“It Is Already Written. They Will Not Win”: Why the Quest For Total Control Is Destined to Fail

by | Jul 14, 2016 | Aftermath, Conspiracy Fact and Theory | 43 comments

Do you LOVE America?



    This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at his Alt-Market.com website.

    Editor’s Note: There is every sense that things are accelerating rapidly towards a sad state of total control, where virtually every form of freedom is regulated, taxed and surveilled. But the truth is that this power is illusory, and “they” will never be able to control everything. The very quest to grasp onto all the pieces makes failure certain to succeed, at least in small doses and cases of individuals standing up or walking away from the game.

    Brandon Smith argues here that resistance will naturally pop up and exploit the weak links, even in the carefully crafted plot for the future grid. It is good motivation to never give up, and never assume that they actually are in control, even as they grip the reigns of power. Perhaps, there something inevitably futile about the system that they are constructing. Let’s hope so.

    The Reasons Why The Globalists Are Destined To Lose

    by Brandon Smith

    Under the surface of almost every sociopolitical and economic event in the world there burns an ever-raging, but often unseen, war. This war, for now, is fought with fiction and with truth, with journalistic combat and with quiet individual deeds. It is defined by two sides which could not be more philosophically or spiritually separate.

    On one side is a pervasive network of corporate moguls and elites, banking entities, international financial consortiums, think tanks and political puppets. They work tirelessly to reshape public psychology and society as a whole into something they sometimes call the “New World Order;” a completely and scientifically centralized planet in which they control every aspect of government, trade, life and even moral compass. I often refer to them simply as the “Globalists,” which is how they at times refer to themselves.

    On the other side is a movement that has developed organically and instinctively, growing without direct top-down “leadership,” but still guided through example by various teachers and activists, driven by a concrete set of principles based in natural law. It is composed of the religious, the agnostic and even some atheists.  It is soldiered by people of all ethnic and financial backgrounds. These groups are tied together by a singular and resounding belief in the one vital thing they can all agree upon — the inherent and inborn rights of freedom. I call them the “Liberty Movement.”

    There are those who think they do not have a dog in this fight, those who ignore it and those who are completely oblivious to it. However, EVERYONE can and will be affected by it, no exceptions. This war is for the future of the human race. Its consequences will determine if the next generation will choose the conditions of their environment and maintain the ability to reach their true potential as individuals or if every aspect of their lives will be micromanaged for them by a faceless, soulless bureaucracy that does not have their best interests at heart.

    As you can probably tell, I am not unbiased in my examination of these two sides. While some of the more “academically minded” cynics out there do attempt to marginalize the entire conflict by accusing both sides of simply trying to impose “their ideology” on the rest of humanity, I would say that such people are generally ignorant of what is at stake.

    There is in fact an elemental force behind this war. I would even call it a conflagration between good and evil. For a more in-depth analysis on the evil behind globalism, read my article “Are Globalists Evil Or Just Misunderstood.”

    Some people don’t adhere to such absolutes or they think good and evil are fantasies created by religion to keep society in check. I have no intention of trying to convince them otherwise. All I can say is, I have seen and experienced these absolutes first hand and, therefore, I have no choice but to remain a believer.

    I would also point out that the general experience of most men and women is that the act of organized and legitimate oppression is inherently evil and such actions in the name of satisfying delusional elitist narcissism are even more evil. While these experiences are subjective, they are also universal, regardless of the culture, place or time in history. Most of us feel the same horror and the same defiance when presented with rising tyranny. We can’t necessarily explain why, but we all know.

    While I am firmly on the side of liberty and am willing to fight and trade my life to stop the “New World Order” the globalists are so obsessed with, I will not turn this examination of their tactics into a blind or one sided farce. I will point out where the elites are effective just as I will point out where they are ineffective. It would do more harm than good to portray the globalists as “stupid” or bumbling in their efforts. They are not stupid. They are actually astonishingly clever and should not be underestimated.

    They are indeed conniving and industrious, but, they are not wise. For if they were wise, they would be able to see the ultimate futility of their goal and the world would be saved decades of tragedy and loss. Their cultism has dulled their senses to reality and they have abandoned truth in the name of control. Here are some of the primary strategies that the globalists are using to gain power and work towards total centralization and why their own mindset has doomed them to failure.

