Mass Shootings, Mass Psychology And Self-Defense

by | Nov 9, 2017 | Headline News | 18 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This report was originally published by Brandon Smith at


    There is an unfortunate correlation between crises and catastrophes and mass psychology. For those with a decent long-term memory, you may have noticed that the frequency of attacks and tragedies taking place today around the world is far above and beyond what occurred 10 years ago. So much so that many in the public have moved beyond the point of outrage and have now embraced complacency.

    The mass shooting issue, for example, once inspired fevered debate over gun rights. Not so much anymore. While I am happy that the relentless attempts by leftists to exploit every shooting as a tool for their gun grabbing agenda have taken a backseat, I see a trend in another direction which is equally dangerous. That trend is a move towards acceptance that “these things happen,” instead of a healthy discussion on real solutions (and no, more gun control is not one of them).

    A decade ago the Vegas shooting would have inspired media and social discussion for at least a year. Now, the story disappears in two weeks and is replaced with 10 others. I will be surprised if the latest church shooting in Texas in which 26 people were killed stays on the news feeds for more than a few days.

    Where does this complacency come from?

    It is a complex problem, but one that I think relates to the state of decline within any particular society. In Carl Jung’s The Undiscovered Self, Jung mentions a consistent element of latent sociopathy and psychopathy within most cultures. Perhaps 10% of people within a society are latent sociopaths and psychopaths, and around 1% or less represent full blown sociopaths/psychopaths. Most of the latent people will never become truly dangerous if they are living within a culture that is healthy and morally balanced. In fact, those with inherent sociopathic traits can become very high functioning human beings who are adept at careers that many other people avoid (surgeons and career soldiers are two examples).

    However, in the event that there is cultural rot and a degradation of principles, environmental influences come into play and latent sociopaths/psychopaths have the potential to mutate into something far more dangerous. Jung examines this dynamic as an explanation for the sudden and accelerated decline of Germany in the 1920s and 1930s into totalitarianism and moral relativism. When the mentally disturbed 1% turns into 10% or more, entire nations can be dragged along into the abyss.

    As a litmus test I find it valuable to look at popular culture when trying to determine if a society is on the brink of collapse into a singularity of moral relativism, because popular culture often reflects these elements more honestly than the supposed “experts” will. When examining Germany before its fall, I recommend studying the films of Fritz Lang; particularly his movie ‘M’ released in 1931, which depicts a serial killer with a penchant for children being put on trial by a group of underworld criminals, not because they abhor what he does on moral grounds, but because his activities are drawing too much unwanted attention from authorities on their own criminal enterprises. If the dark world of ‘M’ doesn’t perfectly showcase the decline of Germany, I don’t know what does.

    Today, we are constantly surrounded by popular culture which leans towards the morally relative; stories in which the heroes must become monsters in order to defeat other supposedly worse monsters. At another level, our popular culture tells us that it is only the fantastical, the super powered and the government contracted heroes that have the ability to affect change and disrupt disaster. Underlying all of this seems to be a narrative of defeat; the notion that there is nothing the average person can do. And, of course, we are also bombarded with stories in which gluttony and decadence are applauded while anyone that takes a more responsible path is portrayed as unhappy or joyless in the long run.

    Translate this to the developing trend of mass shootings around the world and the public reaction to them. On one end of the spectrum, in the past it was the sociopathic left that saw mass death as an opportunity to enforce political control over gun rights advocates, with the goal of eventually achieving total disarmament. These people do not care about the dead, let alone logic, they only care about furthering their agenda. They see government power as the answer to every problem.

    If you were to hold up examples like the Paris or Mumbai attacks to gun grabbers and point out that disarmament only makes mass shootings EASIER for criminals and terrorists, they would not listen. Obviously, if any of the citizens including the off-duty police officers had been armed in Paris, the attack might have been stopped much sooner.

    In the case of the church shooting near San Antonio, that attack WAS interrupted by an armed neighbor of the church who used his rifle to fend off Devin Kelley, forcing him to escape in his vehicle. Had that neighbor not been armed, the massacre might have gone on much longer. Had one of the people within the church been armed, the attack might have ended in seconds, as we saw in Denver in 2007.

    Now, as I said earlier, there are sociopathic members of the political left that seek to take advantage of these scenarios, but these people have fallen by the wayside recently. On the political right, sadly, I have seen another brand of sociopathy rising, with some arguing that all the people within the San Antonio church that were unarmed “deserved to die.” This is just as dangerous a mentality as the exploitations of the left. If the liberty movement itself sets aside empathy and resorts to sensationalist or morally relative methods to drive forward a political agenda, then we are only hastening the fall of our culture, not protecting it. And, we become no better that the leftist disarmament thugs we abhor.

    In between these two extremes sits a coagulated mass of people who simply don’t care much as long as a particular disaster doesn’t involve them. These are the folks who are uninterested in solutions and don’t really want to hear anything about it. It is these people who tend to become wreckage floating on the tides of history; their lack of concern eventually comes back to haunt them in the future.

    So, if these are the wrong ways to approach the mass shooting problem, then what are the right ways?

