A report from Alex Thomas of The Intel Hub should leave no doubt that we may soon see a wide-scale terrorist attack on US soil:
Al Hallor, the assistant port director and an officer with Customs and Border Protection has openly admitted that an unnamed government agency has found a nuclear weapon or weapon of mass effect at a U.S. port in the last year!
That’s right, an assistant port director has spilled the beans on a possible major government cover up. During the conversation the port authority press agent continually interrupted the officer in an attempt to get him to shut up.
Excerpt from the video report that follows:
So, specifically, you’re looking for the dirty bomb? You’re looking for the nuclear device? asked Blacher.
Correct. Weapons of mass effect, Hallor said.
You ever found one?, asked Blacher. Not at this location, Hallor said.
But they have found them? asked Blacher.Yes, said Hallor.
Video Reports from News 10 San Diego:
One could argue that Mr. Hallor’s response to the question of whether a “weapon of mass effect” has ever been found neither confirms nor denies that such an event occurred. However, Mr. Hallor’s mannerisms, body language and speech suggest that an agency of the US government has, indeed, found a weapon of mass destruction entering the United States in the very recent past.
Recent reports from a Wikileak indicate that the “world stands on the brink of a nuclear 9/11” as rogue organizations are attempting to, and in some cases, have already acquired materials to build dirty and/or nuclear bombs. Curiously, the news story regarding a terrorist threat with the potential to kills tens of thousands, perhaps millions of people, quickly disappeared from mainstream reports within hours of it hitting the news wires during the Egyptian riots. The Vancouver Sun details several threats facing not only Western nations, but soldiers on battlefields in Afghanistan and other theaters.
Thousands of classified American cables obtained by the WikiLeaks website and passed to The Daily Telegraph detail the international struggle to stop the spread of weapons-grade nuclear, chemical and biological material around the globe.
At a Nato meeting in January 2009, security chiefs briefed member states that al-Qaida was plotting a program of “dirty radioactive IEDs”, makeshift nuclear roadside bombs that could be used against British troops in Afghanistan.
The briefings also state that al-Qaida documents found in Afghanistan in 2007 revealed that “greater advances” had been made in bioterrorism than was previously realized. An Indian national security adviser told American security personnel in June 2008 that terrorists had made a “manifest attempt to get fissile material” and “have the technical competence to manufacture an explosive device beyond a mere dirty bomb”.
Alerts about the smuggling of nuclear material, sent to Washington from foreign U.S. embassies, document how criminal and terrorist gangs were trafficking large amounts of highly radioactive material across Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
While it is likely much easier to transport these types of materials throughout Europe, the Middle East and Africa, there are no doubt attempts to achieve the same in North America. If Assistant Director Hollar is to be believed, then weapons of mass destruction have already been found entering the United States at our ports.
There’s also the issue of the 2000 mile unsecured southern border.
Another story buried under the information rubble of the Egyptian protests was that of leading Muslim cleric Said Jaziri. The controversial figure is known to oppose American values and called for the killing of Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard because he drew pictures of the prophet Mohammed. As it turns out, Cleric Jaziri was recently caught being smuggled into the United States over the Mexico-US border. Perhaps Jaziri was seeking asylum as he claims, but the point is that 100 other extremists may have made it across. All it takes is one with a dirty bomb or suitcase nuke.
This threat is real, it’s present, and it can be realized at any time. We’re not talking about the Cuban missile crisis here, where both parties involved knew each other’s capabilities and had the ability to negotiate peace. We’re talking about factions determined to strike targets for whatever sinister goals make up their agenda – be they Islamic extremist in nature or something else.
Alex Thomas at The Intel Hub suggests that we could be looking at the possibility of a false flag attack orchestrated by shadow elements within top Western nations – something that has happened throughout the last hundred years for various reasons and includes everything from assassinations of Presidents and Monarchs (Archduke Ferdinand, et al.) as well as staging attacks that eventually took nations to war (Gulf of Tonkin, et al.) :
This appears to be some sort of pathological mind game that certain elements of our government are using on the people, almost as if they are getting us ready for the reality of a nuclear attack in America.
Whatever the case may be, understand that any major American city is a potential target, and any such attack on US soil would lead to complete and total chaos throughout the United States and the rest of the world resulting in the real possibility of worst-case scenarios: food transportation systems being frozen, banking systems out of service, emergency personnel being unavailable, and even global war, to name just some.