New Medical Study: Your Face Mask Is Not Protecting You

by | Nov 19, 2020 | Headline News | 13 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    The long-awaited medical study from Denmark examining the ability of face masks to protect people from coronavirus was finally published on Wednesday. This study provides evidence counter to the propaganda dominant in media and government communications.

    Providing good news for people suffering through wearing masks, and bad news for the politicians and businesses pushing the uncomfortable, dangerous, and dehumanizing dress code, the newly released medical study indicates face masks are not protecting people from coronavirus. Most of us can see this with our own eyes. People are masked up everywhere, yet cases are spiking and the majority of those contracting COVID-19 are religious mask wearers.

    CDC Study: Most COVID-19 Cases Were Admitted Mask Wearers

    Not to mention a hot mic moment when two politicians admitted that wearing a mask is political theatre. And still, people are putting on the ritualistic shame muzzle just because some liar in a suit ordered them to.  When did humans transform into such gullible mindless sheep?

    Hot Mic Moment: Lawmakers Admit Masks Are All “Political Theatre”

    Most Western elites are telegraphing the message that we will be forced to cover our humanity with cheap Chinese face burkas indefinitely. They are mandating that even two-year-olds must wear masks. The long-term effects on the lungs, emotional and behavioral problems and development of infants and toddlers is enormous. For such an unconstitutional invasion of personal liberty, they are responsible to show us some amazing degree of effectiveness of this cultish ritual. In fact, the data show the opposite.The Blaze

    No medical journal wanted to publish this study because it fails to follow the narrative handed down by tyrants. In fact, three medical journals were so averse to publishing its findings. However, science and facts are still more important than cult rituals to some. The Danish mask study was finally published yesterday in the prestigious Annals of Internal Medicine.  The study completely obliterates the cultish devotion to masks. The results of this massive real-life controlled experiment show that the group that wore surgical masks in April experienced a 0.38% lower infection rate than the control group that did not wear masks. That is about one-third of one percent, which is so low that it could just be statistically random variances that demonstrate no definitive efficacy even to that infinitesimal level.

    “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use,” concluded the authors. “The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection.”

    It appears that the study’s authors had to twist their tongues in order to get this study published by noting that “the estimates were imprecise and statistically compatible with an effect ranging from a 46% decrease to a 23% increase in infection.” They of course had to concede that their study doesn’t definitely rule out the idea that masks could be effective! –The Blaze

    The problem is every place has seen the virus spread to everyone in the ensuing months, including in places with 100% mask compliance. The Danish study results clearly corroborate what we see with our own eyes in all environments.

    As we have said from the beginning, this is not about health.  It’s about control. Just how far does this have to go before people wake up and realize it?



    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. They are also trying to convince us to accept that they are not Peeping Toms and that the new normal will include accepting Peeping Toms as legitimate respectable members of society, rather than perceiving them for what they actually are, – lazy assed, mentally incompetent,  low life, scum bags, and perverted freaks, and thieves, with deviant personality disorder that belong in prison for life for serially criminal behavior that poses grave danger to life and property. It’s just something that has always been consider taboo and has always been considered anti-social behavior. They are throwing hissy fits attempting to demand respect for unrespectable and unacceptable behavior. Well, they can throw all of the temper tantrums and forced time outs that they want. It doesn’t change a damned thing! They are still low life, scum bag, perverted freaks and thieves, and  Peeping Toms with deviant personality disorder, and they are just going to have to accept that label because they have earned it. It is non-negotiable. Their character is their desitiny. They have the character of termites. They (((WHO))) have illegally travelled into our lives through our phones, their phones, our appliances, smart meters, and DEWs. Extreminate! Exterminate! Exterminate!

        Andrea Iravani

      2. The author misrepresented the findings of the study. Perhaps being an “arm chair” epidemiologist isn’t your gig.

      3. Finally! I hope this study gets through to the ritualistic mask wearers but somehow I doubt it.I go outside a lot without wearing a mask and I tend to get such nasty looks/reactions from mask wearers.I really don’t think wearing a mask which offers zero protection gives this face covered cult any right to judge you or I or anyone else for that matter.The mask covered sheep have been walking around for months acting as though they are so much more morally superior than the unmasked and along comes a study to prove them wrong-go figure.? As you mentioned in the article,this is not about health,but,about control.We’ll see when or if people wake up.Hopefully,the sheep will wake up.Always remember the 3 R’s- Real eyes Realize Real lies.Wake up please.