    I think it is vital that Americans in particular maintain our care and concern for the victims of these events. The solution to mass shootings is clearly a responsibly armed populace. According to all the stats on active shooters, defense by citizens is the only factor that seems to make much difference. But to convince more and more people of this requires a level of conscience and empathy that inspires confidence, and perhaps brotherhood. When people know that you give a damn and aren’t simply pursuing an agenda like the political left does, it is more likely that they will listen to what you have to say.

    As I noted in my article How To Stop All Future Mass Shootings, the Vegas attack was organized by someone who was smart enough to avoid a point-blank engagement in a city and state in which concealed-carry firearms are more common. Point-blank attacks are by far the most common because they are generally attempted by people who have minimal training or because the attackers are relatively certain that their victims will be disarmed in the area they have chosen (gun free zones).

    The Vegas attacker (or attackers) chose to use sniper-like tactics to prolong the massacre. However, what this shows is that an armed citizenry is a factor or barrier in how an attack is planned. With properly trained and armed security overwatching major events along with an armed population, there may never be another mass shooting again.

    This is what Americans should be talking about, yet, there is no practical discussion on solving the problem. Is this a symptom of impending collapse within our society? Possibly. If there was ever an honorable task for the liberty movement today, it is to inspire solutions and to maintain moral balance. These shootings and other crisis events should not be forgotten within a week. They should at the very least be a learning process, a means by which we evolve our way of life and become more self reliant and by extension more safe.

    If you are not a conceal- or open-carry proponent, then you should be. If you understand that the majority of shooting events that are stopped are stopped by average citizens that are armed, then it should only follow that you should become one of those armed citizens. In the meantime, it is not for us who are consistently armed to admonish disarmed victims as if they “deserve what they got.” Their failure is our failure as well. For if we are not working diligently to convince others of the importance of citizen self defense, then we have contributed to the conditions that led to these massacres taking place.

    There are methods of stemming the tide of social collapse. There are in fact solutions. They begin with each individual acting in small ways and big ways everyday. Complacency and zealotry are the enemy, as well as those that would encourage such mentalities.

    If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.

    You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected]

    With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Brandon Smith, magnificent article.

        • dont confuse gun grabbers with well intentioned people. gun grabbers want their victims disarmed and killed. if someone wants your gun then they are not your friend. but they could be friends of the NRA?

      2. “Where does this complacency come from?”

        It’s called “conditioning”, along with predictive programming for the last few decades that has been forced upon the public.

        The Government, Media, and Entertainment Industries has done wonders to keep a large part of the populace docile.

        • all i want to know/discuss is why they dont make green tip ammo for 7.62×51 to take down armored perps?

        • FTW, no surprise since the media and Hollyweird are owned and controlled by the tribe.

        • @FTW

          Yep. Exactly. Don’t forget about public education and academia.

        • TRUE.

      3. “Most of the latent(sociopath and psychopath)people will never become truly dangerous if they are living within a culture that is healthy and morally balanced.”
        Since a significant portion of our population support Democrats, I submit that we are lost. Today’s Democrats by definition are not a culture that is healthy and morally balanced. They are dystopian, immoral, and perverse.

        • “Democrats by definition are not a culture that is healthy and morally balanced.”

          Many blue collar people vote Democrat out of conditioning. My father was one up until Trump. If you sat down and talked with him you would find him most conservative. He continued to vote for a Democrat party that disappeared likely 50 years ago, certainly during Bill Clintons term when they abandoned labor for freaks. Trump opened many eyes but there is still a mindset of, “I’m labor and I vote Democrat”. FDR did one hell of a job molding public opinion and so did LBJ with the minorities.

          • People need to wake up and see what is really going on with those morally bankrupt clowns on the Left. They will pander to anyone for a damn vote.

      4. We are being “nudged” by government/media in the direction they want us to go. You can see it and feel it and it will probably succeed on the younger generations. wen the older ones die out the left will hold power.

        • i wonder what the NRA will want to ban now?. they will prolly push for military people to have their medical records released and anyone on PTSD meds will be banned?. thanks NRA

        • “You can see it and feel it and it will probably succeed on the younger generations.”

          Very much agree with that statement … New slogan for the youth: “if you like your indoctrination, you can keep your indoctrination.”

        • TRUE.

      5. Funny, my thought was ‘ Brandon, you’re preaching to the choir ‘ . Most here read, see or hear of terrible events like in Texas, Nevada…. and think “my God, the families that lost loved ones… prayers out to them and for the ones lost”; followed by, ” I’m checking on condition of my guns and do I need to top off some particular caliber? “

      6. Kevin2;
        I also voted for JFK. I also believed LBJ had something to do
        with Kennedy’s death. In those days democrats protected the
        “WORKING MAN”. Unions were taking over as the shadow
        government, leaning toward communisim.
        They became the communist union protecting the non-productive
        “NON WORKING MAN”…..and destroying jobs every where
        they would claw their way into.
        They completely destroyed Detroit…business, people and jobs.

      7. Looks to me like a lot of comments are disappearing on posts here.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.