    Globalism vs. “Populism”

    The globalists have used the method of false dichotomies for centuries to divide nations and peoples against each other in order to derive opportunity from chaos. That said, the above dichotomy is about as close to real as they have ever promoted. As I explained in my article, “Globalists Are Now Openly Demanding New World Order Centralization,” the recent passage of the Brexit referendum in the U.K. has triggered a surge of new propaganda from establishment media outlets.  The thrust of this propaganda is the notion that “populists” are behind the fight against globalization and these populists are going to foster the ruin of nations and the global economy.  That is to say — globalism good, populism bad.

    There is a real fight between globalists and those who desire a free, decentralized and voluntary society.  They have just changed some of the labels and the language. We have yet to see how effective this strategy will be for the elites, but it is very useful for them in certain respects.

    The wielding of the term “populist” is about as sterilized and distant from “freedom and liberty” as you can get. It denotes not just “nationalism,” but selfish nationalism. And the association people are supposed to make in their minds is that selfish nationalism leads to destructive fascism (i.e. Nazis).  Therefore, when you hear the term “populist,” the globalists hope you will think “Nazi.”

    Also, keep in mind that the narrative of the rise of populism coincides with grave warnings from the elites that such movements will cause global economic collapse if they continue to grow. Of course, the elites have been fermenting an economic collapse for years. We have been experiencing many of the effects of it for some time. In a brilliant maneuver, the elites have attempted to re-label the liberty movement as “populist” (Nazis), and use liberty activists as a scapegoat for the fiscal time bomb THEY created.

    Will the masses buy it?  I don’t know.  I think that depends on how effectively we expose the strategy before the breakdown becomes too entrenched.  The economic collapse itself has been handled masterfully by the elites, though. There is simply no solution that can prevent it from continuing. Even if every criminal globalist was hanging from a lamp post tomorrow and honest leadership was restored to government, the math cannot be changed and decades of struggle will be required before national economies can be made prosperous again.

    Communism vs. Fascism

    This is a classic ploy by the globalists to divide a culture against itself and initiate a calamity that can be used as leverage for greater centralization down the road.  If you have any doubts about fascism and communism being engineered, I highly suggest you look into the very well documented analysis of Antony Sutton. I do not have the space here to do his investigations justice.

    Today, we see elites like George Soros funding and aiding the latest incarnation of the communist hordes — namely social justice groups like Black Lives Matter.  The collectivist psychosis and Orwellian behavior exhibited by race junkies like BLM and third-wave feminists is thoroughly pissing off conservatives who are tired of being told what to think and how to act every second of every day. And this is the point…

    If you want to get a picture of America in 2016, look back at Europe during the 1930’s. Communist provocateurs, some real and some fabricated by the establishment itself, ran rampant in Europe creating labor disintegration and fiscal turmoil. The elites then funded and elevated fascism as the “solution” to communism. Normally even-handed conservatives were so enraged by the communist spitting and ankle biting that they became something just as evil in response.

    The U.S. may be on the same path if we are not careful. The latest shootings in Texas will make hay for the globalists. Think about this for a moment — on one side you have Obama telling the liberals that the answer to police brutality is to federalize law enforcement even more that it already is. On the other side, you have some Republicans arguing that a more militarized police presence will help prevent groups like BLM from causing more trouble. Notice that the only solution we are being offered here is more federal presence on our streets?

    I do see, though, a rather large weakness in the plan to ignite a communist vs. fascist meltdown in the U.S., and that weakness is the existence of the Liberty Movement itself.  The movement has grown rather sophisticated in its media presence and prevalent in influence. It does have enough sway now to diffuse some aspects of a rise to fascism in the political Right. The only option the elites have is to find a way to co-opt us. If they can manipulate the liberty movement into supporting a fascist system, then they would be very close to winning the entire fight. This would be highly unlikely given the stubbornness of liberty proponents when adhering to their principles.

    The elites might be able to get a large part of the public to take sides in their false paradigm, but if they can’t con the millions that make up the liberty movement into the fold, then their job becomes much harder.

    Moral Compass vs. Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism is perhaps the pinnacle goal of the globalists. Why? Because if you can convince an entire society that their inherent conscience should be ignored and that their inborn feelings of morality are “open to interpretation,” then eventually ANY evil action can be rationalized. When evil becomes “good,” and good becomes evil, evil men will reign supreme.

    The problem is, conscience is an inborn psychological product, a result of inherent archetypal dualities universal to almost all people. It is ingrained in our DNA, or our very souls if you believe in such a thing. It cannot be erased easily.

