Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: “Not A Valid Representation Of Reality… Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data”

by | Jul 14, 2017 | Headline News | 140 comments

Do you LOVE America?



    As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

    According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:

    In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.

    As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.

    The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.

    Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings. (Full Abstract Report)

    Of course, this won’t stop global climate normalcy deniers from saying it’s all one big conspiracy to destroy the earth. They’ll naturally argue that data adjustments to the temperatures need to be made for a variety of reasons, which is something the report doesn’t dispute. What it does show, however, is that these “adjustments” always prove to be to the upside. Always warmer, never cooler:

    While the notion that some “adjustments” to historical data might need to be made is not challenged, logically it would be expected that such historical temperature data adjustments would sometimes raise these temperatures, and sometimes lower them. This situation would mean that the impact of such adjustments on the temperature trend line slope is uncertain. However, each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.

    In short: The evidence has been falsified.

    Karl Denninger sums it up succinctly:

    It is therefore quite-clear that the data has been intentionally tampered with.

    Since this has formed the basis for plans to steal literal trillions of dollars and has already resulted in the forced extraction of hundreds of billions in aggregate for motorists and industry this quite-clearly constitutes the largest economic fraud ever perpetrated in the world.

    I call for the indictment and prosecution of every person and organization involved, asset-stripping all of them to their literal underwear.

    The real data looks something like this:


    And the establishment, along with their fanatical global warming myrmidons, continue to push the need for massive, costly initiatives to reduce green house gases and global temperatures to “normal” levels.

    The problem, of course, is that there is no global warming according to the above referenced report.

    Moreover, none of those supporting the Paris Climate Agreement and other initiatives have any idea what these behemoth regulations will actually do to curb climate change, as evidenced by the following video of Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine, who despite his best efforts, can’t seem to figure out exactly how these agreements actually lower temperatures and help Americans:


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. I like the idea that the left is melting down and not the polar ice caps!!! LOL

        • Climate change was always about control. As the left loose there grip on control they will become more and more violent and radical.

          In 2016 California wanted to prosecute climate change deniers. The bill did not pass, but they sure as hell tried.

          SB-1161 Statutes of limitation: California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016.

          ht tp://

          • If the oceans are rising, then quit building on the edge of the ocean so you get flooded. How difficult is it for the left to understand basic physics.

            I used to live by the Gulf in FL and my house’s first floor was just 8 ft above sea level. How did I fix that problem of rising oceans? I sold the house and moved to higher ground of 45 Ft. I did not send China or India $3 Billion Dollars to keep the oceans from rising. Trump was 100% correct for pulling out of the Paris Sham Climate treaty. Thank you Mr President.

            Next thing you know the left will try to tax us for the wind blowing. The Mayor in the Video needs to be hung and beaten like a Mexican Pinata’ for being ignorant and dumb as a brick. These are the idiots that running the cities of America into the ground, and all by design to create the biggest welfare state on the planet. WTF?

            • Attention Folks, If you see these Bogus articles floating around out there, about how bad Solar is for the environment, that Solar produces a lot of pollution, it is the massive attack on the Solar Industry from the Nuclear Plant folks trying to take the focus off of themselves for their own Global disasters from Fukashima, Chernobal, 3 Mile Island, etc.

              They are trying to connect the fallacies that Solar electronics will eventually get dumped into waste dumps and that the components leach toxins into the environment. Its their only link, to try and paint Solar Energy as harmful to the environment.

              But in fact the Nuke Industry is Frightened to death they will be Obsolete soon and Thanks to the implosion of Safer Solar Panels on the Market today, that is now down to Pennies per Watt for Power. But the Nuke Industry fails to realize the public is smarter, and we know BS when we see it, and that it will take millions of years for the Nuke Radio Active byproduct Waste to break down to safe levels.

              Just a heads up, and go beyond just reading the scary headlines the Nuke Industry is producing against Solar. Seek out the real facts of their bogus claims.

              Every day when I go to bed at night and look at my fully battery bank charged levels, like 12.8 Volts going into night and running my fans and fridge all night on the banked electricity produced from the daily sun, I thank the Solar Industry for their outstanding Technology.

              Have you ever seen any solar plant create a massive disaster like Fukashima? Their Bogus claims are laughable.

              • Mind boggling isnt it, almost as bad as these assholes going after cow farts and agricultural runoff.

                  • KY Mom:

                    When the sun is active, I prefer to stay inside.

                    Thanks for the video.


                  • The solar storm should be hitting by the 17th, and the increase in earthquakes could be any time between now and then. We’re already at a heightened state of unrest with the deep earthquake events.

                    Watch mimic tpw for solar flares to hit the earth. See an example of what an X class flare looks like here at the 55:30 mark:

                    7/15/2017 — Seismic unrest spreading — This coming week should see noteworthy earthquake activity

                    • The biggest flares are known as “X-class flares”, based on a classification system that divides solar flares according to their strength. The smallest ones are A-class, then B, C, M, and X. Each letter is a 10-fold increase in energy, similar to the Richter scale for earthquakes. An X -class flare is ten times an M, and 100 times a C. Within each letter class there is a scale from 1 to 9, just like the Richter scale.

                      Link for mimic tpw:
                      SSMI/SSMIS/AMSR2-derived Total Precipitable Water – Global
                      h ttp://

                    • Sarge,

                      Thank you for the additional links and information!

                    • Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming … BY JIM HANSEN, THE WORLD’S FOREMOST CLIMATE SCIENTIST–

                      Please check it out at Amazon!!!!!

              • What’s bogus, is your continuing IGNORANT bloviations and BS,CSS. Just more from the great and all-knowing cracks sum skulls. Too bad he doesn’t crack some books and actually get some intelligence. As if the rest of us people reading this blog want to read this twit and his comments on every single article

              • crack cum?

            • That is why I live in Dade City, FL which has the highest elevation in the state.

              • Yep Hates Liberals, That area is getting close to where I live in FL. Went for the Highest elevation area. I looked at a lot of FL State Elevation Maps when I was looking for my BOL property and did my own research years ago.

                Also to let you know, get your Sandbags Filled ASAP. I just filled another 40 bags.

                If you were wondering, 1 full Cubic Yard of Sand will fill approximately 60 Sand Bags. Plus or minus about 3-4 bags consistently.

                I use sand bags for stabilizing the foundation blocks my building sit on. And also for a few cover positions for shooting if there is an attempt to over run my BOL position in a collapse. Sand bags are a great bullet stopper up to a .50 Cal Bullet. Get these all filled and in position now, just in case. And of course you know sandbags can be used for stopping flooding like a sand bag dam, because that gosh darn global warming boogie man will flood us all, any day now.

              • I live in Casper Wyo when I can Ocean fish from my front door I’ll start to worry. 45 ft is about the grade out of my grocery store’s parking lot.

          • “Unfortunately, climate science has become political science…: “It is tragic that some perhaps well-meaning but politically motivated scientists who should know better have whipped up a global frenzy about a phenomenon which is statistically questionable at best.”” Award-winning Princeton physicist Dr. Robert Austin, member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, speaking to Senate minority staff March 2, 2009.

            Dr. Willam Gray, Colorado State Univ. noted AGW is “the greatest scientific hoax of all time.”

