COVID-19 Detention Camps: Are Government Round-Ups of Resistors in Our Future?

by | Sep 29, 2021 | Headline News | 23 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead at The Rutherford Institute. 

    “No doubt concentration camps were a means, a menace used to keep order.”—Albert Speer, Nuremberg Trials

    It’s no longer a question of whether the government will lock up Americans for defying its mandates but when.

    This is what we know: the government has the means, the muscle, and the motivation to detain individuals who resist its orders and do not comply with its mandates in a vast array of prisons, detention centers, and FEMA concentration camps paid for with taxpayer dollars.

    It’s just a matter of time.

    It no longer matters what the hot-button issue might be (vaccine mandates, immigration, gun rights, abortion, same-sex marriage, healthcare, criticizing the government, protesting election results, etc.) or which party is wielding its power like a hammer.

    The groundwork has already been laid.

    Under the indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the President and the military can detain and imprison American citizens with no access to friends, family or the courts if the government believes them to be a terrorist.

    So it should come as no surprise that merely criticizing the government or objecting to a COVID-19 vaccine could get you labeled as a terrorist.

    After all, it doesn’t take much to be considered a terrorist anymore, especially given that the government likes to use the words “anti-government,” “extremist” and “terrorist” interchangeably.

    For instance, the Department of Homeland Security broadly defines extremists as individuals, military veterans, and groups “that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.”

    Military veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan may also be characterized as extremists and potential domestic terrorist threats by the government because they may be “disgruntled, disillusioned or suffering from the psychological effects of war.”

    Indeed, if you believe in and exercise your rights under the Constitution (namely, your right to speak freely, worship freely, associate with like-minded individuals who share your political views, criticize the government, own a weapon, demand a warrant before being questioned or searched, or any other activity viewed as potentially anti-government, racist, bigoted, anarchic or sovereign), you could be at the top of the government’s terrorism watch list.

    Moreover, as a New York Times editorial warns, you may be an anti-government extremist (a.k.a. domestic terrorist) in the eyes of the police if you are afraid that the government is plotting to confiscate your firearms, if you believe the economy is about to collapse and the government will soon declare martial law, or if you display an unusual number of political and/or ideological bumper stickers on your car.

    According to the FBI, you might also be classified as a domestic terrorism threat if you espouse conspiracy theories or dare to subscribe to any views that are contrary to the government’s.

    The government also has a growing list—shared with fusion centers and law enforcement agencies—of ideologies, behaviors, affiliations, and other characteristics that could flag someone as suspicious and result in their being labeled potential enemies of the state.

    This is what happens when you not only put the power to determine who is a potential danger in the hands of government agencies, the courts, and the police but also give those agencies liberal authority to lock individuals up for perceived wrongs.

    It’s a system just begging to be abused by power-hungry bureaucrats desperate to retain their power at all costs.

    It’s happened before.

    As history shows, the U.S. government is not averse to locking up its own citizens for its own purposes.

    One need only go back to the 1940s, when the federal government proclaimed that Japanese-Americans, labeled potential dissidents, could be put in concentration (a.k.a. internment) camps based only upon their ethnic origin, to see the lengths the federal government will go to in order to maintain “order” in the homeland.

    The U.S. Supreme Court validated the detention program in Korematsu v. US (1944), concluding that the government’s need to ensure the safety of the country trumped personal liberties.

    Although that Korematsu decision was never formally overturned, Chief Justice Roberts opined in Trump v. Hawaii (2018) that “the forcible relocation of U. S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority.”

    Roberts’ statements provide little assurance of safety in light of the government’s tendency to sidestep the rule of law when it suits its purposes. Pointing out that such blatantly illegal detentions could happen again—with the blessing of the courts—Justice Scalia once warned, “In times of war, the laws fall silent.”

    In fact, the creation of detention camps domestically has long been part of the government’s budget and operations, falling under the jurisdiction of FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    FEMA’s murky history dates back to the 1970s when President Carter created it by way of an executive order merging many of the government’s disaster relief agencies into one large agency.

