In Every Simulated War Game, The U.S. Loses Against China

by | Mar 15, 2021 | Headline News | 20 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    In the autumn of 2020, the United States Air Force held a simulated war game against China, set approximately 10 years in the future. In every single scenario that played out, the United States lost.

    This was reportedly part of the classified war game and the details are just now being revealed.

    The simulation began with a biological weapon released by the Chinese that quickly dealt with America’s military bases and warships in the Indo-Pacific region. Then, China staged a massive military exercise to veil a gigantic deployment of an invasion force. The simulation culminated with Chinese missile strikes raining down on U.S. bases and warships in the region, and a lightning air and amphibious assault on the island of Taiwan.

    China won, within a very short timeframe. Most Americans are fast asleep and unaware that the United States would lose a war as they champion policies that provoke China, and back them into a corner.

    Years of classified Pentagon war games strongly suggest that the U.S. military would lose a war with China, this isn’t new information:

    “More than a decade ago, our war games indicated that the Chinese were doing a good job of investing in military capabilities that would make our preferred model of expeditionary warfare, where we push forces forward and operate out of relatively safe bases and sanctuaries, increasingly difficult,” Air Force Lt. Gen. S. Clinton Hinote, deputy chief of staff for strategy, integration and requirements, told Yahoo News in an exclusive interview.

    “At that point the trend in our war games was not just that we were losing, but we were losing faster,” Hinote said. “After the 2018 war game I distinctly remember one of our gurus of war gaming standing in front of the Air Force secretary and chief of staff, and telling them that we should never play this war game scenario [of a Chinese attack on Taiwan] again, because we know what is going to happen. The definitive answer if the U.S. military doesn’t change course is that we’re going to lose fast. In that case, an American president would likely be presented with almost a fait accompli. South Front

    This information should be sobering. Wake up. If you don’t want to be ruled by the Chinese, why are you ok being ruled by other humans that weren’t born across an ocean? This information, while important, should also seek to open your eyes.  Sure, this could be predictive programming, but we have to stop looking to politicians and rulers who think they have the right to own us and take as much of our property as they want for salvation. A war will accomplish at least one obvious thing for the elitists: a massive decline in population.

    And for those who think “simulations” are meaningless, I advise you to research Event 201. Apply critical thinking and discernment, because we all are going to need those skills in the coming months and years.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Always encourage your rivals to underestimate you. Do you really believe the public is informed about incredible innovations in war-fighting? We may have a generally slovenly society, but our defense capabilities are top notch. Pity the fools that underestimate the capabilities of the USA. Semper Fidelis.

        • I hope your right, but I’m not so sure. Maybe if China goes it alone, the US could prevail, but if Russia joins them it’s over for us. Though Russia doesn’t have our manpower, their weapons programs are as sophisticated as ours, the Chinese would supply the manpower necessary. However, would Russia want to go into a major conflict so China can take Taiwan, I doubt it, they would have nothing really to gain by it.
          The truth is, Russia would rather be friends with the US than be allies to China. But the neo-cons in the US are hellbent on having a war with them. There are several reasons why, here are a few; Russia is rapidly re-Christianizing – the neo-cons for a variety of reasons do not like that, Russia is far too powerful to be controlled and refuse to be subservient or submit to US goals for global hegemony, they don’t allow the global banking system to control their national finances and banks, and they can stymie US and Israeli efforts to establish hegemony in the Mid-East. Russia is still recovering from the political spasms they have experienced over the last 30 years but that is about over. Their population appears to have bottomed out and will likely resume growth, and their economy is trying to be more diverse rather than being an economy based on almost solely on exporting natural resources. Russia has its problems of course, but they consider it their business and on one else. The neo-cons probably welcomes a fight and sees it as a chance to bring Russia to heel before it becomes impossible (it already is impossible). The neo-cons sees our kids and grand kids as cannon fodder for their goals.

          • Bill, those are great observations. I’m concerned that the Demonrats will endanger another generation of young Americans. The RINOS & Neocons are not my type of traditional American (Fiscally responsible, reluctant to go to war, if war is required – fight to win, Individual rights, etc.).

            • Being that the US is on the doorstep of both China and Russia and neither have a foothold in this hemisphere to launch an attack upon the US what are the circumstances regarding, “if war is required”? What would be the “requirement”? Regarding, “fight to win”, win what? No one has ever governed Afghanistan including the government of Afghanistan. The Vietnamese fought China for 1000 years, France for 100, Japan for about 4. Level North Vietnam, kill every person there and the government of South Vietnam still would not effectively govern the countryside. Interestingly the US military came to the conclusion that the war was effectively unwindable in 1967 as per “The Pentagon Papers” yet cannon fodder continued to be sent for the elusive “peace with honor” until 1973. Iraq? Where are those WMDs?

              The wars post WWII have Wall Street & MIC wrote all over them.

              • Regarding “fight to win”. The US is achieving its (the globalists & MIC) goal in the Middle East which is to eternally occupy those nations. Give them time, Africa is next.

