High Prices to Exacerbate Global Food Security Concerns

by | Jun 16, 2010 | Headline News | 4 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    With a growing global population and possible supply issues with oil, the OECD is forecasting the potential for a serious global food crisis:

    Food commodity prices will increase more than previously expected in the next decade because of rising energy prices and developing countries’ rapid growth, two leading organisations said yesterday, worsening the outlook for global food security.

    “A return to higher global economic growth . . . together with continuing population gains, are expected to increase demand and trade and underpin prices,” the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organisation and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said in their annual agricultural outlook.

    Higher crude oil prices would add force to rising agricultural commodities prices, particularly in those regions – including Europe and the US – where energy inputs such as fertilisers were used intensively, said the report.

    For the next 10 years, the FAO and OECD forecast that significant food prices, with the exception of pork, would remain above the 1996-2007 average, in both nominal and real terms – adjusted for inflation. Although prices were unlikely to surge back to the record levels of early 2008, they warned that “if history is any guide, further episodes of strong price fluctuations . . . cannot be ruled out, nor can future short-lived crises”.

    source: Financial Times

    President Obama’s new carbon tax will most certainly not reduce food costs going forward, and it is likely that the OECD didn’t even consider this in their calculations. In regards to cap & trade, you can rest assured that not only will your taxes and energy costs go up, but so too will your food costs.

    Couple this with the likelihood of a longer term dollar devaluation and price inflation and there is a serious possibility that Americans will be unable to acquire the rations necessary to maintain a healthy diet.

    The prospect of higher prices could prompt those nations dependent on food imports – such as Saudi Arabia and South Korea – to try to secure long-term food supplies by accelerating their investment in overseas agriculture in so-called ” farmland grabs ” deals. Mr Gurría said some food-importing nations felt “strategically vulnerable” about their agricultural commodities supplies, but added it was critical to avoid “a race for [food] self-sufficiency“.

    We would argue that self sufficiency should be the very goal we should be seeking, as a nation and as individuals.

    Consider a situation where the SHTF and we run smack dab into a hyperinflationary depression, where the US dollar becomes worthless, goods transportation stops and there is no food to be acquired through our regular just-in-time grocery store inventories. Yes, there may be rations available through the government, but is worrying about where your family will get its next meal something you want to have to do every morning?

    While we have always supported the stockpiling of emergency rations like freeze dried goods, dehydrated foods and canned goods, this is only a short-term solution in the event of a protracted depressive cycle (be it inflationary or deflationary).

    The next several years, perhaps decades, will make it difficult for average Americans to maintain a healthy diet, even if there is no worst-case collapse event. Food costs will rise. Your wages will go down in real terms, perhaps even completely dissappear if your job is eliminated.

    Thus, your only recourse will be to be self sustaining. For those with any sort of acreage available to them, consider micro-farming which includes not just growing vegetables and fruits, but raising chickens, goats, rabbits,  and/or fish.

    It’s either that, or you can stand in one of these lines for 5 hours a day hoping to get a watery bowl of soup for your kids:


    For now, food catastrophes have been limited to the third world, but there is a distinct possibility that the same can happen right here, in the good ‘ol USA.

    The picture above is from the Great Depression, and a similar situation is unfolding around the country right now, as depicted by this picture of a food line in Detroit (Dec. 2009):


    It’s real and it’s happening in the United States already.

    Expect this trend to spread in coming years.

    Start thinking about sustainable living, including personal food and energy production – not to save the earth as some environmentalists like to say – but to save yourself.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. High prices my ass, we are on track for over 30% increases in food prices this year!! Last time I checked we were still the bread basket for the world. 
        Around the world NOW there are food shortages due again to the environmental wack jobs and ethanol.  Food and fuel go hand in hand you need one to produce the other.

        If we could just get rid of the environmentalist we could build Nuke plants, Wind and Solar farms and produce fossil fuels safely.

        Even the French know the value of Nuke power.

      2. getting off of oil (as a fuel) is not in the best interest of the people who control the politicians of the US & the western countries (CEOs, Bankers, Investors, Corporate leaders who pay off the “elected officials”).   history shows us it is extremely easy to buy off those who are “elected” by the people.

        remember, those who actually control the leaders of this country have never made decisions that actually were beneficial to either the masses of people or the environment.

        do not pretend to set the blame of this on the small people, whether they be environmentalists, conservatives, right, left, whatever.   because they’ll then make the stupid decision to find a way to blame your side as well.  you know who is truly in control of this, and you know the little guy–regardless of which side they’re on or what flag they’re flying–are not to blame for our current energy addictions and fiat currency bubble that is about to burst.

        they love it when you take the sides they create for you.

        just look at all the fucking idiots who truly believe in either Palin or Obama’s rhetoric, when neither of them will ever have the balls or the ability to break our chains to the masters that control them as well.

      3. Nuclear plants would be a VERY big mistake! Just say NO to nuclear power. Radioactive waste from a regular nuclear plant takes 10,000 years to decay past a point where it is no longer toxic. Can you say “Ice Age”? RW from a Breeder Reactor takes 1,000 years to lose its toxicity.

        RW from the Hanover Plant in Washington State has leaked into the groundwater and is moving towards the river system. The FEDs have estimated that it would take $8-10 billion to clean this spill up …. if they knew how and had the technology. Consequently they are doing  ….. nothing! Good luck Portland! You are on your own!

        When someone creates a microbe that eats nuclear waste and shits H2O, then it will be time to build more reactors. Not until then.

        Fortunately nuke plants are not going to cut it financially. Estimates of the cost to build one now exceed $30 billion according to Michael Ruppert.

        Energy needs to be democratized, like information on the internet. Every home needs to become a “power station”, every car electric, and every family energy self-sufficient; even if it takes ALL of our tax dollars to subsidize ……… OURSELVES!!!!!!!

        Democratize energy and the people have the power! Literally and figuratively.

      4. Imagine how America would be, if we just took the $500 BILLION that we spend on ILLEGALS every year, and provided that as matching funds, dollar for dollar, to homeowners for solar and vertical axis wind generation for the next ten years to power their homes and cars.

        That IS an energy solution I can believe in. Anyone else?

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.