“Parsing Bill,” by Petrina Ryan-Kleid
An interesting painting of former president Bill Clinton was found in Jeffery Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. It depicts Clinton wearing a blue dress and red high heeled shoes.
“It was hanging up there prominently — as soon as you walked in — in a room to the right,” a source told The New York Post. “Everybody who saw it laughed and smirked.” Was the blue dress symbolic of the Monica Lewinsky era? It sure looks like it, and we were not the only ones who immediately noticed.
Cannot be unseen…..#Epstein #BlueDress https://t.co/bD6hUnyKFt
— Andrew M Hopcroft (@amhopcroft) August 14, 2019
The oil painting of Clinton was dubbed “Parsing Bill,” and was painted and sold by a New York-based artist named Petrina Ryan-Kleid. Saatchi Art, an online art gallery, describes it as an “oil on canvas” with dimensions of 40 W x 40 H x 2 in. The painting inside Epstein’s home appears to be the same size, and sources told The Post it was also done with oil.
Who wore it better? ?#BlueDress#HillaryClinton #BillClinton #Epstein#EpsteinGate pic.twitter.com/jP2uJZJTpl
— Lee (@ozmerica) August 15, 2019
According to The Washington Examiner, Epstein’s opulent $56 million Manhattan home on East 71st Street off Central Park was reportedly filled with other strange decorations, including a mannequin in a wedding dress suspended from the ceiling. Epstein’s uniquely bizarre artistic tastes also carried over into his architectural projects, such as the mysterious domed temple-like structure on his private island in the Caribbean. The FBI raided his so-called “Pedophile Island” on Monday.
The Clinton camp did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The New York Post.
and let's add a happy little stain riiiight here.
~o#Epstein #BlueDress #billclintonbluedress pic.twitter.com/04pJgz5zTL
— The Count of Monte Crisco (@u1oo) August 15, 2019
Clinton has flown on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” numerous times, although he alleges he’s flown less than the records actually show.
https://twitter.com/scroarty/status/1161818351133495298
The hashtag #bluedress has since gained traction on the social media site, Twitter. As Clinton’s team works hard to scrub to his connections to Epstein, more continue to surface, such as this bizarre painting.
https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/reputation-managers-rush-to-scrub-clintons-connection-to-epstein-on-wikileaks_07112019
As RT put it so eloquently, the internet’s unofficial Ministry of Truth has been hard at work trying to memory-hole links between former US President Bill Clinton and financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was recently arrested and charged with sex trafficking. The Ministry of Truth was the agency written about in George Orwell’s 1984, which decided what history was and what the public believed. –SHTFPlan
Conspiracy theories often become conspiracy facts.
I always knew slick willie was a POS but this takes the cake and the whole damn bakery.
If this is the weirdest thing to come out of this, I will be truly shocked.
I think this is a good time to look at the concept of “Age of Consent” (AOC). It is frankly a mess. In the US, you can marry children in many states and jurisdictions. If you marry, then that means you can consummate, as you are obligated under marriage vows. Now, this legalised sex with children is a Christian concept and is called “marriage”.
In Yemen, Islam lets you bag a 9 year old for marriage.
So, when I hear right-wing, Republican “patriots” caterwaul about Bill Clinton screwing Monica Lewinsky, or even 15 year olds, I take it with a grain of salt.
Consent should be drawn at puberty: that would be clear cut.
FT,
I guess you never had a daughter?
My Daughter was not allowed to date until age 16 – period!
All her first time dates had to meet me.
I demanded to know when she would be home and “late”
is not on the clock.
She has been married to the same man over twenty years now.
Parents need to be involved with their kids. You don’t just dump them off and let “The village” raise them.
Rellik, you nailed that one. Only the right kind of parents can raise kids, NOT some damn village especially when that village is full of Dems.
wasn’t it killary that said “it takes a village to mind yer own gawd-damned bizznuss”?
so your theory on “consent” is if they have fully formed plumbing, they should be fair game, regardless of emotional maturity or the logical ability to make a life changing decision.