              • No nation has suffered as unjustly as Vietnam from US support of France to reoccupy its colony post WWII, through stopping the 1954 reunification election, through creating a successive stream of non organic governments in South Vietnam. It’s sad that so much suffering was inflicted upon so many including US and allied cannon fodder.

              • Kevin2, the skirmishes & wars since WWll have been political events – blame the politicians. Most military folks don’t support the never-ending interventions into the affairs of other nations that do NOT suggest a threat to the USA. Colonialism did NOT work for Great Britain. World Conquest did not work for Greece or Rome or Japan. Certainly I don’t agree with these political quests.

                Regarding WMD’s in Iraq. Serin gas, a WMD, was used by Sadaam Husein. To pretend he did NOT have access to WMDs is to accept the Main Stream Media propaganda.

                • cranerigger

                  The invasion was sold to the public as his attempt at a nuclear weapon. If Saddam had Nerve Gas at one time so be it. The WMD was the ostensible, and likely at the time of the invasion a false claim; needless to say none was found. Saddam was starting to sell what oil he was permitted to sell in Euros not the USD as demanded by the oil peg. That is the “kiss of death” and Libya suffered the same fate for also bypassing the oil peg with a newly created gold backed currency. The gas excuse is being false flagged in Syria now. Like the previous going back to the Gulf Of Tonkin “incident” it’s all a false flag.

                  The “War On Terrorism” and it”s older sibling, “The War On Drugs” (Afghanistan’s opium production is not impeded & likely assisted) is utter bullshit.

                  • Hello Kevin
                    Yes, there was poison gas there at one time and the US knew it was there. In fact, they delivered it to Sadaam in the eighties when they goaded him into a fight with Iran. The gas was used on Iranian troops along with US satellite imaging and logistics to gas the Iranian positions. Thousands of Iranian soldiers were killed.

                    The US is using the same tactics against Yemen by supplying the Saudis with logistics and weaponry.

                    The US is probably the biggest economic and international terrorist organization in the world .Their biggest exports are financial fraud and weapons of war.

                    • JRS

                      Iraq had a petrochemical industry, chlorine and to a lesser degree bromine and phosgene are not uncommon. The invasion was sold to the public frightened by 911 as the production of a nuclear weapon which did not occur.

                    • Yes, I am not disagreeing with you. I remember Dick Cheney and the Niger yellowcake lies.

                      Scott Ritter, the UN inspector, found that all of the material relating to the Iraqi nuclear program was destroyed and buried in the desert and no more evidence could be found of an ongoing nuclear program. And all the intelligence agencies knew this.

                      But the “PNAC possee”, as he calls them, would not be denied. They wanted control of the Middle East resources that the Project for a New American Century papers called for before 9/11. The bosses told Shrub Bush he needed to invade. Since presidents are merely front men and don’t control policy, he was obliged to comply.

                      And so the US will be a presence in the ME to control who produces the oil, and to make sure it is sold in FRNs.

      2. This country can’t win a war fighting stinking camel jockeys. How in the H-E -Double L could we ever win a war fighting the yellow hordes of China? A lot of the equipment the US military uses is made in China. China also has the largest blue water navy in the world and probably the largest standing military. Our military has been undermined by the Bolshevik politicians in this country for decades,now it’s full of Phaggots and girlie boys worrying about what color of panties to wear on any given day. Just because you can send a few missiles over and bomb some third world toilet doesn’t make you a world power. The sun is setting on the US empire. You reap what you sow. The traitorous politicians pissed away the country while everyone was busy making money or watching sports. And the ministry of propaganda was busy lying telling everyone how great everything is. We can blame no one but ourselves. Sow to the wind,reap the whirlwind.

      3. I get that we have simulated wars,but, do we also have to have a president who is himself a simulation??

      4. China like Russia controls the ground it can walk too. Neither are powers with global reach. The point is moot because it’s highly likely that any confrontation of size with either would escalate into a nuclear exchange as both sides fear a first strike. The pre war “saber rattling” would collapse the already unstable global economy supported by unsupportable debt. At that point it becomes a free for all as normal commerce, much of it necessities, is greatly interrupted in a globalist interdependent world.

        None of this will end well.

      5. Was this a invasion of the U.S. ? if so I do not think so.

      6. Using biological weapons and delayed action “vaccinations’ leave infrastructure intact and land free of radioactivity.

      7. Does the US military actually learn the lessons of these ‘War Games’, or are they simply scare tactics to get a few extra billion from Congress?
        Why is the US$800 Billion not enough?

      8. The Nuclear Scare Scam | Galen Winsor

        Other sources claim these ^ are turned-off by foo fighters, that fallout could be showered off Bikini Islanders, that lab fees were paid by Faucci, samples were obtained from Canada, and no isolate has been witnessed, directly.

      9. And then what? So China may, somehow, be able to build up its forces enough without anyone noticing(a stretch) to invade Taiwan and knock out a few US bases.
        So what happens next? US just rolls over? Riiiight.
        To paraphrase after Pearl Harbour:
        “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve”
        Isoroku Yamamoto
        They too would repeat this phrase after such an action.

      10. After Pearl Harbor:
        “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve”
        Isoroku Yamamoto

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.