
TRUMP SAYS: HUNTER MAKES FORTUNE FROM SHADY DEALS!
BIDEN FAMILY STINKS TO HIGH HEAVENS OF CORRUPTION!
DON'T GET LEFT OUT: HUNTER MUST BE STOPPED!
This article was originally published by Ava Grace at Natural News.
For the first time since the latest escalation in the U.S.-China trade war, Beijing has signaled a willingness to negotiate — but with major conditions. On Friday, May 2, China’s Commerce Ministry confirmed it was evaluating a U.S. offer to discuss President Donald Trump’s aggressive 145 percent tariffs on Chinese goods. While the statement suggests a potential thaw in tensions, Beijing made clear that any talks hinge on Washington dropping its unilateral tariffs and correcting what it calls “erroneous practices.” The development comes as both economies face mounting pressure: China battles slowing growth and deflation, while U.S. businesses reel from supply chain disruptions.
Until now, Chinese officials had dismissed negotiations, insisting the U.S. must first lift tariffs. The latest acknowledgment marks a subtle but significant shift. Behind the scenes, Beijing has already taken steps to ease tensions, exempting key U.S. imports—such as pharmaceuticals and microchips — from retaliatory duties. Analysts see this as a pragmatic move to protect critical industries while avoiding further escalation. (Related: Tariff war escalates: China retaliates with 125% tariffs on U.S. goods, as Xi Jinping warns of “self-isolation” for America.)
The trade war is taking a toll. U.S. economic growth unexpectedly stalled in early 2024, partly due to businesses stockpiling imports ahead of tariffs. Meanwhile, China’s factory activity slumped to its worst level since late 2023, with export orders plummeting. The mutual economic strain may be forcing both sides back to the table—but neither wants to appear weak.
President Trump has repeatedly framed tariffs as leverage to secure fairer trade terms, insisting China must make the first move. Beijing, however, insists Washington must act first by scrapping tariffs. “If we fight, we fight to the end; if we talk, the door is open,” China’s Commerce Ministry declared. The stalemate underscores deep mistrust, with Beijing accusing the U.S. of coercion and Washington alleging years of unfair trade practices.
Even if talks begin, major obstacles remain. China wants a U.S. negotiator with direct backing from Trump to ensure any deal sticks. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s expanded role in the administration — now including national security — could complicate relations, given his hardline stance on China.
While markets rallied on hopes of de-escalation, the path forward is fraught. Both sides face domestic pressures to stand firm, yet the economic costs of prolonged conflict may soon outweigh political posturing. For now, the world watches to see whether these tentative overtures lead to real compromise or another breakdown.
Watch as Gordon Chang says Trump won’t lose his nerve in a trade war with China.
This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
President Donald Trump has reportedly urged Speaker Mike Johnson to raise the top individual tax...
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and the National Institutes of Health Vaccine...
This article was originally published by Rhoda Wilson at The Exposé. Wind turbines are destroying...
This article was originally published by Lance D. Johnson at Natural News. For years, health...
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
Comments