            “Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science.” Prof. Martin Keeley, University College of London, cited from Newsmax Magazine March, 2010, p. 52

            Dr. Patrick Moore, an ecologist and the co-founder of Greenpeace, also has said “We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science,” while Dr. Will Happer physicist at Princeton Univ, who has stated “Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense,” at a Texas Public Policy Foundation meeting. Happer, Dr. Richard Lindzen of MIT and others at this meeting said claims of the hottest year on record are “nonsense” because there’s so much uncertainty surrounding surface temperature readings — especially since scientists often make lots of adjustments to weather station readings

            In 2014, famed astronaut Walt Cunningham went to that year’s global warming UN climate Summit and called the whole AGW gambit “one of the biggest frauds in the field of science.”

            Dr. Lennart Bengtsson, a leading Swedish meteorologist, withdrew from membership in the Global Warming Policy Foundation, citing unbearable group pressure to conform to the AGW hypothesis, which threatened his ability to work and even his safety. Similarly, climate statistics professor Dr. Cliff Rossiter wrote in the WSJ that global warming was “unproved science,” he was terminated form his 23 year fellowship at the liberal Inst. for Policy Studies (see article by Climate Depot,

            NASA and NOAA, which get a half billion dollars a year from the government, “have been systematically fiddling the worldwide temperature for years, making ‘global warming; look worse than it is.: Joe D’Aleo, American Meteorology Society fellow,

            Dr. Anastasios Tsonis of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee said the global temperature “has flattened and is actually going down. We are seeing a new shift toward cooler temperatures that will last for probably about three decades.”

            “The difference between a scientist and propagandist is clear. If a scientist has a theory, he searches diligently for data that might contradict it so that he can test it further or refine it. The propagandist carefully selects only the data that agrees with his theory and dutifully ignores any that contradicts it. The global warming alarmists don’t even bother with data! All they have are half-baked computer models that are totally out of touch with reality and have already been proven to be false.” Martin Hertzberg, a retired Navy meteorologist with a PhD in physical chemistry

            “If temperatures continue to stay flat or start to cool again, the divergence between the models and recorded data will eventually become so great that the whole scientific community will question the current theories.” Dr. Nicola Scafetta, Duke University Heartland Inst. confirms this by noting “The IPCC’s climate science assessment is dominated by a small clique of alarmists who frequently work closely with each other outside the IPCC process.”

            “ Like many others, I was personally sure that CO2 is the bad culprit in the story of global warming. But after carefully digging into the evidence, I realized things are far more complicated than the story told to us by many climate scientists or the stories regurgitated by the media.” Dr. Nir Shariv who also notes that “solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th century global warming” and greenhouse gases are largely irrelevant to the climate, stating if the amount of C02 doubled by 2100, it “will not dramatically increase the global temperature….” And “Even if we havle the C02 output, and the CO2 increates by 2100 would be, say, a 50% increase relative to today instead of a doubled amount, the expected reduction in the rise of global temperature would be less than 0.5C. This is not significant” Dr. Nir, Shariv, top astrophysicist and assoc. professor at Hebrew Univ.

            “Dr. Harold Lewis, on resigning from the American Physical Society stated about ClimateGate (exposing the outright fraud behind AGW), said he “found fraud on a scale I have never seen” and stated the money flood has become the raison d’etre of much of physics research. He concluded “The global warming scam with the (literally) millions of dollars driving it… has carried the APS before it like a rogue wave.” http://tinyurl.com293enhl

            “‘There is this mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing,’ John Fyfe, Canadian climate modeler and lead author of the new paper, told Nature. ‘We can’t ignore it.’ And echoing this in a related blog post, “‘Reality has deviated from our expectations – it is perfectly normal to try and understand this difference,’ Ed Hawkins, co-author of the study and United Kingdom climate scientist”

            “I do not accept the premise of anthropogenic climate change, I do not accept that we are causing significant global warming and I reject the findings of the IPCC and its local scientific affiliates….I would happily debate the science with any member opposite but I know they are too gutless to take me on.”
            – Dr. Dennis Jensen, only science Ph.D. in Australian parliament
            (Note: William Kininmonth, former head of climate research at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology also disagrees with the global warmers)

            “Today’s debate about global warming is essentially a debate about freedom. The environmentalists would like to mastermind each and every possible (and impossible) aspect of our lives.”
            – Former Czech president Vaclav Klaus, in Blue Planet in Green Shackles

            “I want to …talk about … the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. … “Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results…“There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. … .” … Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E = mc². Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.”
            – Dr. Michael Crichton in a speech at the California Institute of Technology, cited from

            – Atmospheric scientist Dr. Chris Walcek is a professor at the University at Albany in NY and a Senior Research Associate at the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center who studies the relationship of pollutants within the atmosphere. Walcek is also a skeptic of man-made global warming fears. “10,000 years ago we were sitting under 2,000 feet of ice right here. It looked like Antarctica right here. And then over a one to two thousand year period, we went into today’s climate and the cause of that change is not, well, nobody has a definitive theory about why that happened,” Walcek said according to an article. In a separate interview, Walcek expanded on his climate skepticism and accused former Vice President Al Gore of having “exaggerated” part of his film. “A lot of the imagery like hurricanes and tornados. And as far as tornados go, there is no evidence at all that tornados are affected. And a recent committee of scientists concluded that there isn’t a strong correlation between climate change and hurricane intensity. A lot of people are saying we’re going to see more Katrina’s and there’s just not much evidence of that. We have had strong hurricanes throughout the last hundred years and we’re probably going to have strong hurricanes once in a while,” Walcek said. “We are over-due for an ice-age if you look at the geological records, we have had a period of not having a thousand feet of ice sitting here in Albany” New York, he added.

            Atmospheric scientist and hurricane expert Dr. Christopher W. Landsea NOAA’s National Hurricane Center who served as a UN IPCC as both an author and a reviewer and has published numerous peer-reviewed research noted that recent hurricane activity is not linked to man-made factors. According to an article in Myrtle Beach Online, Landsea explained that “the 1926-1935 period was worse for hurricanes than the past 10 years and 1900-1905 was almost as bad.” Landsea asserted that it is therefore not true that there is a current trend of more and stronger hurricanes. “It’s not a trend, it’s a cycle: 20-45 years quiet, 20-45 years busy,” Landsea said. He did say that a warming world would only make hurricanes “5 percent stronger 100 years from now. We can’t measure it if it’s that small.” The article said Landsea blamed Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, for “persuad[ing] some people that global warming is contributing to hurricane frequency and strength.” Landsea, who was both an author and a reviewer for the IPCC’s 2nd Assessment Report in 1995 and the 3rd Assessment Report in 2001, resigned from the 4th Assessment Report after becoming charging the UN with playing politics with Hurricane science. “I am withdrawing because I have come to view the part of the IPCC to which my expertise is relevant as having become politicized. In addition, when I have raised my concerns to the IPCC leadership, their response was simply to dismiss my concerns,” Landsea wrote in a public letter. “My view is that when people identify themselves as being associated with the IPCC and then make pronouncements far outside current scientific understandings that this will harm the credibility of climate change science and will in the longer term diminish our role in public policy,” he continued. “I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound,” Landsea added.