    During the 1980s, however, reports began to surface of secret military-type training exercises carried out by FEMA and the Department of Defense. Code named Rex-84, 34 federal agencies, including the CIA and the Secret Service, were trained on how to deal with domestic civil unrest.

    FEMA’s role in creating top-secret American internment camps is well-documented.

    But be careful who you share this information with: it turns out that voicing concerns about the existence of FEMA detention camps is among the growing list of opinions and activities which may make a federal agent or government official think you’re an extremist (a.k.a. terrorist), or sympathetic to terrorist activities, and thus qualify you for indefinite detention under the NDAA. Also included in that list of “dangerous” viewpoints are advocating states’ rights, believing the state to be unnecessary or undesirable, “conspiracy theorizing,” concern about alleged FEMA camps, opposition to war, organizing for “economic justice,” frustration with “mainstream ideologies,” opposition to abortion, opposition to globalization, and ammunition stockpiling.

    Now if you’re going to have internment camps on American soil, someone has to build them.

    Thus, in 2006, it was announced that Kellogg Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton, had been awarded a $385 million contract to build American detention facilities. Although the government and Halliburton were not forthcoming about where or when these domestic detention centers would be built, they rationalized the need for them in case of “an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support the rapid development of new programs” in the event of other emergencies such as “natural disasters.”

    Of course, these detention camps will have to be used for anyone viewed as a threat to the government, and that includes political dissidents.

    So it’s no coincidence that the U.S. government has, since the 1980s, acquired and maintained, without a warrant or court order, a database of names and information on Americans considered to be threats to the nation.

    As Salon reports, this database, reportedly dubbed “Main Core,” is to be used by the Army and FEMA in times of national emergency or under martial law to locate and round up Americans seen as threats to national security. There are at least 8 million Americans in the Main Core database.

    Fast forward to 2009, when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released two reports, one on “Rightwing Extremism,” which broadly defines rightwing extremists as individuals and groups “that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely,” and one on “Leftwing Extremism,” which labeled environmental and animal rights activist groups as extremists.

    Incredibly, both reports use the words, terrorist and extremist, interchangeably.

    That same year, the DHS launched Operation Vigilant Eagle, which calls for surveillance of military veterans returning from Iraq, Afghanistan, and other far-flung places, characterizing them as extremists and potential domestic terrorist threats because they may be “disgruntled, disillusioned or suffering from the psychological effects of war.”

    These reports indicate that for the government, so-called extremism is not a partisan matter. Anyone seen as opposing the government—whether they’re Left, Right or somewhere in between—is a target, which brings us back, full circle, to the question of whether the government will exercise the power it claims to possess to detain anyone perceived as a threat, i.e., anyone critical of the government.

    The short answer is: yes.

    The longer answer is more complicated.

    Despite what some may think, the Constitution is no magical incantation against government wrongdoing. Indeed, it’s only as effective as those who abide by it.

    However, without courts willing to uphold the Constitution’s provisions when government officials disregard it and a citizenry knowledgeable enough to be outraged when those provisions are undermined, it provides little to no protection against SWAT team raids, domestic surveillance, police shootings of unarmed citizens, indefinite detentions, and the like.

    Frankly, the courts and the police have meshed in their thinking to such an extent that anything goes when it’s done in the name of national security, crime-fighting, and terrorism.

    Consequently, America no longer operates under a system of justice characterized by due process, an assumption of innocence, probable cause, and clear prohibitions on government overreach and police abuse. Instead, our courts of justice have been transformed into courts of order, advocating for the government’s interests, rather than championing the rights of the citizenry, as enshrined in the Constitution.

    We seem to be coming full circle on many fronts.

    Consider that two decades ago we were debating whether non-citizens—for example, so-called enemy combatants being held at Guantanamo Bay and Muslim-Americans rounded up in the wake of 9/11—were entitled to protections under the Constitution, specifically as they relate to indefinite detention. Americans weren’t overly concerned about the rights of non-citizens then, and now we’re the ones in the unenviable position of being targeted for indefinite detention by our own government.

