What Collapsed the Middle Class?

by | Feb 12, 2021 | Headline News | 5 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by Charles Hugh Smith at Of Two Minds Blog. 

    The middle class has already collapsed, but thanks to debt and bubbles, this reality has been temporarily cloaked.

    What collapsed the middle class? In many ways the answer echoes an Agatha Christie mystery: rather than there being one guilty party, a number of suspects participated in the collapse of the middle class.

    Can we consolidate these dynamics into a few core causal factors? I’ve made the case in the past few posts that yes, we can: many of these causes are part of a single dynamic, the decapitalization of the middle class and the decay of the ladder of social mobility which enabled tens of millions of workers to transform their wages into productive capital via saving and investment in their own human capital, their own enterprises, and assets that earn income.

    The Top 10% Is Doing Just Fine, The Middle Class Is Dying on the Vine (2/4/21)

    The second primary dynamic is the substitution of debt and speculation for earned income and productive capital. As the purchasing power of the bottom 90%’s wages declines, the status quo has substituted debt for income and speculation for investing in productive capital.

    Debt and the Demise of the Middle Class (2/9/21)

    This dynamic incentivizes debt, speculation, and consumption rather than producing, savings and investments in human and productive capital. The source of this incentive structure is the maximization of corporate profits earned by banks loaning money to the middle class and by selling the middle class on superfluous consumption being the signifier of “success” rather than production being the signifier of “success”.

    In reality, what counts is agency (control of one’s life, having a voice in governance) and ownership of productive capital. Becoming a debt-serf to buy more stuff and grab a few chips in the speculative casino sacrifices both agency and the acquisition of productive capital. But this sacrifice is oh-so profitable to the financier purveyors of debt and speculative gambles in the casino.

    The third dynamic is globalization, and specifically the tyranny of global markets. Global banks and corporations are ideally placed to profit from the arbitrage of labor, environmental regulations, currencies, corruption (dear in some places, cheap in others), and the price of debt and risk.

    Wage-earners have no such leverage. In effect, all the risks of competition are eliminated for corporate monopolies and cartels while the risks are transferred to workers who face a global race to the bottom in wages, opportunity and income security.

    The fourth dynamic is speculative bubbles put many assets out of reach of the bottom 90% who have only their wages and savings. The winners in speculative bubbles are those fortunate enough to have bought homes, bonds, rental properties, land, etc. decades ago when a house could be had for three times median income and bonds paid solid, above-inflation returns.

    The bottom 90% attempting to find productive assets at affordable prices now are out of luck. Consider a 900 square foot home built in 1916 in the desirable San Francisco Bay Area community of Albany, CA. The house sold for $135,000 in 1996, 3.8 times the national median household income.

    Then Housing Bubble #1 boosted the value to $542,000 in 2004, 12.2 times the national median household income. Housing Bubble #2 has pushed the value to slightly over $1 million, 14.5 times the national median household income. Only those inheriting wealth (or who chose wealthy parents), those earning over $250,000 annually or speculators who just scored big gains in bitcoin or GameStop could afford this very small, modest house.

    That’s what speculative bubbles do to the middle class: they leave them behind forever. Those who bought 25 years ago entered the top 10% in wealth due to the bubblicious increase in the value of their home. A few winners in the casino who sold at the top might have edged into the top 10%, but the vast majority of gamblers in the casino cannot compete with the insiders, manipulators, and pros, so they lose ground. This is why the bottom 90% collect an insignificant 3% of all income from capital.

    Jay Taylor and I discuss The Upcoming Revolt of the Middle Class (22 min)

    These four primary dynamics manifest in the following ways. Each one helps generate a two-tier Neofeudal Economy of a Financial Aristocracy and its top 9.9% technocrat class who own virtually all the productive capital and the bottom 90%, a disenfranchised ALICE (assets limited, income constrained, employed) workforce.

    1. The shifting of pension and healthcare costs and risks from the state and employers to employees. (see chart below)

    2. The decline of safe, secure high-yielding investments as central banks have driven savers into risky, crash-prone speculative assets such as stocks and junk bonds.

