Meet “The Guardian” – Maybe The Scariest-Looking Robot Yet

by | Jun 18, 2018 | Headline News | 16 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge

    Sarcos Robotics’ Guardian GT has earned comparisons from Wired to Sigourney Weaver’s Power Loader – the machine she used to defeat the eponymous Alien from the 1979 film: It’s a robot that allows people to lift and manipulate objects weighing up to 500 pounds with its 7-foot robotic arms.

    While mimicking human dexterity has become one of the defining problems of robotics, the Guardian GT has a couple of advantages that make it more dexterous than its contemporaries: For example, the Guardian GT’s control systems are kinematically equivalent to the human body. This allows the operator to control what’s effectively a larger version of his or her own torso and arms.

    The Guardian also employs force feedback so the operator can feel through the machine’s hands. This creates a strange sensation when the operator is lifting a large object, like say a 1,000-pound pipe.

    “That’s a little disorienting, so we give a little bit of load into the arm,” Wolff says. Meaning, the robot pushes back a tiny bit. “So instead of lifting a thousand pounds you feel like you’re lifting five.” (How it’s able to do this without the herky-jerkiness of other robots comes down to special actuators, the bits that move and bend the arms. What exactly is special about them, Wolff declines to say, because he’s a good businessman.)

    Its designers are marketing the robot for use on construction sites. They argue that the machine would free up workers to handle jobs that require human coordination, while the Guardian does the heavy lifting.

    Just imagine this thing on a construction site. Doing something like lifting and joining two pipes would require a crane and maybe five or six workers, who would be freed up to do other jobs that require a more human touch (fine manipulation, for instance). With the Guardian GT, all it takes is one supercharged human. It still requires a lot of coordination, sure, but the robot takes the strain out of the equation.

    What’s interesting about this workplace robot is that it’s collaborative—a human is always in control. And that’s what the future of work looks like, especially heavy industry. Fields like construction and agriculture are already facing severe labor shortages, and the machines are poised to pick up the slack. Think automated construction tractors and robots that help humans harvest crops without all the stooping. In the very near future we’ll be working alongside robots, as opposed to robots outright replacing us.

    Still, the company insists that robots won’t replace human workers so much as humans will eventually learn to work alongside their robot partners. Robots, which won’t be able to match human dexterity for years to come, just won’t be able to do some tasks that require a high degree of finesse.

    “While I think that we will see increasing amounts of autonomy and AI,” says Wolff, “I think the real role in work generally is for us to find as humans how to maximize the utility of robots. Allow them to do what they’re really good at while still relying on what humans are best at, which is wisdom and judgment.”

    Then there are the jobs that humans simply can’t do. Because the Guardian GT rolls on either tracks or wheels, the operator can drive it into danger. Think exploring toxic environments and decommissioning nuclear power plants. With the inherent dexterity of the machine, it could easily manipulate things made for humans hands, like valves and buttons.

    Indeed, the death of human labor has been greatly exaggerated. For now, at least.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Still needs human intervention which is its weak point.

      2. No worries…….. DISASSEMBLE…

      3. Well, they are starting to look more and more like the huge monstrosities from the Terminator movies

      4. Like anything else, it isn’t good or bad, it is all about how it is used.

        This could help the disabled. I can imagine some day there will be no paraplegics. But until then, artificial arms with great dexterity could be of enormous assistance toward independence.


        • B: I may need on for the house someday to move heavy appliances and sofa to clean behind it. They will be for rent by the day or week maybe at a rent a center. Too expensive to buy to use rarely.

      5. Only 3 comments, Mac your site seems to be loosing popularity. I remember when articles used to get hundreds of comments. What’s happened lately?

        • Did they get deported?

      6. There are 5 comments. Can’t you count? 🙂

      7. Six

      8. I don’t believe that going through these motions, with a squeeze trigger, mimics human dexterity.

        Also, the jobs being performed are still, more-or-less, on a human scale, no matter how dangerous. In an equation, where human life holds little value, they can still do hazardous, back breaking work, for cheap, relative to the cost of the robot arm.

        (Like the story about poor people, collecting sand for construction.)

        That high tech would still tend to be more popular, if it was subsidized, favorably. We already have a social contract, which refuses to provide life support, for the human bodies, which it needs. If so much focus and energy were put on machinery, it’s all that would be available, to use.

      9. Artificial intelligence and robotics allows a few people to control many people. The combination of artificial intelligence with the intelligence of people intent on controlling many people is the danger.

        • Absolutely correct.

      10. No disrespect intended and without any bearing whatsoever on the article content, but the Power Loader referenced in the front end of the article was a part of the movie Aliens, second in the Alien series, dated 1986.

      11. Very easy to disable one of these things in a low-tech manner (cable snares, trenches, spikes, good old .30-06 API rounds, etc.) so I wouldn’t worry too much about these things being used for “evil.”

      12. Yep! Replace a crew of illegal aliens making 7 bucks an hour with a million buck machine that can’t do much more than roll around on a clear cement floor! Do that so the totally uneducated illegal aliens can do work that requires a “high degree of finesse!” Gimme a break!

      13. Crescent wrench please.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.