            Meteorologist Justin Berk asserted that the “majority of TV meteorologists” are skeptical of dire man-made global warming claims. Berk said in an article in The Jewish Times, “I truly believe that global warming is more political than anything else. It’s a hot topic. It grabs people’s interest. As a meteorologist, I have studied this a lot and I believe in cutting down pollution and in energy efficiency. But I have a hard time accepting stories how we as individuals can stop climate change. It has happened on and off throughout history. We produce pollution but that is a small piece of the entire puzzle.” Berk continued: “There are cycles of hurricanes and we had a 30-year cycle from the 1930s to the 1950s. Then from the mid-1960s to the 1990s there was low hurricane activity. We knew there would be another round of higher activity in hurricanes and now it’s happening. [But people have] latched onto this topic and it’s been distorted and exploited. I know that a lot of scientists, including the majority of TV meteorologists, agree with me. In the mid-1970s, climate experts said we were heading for an ice age. Thirty years later, they’re saying global warming. If you look at the big picture, we’ve had warming and cooling throughout history. It’s a natural cycle. We haven’t created it and it’s not something we can stop.”

            CNN Meteorologist Rob Marciano compared Gore’s film to “fiction” in an on air broadcast. When a British judge ordered schools that show Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth to include a disclaimer noting multiple errors in the film, Marciano applauded the judge saying, “Finally, finally.” Marciano then added, “The Oscars, they give out awards for fictional films as well.” Marciano specifically critiqued Gore for claiming hurricanes and global warming were linked.

            Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review:
            Briggs, a visiting Mathematics professor at Central Michigan University and a Biostatistician at New York Methodist Hospital, has a new paper coming out in the peer-reviewed Journal of Climate which finds that hurricanes have not increased in number or intensity in the North Atlantic. Briggs, who has authored numerous articles in meteorological and climatological journals, has also authored another study looking at tropical cyclones around the globe, and finds that they have not increased in number or intensity either. Briggs expressed skepticism about man-made global warming fears in 2007. “There is a lot of uncertainly among scientists about what’s going on with the climate,” Briggs wrote to EPW. “Most scientists just don’t want the publicity one way or another. Generally, publicity is not good for one’s academic career. Only, after reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing scientists skeptical of man-made climate fears to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet,” Briggs explained. “It is well known that weather forecasts, out to, say, four to five days, have skill; that is, they can beat just guessing the average. Forecasts with lead times greater than this have decreasing to no skill,” Briggs wrote. “The skill of climate forecasts—global climate models—upon which the vast majority of global warming science is based are not well investigated, but what is known is that these models do not do a good job at reproducing past, known climates, nor at predicting future climates. The error associated with climate predictions is also much larger than that usually ascribed to them; meaning, of course, that people are far too sure of themselves and their models,” he added. Briggs also further explained the inadequacies of climate models. “Here is a simplified version of what happens. A modeler starts with the hypothesis that CO2 traps heat, describes an equation for this, finds a numericalapproximate solution for this equation, codes the approximation, and then runs the model twice, once at ‘pre-industrial’ levels of CO2, and once at twice that level, and, lo!, the modeler discovers that the later simulation gives a warmer atmosphere! He then publishes a paper which states something to the effect of, ‘Our new model shows that increasing CO2 warms the air,’” Briggs explained. “Well, it couldn’t do anything *but* show that, since that is what it was programmed to show. But, somehow, the fact the model shows just what it was programmed to show is used as evidence that the assumptions underlying the model were correct. Needless to say—but I will say it—this is backwards,” he added.

            Meteorologist and hurricane expert Boylan Point, past chairman of the American Meteorological Society’s broadcast board, a retired U.S. Navy Flight meteorologist with Hurricane Hunters and currently a forecaster with WSBB in Florida, dissented from the view that man-made CO2 is driving a climate disaster. “A lot of folks have opinions in which they have nothing to back them up with. Mr. [Al] Gore I think may well fit into that category,” Point said in an interview on “To lay the whole thing [global warming] at one doorstep [CO2] may be a bit of a mistake,” Point explained. Point is a pioneer in the study of hurricanes, having logged thousands of hours flying through the storms taking critical measurements during his U.S. Navy career.

          • IF 97% OF THE WORLD’S FOREMOST SCIENTISTS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD are saying that IT IS HAPPENING– which is the case– then what does it matter if about 4 pseudo-scientists say its not happening? (Who, by the way, just happened to be on the payroll of Exxon Mobile)!!– as are all the congressmen who say its not happening…

            I know the facts, I studied it for years, and the few who say its not happening “just happen to be paid by the fossil fuel industry”. In leaked emails, they told the politicians to say “the science is not yet decided– to cast doubt in the public’s minds”… that was their strategy and its worked quite well.

            If you received billions of dollars per day from fossil fuel extraction, would you want some scientists destroying your profits by warning about the consequences of burning fossil fuels?

            • If you did a bit of homework on the source of the 97% and just what it purports to represent, you might find that it comes from a single person, an Australian website developer named John Cook who, on the side, runs a website An article by Alex Epstein in Jan 6, 2015 entitled “97% of Climate Scientists Agree is 100% wrong” questions just what the 97% actually refers to, and then answers the question with reference to an article by David Henderson at where, with different evaluation criteria of the same 1300 papers, only 1.6% are found to actually support what the general public is led to believe that the 97% means. Cook and a helper attempt to defend the 97% amongst the article’s comments. These days you need to do your own research rather than just believe the mainstream media, which tends to be a mouthpiece for “the establishment” as supported by Progressives, both of whose motives are not always transparent.

        • Repubics don’t want to consider the possibility of a warming climate-too far fetched, but they will prostrate themselves to the belief that there are rogue planets wanting to destroy all life on earth.

          Real science to much to bear for those on the right.

          • Frank, with all due respect, see the peer scientists reviewed above, including Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof of atmospheric science, MIT, Dr. William Gray, the #1 hurricane forecaster in the world, and John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, all of whom have called AGW “a scam.”

            The staggering mind-boggling anti-science ignorance of you leftists who come on here and post-and-run because you are too anti-science to actually debate, is staggering.

            You are truly a fraud. Frank. Oh yeah. Science has NEVER been decided by “consensus,” of which there is none anyway. I realize you leftists here are too ignorant to have heard of these people, but re. “consensus,” ask Copernicus, Galileo, Einstein – against whom Hitler published “100 Scientists Agains Einstein”, and to which Einstein famously replied “Why 100? If the facts are right only ONE is needed,” or perhaps Ignaz Semmelweis who was drummed out the medical biz in the 1800s after insisting his docs wash their hands between operations, but was drummed out as the “consensus” as that germs didn’t exist.

            You sir, are typical of the anti-science, arrogant-yet-ignorant leftists who come on this site, post and run. But thanks for posting. It is important for the world to see just how utterly ignorant and close-minded the left is. Your post is the perfect exemplar of that.

            • TEST, in all due respect, Lindzen is a well known climate change denier, who happens to be on the payroll of Exxon Mobile. I saw the data, which has now been taken off the Internet, of Exxon Mobile’s “payees”.

              Around 97% of the best respected scientists from ALL OVER THE WORLD ALL AGREE THAT IT IS HAPPENING. THERE IS NO DEBATE, AS FAR AS THE REPUTABLE SCIENTIST ARE CONCERNED. There may be 1-2 REAL SCIENTISTS who disagree, but that is all… the rest of the deniers are pseudo-scientists who have never even had peer-reviewed work because their work is so inferior in quality.

            • TEST– Weather IS NOT THE SAME THING AS CLIMATE!!!! If some TV “weatherman” says its not happening, like who gives a f–? Weathermen DO NOT HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS OF CLIMATE SCIENTISTS!!!

              Its like having your foot doctor pull your teeth!

              My daughter recently became a nurse. There are nurses aids who work at the hospital as well. Would you take the word of the nurse’s aid ABOVE THE DOCTORS’ WORDS???