    Moral relativism requires a person to treat every scenario as a “gray area.”  This is not practical. Conscience dictates that we treat every situation as potentially unique and act according to what we feel in our hearts is right given the circumstances.  This does not mean, though, that there is no black and white; or that there are no concrete rules.  There is almost always a black and white side to any situation dealing with right and wrong.  Moral “dilemmas” are exceedingly rare.  In fact, I don’t think I have ever encountered a real moral dilemma in history or in personal experience. The only time I ever see moral dilemmas is in movies and television.

    Only in television fantasy is moral relativism ever the “only way” to solve a problem. And despite the preponderance of moral relativism in our popular culture, the ideology is still having trouble taking hold.  If it was so easy to undermine conscience, then the NWO would have already achieved complete pacification. We are still far from pacification. Whoever hard-wired our conscience should be applauded.

    Collectivism vs. Individualism

    The very core of globalism and the NWO is the position that sovereignty and individualism must be sacrificed for the “good of the group”; in other words, they promote collectivism.  Of course, groups by their very nature are abstractions; they only exist as long as the individuals within them recognize them as viable.  Unfortunately, collectivists do not accept this fact because it would mean that the group, not matter how utopian, is not the pinnacle of human existence – rather, the individual is and always will be the pinnacle of human existence.

    The elites MUST convince people that individualism is dangerous and that collectivism is the only way to prevent the tragedies wrought by those who wish to be separate.  Of course, most of the tragedies we experience on a national or global scale are actually engineered by the elites, not by wild individuals or sovereign nations looking for trouble.  They then blame the very concept of sovereignty as a barbaric ritual from the past that must be abolished for the sake of all.

    In order for the globalists to reinforce the need for collectivism, though, they must engage people on an individual psychological level.  Most human beings have an inherent desire to interact with their fellow man, but they also have an inherent identity and drive to pursue their own development without interference.  We like to be a part of a group as long as our participation is healthy and voluntary and our associations are a matter of choice.

    Human beings are instinctively tribal, but we have psychological and biological limits to the size of the tribe we prefer to be a part of.  Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary psychology prevalent in the 1990’s, found that there is a cognitive limit to the number of individuals any one person can maintain stable relationships with.  Dunbar found this number to be between 100 – 200 people.  A limitation also extends to the size of effective groups versus ineffective groups.  He found that effective tribes and communities tend to remain between 500 – 2500 people.

    The human mind does not adapt well to a vast tribal groups, and recoils from the idea of a “global tribe”.  The truth is, human beings function far better in smaller groups and they do not like to be forced into participating in any group, let alone larger groups.  This may account for the feeling of isolation that is common among people who live in metropolitan areas.  They are surrounded by millions of neighbors and perhaps hundreds of associates yet they still feel alone because they do not have a functioning tribe of acceptable size.

    Vast numbers of people can be tied together by an ideal that resonates with them, which is the only purpose for nations to form (to protect that ideal), but that is as far as the voluntary association goes.  Globalist collectivism is simply unnatural.  People know it unconsciously, they know it is an act of force and oppression, and will invariably move to sabotage its false tribalism as they begin to see its true colors.

    Total Control vs. Reality

    This is where the globalists philosophy really begins to break down. The elitist pursuit of total information awareness and total social control is truly perverse and insane, and insanity breeds delusion and weakness.  The fact is, they will NEVER complete the goal of complete micro-control. It is mathematically and psychologically impossible.

    First, in any system, and in complex systems most of all, there are always elements that cannot be quantified or predicted. To understand this issue, I recommend studying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. To summarize, the uncertainty principle dictates that anyone observing a system in action, even from a distance, can still affect the behavior of that system indirectly or unconsciously in ways they could never predict.  They are also limited by their ability to objectively perceive all available elements of what they observe.  Unknown quantities result, predictability goes out the window and total control of that system becomes unattainable.

    This principle also applies to human psychology, as numerous psychoanalysts have discovered when treating patients. The doctor, or the observer, is never able to observe their patient without indirectly affecting the behavior of their patient in unpredictable ways. Therefore, a completely objective analysis of that patient can never be obtained.

    What the elites seek is a system by which they can observe and influence all of us in minute detail without triggering a reaction that they wouldn’t expect.  The laws of physics and psychology derail this level of control.  There will always be unknown quantities, free radicals, wild cards, etc. Even a seemingly perfect utopia can be brought down by a single unknown.

