such a simple, polite technique to keep your own saliva in your mouth rather than in someone else’s lungs. Why why why is such an easy thing so difficult? Makes no sense whatsoever to me. There is no logic being applied to this situation by people refusing to do something that costs so little effort, time and money.

      7. DRC -What does wearing a mask have to do with driving drunk, robbing a bank, or shooting someone. When harming someone else or their property that is a crime, when harming yourself it is not a crime – it is a vice. Are you saying not wearing a mask is a crime, or a vice?
        Secondly, a mask may only stop sneezing or coughing droplets from spreading. This virus, like basically all viruses are too small to be seen with an optical type microscope, and even if an optical microscope was powerful enough the virus is still smaller than the wavelength of visible light, so one still cannot see it. The average mask as fine as they are, still has pores more than 4000 times the size of the virus. If one wore a mask fine enough to keep out all viruses you would have difficulty breathing.
        But most importantly, we all know the efficacy of not doing the items you mentioned, but wearing a mask is a social control measure, not a sound medical precaution. You can accept any information you want, it’s your right, but many, if not all independent studies, over the globe, show wearing a mask, lockdowns, etc. serve little to no medical purpose. That being the real case, what is the real State motive. All for a disease where 99.84 % of the people survive.
        Yes, there are people who are susceptible, and unfortunately who do get sick or pass away from this virus, and they need appropriate care, but is this virus really a pandemic. I could spend a lot of time discussing the facts of why we are being mislead about this virus, the measures the State is imposing, and why. One should do their own research, not listen to the MSM, one will learn more and make a better decision.

      8. @Darcie,the masks are not being used to keep others “healthy”.The masks are being used as a control/enslavement method.Look,if you wanna wear a mask – that’s your choice,but,that is where the dilemma lies in PERSONAL CHOICE! As human beings,everyone should have the right to wear or NOT wear a mask.It makes me feel sick as an American to see people made to feel like lepers,diseased,or “bad” people if they don’t wear the muzzle.It should be my personal choice whether to wear the mask or not.This is still America after all.Well,at least it used to be!?!

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.