          • Good ol fascist left Frank.I don’t consider the possibility of warming because, Einstein, it **was warmer during the MWP***. Of course, you, in your staggering ignorance, have no idea what the MWP is… nor the warmer Minoan and Roman Warm Periods. Nor do you know what the LIA was, do you? Turns out Kegwin’s study of marine radioisotopes in the Sargasso Sea PROVE that we are today warmer than 100 years ago, (we were coming out the LIA, which was the coldest we had been in thousands of years, so no duh), BUT WE ARE TODAY BELOW THE 3,OOO YEAR AVERAGE TEMP.

            Mt. Pinatubo, when it went off, let off more CO2 than mankind has emitted in total over his entire time on earth. Gonna stop volcanoes, Frank?

            But you are too intellectually dishonest to know any of this, aren’t you, Frank? You fascist leftist continue to amaze me in your arrogance paired with your ignorance. The only redeeming value of your post is for the word to see just how utterly close minded, anti-science and ignorant the left is. So, in that sense, good on ya!

            • Of course the earth is not getting warmer– that’s why the arctic and Antarctica are melting at such a great rate!!!

              Its probably due to the poles shifting– surely not because the overall earth’s temperature (that is, climate) is not getting hotter…

              Everyone knows that HEAT doesn’t make ice melt, right?

        • Why should facts get in the way of them using the weather as an excuse to rob us and take power?

        • For those of you that want to do some in depth reading on the topic, see climatologist Dr. Judith Curry’s recent work on this at

 is perhaps THE top site in the world on the topic for those of you who want to do more research. I also like

          I would wait for CSS/Zeus/Apollo/Next Name du Jour to add his usual ad hominem invective to this post, calling me names for simply asking people to think critically and use logic to critically evaluate things, but I have learned there are unhappy, unstable people who have all kinds of mental, emotional or otherwise problems, so I will miss his latest insults towards me as I have simply stopped reading his incessant cavils.

          • TEST– I studied it for YEARS– Even did a term paper on it in college. I read every book I could get my hands on about it– that was before it became a hot topic (before the fossil fuel industry got in full swing to deny the science).

            A really good book (one of my favorites) is “Climate Wars” written by a journalist, who interviewed scientists, politicians and military people from all over the world about the subject.

            Also, there is “One Degree” by Dotti– who argues that one degree increase (or decrease) in the world’s climate is NOT a minor thing!! There was only about degree in the overall temperature of the earth (cooler) during the great ice age.

            • Also, there used to be a really good website– Joe Romm’s website (who used to be secretary of energy under some president)– He used to have a really good website which went into details about the science, list of deniers, etc.

              Basically, the world’s richest 1% have a stake in denying the science. (The website is still there, its just not as good as it used to be).

            • I JUST WENT TO AMAZON TO SEE IF THEY HAD A LITTLE synopsis of the book I mentioned– where you could look inside (the book, “Climate Wars” by Gwynn Dyer) and THERE WAS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BOOK THERE!!! they didn’t even have the correct book cover illustration, a different author and the book that you could read from was extremely dry and boring!!!

              They switched books at Amazon, so DON’T GO THERE TO CHECK OUT THE BOOK!! Weird shit– Is amazon paid off too? Actually, I read that Amazon WAS OWNED/PARTIALLY OWNED BY THE CIA. ;(

              The establishment (the 1%/ New World Order/1984 people) are constantly hiding the truth!! What a bunch of f— ers!!

        • Anyone that believes this crap has their head way up someone’s ass.. frickin’ repubs are pretty stupid, don’t you think?!?

        • IF YOU LOVE YOUR KIDS, Please read, “Storms of My Grandchildren” by Jim Hansen, the world’s most respected climate scientist.

          You can go to Amazon to check it out!!!!

      2. We had global warming 3 days ago when it was 90+ degrees in central Illinois. Today we have global cooling only 78 degrees. LOL

        • I remember in the 1970s it was all about global cooling and acid rain.

          I guess that bullsh!t played out so they had to create global warming.

          • I was in a museum, in one room they had a display of dinosaurs etc along with a graph of derived historical world temperatures along with significant extinction points.

            In the very next room they had a global warming display and chart that showed completely different temperature history.

            Obviously if there were dozens of historical times with higher than current temperatures and CO2 levels, it would imply we are in no danger….. Liberals must edit all that science out of the text books and museums.

            • Liberals are truly a special kinda retarded,,, i hate them, all of them

              • Nailbanger, I also hate the libturds. The day is coming when we’ll be at war with them.

                • Why hate them? Can you think of a better bunch of targets? Just post a sign that says: “Make a Single Line Get you SNAP Cards filled here”. You’ll get all the smart ones that can read.

              • Do you ever have anything helpful to contribute to this board NB other than your hatred of everything not exactly like you? ,,, You sure are full of hate,,, you hate Germans,,, you hate all black people and want to shoot all of them ,,, you hate anyone who disagrees with you ,,, and you can’t construct a proper sentence beyond the 1st grade level,,, SENTENCES END WITH A PERIOD. MORON. Even 1st graders know that!!! Try posting something helpful instead of sentences on every thread that start with I Hate ,,, Then end the sentence with a period. Like that. It’s a dot that’s on your keyboard right next to the comma you overuse. Go upstairs and ask your mother if you can’t find it. Then change one of your 3 screen names to I HATE.

                • I hate prissy little limpwrists who have to hide behind the moniker “anonymous” before they unfairly unload on people. Just lettin’ you know, Pajama Boy, that Nail has more character in his little finger than you have in your entire beta male body. ?Kiss Kiss?


                  • Thanks Grunty,,,
                    Have a great weekend!

                    • NB,

                      You are OK in my book. I have noticed that many people writing/texting on their smartphones use a lot of shortened words and acronyms and they don’t capitalize words or end sentences with a period. My postings are short when I am on the smartphone too! What you write is usually to the point unless you write something technical like on ballistics or farming practices, etc. The village dogs may bark but the Caravan moves on!

                      Louisiana Eagle ?

                  • Nail doesn’t have a little finger, just a little penis.

                  • Grunty, I’m a McPherson too…however, just because a person has the qualities of the female gender, I don’t put them down. God is Love. I LIKE what Anonymous said (the other Anonymous).

                • A,
                  Try attacking ideas rather than people.
                  As for hate, I agree with Nail most all the time,
                  But for you I’ll offer a change,
                  I’d love to kill all liberals.
                  I’d love to kill all Moslem Terrorists.
                  I’d love to kill the government.
                  I’d love to kill all bad cops.
                  I could go on, but you get my drift.
                  Keep in mind we do not have an edit
                  function on this site. I frequently
                  find things after posting, that are
                  wrong, but I can’t fix.
                  Things such as sentence structure, context,
                  grammar, and punctuation, are often screwed
                  up in comments.
                  As long as most people get my point, I’ve
                  succeeded, even though I forgot the period


                  • I really think you and i could be good buds!
                    Too bad they killed the super ferry, i could cruise over to the BI for the weekend and go show you where i grew up, would blow your mind, theres stuff up in the Okala and Laupahoihoi forest you never imagined was up there…
                    As to posting,
                    Honestly this place is more the vent than anything else,

                    • Nail,
                      Agreed on the “venting”, although I
                      received some interesting advice on
                      my bread making problems. I’m
                      still waiting for someone to post
                      a large off grid solar system ” one line”
                      with a bill of materials.

                      I have to wear a knee brace these
                      days or I’d really like to try the
                      trail up to the Ranger station/orchard
                      on Mana road. Due to poaching and Ohia
                      disease, DLNR is shutting down a lot of
                      what you used to call your backyard.


