US Military Ordered ‘Clandestine Burning’ of Toxic Chemicals in Poor Neighborhoods

by | Mar 31, 2021 | Headline News | 16 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by The Free Thought Project. 

    (CD) New research conducted by environmental justice scholars at Vermont’s Bennington College reveals that between 2016 and 2020, the U.S. military oversaw the “clandestine burning” of more than 20 million pounds of Aqueous Fire Fighting Foam in low-income communities around the country—even though there is no evidence that incineration destroys the toxic “forever chemicals” that make up the foam and are linked to a range of cancers, developmental disorders, immune dysfunction, and infertility.

    “Weighing out its own liability against the health of these communities, the Pentagon struck the match.”
    —David Bond, Bennington College

    “In defiance of common sense and environmental expertise, the Department of Defense (DOD) has enlisted poor communities across the U.S. as unwilling test subjects in its toxic experiment with burning AFFF,” David Bond, associate director of the Center for the Advancement of Public Action at Bennington College, said (pdf) in a statement earlier this week.

    Noting that scientists, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and even Pentagon officials have warned that “burning AFFF is an unproven method and dangerous mix that threatens the health of millions of Americans,” Bond characterized the decision of the military to dump huge stockpiles of AFFF and AFFF wastewater into “a handful of habitually negligent incinerators” as a “harebrained” operation as well as a manifestation of environmental injustice.

    “In effect,” he added, “the Pentagon redistributed its AFFF problem into poor and working-class neighborhoods.”

    After months of compiling and analyzing data—obtained last year from the Pentagon and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation—the team from Vermont launched an interactive website this week that publicizes for the first time the results of their investigation into all known shipments of AFFF to hazardous waste incinerators in the U.S.

    The Bennington College researchers summarized their findings as follows:

    • Over 20 million pounds of the toxic firefighting foam AFFF and AFFF wastewater was incinerated between 2016-2020;
    • The U.S. military, the EPA, and state regulators all expressed serious concern about the ability of incineration to destroy the toxic chemicals in AFFF during this time;
    • Six incinerators were contracted to burn AFFF. Each is a habitual violator of environmental law. Since 2017, three of the incinerators were out of compliance with environmental law 100% of the time while the other incinerators were out of compliance with environmental law about 50% of the time;
    • 35% of known shipments of AFFF (7.7 million pounds) was burned at the Norlite Hazardous Waste Incinerator in Cohoes, New York, located within a densely populated urban area and less than 400 feet from a public housing complex. Norlite burned 2.47 million pounds of AFFF and 5.3 million pounds of AFFF wastewater, which likely was burned in violation of its Resource Conservation and Recovery Act permit;
    • 40% of the national stockpile of AFFF (5.5 million pounds) was sent to “fuel-blending” facilities where it was mixed into fuels for industrial use. It is not clear where the AFFF-laden fuel went next, although the DOD contract stipulates incineration should be the endpoint; and
    • 970,000 pounds of AFFF was burned overseas.

    AFFF contains contaminants known as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); exposure to trace amounts of these synthetic chemicals is associated with a variety of detrimental health effects, and some have argued that PFAS are so risky that they not only endanger public health but threaten to undermine human reproduction writ large.

    Jane Williams, chair of the Sierra Club’s National Clean Air team stressed: “We simply must stop burning PFAS compounds.”

    “Attempting to burn these forever chemicals can generate highly toxic emissions which endanger the health of nearby communities,” she said. “Burning also releases gases which are powerful climate forcing chemicals.”

    According to Williams, “EPA and DOD are both pursuing advanced technologies that can more effectively destroy these compounds without causing these unacceptable impacts.”

    The pursuit of alternative disposal methods raises the question, posed by the researchers on their website: “If incineration is an unproven means of destroying these toxins, is burning AFFF solving the problem or simply emitting it into the poor communities that so often surround incinerators in the U.S.?”

    According to the researchers, the military rushed to burn more than 20 million pounds of AFFF over the past four years because they feared the substance “would be classified as a toxic chemical (and with that designation, would require new safeguards and introduce new liability).”

    In a column published Thursday in The Guardian, Bond explained:

    While some states file suit against the manufactures of AFFF, the fingerprints of the U.S. Armed Forces are all over the scene of the crime. When federal scientists moved to publish a comprehensive review of the toxic chemistry of AFFF in 2018, DOD officials called that science “a public relations nightmare” and tried to suppress the findings.

