Source: The Washington Examiner
Infamous Democrat Adam Schiff, who has been on a witch hunt against Donald Trump since he won the election against Hillary Clinton in 2016, reportedly stopped an impeachment witness from answering some questions. Schiff is now being accused of “coaching” the witness, so he can be successful in the impeachment of the president.
In a heated news conference on Tuesday, House Republican leaders stated that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., prevented a witness from answering certain questions from Republican members during the latest impeachment hearing. Visibly upset Republicans told reporters that Schiff had shut down a Republican line of questioning during a hearing with Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the latest current or former Trump administration official to come before Congress in relation to the impeachment probe.
“When we asked [Vindman] who he spoke to after important events in July — Adam Schiff says, ‘no, no, no, we’re not going to let him answer that question,”‘ Jim Jordan, R-Ohio said. Jordan went on to say that Schiff seemed to be breaking his own rules for the hearings, implying the chairman was acting almost like a “lawyer” for Vindman, according to a report by Fox News.
Scalise on Schiff: He gets to choose all the witnesses and he, himself, only, which means it's not a fair process on the face, but even his claim now that Republicans can ask question has been undermined because now he's directing witnesses
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) October 29, 2019
“The Democrats run out here and say, ‘ooh, the Republicans are trying to figure out who the whistleblower is,'” Jordan continued. “We’re trying to figure out who our witness list is! The resolution that the Speaker has just filed … she points this out in the resolution that this is going to go to the Judiciary Committee if in fact, they push it there. There will be witnesses called. We would like to figure out who those witnesses should be.”
“I pointed out last week there 435 members of Congress … only one of them knows who the whistleblower is, more importantly, who the sources are for the whistleblower who were the basis of him filing this complaint. Now he doesn’t want anyone else to know that,” Jordan said.
Scalise: The Soviet style process that Speaker Pelosi and Adam Schiff, have been conducting behind closed doors for weeks now::it completely denies due process to Republican members of Congress as well as to the White House.
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) October 29, 2019
Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., said that Nancy Pelosi should call a mistrial. “This has been a tainted process from the start. What happened today confirms even worse just how poorly Adam Schiff is handling this process, denying the ability for Republicans to even ask basic questions that are critical to the heart of whether or not a President of the United States is impeached.”
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
President-elect, Donald Trump has announced that he will enforce tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and...
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog. Donald...
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
is a federal crime, moron. Schiff is saving the idiot Republicans from themselves.
“Whistleblower” is the wrong name for a political partisan that had NO FIRST-HAND EVIDENCE. Second hand hearsay does not meet the requirement for FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE of allegations to be named a whistleblower. The main stream media continues to use this incorrect language to shape the thoughts of poorly educated and poorly informed AMERICANS. How does “he said – she said” overrule a verbatim written transcript – IT DOES NOT.
Ok your guilty of treason we’ve decided your an enemy of the state. The Republican judge jury and witness all have colluded and your gonna hang because they have all the evidence, but your defense attorney can not defend you. Good luck…let us know how it works out for you…Moron Democrats.
A POAM by Seminole Wind
“Hang Schiffy Schiff from a sour apple tree, don’t forget to do the same to Pelosi and AOC! “
Schiff is a Boni – fide lying sleaze bag.
He and the dopey Nancy will be indicted and jailed for misuse of power.
Hopefully the public sees what this joke is about and why.
Tump needs to beat these lying scums and their partners the MSM
God Bless Trump
KAG 2020
Thats a good Poam there…..
Why things havent gone hot is beyond me.
There is a flaw, amongst conservatives and pedants, to the effect of being put through due process, and due process, until there is nothing left.
Holy hell, what kind of idiot are you to be defending Schiff?
Demonrats are a DISGRACE to the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!
The liberals hate all conservatives, Trump is just a lightning rod. Other consecutive law makers are beholden to the establishment and won’t go against the accepted norm. Too many in DC are obstructionist for any real positive outcome to happen.
ADAM the-piece-of-SHIFF is making a mockery of the Constitutional guidelines & “House traditions” for the process of impeachment. DUE PROCESS is one of the casualties of this highly partisan WITCH HUNT. This is what happens when party-politics supercede the GOOD OF THE NATION. Since the Demonrats have decided the PURSUIT OF POWER is more important than the WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS; we can thank Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and the rest of the PARADE OF IDIOTS for taking us to the brink of armed conflict within our borders.
Interestingly..
There is no objective proof available to Americans that an alleged whistleblower exists at all.