TRUMP SAYS: HUNTER MAKES FORTUNE FROM SHADY DEALS!
BIDEN FAMILY STINKS TO HIGH HEAVENS OF CORRUPTION!
DON'T GET LEFT OUT: HUNTER MUST BE STOPPED!
This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News.
A new peer-reviewed scientific paper published in the journal Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines has found that the DTaP vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) is causing children who receive it to become more prone to contracting whooping cough later on in life.
According to the study, children who receive the entire DTaP series of vaccinations are up to 15 times more likely to contract whooping cough at the five-year mark following these jabs compared to unvaccinated children, completely obliterating the myth that whooping cough outbreaks are the result of “anti-vaxxers.”
As it turns out, the vast majority of children being affected by pertussis outbreaks are vaccinated children, which some health authorities are reluctantly admitting. Even so, pro-vaxxers are insistent that all disease spread is caused by unvaccinated children, despite the fact that science continues to prove otherwise.
What’s more, the DTaP vaccine, along with many other vaccines, fails to provide permanent protection against disease – assuming they provide any protection at all. As reported in the same aforementioned DTaP study, pertussis antibodies experience a “rapid decline” in as little as 2-3 years post-vaccination, “often to pre-vaccination levels.”
Even though antibody levels alone “are not necessarily indicative of waning immunity,” this same study goes on to explain, “in this case given the higher risk of infection after aP (acellular pertussis) vaccine with time, it is strongly suggestive of it.”
It would be better if children weren’t vaccinated with DTaP vaccines at all because research shows that they actually increase susceptibility to disease after the antigens have all worn off. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) says that this “linked-epitope suppression,” once it subsides, increases disease susceptibility, “and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.”
Another paper published in the journal BMC Medicine contrasts the difference between whole-cell pertussis vaccines (wP) and aP vaccines, the latter of which replaced the former. Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, this particular study denotes, might block symptomatic disease but not asymptomatic transmission, which could account “for the observed increase in B. pertussis incidence.”
It’s a little science-heavy for the average person to understand, but suffice it to say that aP vaccines for pertussis, including DTaP, might appear to work initially, but ultimately fail to provide long-term protection from, also known as real immunity to, disease. Likewise, aP vaccines fail to protect against transmission of disease, which means people vaccinated with them are a serious public health risk.
“… public health authorities may be facing a situation similar to that of polio, where vaccinated individuals can still transmit infection,” this same paper reveals.
Pro-vaxxers can call these findings “misinformation” all day long, but the science speaks for itself. The temporary “immunity” – if you can even call it immunity – provided by the DTaP vaccine is illusory at best. At worst, it’s a mass deception that’s triggering disease outbreaks that are being erroneously blamed on the unvaccinated and used as an excuse to censor vaccine truth online while simultaneously eliminating vaccine exemption laws in as many states as possible.
“Even though vaccine propaganda is filled with malicious lies and deliberate false information, anyone who questions the official false narratives of the vaccine industry is instantly censored and de-platformed from all the major tech platforms, including Pinterest, Vimeo, Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook,” warns Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
“The entire tech industry, in fact, has gone all-in with the medical violence of the vaccine industry and its history of running inhumane medical experiments on human children.”
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
President-elect, Donald Trump has announced that he will enforce tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and...
This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News. Great Britain's decision to...
Current United States President Joe Biden wants every single dollar allocated for Ukraine to go to...
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
It fried my Biology teacher’s brain, when she said that a virus doesn’t fully fit the definition of a living thing, and I asked about attenuation. She said there was cross species resistance, and I asked about the different vectors.
I wanted to write that meritocracy would be an effective means of population control, in a scarcity of resources. But, several, common examples can be taken from this slow-kill story.
Public school teachers, take yours, first.
And, noone is more deserving of the 15x greater rate of infection than you shedders, seeing as how you were discovered in the Colonial Era.
Side effects were reported from the very first medical trials, forced on men in uniform, in spite of us saying this is ‘new’ science.
The paper is arguing for a return to the old vaccine. It’s not arguing that vaccines don’t work, just that the new vaccine doesn’t work as well as the old one.
If we’re being told that something is live or not alive, as it’s one and only descriptor, the first logical step is to define the properties of a living thing.
Virions (a neologism for particles) are apparently able to replicate themselves and become recombinant, like your parents once did.
Watch Big Pharma commercials on the auto-immune conditions, Crohn’s and psoriasis, and they want to know whether you or family have been vaccinated, prior to prescribing an immuno-depressant.
You shedders ooze from your tear ducts, sweat glands, and all the others, while your gambling odds were reported by a monopoly.
Just more stupidity from anti- vaxers. Of course immunity decreases after 5 years post vax. Get a booster. The vax covers the years when the patient is most at risk, except for that first month’s time when a vax won’t work. And that’s why herd immunity matters- to protect the most vulnerable youngest patients.
Btw- those supposed peer reviewed articles mentioned aren’t really peer reviewed by any valid scientific journal. Seriously, they are sophisticated appearing crappy fakes if you scrutinize them. And the same authors appear over and over again. I couldn’t really access the originals.
The lesson: vaccinate your kids. Its better in the long run.