The Presence of a Virus Does NOT Mean “Disease:” PCR Testing Scheme EXPOSED as Total Science Fraud

by | Dec 16, 2021 | Headline News | 11 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News. 

    Many people are still unaware of this, but the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is not an accurate tool for detecting the presence of this alleged “virus” inside people’s bodies. Not only that, but the presence of a virus does not equate to the presence of disease, despite what the government claims.

    The Brownstone Institute put together an excellent paper about this subject that exposes the PCR testing scheme as a fraud.

    Before the PCR test was invented in 1983, scientists had to wait for viruses to grow naturally in order to identify them. PCR technology changed all this by rapidly multiplying very small amounts of viral DNA in an exponential series of heating and cooling cycles.

    The process is fully automated and only takes about an hour. The problem is that it can be tuned (i.e. misused) to pick up things that are not necessarily there.

    “PCR revolutionised molecular biology but its most notable application was in genetic fingerprinting, where its ability to magnify even the smallest traces of DNA became a major weapon in the fight against crime,” the paper explains.

    “But, like a powerful magnifying glass or zoom lens, if it’s powerful enough to find a needle in a haystack it’s powerful enough to make mountains out of molehills.”

    PCR test inventor vehemently opposed to using it to diagnose diseases

    Even Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test and winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, recognized this. He went so far as to warn against using his PCR test to try to diagnose disease.

    “PCR is a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something,” Mullis stated. “It allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it like it’s important.”

    In other words, PCR tests should never have been used to try to diagnose people with “covid.” And yet this is what health authorities all around the world have been doing, deceiving and enslaving the public in the process.

    It turns out that the PCR test can be calibrated to a cycle count so high that it will pick up pretty much anything and render someone “positive.” This is exactly what happened with covid, especially in areas with low rates of mask-wearing and vaccine-taking.

    If the government wanted to make it seem like masks were working to “stop the spread,” then it would cycle down the PCR tests in areas of high compliance – and vice versa.

    The other thing to keep in mind is that trace amounts of “covid,” assuming it even exists, would not be the same kind of threat as large amounts of covid. And yet the PCR test when applied in this manner sees no difference between small or large quantities of whatever it is that is being tested.

    “Bacteria and viruses are different from other toxins, but the principle is the same,” Brownstone says. “Because they multiply and increase their dose with time, maximum permissible doses need to be based on the minimum dose likely to start an infection, known as the Minimum Infective Dose (MID).”

    “PCR tests magnify the number of target DNA particles in a swab exponentially until they become visible. Like a powerful zoom lens, the greater the magnification needed to see something, the smaller it actually is.”

    There is currently no standard measure of viral load in clinical samples. There is also no way to reproduce PCR test results because the nucleic acid target (the pathogen of interest), platform, and format all differ.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. This article completely ignores the process of validation and misstates several points to support a bogus argument. Stop spreading misinformation.

        • This usually what happens when a website is chasing monetary clicks.

        • Is that lying or just ignorantly repeating lies?

      2. the easily manipulated PCR test are the widget that technocrats dream of.

        If the superstates in 1984, Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia, are conceptualized as the end game of biological warfare rather than nuclear; the emergence of technocratic ,totalitarian, surveillance states becomes mandatory by default.
        What i mean is if imagined ….the technocrats are hardly subservient to the generals of virological genocide , but the other way around.

        What is of monumental importance now is determining if the Wuhan bsl-4 leak (Eastasia) was reactionary or unconsionable negligence.
        Was it the overt provocation by Oceania slated to take place in the time span 2025-2028 that instigated a Eastasia countermeasure?
        Or was this the best worst case scenario that could be hoped for under the circumstances?

        You be the judge.
        Medical Mein Kampf > completed Oct 2017
        Link below

        Ht tps://

      3. The immune system prevents disease by killing off virus and bacteria before it makes a person sick and symptoms develop.

        Except for Covid.

        In the case of Covid you are sick even if this happens no matter whether the immune system responds as it should and kills off the virus before it makes you sick and symptoms develop.

        I’m not sure why, but science reassures me this is the case and I have no scientific credentials to credibly dispute it so I just have to accept it as truth.

      4. PCRtesta are junk and quite inaccurate. How many people have been treated for covid or gotten shots that had inaccurate results They have been found to be 40% wrong are supposed to be replaced with a new test this month.

      5. PCR tests are misused (on purpose) to prove a negative. HIV is a retrovirus. It does nothing, by itself, to have a negative effect on human health. In fact, HIV and the human autoimmune system get along just fine. Just because a human has HIV, that doesn’t mean they have a disease. Coronavirus’ are easily treated (much like influenza). The PCR test is amplified to detect viral material from a PAST viral infection. It CANNOT identify a particular virus because the viral material detected are in pieces from the original virus, therefore cannot be attributed to a known virus (much like a jigsaw puzzle with most of the pieces missing). Any body that tells you different is a Faucian liar.

      6. FYI…

        Kroger, by the way, operates grocery stores under many different names depending on the state. These include Ralphs, Dillons, Smith’s, King Soopers, Fry’s, QFC, City Market, Owen’s, Jay C, Pay Less, Baker’s Gerbes, Harris Teeter, Pick ‘n Save, Metro Market, Mariano’s and Fred Meyer.

      7. PCR tests for the virus are not accurate, yet PCR DNA tests to determine if someone committed a murder and should be executed are 100% accurate?

        Because that seems to be what is being claimed here…or are they saying the PCR test used in criminal forensics is no good either? Can’t have it both ways. It’s the same test.

        • gees, get a life.
          PCR tests can confirm the PRESENCE of something. It does this through multiplying.
          So, it can find a strand of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, but ALL that tells you is that a FRAGMENT of the virus exists in/on you. It tells you nothing about whether the fragment is viable, whether you’re infectious, whether its a past infection or current infection. It would NOT qualify as being counted as a CASE (there’s a high likelihood you could PCR test yourself for tens of thousands of other viruses and they’d all come back positive, it does NOT mean you have any of those diseases).

          For criminal forensics, in the same way PCR can tell IF someone’s DNA is present at a scene.
          It can’t tell HOW it got there either, or whether the owner’s DNA murdered anyone (however its hard to explain the presence of your DNA on a dead body if you have no relation to that person).

          • So it can’t determine if you are infectious or not. It guess it can determine you had a virus at some point. That is all the test is supposed to do.

            Guilty of virus carrying. Sentenced to a mask and a vaxx. Take him away.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.