      4. Maybe they will realize it when they are dead and voting Demonrat.

      5. I still won’t wear a suppressor, ever. I will go when,where & with whom I want. I was born free and I will die free. Simple as that. Elbulleheal

      6. Let’s be clear; the mask referred to in the study is a “surgical mask” that is virtually no different than the “decorator cloth” masks with cute pictures or political statements printed on them. The purpose of a certifiable N95 or N100 mask or respirator is to protect the wearer from breathing in the virus. There is a huge difference between the types. One is for show (and giving the appearance of compliance) and the other is for go (actually protecting the person wearing it). This is why the mask is called a PPE or Personal Protective Equipment. Be smart about your exposure and protect yourself with an effective covering. To be effective it has to be able to actually filter the virus. Don’t be ashamed to be a mask wearer if you feel it will protect you. Who cares how or why this pandemic started, it’s here, it’s real and it can kill you. Do it because you freely choose to not because a tyrant is forcing you.

        • Life went on — and so did the science debates — another 20ish yrs, after 9-11.

          I guess, this post would alienate me from either wing of the uniparty / duopoly, because both sides are in support CV-19 controls, too.

          As apolitically, coolly, and calmly as possible…

          Label on the mask:

          Particulates demo:

          I am not asking anyone for anything, except to be a free thinker and live a happy, fulfilled life, in which you are a self-starter. Under some rock, “pajama boy”, in a bubble, or insular universe, fine by me.

        • They never said the masks protects you, they said it protects others, which I do not believe either. If masks protected others, there should be some reduction in the spread, rather than the huge spike, as a great deal of people are wearing masks. The politicians keep doubling down on what is not working. No matter what kind of mask you wear, if you are infected you still shed viruses. The most a mask can do is limit the distance the virus can travel, there is no filtering, there is no fit. So it is still in the air, it is still on that door handle, it is still on the shopping cart handle. it is still on everything and everywhere.

      7. Using the term “surgical mask” or simply the word “mask” without stating the NIOSH protection standard such as N95 or P100 makes conclusions meaningless.

        The BEAM Contact Reports are very clear on the protocol that should be used by everyone.

        There is still NO recognition that this rapidly mutating virus has an asymptomatic period of up to 3 monthsduring which time the infected person can spread the virus to others.

        Vectors for viral transmission include the eyes, the skin, contaminated surfaces, and all infected mammals including pets.

        A virus infection can reappear impulse-based unpredictably in those who have made an apparent recovery with complications to vital organs that can lead to death.

      8. This kind of randomized trials are flawed because the two groups went to different places at different times. It’s more sensible to test mannequins with and without masks in the same condition with different wind speeds, temperatures and humilities. The measured outcomes are concentrations of viruses in the noses.

      9. Want to test whether masks work or not?
        Pass gas. That’s right, FART. If you can smell the fart through your mask, it’s NOT blocking the virus. The virus and the odor molecules from the fart are the same size. If you can smell the fart, you’re mask is not blocking the virus.

        Not to mention that air leaks around ALL sides of the mask aren’t blocking the virus either.

        Only sheep and Dr Fauci believe masks work. Oh wait, Fauci changed his mind AGAIN.

        • You mean on ship you had to have masks that are individually fit? You have to be clean shaven or have supplied air? Wow, what does the Navy know the Doctors don’t?
          Well is was that way in the 70’s when I was in the USCG, I doubt the “SCIENCE” has changed!

      10. @James,I doubt very much that the “SCIENCE” has changed very much,but,the problem is that the “experts”/tyrants interpreting the numbers/data nowadays are absolute morons.People such as this supposed “Dr” Fauxi are absolutely ruining this country.Idiots such as him seize every opportunity to take any bad “health emergency” and make it that much worse.Nowadays,if the supposed “virus” doesn’t kill us,following the “advice” of the “experts”surely will.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.