                    • Nailbanger, I’ll take you any day over some stupid-assed troll.

                  • Who you should love to kill is your mother for bringing you into this world full of people you would love to kill.

                  • Jim Hansen, THE WORLD’S MOST RESPECTED CLIMATE SCIENTIST– WHO USED TO WORK FOR NASA– wrote a book that you can get a glimpse of at Amazon.

                    Its called, “Storms of my Grandchildren”. PLEASE CHECK IT OUT!!!! ESPECIALLY IF YOU LOVE YOUR KIDS!!!!!

                • Dont like what i write?
                  TOUGH SHIT

                  • Tough shit for you

                • Anonymous:

                  Nailbanger may be all that you say and more, but I like him. You could be one of my grand-daughters. They are sweet girls. But, I’m sorry to say that cranky old men know much more than you, my dear. To hate is just one of those things everybody does feel. If you deny your feelings, you become emotionally incapacitated. Accept what nature has created. No amount of Communist propaganda from TV or teachers can alter human nature. Get in touch with your emotions. And, check out the archives. Nailbanger may have contributed as much info on prepper-ism as anyone on this sight. He knows lots about growing food. Grammar and spelling are important, but knowledge is more important.


                  • Why don’t you guys just get married, it’s legal now.

                    • Frank, why don’t YOU go marry some freak and STFU.

                  • Cranky old men are full of shi–, B from California. Not all girls are sweet. (I’m a female!!)

                • A
                  I think Nail and Brave are right.

                  It is time to tell these bastards just what we think and mean it.

                  I for one am sick of their BS.

                  • Sarge, thanks for that. I never had any use for trolls anyway.

                • Anonymous, go f#$% yourself.

            • When climategate broke, it was revealed that “researchers” from East Anglia University’s Climate Research Unit threw away decades of original temperature readings. No real scientist would EVER destroy original data. The only reason to do this is so their own figures could not be disputed.

              The “researchers” gave the bullshit excuse that they didn’t have room to store the data when they moved into a new facility.
              Sure. They were eager to move into a new facility with LESS capacity.

            • Since Plants need CO2 to breath, to then make Oxygen required for human life, I would think the more CO2 there is, the more plants and trees will grow and produce more oxygen. If you want to preserve the Globes O2 Levels, then quit cutting down the forests. The earth plants are the natural filters. Did these idiots ever study biology and understand Photosynthesis?

              Here’s the formula:

              carbon dioxide + water =light energy=> glucose + oxygen

              6CO2 + 6H2O =light energy=> C6H12O6 + 6O2

              • No, those idiots never studied biology, they don’t understand Photosynthesis, and they only got where they are because they have master degrees and doctorates, and do research-unlike you. They should have taken your route and just make comments, like you, on a mediocre doomer’s website like SHTF just as you do.

                • Yes, I agree that you’re a douche, Frank.


                • Frank, you say is a MEDIOCRE DOOMER site? Then why do you still come here? Mac will take you to the woodshed.

          • ….and wot about the hole in the ozone layer?

            AND the year 2000!

            • Or the Mayan callendar?

          • yeah, that bullshit played itself out so THEY had to create global warming……break out your tin foil hat, repubtard.

            • Frank, STFU.

        • Msg fro the NRA
          CMP Sales of 1911s One Step Closer With House Passage of 2018 NDAA

          On Friday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2810, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2018. Included in the bill is a provision that would make U.S. Army surplus 1911 .45 ACP pistols available to the American public through the Civilian Marksmanship program (CMP).

          • I forgot to add my comment: If it is coming from the NDAA I would assume there are no firing pins included with the 45 Cal pistols. Just my take.

            Never buy a gun and go to battle with it, unless it is tested at the range for flaws.

          • From a collectors perspective increasing the supply of WWI 1911 or WWII 1911A1 is fantastic unless of course your concerned about the value of your present collection. Regardless its good news. Aren’t they ours anyway?

        • Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming …

          In explaining the science of climate change, Hansen paints a devastating but all-too-realistic picture of what will happen … The best book on Climate Change by the …
          James Hansen, father of climate change awareness, calls …

      3. I don’t care about global warming or not, but according to the chart you are using as an illustration, it shows that there IS warming, since 1997 at least.

        Looking at the scale at the bottom at zero, it says that zero (or 14 degrees Celsius) is the average global temperature. The plot is all above that, so that means warmer than average to anyone who can read a graph.

        Try to use graphics that actually support your argument…”…that there is no global warming according to the above referenced report.”

        • if it is on the internet, it must be true.

          • Yeah, we sure don’t hear about Acid Rain anymore, do we? The left gave up on that Hoax, then switched to Global Warming, and that scam did not work either so now is Climate change. Its the weather boogie man that is the enemy, they are trying to rise money to combat.

            With all the time and effort the left spends on scamming the populace out of their wealth with these fake hoaxes, they all need to hang. I have never in my lifetime, see so many psychopaths on the Government payroll wasting so much time and effort scamming the Tax payers. All I want to see is the Great Culling Movement for all political scammers.

            • I do wonder about the time and effort part myself. Imagine if all that time and effort was put to positive productive use. The US might have far less debt or even no more deficits. However, there are always going to be people with their hand out for the freebies.

        • Until recently, the global average temp was 15 degrees. Since that didn’t show any warming, it was lowered to 14.

        • If you think the globe is warming, then move to the northern hemisphere and enjoy your winters. If you dislike winter move south towards the equator for more summer weather. This is basic stuff here. I think the left is trying to make sure all the 4 seasons are equal, and have equal rights. The climate Hoax is all about fleecing the masses to enrich some policy makers pockets. Nobody can control the climate. We live on a living, moving, breathing planet and the oceans rise and fall with the daily tides. There are usually 2 high tides per day, and 2 low tides per day. Keeping the oceans on the move with various climate conditions is what keeps us alive the sea life reproducing.

          Had 1.25 Lb basket of Fresh Gulf Shrimp that was cooked to perfection last weekend. So I thank climate change for the delicious sea food it produces.

        • Im sure things are warming,,
          I just have a hard time beleiving that us puny little humans have as big a role in it as they say we do, would bet its more a long wave trend that goes up and down over the eons, much more believeable than you n me and the cow farts are causing glowbull warming

          • Ebb and flow, the earth is dynamic. Ups and downs just like our lives but on a much grander scale. Not really too complicated on the surface. Makes for good fear porn though for the left.

      4. The picture of the earth with the thermometer is racist.

        The thermometer is obliviously inserted into the assh@le of the world, New Orleans.

        • LOL! I didn’t catch that! I had to go back up to check it out

      5. As Blaise Pascal once noted, once science is divorced from ethics, scientists will use their skills to pursue power, not truth.

        What is behind the global warming? The same thing that was behind the global cooling scare of the 1970s: The 1974 Club of Rome report titled, Mankind at the Turning Point stated, “The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” Their solution was simple – engineer a massive reduction in population and utterly change the socio-economic system through centralized planning via total government control. And yes, this does smack of being called “The Final Solution” to me, too. This “man is the enemy” was reiterated by the Club of Rome in 1993, as well, when they stated in their The First Global Revolution, downloadable at that “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

        “We came up with the idea??” In other words, a conclusion had already been reached, and now they needed to create a “reason” to support their unsupported – and as Julian Simon provisionally demonstrated, possibly false – a priori assumptions. Do not try this technique in any school paper you may attempt, or you will be failed!

