“Zero References” to Wall Street Reform at GOP Debate As Candidates Talk Fantasy Football Instead

by Contributing Author | Oct 30, 2015 | Conspiracy Fact and Theory, Experts

Do you LOVE America?

    Share

    gop-2016-candidates

    This article was written by Michael Krieger and originally published at his Liberty Blitzkrieg website.

    Editor’s Comment: As Mark Twain said, “If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do it.” Politics is just entertainment to distract from the fact that Americans have been disenfranchised, and that their vote is powerless to change things.

    Candidates obviously don’t keep their political promises, but if they aren’t even bothering to make them in the first place, and sell voters on the idea that they might address big problems – like the dismal job opportunities and crumbling economy – than there is even less hope of the problem being fixed. Just keep shopping, and carry on…

    The American Banana Republic – GOP Debate Spent More Time Discussing Fantasy Sports than Wall Street Reform

    by Michael Krieger

    Fortunately for me, I don’t have cable so watching last night’s Republican debate was not even an option, despite the fact that the clownish spectacle was held right in my backyard of Boulder, Colorado. All indications are that I missed absolutely nothing of significance, which is far from surprising.

    However, one thing that I found interesting based on the post debate commentary of those who had the painful experience of watching it, was the fact that more time was spent discussing fantasy sports regulation, than Wall Street reform.

    As the New York Times notes:

    It’s easy to miss things when watching long, crowded presidential debates like the CNBC event on Wednesday night. So it can be good to go back to the transcript the next morning to verify one’s recollections.

    I looked for the discussion of how to regulate the financial sector that I must have somehow missed. I searched for “Too big to fail” and turned up one fleeting reference by Ben Carson. There were zero references to “Glass-Steagall,” the Depression-era banking law discussed extensively in the Democratic debate earlier in the month, or “Dodd-Frank,” the 2010 law meant to rein in risks in the financial sector.

    The transcript also revealed that I was not hallucinating when I saw a reasonably detailed discussion of whether the government should regulate “daily fantasy sports” sites — and learned that Jeb Bush’s fantasy football team is undefeated and is anchored by the Miami Dolphins quarterback Ryan Tannehill.

    And you wonder why the country is circling the toilet bowl.

    For related articles, see:

    The U.S. Department of Justice Handles Banker Criminals Like Juvenile Offenders…Literally

    Cronyism Pays – Eric “Too Big to Jail” Holder Triumphantly Returns to His Prior Corporate Law Firm Job

    Another Settlement – JP Morgan Receives Slap on the Wrist Despite Years of Fraudulent CFTC Data

    Video of the Day – Three Former U.S. Treasury Secretaries and a Facebook Executive Laugh About Income Inequality

    In Liberty,
    Michael Krieger

    URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report

    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles

      Comments

      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

      0 Comments

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.