    Similarly, most Americans weren’t unduly concerned when the U.S. Supreme Court gave Arizona police officers the green light to stop, search and question anyone—ostensibly those fitting a particular racial profile—they suspect might be an illegal immigrant. A decade later, the cops largely have carte blanche authority to stop any individual, citizen and non-citizen alike, they suspect might be doing something illegal (mind you, in this age of overcriminalization, that could be anything from feeding the birds to growing exotic orchids).

    Likewise, you still have a sizeable portion of the population today unconcerned about the government’s practice of spying on Americans, having been brainwashed into believing that if you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.

    It will only be a matter of time before they learn the hard way that in a police state, it doesn’t matter who you are or how righteous you claim to be, because eventually, you will be lumped in with everyone else and everything you do will be “wrong” and suspect.

    Indeed, it’s happening already, with police relying on surveillance software such as ShadowDragon to watch people’s social media and other website activity, whether or not they suspected of a crime, and potentially use it against them when the need arises.

    It turns out that we are Soylent Green, being cannibalized by a government greedily looking to squeeze every last drop out of us.

    The 1973 film Soylent Green, starring Charlton Heston and Edward G. Robinson, is set in 2022 in an overpopulated, polluted, starving New York City whose inhabitants depend on synthetic foods manufactured by the Soylent Corporation for survival.

    Heston plays a policeman investigating a murder who discovers the grisly truth about the primary ingredient in the wafer, Soylent Green, which is the principal source of nourishment for a starved population. “It’s people. Soylent Green is made out of people,” declares Heston’s character. “They’re making our food out of people. Next thing they’ll be breeding us like cattle for food.”

    Oh, how right he was.

    Soylent Green is indeed people or, in our case, Soylent Green is our own personal data, repossessed, repackaged, and used by corporations and the government to entrap us in prisons of our own making.

    Without constitutional protections in place to guard against encroachments on our rights when power, technology, and militaristic governance converge, it won’t be long before we find ourselves, much like Edward G. Robinson’s character in Soylent Green, looking back on the past with longing, back to an age where we could speak to whom we wanted, buy what we wanted, think what we wanted, and go where we wanted without those thoughts, words, and movements being tracked, processed and stored by corporate giants such as Google, sold to government agencies such as the NSA and CIA, and used against us by militarized police with their army of futuristic technologies.

    We’re not quite there yet, but as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, that moment of reckoning is getting closer by the minute.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. What can be called detention camps has existed about 150 years. But it was the Marxists and Bolsheviks of the early USSR who really made vast use of them. Nazi Germany of course made use of them, but articles can be found the Germans learned what they needed about camps from the Soviets. Many years before WW II the purpose, concept, development, and use of detention camps, labor camps, concentration camps, gulags, however labeled, was perfected in the early Soviet Union. (Russian Orthodox Christians were among the highest in detained numbers. It must also be noted there was a concerted effort by the Marxists/Leninists/Bolsheviks etc. to mass murder Orthodox priests, churchmen, and practicing Christians by the thousands and millions, and destroy churches and church property.) Practice of one’s faith landed them in a labor camp for years or until they died.
        The history of these camps in Germany are heavily taught in history classes all across the US and have been for decades. But never much, or at all, about those in the USSR though they were just as barbaric and cruel, and the death counts actually much higher. The education system in the US chooses not to teach about this topic when communists do things like this. After the death of Stalin and most of the early communists, the USSR diminished much of the gulag system, but actually it continued in some way until the collapse of the USSR.
        Now it appears there are politicians, activists, progressives, celebrities, and people in academia who think camps are a good idea here in the US. And its not just for non-vaxxers, but also for “political crimes” like asserting your individual rights instead of surrendering them for the “greater good” (not my words). Include preppers, conservatives, Christians, proponents of less gov’t, among other “enemies of the State”.
        I will say now you can be good and g*dd*m sure there are entities, both official and non-official, working behind closed doors developing (or have developed) an American gulag system, even as you read this, including documents to justify a camp system. Videos and photographs can be found on-line purporting actual camp facilities and infrastructure already existing on American soil.
        How many times does one have to be told, the State does not exist on behalf of the citizens, it exists for itself and the minions who serve it. It is not your friend, and will never be your friend. In fact, it despises you and wants to replace you with more compliant 3rd worlders. My loyalty is only to my family, my friends, like-minded people, my faith, and my community.

