DARPA Seeks FAA Approval For Military Drones Over American Cities By 2030 – At The Latest

by | Nov 2, 2018 | Headline News | 16 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This report was originally published by Nicholas West at Activist Post

    Just a little over 10 years after drone surveillance inside U.S. borders was declared a conspiracy theory, it is now an indisputable fact of life. So, too, are military grade drones along the “border,” which in reality constitutes a 100-mile-wide swath that encircles the continental United States and 2/3 of its population.

    According to a new report from Defense One, this level of access is still seen as a restriction by the DARPA-directed military apparatus. As new forms of autonomous aircraft take to the skies such as the latest Blackhawk helicopter drones that could be ready by 2019, DARPA and aircraft developers want permission to fly over large cities as needed. Utilizing a new artificial intelligence system that is literally called MATRIX, developers see an opportunity for more flexibility in potential use. Of course, surveillance isn’t mentioned among those uses:

    After that, similar to Predator drone maker General Atomics, they have their eyes on FAA certification to fly large, unmanned aircraft within the continental United States, to help ferry people and supplies from the mainland to offshore oil rigs, among other potential jobs. Today, large drones likes Predators are forbidden to fly over the U.S. except in a handful of largely unpopulated areas along the U.S.Mexico border.

    The FAA is now figuring out how to change guidelines to allow unmanned planes and helicopters to fly over big cities. “We are working with the FAA on that. Our stated goal is 2030. It very much depends on rule making. We are certainly hoping for sooner, for the mid-2020s, to field it,” he said.

    In that linked article sourced above, the long-range plans of converting military aircraft to drones and incorporating them anywhere and everywhere inside America is also detailed and expanded upon as a potential replacement for the already controversial use of police drones.

    By 2025, enormous military-style drones – close relatives of the sort made famous by counterterrorism strikes in Afghanistan and Iraq – will be visible 2,000 feet above U.S. cities, streaming high-resolution video to police departments below. That is the bet that multiple defense contractors are placing, anyway, as they race to build unmanned aircraft that can pass evolving airworthiness certifications and replace police helicopters. And if that bet pays off, it will radically transform the way cities, citizens, and law enforcement interact.

    We are now seeing various trends beginning to dovetail into what could become the ultimate in military presence over the United States. As I recently reported, new A.I. algorithms are being devised that look for emotional indicators in an attempt to predict crime and social unrest. The “Eye in the Sky” system, developed by Cambridge University, seeks to use small Parrot drones to identify “violent poses” in crowds. The system will be powered by biometric recognition and artificial intelligence, as seen in the video below:

    Imagine a system like this being applied to the far more sophisticated military systems that already exist, then connecting all of it to the growing federal biometrics database.

    I suspect that if the FAA does grant access to larger military aircraft over U.S. cities, it will be with the “strict guidelines” that no forms of surveillance or weaponry will be permitted onboard. Of course, once granted even the slightest access, all it will take is one catastrophic event to remove any restrictions at all.

    Unlike many new industries, which grow unfettered until emerging problems prompt regulation, unmanned flight needs relief from existing restrictions in order to blossom, Scassero said. Once that happens, the market for large unmanned planes could be enormous.

    For reference, here is what I wrote in 2013 regarding the long-term plans and eventuality that was also hinted at in the mainstream media at the time in an Associated Press article entitled, “Drones With Facial Recognition Technology Will End Anonymity, Everywhere.”

    AP certainly offers a correct summary of how the databases that already exist (where we thought our personal information was protected) will be opened and utilized any time necessary.

    “From seeing just the image of a face, computers will find its match in a database of millions of driver’s license portraits and photos on social media sites. From there, the computer will link to the person’s name and details such as their Social Security number, preferences, hobbies, family and friends. 

    Adding that capability to drones that can fly into spaces where planes cannot — machines that can track a person moving about and can stay aloft for days — means that people will give up privacy as well as the concept of anonymity.”

    Naturally, the AP peddles this softly as it recounts these “new” developments in a tale of researchers with Carnegie Mellon University’s CyLab Biometrics Center attempting to assist in sharpening FBI images of Boston bombing suspects, the Tsarnaev brothers. This is reminiscent of the above-mentioned Chris Dorner manhunt where we heard calls for how nice it would have been to have a drone at the ready for quicker identification and possible assassination.

    “In a real-time experiment, the scientists digitally mapped the face of “Suspect 2,” turned it toward the camera and enhanced it so it could be matched against a database. The researchers did not know how well they had done until authorities identified the suspect as Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the younger, surviving brother and a student at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. 

    ‘I was like, ‘Holy shish kabobs!’ ‘ Marios Savvides, director of the CMU Cylab, told the Tribune-Review. ‘It’s not exactly him, but it’s also not a random face. It does fit him.’”

    This astonishment is somewhat absurd considering that drones have already been developed that are equipped with camera systems like DARPA’s Autonomous Real-time Ground Ubiquitous Surveillance Imaging System (ARGUS). This sensor system can instantly see an area roughly the “size of a small city” with an “all-seeing” eye according to retired Lieutenant, David A. Deptula. The next generation of surveillance tech sees the landscape through a 1.8 billion pixels camera, the highest resolution yet created.

    Using a touchscreen interface that can produce up to 65 windows for analysis, military observers can see down to the individual object level to track the movements of vehicles and people. Beyond the real-time surveillance, the system can store everything for future review right down to the minutes and seconds.