    To break this down even further to the level of pure mathematics, I recommend study into Kurt Godel and his Incompleteness Proof. This, I believe is the ultimate example of the elites struggling against the fact of unknown quantities and failing.

    Godel’s work revolved around either proving or disproving the idea that mathematicians could define “infinity” in mathematical terms. For, if infinity can be defined, then it can be understood in base mathematical axioms, and if infinity can be understood, then the universe in its entirety can be understood. Godel discovered the opposite — his incompleteness proof established once and for all that infinity is a self inclusive paradox that CANNOT be defined through mathematics. Keep in mind that a proof is a set of mathematical laws that can never be broken. Two plus two will always equal four; it will never equal anything else.

    Well known globalist Bertrand Russell worked tirelessly to show that the entirety of the universe could be broken down into numbers, writing a three volume monstrosity called the Principia Mathematica.  Russell’s efforts were fruitless and Godel’s proof later crushed his theory. Russell railed against Godel’s proof, but to no avail.

    Now, why was an elitist like Russell who openly championed scientific dictatorship so concerned by Godel? Well, because Godel, in mathematical terms, destroyed the very core of the globalist ideology. He proved that the globalist aspirations of godhood would never be realized. There are limits to the knowledge of man, and limits to what he can control.  This is not something globalists can ever accept, for if they did, every effort they have made for decades if not centuries would be pointless.

    As mentioned earlier, the issue is one of unknown quantities. Can human society ever be fully dominated? Or, is the act of rebellion against stagnating and oppressive systems a part of nature?  Is it possible that the more the elites wrap the world in a cage, the more they inspire unpredictable reactions that could undermine their authority?

    This might explain the establishment’s constant attention to the idea of the “lone wolf” and the damage one person acting outside the dictates of the system can do. This is what the elites fear most: the possibility that despite all their efforts of surveillance and manipulation, individuals and groups may one day be struck by an unpredictable urge to pick up a rifle and put the the globalists out of everyone’s misery. No chatter, no electronic trail, no warning.

    This is why they are destined to lose. They can never know all the unknowns. They can never control all the free radicals. There will always be rebellion. There will always be a liberty movement. The entirety of their utopian schematic revolves around the need to remove unknowns. They refuse to acknowledge that control at these levels is so frail it becomes useless and mortally dangerous. In their arrogance, they have ignored the warnings of the very sciences they worship and have set their eventual end in stone. While they may leave a considerable path of destruction in their wake, it is already written; they will not win.

    This article was written by Brandon Smith. Please visit his independent site Alt-Market.com to read more and support his work.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Eyes open, what fear…

        • There are two major traditions in Western political thought. The first is Aristotelian, logical, rational, centrist, mechanistic. You concentrate power and truth in the centre and apply it outward, shaping the world according to plan.
          This was the guiding principle of the Roman Empire. It evolved into the Holy Roman Empire and the Church of Rome. Except for Switzerland, it has dominated politics on the continent ever since. Most recently, it has morphed into the European Union.
          The principle is simple – smart people can figure out how to run things, and should be allowed to do so. This was the idea behind Hillary Clinton’s health care task force (and now ObamaCare), as well as Japan, Inc. and even Adolph Hitler’s National Socialist Germany. It has animated nearly every politician (each one of whom, as Garrison Keilor notes about Lake Woebegone children, are above average) in this century.
          But there is another tradition that is much less well understood. It is the tradition of the Roman Republic… of English common law… of Adam Smith and Emmanuel Kant… of Austrian School economists such as Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek and of pre-Rooseveltian American. It is organic, rather than mechanistic – the tradition of tradition, based on the recognition that people, no matter how smart, cannot replace thousands of years of accumulated experience (remember the “best and the brightest” who led the Vietnam war? Or, wonder where the radical homosexual power move is going to end?)

          Experience is embodied in the evolved systems of values, customs, rules and traditions that people use to order and give meaning to their lives. A free market and a free society allow people to express these preferences, as well as allowing the process of social and civil evolution to continue. This tradition, in other words, is neither liberal nor conservative in the modern sense, but anti-political. Indeed, it is often seen as “anti-intellectual” because it denies the authority of intellectuals to tell the rest of us what to do (through the political process).

          Fleet Street Letter, page 6, date unknown!

