Republican representative, Trey Gowdy from South Carolina said that in 18 months, he has not seen “one scintilla” of evidence that Donald Trump colluded with Russia. He added that if that evidence existed, we could all be rest assured that it would have been leaked by now.
Since leaks from the White House are not few and far between since Donald Trump has taken office, Gowdy is likely onto something here. There are leaks about everything and regarding everything.
Leaks to the media have plagued Trump’s presidency since his first day in office, and a new report on leakers’ motives opens a window into the extent of the subterfuge. “To be honest, it probably falls into a couple of categories,” one White House official told Axios‘s, Jonathan Swan. “The first is personal vendettas. And two is to make sure there’s an accurate record of what’s really going on in the White House.” Many of those with ties and puppet strings connecting them to the deep state are actually in Trump’s White House, according to The Washington Post.
A wave of leaks from government officials has hobbled the Trump administration, leading some to draw comparisons to countries like Egypt, Turkey, and Pakistan, where shadowy networks within government bureaucracies, often referred to as “deep states,” undermine and coerce elected governments. Though leaks can be a normal and healthy check on a president’s power, what’s happening now extends much further.
A former White House official who, according to Swan, “turned leaking into an art form,” said that “leaking is information warfare; it’s strategic and tactical — strategic to drive [the] narrative, tactical to settle scores.” –SHTFPlan
And Gowdy seems to see the writing on the wall. Who was that said, “a lie told often enough times becomes the truth?” (It was infamous Marxist Vladimir Lenin, FYI). That appears to be exactly what Democrats and their lapdogs in mainstream media continue to propagate. If they just repeat that Trump and Russia colluded enough times, the people will eventually buy that lie without any evidence.
“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on Fox News Sunday as reported by The Daily Wire.
Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, has been among the most vocal of Trump haters. As head of the House Intelligence Committee, Schiff is privy to a lot of information that others are not and leaks of information have streamed out of the committee. “That’s why they’ve moved off of collusion onto obstruction of justice, which is now their current preoccupation,” Gowdy added alluding to the fact that if there was evidence of collusion, the public would have seen it months ago
Gowdy, though, noted that after 18 months, there’s been no evidence of any crime committed. And now, the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller appears to moving into the sex realm. Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, reportedly recorded a conversation with Trump about a former Playboy model who claims Trump once had an affair with her.
That latest revelation, of course, has already leaked. So it does make sense: If anyone had anything on Trump, it’d already be out there. –The Daily Wire
Time to TERMINATE the “investigation”. 🙂
The word “leaked” is very modest. If they had found evidence of collusion, they would have trumpeted it all over the world. All of the major news networks would have broadcast it.
You can trot out and prop up whatever talking head you choose, ain’t none of them telling the truth. The best liars government can buy spewing endless lies with zero credibility. To tell the truth would be revolutionary.
What ever happened to all that Q nonsense wherein Trump was going to take all the trash down?
It’s in process. There are over 40,000 sealed indictments. There is a ton of evidence to go through. It will take time.
Off Topic:
Today is the anniversary of the death of white civil rights activist and acclaimed physicist (Who’s Who In Science), Dr. William Luther Pierce; whose birthday was on September Eleventh, Nineteen Hundred And Thirty Three.
_
hummmm an American white supremacist, author, and political activist. He was one of the most influential ideologues of the white nationalist movement for some 30 years before his death.
in case there are others who never heard of this one
And what a great inspiration to the White people he was!
We should also remember to celebrate his birth.
This is a game the uni-party likes to play to stall
distract….and obstruct.
NEW GAME…..Accuser has one month to prove
their accusations (30 days only) at which time they
will face a jury to decide their penalty for wasting
government time with frivolous law suits. OBSTRUCTION
of JUSTICE could mean LOSING ONES LAW LICENSE!!!
MR PRESIDENT are you listening???
This game of “hide and seek the truth” is
getting boring. Everyone knows why they
are stalling……because it grinds the wheels of
justice to a complete halt in hopes to hold out
until the next election, error, surprise, or manufactured
accusation… which is insane!!!
EITHER PROVE IT IN 30 days or you die…. financially.
The accused has as much time as needed to prove innocence…
or counter sue.
Good ideas. But the reason your suggestion will never be put into place is because lawyers wouldn’t be able to make a living that way. Well, some of the honest ones might, but not the other 99.9%.
Russian govt gave evidence of Russians spying but didn’t take credit for them being state actors.
In kind, asked for info on Americans spying.
Trump is discussing taking away security clearances from former Obama deep state operatives. Fox News again comes out on the side of the deep state. Fox is claiming it would set a precedent. It would. However, they fail to mention that Brennan, Clapper, Comey etc. are setting a precedent also. Never has an entire group of former heads of the intel community attacked a sitting President. Never before has a President had to defend himself and the election results from an attempted coup. He’s too soft on them. They would have been arrested for sedition by now, if I was in charge.
Adam Schiff and former Secret Service agent Don Bongino both have rather crazy eyes. Bongino looks Like he would like to kick your ass, Schiff like he would like to touch it.
Trey Gowdy is hardly better than the rest. Yes, he’s right…no collusion. BUT, in the first place, collusion is not a crime. So why is he playing along by giving the investigation ANY credibility?
Why? Because they are all bunko artists, inside traders and grifters. It’s all for a red/blue theater production to keep the people from seeing the real crimes being committed. The real criminals will not be prosecuted.
The prevailing mental condition is now controlled insanity.
I think he’s “playing along” just to keep the bad actors preoccupied until it’s time for the 40,000 sealed indictments to start being unsealed.
So what if the Russians meddled in our election? The usa meddles in elections all over the globe. The Us even kept the Shaw of Iran in power. The usa topples goverments right and left. Trump was elected because enough folks had there belly full of the republithugs and dimocraps. Hellery lost because she was the very worst candidate the dimocraps could muster. Arkansas was a dimocrap stronghold for a century. Then The Klintons left for the white house (good riddance) and the next governor got caught stealing and was booted out. And Mike Huckabee was made governor. And he showed the citizens just how good a repub governor could govern. And was elected for another term. Now Arkansas is a entirely Red state. Only the klintons could destroy the dimocrap party in Ark. Most Everyone in Ark hates the klintons.
The mainstream media is calling for the US to effect regime change in Iran/Iraq/Syria. Why is it okay for the US to meddle openly in sovereign nations’ affairs?
Maybe the concern should be that Trump is an Israeli operative.
Yesterday it was reported that OBAMA was involved in the whole thing
Speaking just in terms of biological evolution, human females have an interest in mating with victors. After WWII this took the form, in the USA, of surviving soldiers going home and making babies, thus the Baby Boom. In Germany it took the form of the invading Russian army raping German women. What’s important about this is that if there are no victors it can only be because there is no conflict. Therefore it is only reasonable to understand that women have a biological interest in there being conflict among men. Sounds terrible, I agree. But what is a logical argument that would prove this untrue?