    The only thing truly new about this Associated Press story is the announcement that what most people thought to be limited to overseas theaters of war will now definitely be used across Battlefield USA.

    It would be wise to contact the FAA now with concerns about permitting military-grade aircraft flying over the United States for any reason in order to stave off the imminent arrival of “Battlefield USA.”


    Nicholas West writes for Activist Post. Support us at Patreon for as little as $1 per month. Follow us on MindsSteemitSoMeeBitChuteFacebook and Twitter. Ready for solutions? Subscribe to our premium newsletter Counter Markets.

    Free ebook How To Survive the Job Automation Apocalypse

    Free ebook How To Get Started with Bitcoin: Quick and Easy Beginner’s Guide


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. What a crock. Those drones are in the air over the USA already. Have been for some time.

        • Wanted to share this, but couldn’t. Anyone else tried?

      2. Menzo, if any of those drones are weaponized and start attacking people like us, then they’re subject to being shot down if they get within range of our weapons.

        • ISIS, Iran, Syria, and so on have far longer range weapons than you have, and ones actually powerful enough to bring down a military drone.

          If they can’t get rid of them, you can’t either.

          But their camera’s will see you trying and do something about it.

        • We’ll never even see these DR

        • 2030 coincides with UN Agenda 2030, which will force all of us into “sustainable cities” where we will be forced to live in very tall high-rise apartments no larger than 300-400ft, with 24/7 surveillance from appliances to the hallways to the streets. Neighborhoods will be divided into zones and each zone will have retail and service sectors. There will be no cars. To get from one zone to another we will have to use trains or buses, depending on the cost. The rest of the country will be mined for minerals, drilled for oil and farmed. People will be living there in large mansions with surrounded by a lot of land. Thus, the weaponized drones will be used to control any insurgency, riots, rebellions. Read all about UN Agenda 2030 and “Sustainable Cities” which all democratic leaders support and which obama signed with the UN.

        • The UN Agenda 2030 signed by obama calls or us to be completely disarmed by 2030, that’s why the drones are planned for 2030.

      3. Yet another reason NOT to live in cities. Cities are where “certain” people are and will be “imprisoned”.

        • You’re right, Justice, if we allow it to happen. Read my above comment about the DSS date of 2030 corresponds to the UN Agenda 2030, that obama signed and which contains their plans for “Sustainable Cities” – the worst of all nightmares.

      4. As shown in this article, a recent high-level meeting of the Five Eyes member states (which includes the United States) has proposed measures that would reduce our ability to encrypt our own data:


        Five Eyes are calling on technology companies to build back doors into their products so that law enforcement (aka “The State”) will always be able to access encrypted data, largely because the group believes that privacy is not absolute in this post-truth era.

      5. This is unnecessarryyyyyyyyy

        Inventing something that makes mass shootings impossible.

        Do that, it’s way less invasive, trust me.

        This is dumb. Just like the plane hijacking thing is dumb. PUT A WALL BETWEEN THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT AND THE PILOT COMPARTMENT. Not a door. A WALL. Bulletproof wall.

        Door from the outside for the pilots to get in, toilet in there.

        The end.

        You could tell the pilot fly to Cairo or the kid dies. You can’t really tell a pilot fly into this building or the kid dies, what sane person is going to agree to that one?

      6. After that, similar to Predator drone maker General Atomics…


        Mandella effect?

        Did I just wake up in the Fallout universe or something??

      7. I have a penchant for certain theories. My favorite.. if you break your glasses, what’s the first thing you need? Glasses. In the IT world, if a computer is acting up, the first thing you need is a working system/computer. With this problem of drones, what’s needed are drones… owned and operated by us. Conventional weaponry is useless. You ain’t going to shoot them with your rifle. You need a drone that can get close enough to either attack in kind to the enemy’s machine or cause a sys failure. Localized EMP that can overcome the inherent defensive screen/materials already a part of that same drone.

      8. So, the creepy arms dealer wants to cater to the newish fad, on AI (Skynet).

        But, there’s a flaw, in this person’s reasoning —
        “…unmanned flight needs relief from existing restrictions in order to blossom, Scassero said. Once that happens, the market for large unmanned planes could be enormous.”

        In aeronautics, space travel, and war, one, big, metal machine would be replaced with many, little, plastic, toy-like things, like nanobots, in order to satisfy an economy of resources.

        They didn’t care about your ‘singularity’ or the point of sentience, or anything philosophical or utopian — beyond designing something to be wasted.

        Testing grounds are apparently littered with this stuff. Think of an expensive napkin or swizzle stick.

      9. “…ten years after drone surveillance inside US borders is declared a conspiracy theory, it is now a proven undeniable fact…”

        “…declared conspiracy theory, it is now undeniable proven fact…”

        “…conspiracy theory…is…proven fact…

        “…conspiracy theory… is…fact…”

        ………Taken out of context…


      10. If you go to Shoot Down a drone, you need to be VERY CAREFUL about what is BEHIND the drone. And you need to know what size the drone is.

        It will work much better if you can correctly gauge the drone’s airspeed – as well as its distance.

        In one quadrant of air space near me, there is a 100 square mile patch of forest. Shooting in any other direction – the bullet lands in a rural area with homes – NOT GOOD.

        Of course, there are options to using firearms to shoot down a drone. Might post those if the Mods. allow this post to be published. Obviously very sensitive.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.