      2. I know God is in Control.. and He said they will soon be out of office if we pray and repent

        • jesus is coming,…..and boy, is he PISSED!

          • you are a tard.no such thing as gods,grow up.

            • You know jack shit. God in the name of Jesus is very real, wise up.

              • only brain dead morons believe in mythology.

                • So what does that make you my dear friend? The word is unpronounceable, sorry.

                  • yep,a tard is what you are.god botherers and their empty threats from a make believe entity-you morons crack me up!

            • Knowitall? So THAT’S your moniker? ROTFLMAO! You don’t know shit, troll!

              • on your knees,tard.suck the cock of christ you slave!

                • Scientists have found plunium locked in granet . Plunium has a 7 day life . So that granet had to be made within 7 days. Scientists don’t know why the cells in your body stay together . There’s no glue. Some people say that evolution means seeing a Rolex watch laying in the dirt . And thinking that over millions of years the dirt evolved into the watch. Dinosaur bones or any bones can only be preserved if immediately buried in mud. The great flood of Noah? Where God wiped out some of the life. The bad? The lie is that they are millions of years old . Scientists find little chips of bones and construct skulls . Of maybe deformed of extremely malnourished people . And put them on display for you to spend your money to see. Kind of like a freak show. They justify it by saying it brings in money to build a new school. Ounce a life form is created it evolves. Noah’s two of each animal on the ark . Evolved over time to all the different look alikes we have now. Look how many different dogs. Big little black white. Look at the size of this universe . Do you really think we know anything? And Gods word is if we don’t do evil with our free will we will go on to a better world. And part of that free will is deciding what is evil. Regardless of what others say. And God says his most powerful angel betrayed him and took over this world . And maybe he can’t get himself out without destroying everything. And maybe he can only get us out one at a time . He probably can’t explain every detail. That’s the faith part. And it’s all we got to hope for.?

        • DustyFae
          God SAID that they will be out of office soon if we pray and repent.
          When did God say that?

      3. yeah?
        well the problem for me at least is,,, will I get to live to see it?

        • Lately, I have come across all these people who are “awake”… not part of the Matrix… and it is absolutely amazing! I talk to different people– different ages/different races– and they say things which all of us talk about! And when I tell them– for example, about the real purpose of the second ammendment– they say, “that’s rIght!! You’re speaking my language!” and I say the same thing to them… And they are just people I meet off the street, at restaurants, on the buses, etc… Mostly poor people!!

          there is the theory of one monkey eating a banana a certain way and then everywhere– all over the world– all the monkeys start eating their bananas the same way, even though they never saw the other monkeys eating that way… perhaps this is what is happening…the 100th monkey. 🙂

          • I was talking to this one guy and I told him that in the near future there will be no government. And he said, well, we are at the cusp, where it could go either way– greater government control (a police state) or just the opposite. Another guy I heard talking to other guys and they were talking about Revolution… The people are waking up!!

      4. yeah?
        well the problem for me at least is,,, will I get to live to see it?

      5. UGh.. Mac WTF?
        everytime i post it goes double or more

      6. We the 99% can take control back in a weekend if we unite and stop blaming the blacks that are being executed by the police and we all grow some balls.

        Something is being put in the food or water we drink to domesticate us and the youth of the day in the 1980’s would had rose up long before now instead of taking all this shit

        something is going on and when you look at cancer rates going up and sperm rates going down then what i am saying does not seem so far off the mark.

        We also see men being turned into queers which could well be triggerd by what ever it is in the cool-aid so get into gear and be ready to rock and roll if/when the time comes instead of running for them hills like chicken’s

        • THANK YOU, MR. SMITH– I agree 100%! I am white but racist comments (stupidity) from blacks or whites is disgusting. The elites want us divided so they can conquer us.

          Yeah, something obviously IS being put in our food and drinks.. They are purposely poisoning us while Monsanto elites ONLY eat organic products and have special food preparations by experts.

          About the homosexuals– I see a lot of men nowdays with real tight pants and shorts and it turns out most guys who dress this way are faggots. As a female, this really turns me off!!! Men do NOT look good in tight pants, which shows everything… well, most guys don’t. (There are exceptions. Ha!) Also, yesterday the bus driver came to a bus stop and there was this man who walked over to the bus and he was WEARING A DRESS!!! And it looked HORRIBLE on him!!! He did NOT have the body for it!!! truly hilarious! Everyone was snickering!

