We Need a #MeToo Movement for Political Consent

by | Nov 7, 2019 | Headline News | 8 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by James Bovard at the Mises Institute. 

    The #MeToo movement is spurring millions of Americans to reconsider the meaning of consent in sexual relations. But there is another realm where far too much has been presumed because of often token gestures. Political consent is defined radically differently than the consent that people freely give in their daily lives.

    The Declaration of Independence enshrined the notion that government must possess “the consent of the governed.” Unfortunately, winning politicians often claim blank checks to define the hidden meaning behind citizens’ ballots. “Consenting” on Election Day is portrayed as pre-approving anything politicians dictate in the following years.

    Regardless if your candidate campaigned on a peace platform, you “consented” to any wars he might subsequently start or support. Regardless if your candidate promised to end federal crackdowns on marijuana, you “consented” to the Drug Enforcement Administration’s raids on medical cannibis cooperatives. Regardless if your candidate promised to end deficit spending, you “consented” to trillions of dollars of additional federal debt. Regardless if your candidate promised transparency and honesty, you consented to the government keeping millions of secrets and shrouding its worst abuses.

    Government agencies structure their policies to make even more absurd presumptions of “consent” in daily life.

    Because you traveled abroad, you supposedly consented to Department of Homeland Security agents examining and copying all the records on your cell phone or computer when you return to the United States. The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are fighting this policy in federal court but this Obama-era policy remains the law of the land.

    Because you bought an airline ticket, you supposedly consented to being pawed by a Transportation Security Administration agent, including an “enhanced patdown” that often includes vigorously groping Americans’ groins (regardless of TSA’s incompetence at discovering actual threats).

    Because you chose to use the Washington or New York subway, you have consented to a warrantless search of your backpack or purse by local police who receive a federal grant to conduct security theater performances.

    Because you drive on government roads, you supposedly consented to federally-funded license plate scanners compiling a dossier of when and where you travel. And for anyone who objects to federal, state, and local agencies tracking them at almost all times (including when they visit gun shows ), remember that “those who have nothing to hide have nothing to fear.”

    Presumed consent entitles government to do as politicians please. Because Americans “consented” to George W. Bush and Barack Obama’s presidential candidacies, their appointees authorized the National Security Administration to create massive databases compiling details on all the phone calls they made or received. In millions of cases, NSA also vacuumed up Americans’ emails and web browsing history. Even though presidents denied they were illegally spying on Americans, voters still presumably “consented.” Americans may be shocked in the coming months and years to learn of illegalities they purportedly “consented” to when Trump was elected.

    Political consent is defined these days as rape was defined a generation or two ago: people consent to anything which they do not forcibly resist. Anyone who does not stone city hall presumably consented to everything the mayor does. Anyone who does not jump the White House fence and try to storm into the Oval Office consents to all executive orders. Anyone who doesn’t assail the nearest federal office building consents to the latest edicts in the Federal Register. And if people do attack government facilities, then they are terrorists who can be justifiably killed or imprisoned forever.

    Ironically, the Founding Fathers proffered a notion of political consent much closer to what #MeToo activists are championing nowadays. The Bill of Rights provided bright lines which politicians were prohibited from crossing regardless of vote counts. The Bill of Rights was a sacred pledge that politicians admitted they had no right to censor the press, confiscate private firearms, suppress religion, or inflict cruel and unusual punishment on citizens. The fact that politicians routinely often violate Americans’ constitutional rights does not make the Bill of Rights any less binding.

    Regardless of the outcome of the midterm congressional elections, we should remember that members of Congress and the president took oaths promising to honor and defend the Constitution. In the same way that consenting to a dinner date does not entitle someone to bind and beat another person, consenting in a voting booth does not entitle politicians to ravage Americans’ rights. A strict adherence to the Bill of Rights is the surest way to reduce perils after Election Day.

    James Bovard is the author of ten books, including 2012’s Public Policy Hooligan, and 2006’s Attention Deficit Democracy. He has written for the New York TimesWall Street JournalPlayboyWashington Post, and many other publications.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. In organized American society there are black, Jewish, Hispanic, Asian, etc. organizations, institutions, special interest groups, associations, etc. They exist in the finance world, in the legal world, and in gov’t in the form of caucuses, quasi-secret influencers, and of course lobbyists. That’s fine, everyone has a right to have an advocate. Any group may have their own “mainstream” advocacy organization(s) except for people of white European heritage. To do so it would automatically be branded some type rabid anti-social hate group, no matter how benign.
        In reality, many of these so-called “mainstream” advocacy groups are indeed racist. Their mission is to not necessarily strive for equality and peaceful coexistence, but to minimize/eliminate white European society, heritage, values, identity, and culture. Some of these groups even strive to remove Christian values from society . They know that in denying a group the ability to associate and organize and maintain their identity weakens it. Their weapons consist of MSM, billionaires with social and political agendas, NGOs, a variety “civil rights” organizations (that publicly profess one philosophy but in reality nothing more than associations to establish their own supremacy), and the legal system itself.
        Besides trying to destroy everything European, the other thing they have in common is they actually despise democracy. They desire an authoritarian gov’t and censorship. This helps explain why “elites” encourage mass migration of third-world peoples into the US. It is because these immigrants are unaccustomed to civil rights and liberties.
        Despite claims by officialdom, gov’t has been co-opted by a cabal who seek to fracture, not unify the people (divide and conquer). The goal is subjugation, pure and simple.

        • Edith Bunker said, “I got three accounts of my own, in my name. My education for my grandson account, and my Christmas club account, and my magic potato cutter account. That’s mine, too.”

          Just don’t call it the kkk account.

      2. I look like Shrek, go out presentably, and show them I have a pulse. It’s pheromonal. Younger redheads, blondes, and brunettes have zero, political impediments. None.

        Maybe, I need to put ‘Paleo’, in front of it. If she’s not willingly chattel, you’re not a conservative, and neither is your political system.

      3. I like this blog. I have no complaints. Keep up the good work.

      4. “Consent” is a tool used by gov’t (al all levels), corporations, and other powerful entities to maintain power and advantages by keeping all inactions on their terms. You might say to keep the upper hand, to stay in the driver’s seat. This may be technically legal, after all they can merely say don’t use their product or service. But it grossly defies the spirit of the Constitution.
        Though you may not do anything illegal, if you try to play, but not on their terms, you can be arrested. This is just another way for powerful entities to maintain control by bypassing the Constitution. Gov’t and corporation frequently work mutually for each others benefit, this is fascism. Gov’t may not have the expertise or resources for something in particular, and corporations want more profit and special privileges. They work together to achieve their goals. The working people are always the ones who have the least say.

      5. And when you choose to stick your d*ck in a chick when she tells you she is 100% for sure on birth control (fo sho… wink)… you are presumably “consenting” to 18 years of child support payments.

        So turn that frown upside down. You want equality let’s see some.

      6. I have no complaints. I have no complaints. War is peace. Slavery is freedom.

      7. Just to be clear, I’m fully supportive of the “Free the Nipple Movement”. Just saying.

        Waiting for women to show up at the beach in mass saying they identify as male today and don’t want to wear a top, but they don’t do they…….

        Gender this gender that, it’s all a fraud, political games. Reality speaks volumes every time I go to the beach.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.