        As Robert Zubrin observed, to the warmers, “… each new life is unwelcome, each unregulated thought or act is menace, every person is fundamentally the enemy of every other person, and each race or nation is the enemy of every other race or nation.” Perhaps it is put most clearly by the World Wildlife Fund Living Plant Report of 2012, which Lewis Page summarizes in the May 16, 2012 edition of the Register that “economic growth should be abandoned, (and) citizens of the world’s wealthy nations should prepare for poverty.” The rich, of course, are especially bad, as the Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit, by Rosalyn McKeown, found at tells us: “Generally, more highly educated people who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people, who tend to have lower incomes. In this case, more education increases the threat to sustainability.”

        Of course, individual rights are verboten, given the Malthusian threat to the earth. As Harvey Ruvin, Vice-chair of International Committee for Local Environment Initiatives (ICLEI), a group that wants to impose the green agenda on everyone has noted, “Individual rights must take a back seat to the collective.” Pol Pot, move over. (Incidentally, the Malthusians might want to get a clue, as between 30 and 50 percent of all food produced globally, equivalent to two billion tons, is thrown away each year according to a recent report written by the UK-based Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IME), titled ‘Global Food; Waste Not, Want Not’, found at Of course, per the usually PC Time Magazine, the Malthusians are doubly wrong, as “…it turns out the world’s population isn’t growing nearly as fast as it once did. In fact, experts say the rate of population growth will continue to slow and that the total population will eventually — likely within our lifetimes — fall.”

        • Test:

          Blaise Pascal: that reminds me. For a great education, join a Convent if you are female; or, a Seminary if you are male. You will never be unemployed. You can pursue goals in teaching, as a Scientist/Researcher, or missionary in some exotic location.

          __ The down sides are many, and include such things as restrictions on your sexual exploits, and a religion that is changing to accommodate globalism.


      6. … Are these people alone? Hardly. Maurice Strong, the leftist hero of global governance, and former Secretary General of the UN’s Conference on Environment and Development, stated in his 2000 autobiography, Where We Are Going, that by 2031, two thirds of earth’s population might be wiped out. A tragedy? Not to the left. He describes this possibility as “A glimmer of hope for the future of our species and its potential for regeneration” (think the evil Professor Weston here in CS Lewis’ Out of the Silent Planet and Perelandra). As James Delinpole observes about Strong’s comment: “See: It’s perfectly OK to fantasize about the deaths of maybe 5 billion people – as long as you show at the end that you really care: you’re thinking about humanity.” Exactly what the leftists said as they wiped out over 60 million in the Soviet Union, Pol Pot with his millions in Cambodia, or Mao with his toll of perhaps 20 million. And this will be done with or without your consent, as Strong again notes: “Our concept of ballot box democracy may need to be modified (Agenda 21, anyone? I think we can agree “Abolished” will be the operative word, not “modified,” once the left is through) to produce strong governments capable of making difficult decisions, particularly in terms of safe-guarding the environment.” Strong’s United Nations Environment Programme also had a decidely socialist mandate, stating in their 1976 report “Private land ownership is a principal instrument of accumulating wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice Public control of land is therefore indispensible,” and “public ownership of land is justified in favour of the common good, rather than to protect the interestes of the already privileged.”

        And for good measure, Strong also wanted a “collectivist global government.” Unknown is whether Strong wanted a Pol Pot style collective, a USSR style collective, or a Maoist collective. We can be sure, however, that the private property and zillion room mansions of the Hollywood Learjet leftists won’t be affected, nor the leftist limousine liberals in New York’s Hamptons or Martha’s Vineyard, nor Michele Obama’s uber luxe monthly vacations.

        But Strong doesn’t stop there. As Discover the Networks noted, Strong felt that industrialized countries benefitted “from unsustainable patters of production and consumption, which have produced our present dilemma,” with all the environmental problems emanating from our Western middle class lifestyles (that Strong, himself, had no problem personally enjoying!) which includes “high mean intake, consumption of of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work palce air conditioning, and suburban housing” – all of which were not sustainable. Concluded strong about his delusional dilemma: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring it about?”

        • That guy will be warming in the lake of fire if he doesn’t change his tune.

          • Actually, strong died a few years ago. So you are very correct, he is not in a good place probably

      7. I can’t help but vomit in my mouth everytime some Hollywood celeb gets on tv and wants to talk about GW..Never mind these same celebs travel the world in learjets and gas guzzling Limo’s..Never mind these celebs own several multi-million dollar homes that take up several acres of land that could be farmed..Never mind all the wooden furniture inside their homes..Hollywood celebs and the “earth friendly” people love protecting the earth just as long as it doesn’t affect their lifestyle..Notice the instant these same “earth lovers” don’t get their way they throw trash everywhere and burn tires…It’s ALL about $$$$ folks,that’s all…

      8. A kid comes home after school to their uneducated family. Whatever the teacher says is accepted. The two necessities are:

        1. Ignorance
        2. Presumed knowledge coming from authority

        To facilitate the above:

        1.Dumb down the population
        2. Co-opt science

        The massive changes to the US Constitution with the Federal Reserve and Income Tax came after the huge influx of uneducated trusting immigrants.

      9. Off Topic: Mauldin: “Financial Crisis” Coming By End Of 2018; Prepare Urgently

        “Financial Crisis Of Historic Proportions” Is “Bearing Down On Us”

        John Mauldin of Mauldin Economics latest research note, Prepare for Turbulence, is excellent and a must read warning about the coming financial crisis. Mind refreshed from what sounds like a wonderful honeymoon and having had the time to read some books outside his “comfort zone” he has come to the conclusion that we are on the verge of a “major financial crisis, if not later this year, then by the end of 2018 at the latest.”

        Mauldin is a New York Times bestselling author and respected investment expert and his excellent analysis concludes with advice to prepare urgently for the financial “crisis of historic proportions” which is “once again bearing down on us”

        • Oh goodie another date. Guess I’ll have to buy more S.T.U.F.F.F.(shit to utilize for financial fallout)

      10. The reason for the carbon tax was to hold up the banks and stock markets. The Dems could not wait to crush bush so they popped the cork on Indy bank and there was no carbon tax money to keep the market’s afloat. All the big conspiracy theories are mostly bs, I worked for a financial newspaper so it is not my ass talking.
        We are all part of debt money and the 10 to 1 money system. We all need to have some real hold in your hand assets nails,to,gun powder,soup,tires not just gold and silver. They can only tax or take paper assets and land,cars campers but not small cash or small things.
        We see the scam of carbon taxes so what is next is greater zoning laws with higher property tax.stay on them and we can still win by making them keep changing the subject of attack.

      11. Fukushima plant set to elease radioactive material into the ocean

        Drudge Report

        • I wish there was a way to contain that but it’s beyond us. Too bad for all of us.

        • KYM. I am not a fan of pollution of any sort. That being said, I communicated with Dr. Jane Orient, head of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness, who is a world expert on nuclear issues. I asked her about the impact to Pacific fish (not 1 mile of the coast of Fukishima, but, say, Alaska salmon). She said it was a non-issue and not to worry about.

          So, while Fukishima is not nothing, according to one expert I trust, it is not “poisoning the world” either. I realize there will be debate on this, and that CSS dude will respond with his usual insults rather than logical, but the rest of you can take this as you will. I am NOT saying Fukishima was a non-event, or insignificant. Rather, it appears it is not some quasi extinction level event.