      7. They can’t control things over the long haul, but ask anyone that lived their entire lives under Soviet Russia if they can’t control it over at least your life time.

      8. Unfortunately for Mr. Smith, the Word of GOD tells us that the Globalists will win – at least until Jesus returns. That’s what Armageddon is all about.
        It is also why I prep…. so that my family will miss as much of the ugliness as possible.

        • I don’t believe in the interpretations of Revelations currently propounded by certain mainstream Christian groups. Considering that most major churches have ties to elitist foundations and are also controlled through 501C3, I think that they are promoting an interpretation of revelations that is designed to convince the Christian community that they should do nothing except sit on their asses and wait to be raptured. This is exactly what the elites want.

          Evil will be defeated, with or without their help.

        • Doesn’t it say the tribulation will last 7 weeks but people say that means 7 years? If the earth burns like the sun . And one third of the trees and all the green grass. Burns Sounds like the movie Knowing So be in a steel building or lift a man hole cover and jump in. With your preps. It also says that if God didn’t stop it no flesh would be saved. Out of 6 billion people a million left alive would be almost no one left . So if it happened so fast you had to stop in the middle of the street lift a man hole cover jump in . Come up when the smoke cleared to your fire proof preps . You might be a one in a million.

      9. Not one word mentioned as to who are the actual enforcers of the worldwide capitalistic system, that being the US CIA, and they are winning. A revealing history of the 100% greed enforcement is at veteranstoday.com titled: Steve Kangas, Until You Know His Work, You Will Never Understand Who Is Behind Trump. Smith is probably on the CIA payroll for disinfo like most of what passes as legitimate news and opinion.

        • The globalists have no loyalties to the U.S. or the CIA. They merely run the U.S. and the CIA like franchises. Your understanding of the situation is limited. If I was CIA I think I would have a much larger savings account, but I do love it when the ignorant make assumptions about my affiliations because they don’t understand my position.

      10. Good article. I agree that the globalist are SOL and I believe they will continue to try to dominate all humans. They are high functioning psychopaths that are willing to commit any atrocity to get their way, so don’t underestimate them. These psychopaths have always and will always be part of us, technology enables them to luster for global control. Society has never created a solution to high functioning psychopaths, it is time to do so.

        • I wouldn’t doubt if they are at each others throats . Trying to steel each others money . Trying to protect themselves from each other . And they use us like pawns to get more and keep what they have. They obviously don’t believe there is a God that will hold them accountable. Or they think Satan will take them in and treat them good. Or they have inside information about aliens and that makes them think that their is no God. Maybe the aliens tell them that to get them to do things . And the aliens are Satan and his tricks. I read that Mary the women of means the rich women who knew Jesus was found after she died . Living in a hut penniless and everyone thought she was a man. The apostles many tortured to death . When all they had to say it was all a lie . And they would be freed. How could a regular man under extreme torture do that unless he was absolutely sure of a second life in heaven?

      11. Like the line in “Casino”, when the old crime bosses are deciding if Nicki should be wacked. Remo says “i figure, why take chances”.
        I hope i see the day these bastards are all hung from lamp posts, like Mussolini…..!!!

      12. It all comes back to the Tower of Babel. Mankind is evil, all he plans are evil continually, Hence the Flood, The world is able to understand each other, and the LORD came down to see what was up, and confused the language understanding, so that mankind could Not do what the Globalists want. One world control.
        There has to be something evil in men who are trying to bring Unity about or the GOD would not be continually doing his part to prevent it.
        As I see it, this is trying to stick your finger in the Eye of God and ask, What are you going to do about it?

      13. The threat of tyranny is a constant that will always be. The House of the Red Shield keeps it so. As they have for 300 years. I see how they run. Soon everyone will, be running that is, unless, yes, a surgical preemptive adventure intervenes. A peoples sword to the heart from the small minded, so to speak. “Ha, saw you coming you elite bastard. Tear down my world to build yours will ya”. But alas, I fear the time for preemption is passing away. With no redress tolerated, we have been outmaneuvered. Dead right we were. Just tell St Peter at the gate that this wasn’t supposed to happen and then hope he voted for Hillary.

        • ‘ello Gramps, I read somewhere that a house divided will fall. I’m hoping, praying that they will start scrapping amongst themselves… Just don’t wannabe anywhere close when they start.