    Beyond damning internal emails, the military is still in possession of a tremendous amount of AFFF. As the EPA and states around the U.S. begin to designate AFFF a hazardous substance, the military’s stockpiles of AFFF are starting to add up to an astronomical liability on the military’s balance sheet. Perhaps thinking the Trump administration presented an opportune moment, the Pentagon decided to torch their AFFF problem in 2016.

    Despite AFFF’s extraordinary resistance to fire, incineration quietly became the military’s preferred method to handle AFFF. “We knew that this would be a costly endeavor, since it meant we’d be burning something that was engineered to put out fires,” Steve Schneider, chief of Hazardous Disposal for the logistics wing of DOD, said in 2017 as the operation got underway…

    As the military was sending AFFF to incinerators around the country, the EPA, state regulators, and university scientists all warned that subjecting AFFF to extremely high temperatures would likely conjure up a witches brew of fluorinated toxins, that existing smokestack technologies would be insufficient to monitor poisonous emissions let alone capture them, and that dangerous chemicals might rain down on surrounding neighborhoods. Weighing out its own liability against the health of these communities, the Pentagon struck the match.

    Judith Enck, the former EPA regional administrator, said the data compiled by the Bennington College team demonstrate that “we have a national problem on our hands.”

    “Congress needs to throw cold water on the Pentagon’s mad dash to burn toxic firefighting foam. There is no evidence that incineration destroys AFFF,” she added, calling for “a national ban on burning these forever chemicals.”



    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. You don’t say any mean words.

        They vacuum babies in the Brownsvilles.

      2. Burning fire fighting foam seems no more oxymoronic than showing up at a polling place to take part in a selection.

        Stay the course Norsemen.

      3. I thought it was interesting, the way you can find a need and make an invention.

        For an extra layer of irony, I was wondering whether they burnt fluorine, in favor of the more-environmental recipe.

        • I have an idea, for something harmless, foaming, absorbent, and non-reactive.

      4. ALL US MIlitary Bases and Airforce bases are all toxic waste dumps, run by subpar low IQ humanoids that have no morals. They have no stake in the matter since they just destroy the environment then move onto another base. They pocket Superfund monies then dump more toxics into the environment. Military bases also massively lie on EIS Environmental impact statement and back date data to his incompatibility by their incompatible missions on base.
        You want to freak out your local Military base. Just for a FOIA request for their last Environments Impact Statement and full study, for their current mission they advertise on their website. They are not reporting truthfully all of their hazards, and are not compatible nor compliant with your community.

        • I remember when I was in northern cali for a while in 2011 reading in the paper that the navy got permission to kill up to 63 MILLION marine animals! WTF? And the river that goes under Las Vegas is totally contaminated from the nuke test site north of there. SW Utah was blanketed by fallout for years. Stay far far away from any military bases!

      5. In 1991 I was doing a 6 month active duty tour in the was in the fall and winter months on a regular Army post.They were still using coal for heating all the buildings. One day I was watching the civilian workers using a portable conveyor to fill the storage area for one of the buildings.They were unloading coal, 2 or 3 inch chunks from a large truck, I noticed along with the coal there were small little square things about 1 inch square of a light tan color equally mixed in with the coal. That kinda raised a red flag in my brain,I have wondered to this day what else they were getting rid of,sneaking it in with the coal.

        • Different mineral coals, like lignite, do come in tan colors and are sometimes processed, in bulk, into briquette-like shapes.

      6. …..but these fuckers are on our side right?…?

        • It would appear they are more domestic enemies than defenders.

          They were part of the scumbag crew that false flagged us on 9/11. Then, they decided to wage illegal, aggressive war on 7 countries in 5 years — a process still ongoing. Adding insult to injury, they flew over 300 tons of cash into a war zone and promptly disappeared it.

          According to Mark Skidmore and Catherine Austin Fitts, they have stolen trillions from us and the amount could be as high as 90 trillion. Their budgets are now “secret” so we can’t really tell what they are up to and what they have stolen.

          To bad some of bloody Gina’s friends can’t work on the joint chiefs for a while. It would be nice to get the bottom of this national and international crime spree.

        • There was a tradition against standing armies, though we are hardly compatible and rarely do anything for ourselves.

      7. Even the military is evil.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.