    3. The decline of scarcity value in college diplomas that were once the ticket to middle-class security. How Many Slots Are Open in the Upper Middle Class? Not As Many As You Might Think (March 30, 2015).

    4. The inexorable rise in big-ticket costs: higher education, healthcare, and housing. Even as wages stagnate, these costs continue rising, claiming an ever-larger share of household incomes, leaving less to save/invest.

    5. The transition from a stable economy with predictable returns to a financialized boom-and-bust economy that wipes out middle-class wealth in the inevitable busts but does not rebuild it in the booms.

    6. The regulatory and administrative barriers to self-employment, forcing most of the workforce into wage-slavery and/or dependence on the state. Endangered Species: The Self-Employed Middle Class (May 2015).

    7. The rising exposure of the U.S. workforce to highly educated, lower-cost competing workforces in a globalized economy.

    8. The decline of labor’s share of the U.S. economy: the slice of the pie distributed to earned income has been declining for decades.

    9. The share of the earned-income slice going to the top 5% is rising.

    10. The wealth of the middle class is tied up in the family home, a non-income producing asset prone to the wild swings of housing bubbles and busts. Stagnation Nation: Middle-Class Wealth Is Locked Up in Housing and Retirement Funds (October 25, 2017).

    The middle class has already collapsed, but thanks to debt and bubbles, this reality has been temporarily cloaked. All bubbles pop and all excessive debt ends in default. When these inevitably occur, the reality can no longer be hidden.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Anyone sorta old like me can remember how things were back in the 1950s 60s 70s even the 80s. It was a in a different time a different galaxy,actually I believe America peaked out in the 50s and 60s for the middle class to have an outstanding standard of living,we were the envy of the rest of the world. But there were always the small percent of people sounding the alarm and warning to those who had ears to hear, i.e. the John Birch people and others etc etc. Who were always dismissed as crazies and wing nuts by the controlled media and the “Normies” But I must say even as a youngster I had an ear to hear and pondered in my heart and mind things I heard. And started seeing those things come to pass. As the decades flew by at an ever increasing speed. Someone born 10, 15 ,20 years ago have no idea how it once was,no fault of theirs though. It’s a torment to know and remember how it was,always not perfect but NOTHING like the present. I often wonder if people that passed away 50 ,75 ,or 100 years ago could see this nightmare world today what they would think.

      2. Health insurance? Why ANYONE would not look into health sharing plans (we use Liberty Health Share, but there are others) is beyond me. 1/3 of the price, better coverage. Go figure

      3. I read almost two-thirds of men aged 18 to 34 in the US presently intend to never marry. I don’t know how accurate the statistics are but some statisticians say it’s likely half of all males in the US under 35 will never marry. At least there’s one good trend. I think this contributes to a more beneficial society. I’m not married (and never will) and have all the female companionship that I have time for. Most women I’ve dated want a serious relationship and to eventually be married so I don’t tell them it won’t happen for me until I’m ready to break up the relationship, usually a 3 to 4 month relationship is my routine. All I have to do really is let them know them I had a vasectomy, it seems this angers a lot of them. Another good sign is more men are saying they don’t want kids. I agree with what women are saying, they say they want a career, and not depend on men, I’m good with that. If I was married I’d want a wife who has a career and is a workaholic. Guys, the world is your oyster, learn to take advantage of it.

        • Marriage is an outdated concept in today’s America.
          More and more people have decided that they don’t want to trade their freedom and independence away just so they can get married and be CONTROLLED by their spouse..
          The majority of married men today are not even in control of their own life because their wife is CONTROLLING their life for them..
          We’ve all seen it…

      4. “The second primary dynamic is the substitution of debt and speculation for earned income and productive capital.”

        No one, who has been to work with a champagne socialist, who knows or lives with one, believes that these people are competent to literally earn anything or to be productive — particularly, under structured time. It was a job appointment.

        Let’s assume that middle class job was for a state, financial interest, or caters to such a person. Then, who do you have left.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.