      14. Interesting choice of picture… I am guessing “The Obsolete Man” episode of “The Twilight Zone”? Sadly, the compare and contrast between television shows of the 1960’s and today shows just how far we have fallen, both in terms of morality and of respect for the rights of the individual. This was made all too clear to me when they did a remake of “The Prisoner” and changed it around from being about the good of the individual to the good of the collective.

      15. Fuck Google fiber. Beware all ads that use the word opportunity over and over . Mindless twits love this horseshit.

      16. Some people don’t adhere to such absolutes or they think good and evil are fantasies created by religion to keep society in check.

        You have it all backwards.

        Good and evil are realities, based on the interaction between individual (non-telepathic LOL) beings. And based on entropy. We discover good and evil through centuries of trial and error. It has cost us millions of lives as a species to gain even our present meager understanding of it. And good and evil have the natural result of building or destroying societies.

        So, next time you feel like just tossing the concept out the window in favor of hedonism, realize that you are stating directly that you personally are more intelligent than the entire history of the human race.

        Yeah I doubt you are.

      17. The wielding of the term “populist” is about as sterilized and distant from “freedom and liberty” as you can get. It denotes not just “nationalism,” but selfish nationalism. And the association people are supposed to make in their minds is that selfish nationalism leads to destructive fascism (i.e. Nazis). Therefore, when you hear the term “populist,” the globalists hope you will think “Nazi.”

        You know I hate to break it to you but you completely assraped the Germans with the Treaty of Versailles. You expected no response? Even the US said “fuck this I’m out” to that particular treaty.

        If they weren’t such a bunch of delusional racist pricks… if they’d simply stopped at taking parts of Europe and consolidated… and hadn’t gone killing a bunch of civilians because of their race… would you really call them wrong?

        Ya kiiiinda brought it on yourselves you know.

        The civilians did NOT for sure but the European governments? Oh boy yeah they did.

        I guess it would have taken a leader that wasn’t a psychotic half-wit for it to come out any differently that it did… which is what makes Nazis Nazis… but dude I mean… something was gonna give there one way or another.

        (Globalists kinda get this. Here’s the problem: nuclear weapons. Ever stop to think that the reason they want absolute control is because they’re afraid Option B is pretty much an extinction level event…)

      18. Moral relativism requires a person to treat every scenario as a “gray area.” This is not practical. Conscience dictates that we treat every situation as potentially unique and act according to what we feel in our hearts is right given the circumstances. This does not mean, though, that there is no black and white; or that there are no concrete rules. There is almost always a black and white side to any situation dealing with right and wrong. Moral “dilemmas” are exceedingly rare. In fact, I don’t think I have ever encountered a real moral dilemma in history or in personal experience. The only time I ever see moral dilemmas is in movies and television.

        The most awesome part about moral dilemmas is you create them for yourself. I should know, I did. Generally it’s directly tied to the very same belief that everything is a grey area. Run with that too long and consequences start piling up, if you’re actually dealing with actual people in actual serious bad situations.

        Also you need to realize sometimes, when looking at a conflict between two people / groups… there is often not a “black vs white” dynamic. I find an astounding number of “black vs black” scenarios.

        You don’t always have to pick a side. Sometimes the right thing to do is to just leave it alone.

      19. This article has some good points and it flirts around with truth but never gets right to it. Listen up. We must look at the two great opposites that determine our freedom. Sovereign individuals vs manipulated masses. More detail found in reading The Valorian Society.
        It all centers around organization. Every organization given time will exist mainly to perpetuate the organization and benefit those at the top. Absorb that! We are a world of organizations. Most humans have become organization minded people the downfall of humanity. The antihuman psychopaths who control and abuse humanity can only do so by using the power and wealth of organization. Without controlling that centralized power of organization the psychopaths are nothing. All organizations centralize power. Usually it comes built in. The only way we can be free is to recognize the danger of organization then abhor and forbid organization. Organization and freedom are mutually exclusive. Think outside the box if you can shake some of the mind control.

        We continue doing the same things over and over expecting different results because we are a deeply mind controlled and insane people. Wake up. Organization minded people are the most dangerous people to our freedom and existence in the long run.

      20. Its a very well written article….. clarity and wisdom… i think the only point worth adding is that the globalist side of the equation is inherent in human beings, especially wealthy ones, to want to try to manipulate, control and nanny things along…..I’m not at all religious but the phrase “forgive them for they know not what they do” springs to mind….