          BTW, KYM, KY. pension underfunding is almost on par with Illinois. I hope you aren’t at risk, or know others who are. You will want to be aware of this, as even if you, personally, aren’t impacted, others around you will be

          • TEST,

            The thought of “770,000 tons of highly radioactive water being dumped into the ocean” is not a welcome one.

            Thanks for the tip. I am not surprised Kentucky pension are underfunded. I am not impacted, but many in my community will be.

      12. I think climate change is bollocks as the high taxes on fuels dont STOP their use, it merely raises TAX revenue for governments & stretches the worlds resources around an ever increasing population.
        If climate change was genuine we would all have hydrogen cars & solar panels on our roofs at great subsidy!

        • The exponential increase in world population has all come from non-white countries.

      13. Anthony Watts has a website Watts up With That? he does a credible job of debunking Glowbull warming and Climate Change.

        • is one of the best sites out their on the global warming scam.

          Check out Dr. Tim Ball’s site at where he has a pix of a picea glauca (white spruce) stump, ~ 5k years before present, located ***on Canada’s Arctic Ocean,*** outside of Tuktayuktuk. I.e., it was warm enough 5k years ago for a tree to grow, where today it is FAR above the treeline. Same thing with Vatnajökull in Iceland, where they KNOW there are currently 40 Viking era farm buried under the glacier TODAY, that were function farms in 1,000 AD. I.e., it was as warm as, or warmer, than today. The glacier (which I have stood on) is also currently disgorging trees and other greenery , proving the glacier was FAR receded in the past than today.

          Oh yeah. The Archeological Survey of Canada says back then the treeline was a couple hundred km. north of where it is today.

          Truth is, as Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof of atmospheric science at MIT, Dr. William Gray, the #1 hurricane forecaster in the world, and John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel have all said, anthropogenic global warming is – in their own words, direct quote – “a scam.”

      14. Liberals are always looking for victims to help. And even if some person or group is not a victim they will make that person or group a victim so they can champion a cause that will make them feel good about themselves. The same is true of global warming. Liberals believe that Mother Earth is the victim of the evil corporations, who are raping her and destroying the environment for a profit. Once you realize that liberals are just emotion driven group-think brain dead control freaks you will be able to see right through them.

      15. GOLLY GOSH!

        Does this mean that all those predictions have been BULLSHIT?

      16. Trump acted in the interest of the People of the United States by withdrawing from another financial scam by the globalist shysters.


      17. When I was a kid I would always go fishing with my dad, he always had a tide table and I, being curios and into science, would always check it out. It would always be about centered around sea level, it varied but went negative as much as positive. It almost never goes negative now, last time I checked it went negative one day that year (which was 4 years ago). I have a dark complexion, almost never burned. Now I have to watch it. Nitpicking the numbers is as bad as the Democraps in DC. From what I found President Trump pulled out of the agreement because of economic aspects. This article is off base, as bad as the bimbo’s on The View featuring Whoopi Fattass!


      19. Just look at who are the biggest pushers of this scam: the Chinese (well-known money launderers and scamsters and the world’s worst polluters) and Muslims, especially Muslims from countries that make all their money from selling oil and gas. Most of the senior positions in the climate change institutions are now held by Muslims. Now, why would people who believe in something as backward as Islam would be so obsessed with helping the environment? Or people, like in India, who take a crap outside and have the worst hygiene habits, would be such champions of the environment? It’s because they see it as a great way to fleece the rich countries for every – last – penny.

      20. Claims of global warming first showed up during the 1960’s among career scientists, not among government bureaucrats. The bizarre weather patterns they predicted then have been occurring. You can always depend on denial playing a big part in any unpopular concept. The public typically is ignorant of just about everything, and yet their conviction and confidence are strong. They think they know everything. When it’s 120 degrees in Manhattan some July, then people in New York will be convinced, and people in Bolivia still won’t believe it. It snowed my backyard last November for the first time in three years, so it can’t possibly be getting warmer. That’s how most people think.

        • RRR, this is THE most ignorant, fraudulent and STUPID post ever post on this site, and of course an outright lie. As everyone knows – except apparently science denier leftist liars like you – Ehrlich, Holdren (Obama’s science advisor) are on RECORD as being catastrophic global COOLERS in the 1970s. On 1975 the National Academy of Sciences put out a report addressing coming ice age fears and in 1971, NASA predicted the world “could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age.”

          In one of its 1970 issues, Life Magazine wrote that “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support… the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half…” This is the same Holdren who stated in 1973 that the goal must be to “de-develop the United States”

          By November of 1974, the Earth’s chilling situation appeared even more dire. An article dug up by Climate Depot, reported the United States and Russia were considering damming up the Bering Strait in an effort to deliberately warm the Earth’s temperature and avoid a catastrophic ice age.

          in 1974, the famed Lowell Ponte warned of a global ice age that could last anywhere from 200 to 10,000 years, and result in “rivers of solid ice again as far south as Yosemite in California and Cincinnati, Ohio.” The paper added that scientists had proposed about 60 theories to explain the cooling phenomenon.

          According to Ponte — who was basically the Al Gore of the 1970s – global powers needed to combine efforts and point a manmade space heater toward Mother Earth in order to “convert the American southwestern deserts into verdant green valleys” and “stave off worldwide famine.” He further detailed how the Earth would basically morph into the Planet Hoth in his book “The Cooling: Has the Next Ice Age Already Begun? Can We Survive It?”

        • RRR: You, sir, are a science denier leftist and a lying fraud. Which, of course, you well know. Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric science at MIT (ever hear of MIT) specifically stated the phony “consensus” behind global warming is similar to Soviet Lysenkoism and is “unscientific,” and stating that “With respect to science, the assumption behind consensus is that science is a source of authority. Rather, it is a particularly effective approach to inquiry and analysis. Skepticism is essential to science; consensus is foreign.

          A 1974 study by NOAA, pushing the global cooling scam, reported an average of a half degree F drop in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968, which included citing the fact that NOAA scientists had confirmed “the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental US diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.”

          A 1975 National Academy of Sciences worried about “huge year-round snowfields in the U.S. or Europe” and Stephen H. Schneider at the National Center of Atmospheric Research, asked if “we can afford to gamble that we will not have a series of years like 1972 and 1974 when drought, floods and early frosts will dramatically reduce crop yields, causing mass misery in the world.” He wrote a book “Genesis Strategy” suggesting we store grain to feed the hungry during the upcoming cold-induced mass starvation, but – and here is the fun part – Ralph Hostetter wrote “What makes Schneider’s proclamation so unusual is that he became one of 2,500 scientists later to proclaim global warming, and he wrote another book, entitled “Global Warming,” never mentioning his “ice age” connections.” “Unusual” is one way describe this man’s work. Error filled or ridiculous might be another.

          As noted, you, Sir RRR, are either ignorant, a liar, or a leftist shill. I suggest you try showing some intellectual honesty rather than imbibing of your leftist anti-science Kool-aide

      21. And what is the actual presence of CO2 in the atmosphere? Just over 400ppm, ~ 0.04%, up from 320 ppm, or 0.032% 50 years ago. Of the remaining percentages, nitrogen amounts for 78%, oxygen 21%. Of the 1% that then remains, 90% of that is argon, with less than 4% of that 1% being carbon dioxide (these percentages exclude highly variable water vapor, which is usually around 1 – 4% of the atmosphere – and a much more major contributor to global warming, estimated at being 50-90% of the greenhouse effect). Of course the logarithmic effect of CO2 means each additional increase has less impact that the prior, same sized increase. Even more, about 96 to 97% of carbon dioxide comes from natural sources, such as animals, plant decay and volcanoes.

