Banned: Woman’s Photo Rejected from Beauty Contest Because Of Handgun: “Inappropriate Content”

by Mac Slavo | Apr 9, 2014 | Headline News

Do you LOVE America?

    Share

    Last summer Bob Ferris’ wife returned from church looking particularly beautiful so he decided to take a few snapshots with his camera. A few months later the couple happened across a contest promotion in People magazine called “Real Beauty at Every Age.” The contest was open to everyone and all that it required was a photo submission. Just about all submissions, so long as the pictures were tasteful, were allowed entry into the contest.

    But Sandra Ferris, who says the contest submission was her husband’s idea, didn’t even get past the qualifying stage.

    Apparently, the photo she submitted was flagged as “inappropriate content” by People Magazine editors and was denied entry, though the magazine itself has yet to comment on specifically why the photo was not accepted.

    Apparently, the submission broke the rules because Mrs. Ferris happened to be holding a .45 caliber handgun in the picture.

    “I don’t think there is anything more beautiful than a woman holding a handgun,” said Bob Ferris in response to the rejected entry.

    Here’s the offending photo:

    Sandra-Ferris---with-gun

    Though Mr. Ferris had his suspicions, he wasn’t convinced that the gun was the reason for the photo being rejected, so he persevered.

    I didn’t think they’d reject the photo,” Bob Ferris said.

    But they did, listing at least three possible reasons for rejection: size, focus or inappropriate content.

    “I was a little shocked at first,” Bob Ferris said.

    To see if the gun was the problem, Bob submitted a second pistol-packing momma picture, and was once again shot down. Only after entering a third time with a gunless photo did Bob finally hit the target – the photo was accepted.

    The contest rules make it clear that the judges can reject any photo for any reason at any time.

    His next submission using a different photograph was also rejected:

    sandra ferris - 2

    Not one to give up, Mr. Ferris really wanted to know whether the issue was because of problems with focus or size, so he sent over yet another picture, this time with no gun.

    The third time was a charm and Mrs. Ferris’ picture was finally entered into the contest.

    sandra ferris - 3

    In all fairness, People magazine enjoys the same rights as a private business as individual Americans do, so they are protected by the First Amendment.

    But apparently that’s the only one that really matters to them, because the Second Amendment is now considered “inappropriate content” by the popular magazine.

    Insofar as Bob and Sandra Ferris are concerned, they won’t be cancelling their subscription to People magazine… because they didn’t have one (and don’t plan on getting one any time soon).

    sandra-ferris---thumbnail

    URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report

    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles

      Comments

      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

      0 Comments

      Submit a Comment

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.