        Essentially anyone who stands up and starts trying to implement ‘policy and laws’ for the greater good, is a hypocrite to be treated with suspicion…. it’s not that they are inherently or consciously evil, it’s simply likely they will be putting in place some kind of one rule for everyone else and no rules for me type scenario…. like communists and fascists tend to….. they are nothing more than school headmasters gone wrong…

        On the other hand the populist side of the equation is some what idealistic… I think it was Rupert Murdoch who said, “if a young man isn’t liberal minded he has no heart, but as he grows older if he’s not conservative minded he has no head”….

        People do need to be lead, but in a smaller tribal sense, even army units etc… they are lead by example….. not by laws and regulations…… thus the final piece of the puzzle that perhaps I can help you slide into place… is simply a demand to anyone who wants to lead… who the fuck are you ? and what have you ever accomplished in life ? We only follow people setting an example…

        People can only truly be led by example…. I expect 1/2 the world would vote for somelike Branson to be world president, because he actually accomplished things, he was the little guy and for whatever reason he actually moved forward and creatively bought things, developed businesses and went about trying to be not only better but also nicer than some of these faceless corporations….. bad example perhaps, but of all the billionaires at least he tried a little….. he seems like someone who is not desperately trying to cling onto his wealth in abject fear of losing it, because he had to steal it in the first place…. talent creates confidence whereas angling for advantage creates fear of loss…. most wealthy people are petrified of losing it… because it was some lucky break or inside hookup they got and it’s not easily repeated… they are also intoxicated with the power it brought them…. rather than appreciative of the hard work and development of their own talent and skill….

        The balance lies in choosing leaders that perhaps don’t actually want to lead…. business people, not academics, legal minds and career politicians…. simply demanding a burden of proof on anyone that wants to lead…. any one that wants to write a law or charge a tax, who the fuck are you and what have you ever accomplished on your own two feet…..

        ask this to clowns like Hillary, most of the senate and congress… and you find you have nothing at all of substance…. career do gooders, angling for power…. and this is where the problem really lies…… when you make a profession out of ass licking, ass covering and poking into other peoples fine details, it’s very easy to climb to the top of the pile….. because most people are too busy in real pursuits to be bothered….

        the world is basically turning into a giant version of Lord of Flies….. it’s like a high school gone wrong….. there’s really no one in charge… psycho prefects against the general population…… the teachers and elders long since left the building…..

        where the internet might have brought us all together it’s shoved us all into a lowest common denominator situation…. where the gossipy, connected, favoritism can rise and bully the shit out of everyone else……

        it’s quite simple mechanics when you dig into it a little more….. push aside some wild conspiracy theories…. unless aliens are harvesting pineal glands from babies, or some strange scifi shit we don’t know about (seems unlikely)… it’s really just a case of school bullies…. people that live in fear of losing what they have…. verses salt of the earth that have talents and know they don’t really need to build a enormous tower of ambition and power …. live and let live… verses kill or be killed…. basically….

      21. You may want to include the effect of uncertainty and randomness, as in Black Swan events.

        These come out of left field and can derail empires and the best laid plans…

        Nicholas Taleb also demonstrates that some things gain from disorder. Overt amounts of control do not ensure certainty, too much control typically over-optimises and creates fragility in systems.

      22. Without boring you with my dossier let me say that my personal feelings on Liberty sprang from a long and in depth study of early American frontiersman. Basically its just a suck it up and tough it out approach to life. I will take the hits and the struggles and be RESPONSIBLE for my own mistakes. Just don’t try to force yours on me lest you reap the consequences that the British did at Kings Mountain. The modern equivalency would be that if the Globalists, Communists, Fascists (name your own oppressors) say that they will come for us if we don’t do what they say that we reply, well hell, we aren’t going to wait for you WE ARE COMING FOR YOU!

      23. It will be quite a while before I believe our country will attempt total control. There are simply too many people they would be up against. On top of this do you really thing they will convince even half our military forces to fire upon or control their own people? We are talking about normal people our sons and daughters. Do you think your son would kill an innocent child or grandfather because he didnt stand down to the control? I could not imagine that and it would simply be too easy for 200 million U.S. citizens could not overpower our government if needed. They would need to use population control methods first, by killing 3/4 of the countries citizens they might succeed though!

        Sean Holland
        FREE Survival guides and training!

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.