There’s a good reason “adulthood” starts at 18, and these days, I’d argue many 20-somethings arent mature enough to think for themselves.
but hey, as long as you can bag a 12yo, right Frank?
sick.
The human brain is not fully developed until the mid-20s with an average of 25 y.o. This affects many areas of thinking such as impulse control, logic, complex planning, and more. At age 18, the “cake” is only half done.
One of many links in searching “maturation of human brain.”
ht tps://mentalhealthdaily.com/2015/02/18/at-what-age-is-the-brain-fully-developed/
In times long past, men weren’t considered good husband material until age 30 when they were more likely to be settled in life. Women usually married by late teens or early 20s.
I’m not (very) rapey but also question the nature of consent, in light of #MeToo famousness and all the misandrist rip-offs and what appears to be an inability to make conscious choices, well into pre-menopause.
Constant difficulties with abstract logic, spacial reasoning, and executive function, when they’re not quite old enough to be senile, yet. That’s as mature as they’re going to get.
Stay away from the kids. The law is there to protect the young and naive from the older lechers. Many, if not most of the young girls were lied to about the work they would be doing. Then they had no way off the island. Makes you wonder how many of them were “snuffed”.
This would make good advice for male day-laborers, though.
I have an T-shirt iron-on, of a Xerox, of a photo, of a painting, of a stickdrawing, of a sasquatch in a dollar store tiara, riding a unicorn, on a quadruple rainbow, with golden fairy sparkles, which is the gayest thing I have ever seen in real life. (sarc)
I don’t necessary like the people involved in this news item, but am still capable of objectivity. I remember where I came from. I can retrace all of my steps and have no serious regrets, except that I have read that story and posted this response.
You know who would really like this picture?
Seems to be a theme with blue dresses. Monica’s and now this.
The real story is blackmailing by the Mossad.
This is being sidestepped.
People get distracted so easily.
Epstein is not the story. He may be dead or not dead. We don’t know. The Mossad put him in business. The Mossad could have faked his death and just sprung him. We just don’t know.
But we do know that the Mossad is capable of assignations. We know that these leaders in the USA and elsewhere are joining a club that requires them to do strange sexual acts as part of their initiation.
I think I read somewhere that initiation into Yale’s Skull & Cossbones requires new initiates to lay in a coffin while they get manhandled and more by the other members of the club. Weird, very weird.
Bill doesn’t look half bad. At least his colors are Patriot; red shoes, blue dress, white skin.
Russia is not where the money to fund Lolita came from. The money came from the Mossad and Epstein’s girlfriend who is the daughter of a spy that the Mossad was supposed to have killed. Most likely, these murder suicides are an escape clause for agents that have become too visible. Epstein, his girlfriend’s father and probably soon the girlfriend are free and living under new identities.
What we know is that it is Mossad that has been behind this perversion, and blackmail.
.
“The real story is blackmailing by the Mossad.”
The NSA US intelligence is eyeballs deep in this and it could not occur without their collusion. I look at it as global organized crime with so much government corruption that they’re merged and therefore indistinguishable from each other.
Corruption isn’t in the system, it is the system.
Would this painting be considered pro or con Billy? At any rate he looks like a hideous old hag.
The painting was the work of a young woman as a project while pursuing her art degree. It was a lark. satire. It was apparently auctioned off in a fund raiser the school had. The artist stated she has never met Epstein or Clinton and was unaware of who purchased it. Epstein seems to have hung it as a good natured jab at his friend Clinton.
See how easily we are misdirected.
Did he actually pose for this? What an idiot. These people are perverted. Possessed.
The artist stated she had never met Clinton.
Reading comprehension is a worthy goal to strive for.
Honeypot, how do you know so much about Mossad?
Honey pot,how do you know so much about Mossad?