      2. Just comply, it’s easier that way and there is nothing you can do to stop it anyway.

        You can’t win so give it up.

        • Only a libtard would give up! TRUE Americans will fight to the death! liberalism is a disease just like rabies! all infected get the same cure!

          • It’s probably a shill post. Sew the seeds of demoralization, organize defeat.

        • Take your own advice paid troll. your masters do not win but lose in the end … Be a man and tell us your anonymous real name. You are to much of a P#ssy to do such and your Master Sloppy Hole Joe’s basement smells like feces.

      3. Did the idiots in charge fail to see the movie RED DAWN? Incarcerating our family members & neighbors by thought police provides an epic recruiting opportunity for patriots. The movie IDIOCRACY began as a comedy & has become an awful documentary.

        Who knows? Maybe it will be more like SOYLENT GREEN. Yuck!

        • Red Dawn is a work of fiction.

          • Fans of “doom and gloom” websites are always making references to fictional Hollywood movies that reinforce the “doom and gloom” narrative.
            Here’s just a few fictional Hollywood movies that are always being referenced;
            1. Mad Max
            2. Rambo
            3. Terminator
            4. Purge
            5. Red Dawn

          • And you are a work from Satan and you lick your master’s boots. Go away paid troll … be a real person and don’t hide your Anonymity. You are a little P#ssy!

        • At want point in time, do you believe that imprisonments began?

      4. Get your reservations in now for FEMA camps. Best spotvis near the latrines/cafeteria……we are noe in INDIAN COUNTRY!

      5. They start to lock up Americans for not taking an experimental jab – That is one big fat red line for me and I am sure many others. We have become a nation of sheeple but there are still some alpha men that just may put up a strong stance

      6. The name of this forum needs to be changed to something like “Andrea Iravani” speaks.

        • True. I wish they had an “ignore” button/feature. It’s sad as she makes some good points once in a while, but they get buried in the extreme rants, going on and on and on. Sometimes incoherent, they become unreadable, and exercise the “scroll” button.

      7. To go along to get along is nothing but pure unadulterated cowardice,something a weak sniveling “effeminate man” would do. The must disgusting vile specimen of humanity is a coward.

      8. This is why I have a rifle and ammo in my truck, and a handgun on my hip at all times. When that time comes for me to be rounded up (and I guarantee I am on the list) I won’t be taken alive and can only hope I take a few of the bastards with me. As far as body armor goes, just remember where to target… “Lips and Hips”

        • Might it not be easier to vote Republican and ensure the candidate is not a RINO by showing up at his nominating convention as a Republican Party member?

          Gun owners always seem to forget – the government got this far with COVID-1984, and not only did guns not stop them, they didn’t have to fire a shot themselves.

      9. There are already quarantine hotels, but Australia has actual camps set up.

        So yeah, the Soros creatures really, really want their QR code social credit surveillance state. Aryan Card Vaccine Passports are just the groundwork pilot rollout.

      10. Please get rid of that disease called Andrea Iravani. Who in the hell is the moderator on this site? Macko Slacko? Get your head out of your ass or close this claptrap site down

      11. What a bunch of self-indulgent craphounds!
        As elsewhere, you folks are saying in 10,000 words what could be said in 100. Instead of just stating a notion or position simply and concisely, you all force your irrelevant blathering on the few who genuinely want to engage in intellectual discourse. You gush forth massive volumes of incoherent drival more to camouflage your stupidity than to display any worthwhile thought. Let’s be clear…virtually none of you have any idea of what you are talking about. You are bleating like stuck sheep, just making noise.

        • And you know this how ? Only a pompass @ss would make a general statement like that about a large number of people they do NOT know.

      12. Maybe there will be a round up of capacitors as well.

        Resistors are components in electronic devices.

        People who resist are resisters.

      13. Shoot any unauthorized invaders.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.