        In fact, relative to volcanoes, former FDA investigator Dr. Arthur Evangelista, noted that the 2010 eruption of Eyafjallajokull in Iceland emitted, in four days, enough CO2 in four days to negate every single effort mankind made that year to reduce CO2. But this volcano was a piker compared to Mt. Pinatubo, which when it erupted in the Philippines in 1991 “spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in its entire 40 MILLION YEARS on earth.” And this doesn’t include that fact that, as he notes the “bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.”

      22. Here is the lefts Formula for climate control:

        Ignorant Left + Political Controlling Psychopaths = Higher Taxes.

        Which does not solve climate change, but only in the lefty mind. Any questions?

      23. Theoretical physicist and Democrat voter Freeman Dyson on global warming: “I’m 100 percent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this issue, and the Republicans took the right side.” Now retired, Dyson was a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton between 1953 and 1994. Famed for his work in quantum electrodynamics and nuclear engineering, Dyson also worked on climate studies during his career. Climate change, according to Freeman, “is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?” The physicist and mathematician argues that pollution caused by fossil fuels has been conflated with climate change. “Coal is very unpleasant stuff, and there are problems with coal quite apart from climate,” he said. “Pollution is quite separate to the climate problem: one can be solved, and the other cannot, and the public doesn’t understand that.”

        During his interview with The Register Dyson noted shortcomings in climate models. “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger,” he said. “It’s clear now the models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago. I can’t say if they’ll always be wrong, but the observations are improving and so the models are becoming more verifiable.”

        Dyson also wrote a strong foreword in The Global Warming Policy Foundation, which calls for a reassessment of carbon dioxide. “To any unprejudiced person reading this account, the facts should be obvious: that the non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage,” he wrote.

        And speaking of Democrats calling out the scam of global warming, former Energy Department Undersecretary Steven Koonin told The Wall Street Journal April 24, 2017, re. the global warming scam, that “bureaucrats within former President Barack Obama’s administration spun scientific data to manipulate public opinion: ‘What you saw coming out of the press releases about climate data, climate analysis, was, I’d say, misleading, sometimes just wrong,’ Koonin said, referring to elements within the Obama administration he said were responsible for manipulating climate data. He pointed to a National Climate Assessment in 2014 showing hurricane activity has increased from 1980 as an illustration of how federal agencies fudged climate data. Koonin said the assessment was technically incorrect. “What they forgot to tell you, and you don’t know until you read all the way into the fine print, is that it actually decreased in the decades before that,” he said. The U.N. published reports in 2014 essentially mirroring Koonin’s argument.” (Cited from

      24. And that sea level scam? Forgetting Al Gore’s purchase of one property BELOW his claimed sea level rise, Danish scientist Bjorn Lomborg wrote in Canada’s National Post Oct. 17, 2008 that since 1992, satellites have measured sea levels, noting a 3.2 mm increase/yr. Unfortunately for Mr. Gore, the past two years after that showed a slight drop in sea level, and Lomborg also notes that “the heat content of the world’s oceans had been dropping for the past four years where we have measurements.” In fact, in 2011, the Washington Post reported that sea level had dropped ¼ of an inch! The Post also notes in this article “A recent tide gauge study of sea levels in Australia and New Zealand, published in the Journal of Coastal Research, provided readings that suggested the rate of ocean rise has declined in the past decade.”) One other tidbit bears noting: Any ice melt in the Arctic will not increase the sea level, of course… any more than melting ice cubs in your drinks raise the water level in your glass. Finally, sea level data from 2011 still show no rise in a report published at – with data from Univ. of Colorado’s Sea Level Research Group, which shows a 0.3 mm rise in sea level per year over the past few years, being considered flawed in that it fails to take into account isostacy (the rebound of land masses from the last Ice Age, which is still continuing today) , or else doctored due to political reasons (see . (Incidentally, per the UK’s Daily Mail at, “…sea level is naturally higher in the western Pacific; in fact, it is roughly 40 to 50cm (15-20 inches) higher near Indonesia than off of Ecuador. Much of this difference is due to tropical trade winds, which predominantly blow from east to west across the Pacific Ocean, piling up the water near Asia and Oceania. When those trade winds ease and bursts of wind come out of the west, warm water from the western Pacific sloshes east in vast and deep waves and evens out sea level a bit.”) The NIPCC report from 2011 doesn’t do any favours to the “sea is rising crowd” either, as can be read at Of course, as Ken Moore points out at, Global Warming: The big one hit 14,600 years ago, there was a
        45 foot rise in sea level in a sudden sharp spike 14650 to 14310 years ago. Says Moore, citing a study by Oxford University, “The massive ice melt shows up in Tahiti where precisely-dated dead coral was suddenly buried deep in the ocean. Climate change of 10 to 15 degrees C was abrupt. The best guess is that seawater flow broke into the arctic basins and triggered the end of that ice age.” Science Daily News., at

        Another report from quotes Nils-Axel Mærner, who is chief of the paleogeophysics and geodynamics department at Sweden’s Stockholm University. Maerner stating that sea level has “risen by about 1 millimeter a year from about 1850 to perhaps 1940. That’s a tiny amount. But then sea levels fell. There’s no trend, absolutely no trend.” Regarding the IPCC report on rising ocean levels Maerner said the IPCC team didn’t record ¬– i.e., actually see — such an increase. It was a “correction factor” of a computer model. In other words, Mærner said, “It is a falsification of the data set.”

        The article also discusses the Maldives Islands sinking into the Indian Ocean, which Morner has visited. What he discovered from the people living there that there was a sinking of the sea level — in the 1970s; however, this may have been caused by non-oceanic factors. Nevertheless, the new level, per Maerner, “has been stable, has not changed in the last 35 years.” The polar regions melting? “Antarctic is certainly not melting,” Maerner said, and “All the Antarctic records show expansion of ice.” The problem, to Maerner, is that the warmers have no background in sea-level research. “So all this talk that sea level is rising, this stems from the computer modeling, not from observations…The observations don’t find it!”

        Dr. Klaus Ekart-Puls, physicist and meteorologist, has also noted about sea level that “it’s important to remember that mean sea level is a calculated magnitude, and not a measured one. There are a great number of factors that influence sea level, e.g. tectonic processes, continental shifting, wind currents, passats, and volcanoes. Climate change is only one of ten factors.” Sea level rise, according the Ekart-Puls, has risen 100m from 10,000 years ago (as noted elsewhere, the Romans and Vikings didn’t drive SUVs), but from 1900 to 2000 sea level rose only 25 cm – a slowdown even though CO2 and temperature rose from the LIA See for full details on the subject
        For completeness on the sea level issue, see Dr. Tim Ball’s summary graph, found at, also show no precipitous rise:

        Meanwhile, reported Sept., 2011, on sea level numbers, and Envisat showed that a two year long decline in sea level was continuing at that point (I haven’t looked since then), at a rate of 5mm per year (see A Der Spiegel report from 2011 at also confirms sea level is dropping

      25. The trouble with Global Warming/Climate Change” is that Yuppies unanimously believe in it. Anything the Yuppies believe in so solidly has to be wrong. “Right to Choose”. “Open Borders”. They are so wrong, so often that it is hard to believe in anything they believe in. Red Neck forever!!!!

      26. Spikes of record breaking weather no matter if its heat or cold do not validate the bogus glowbull warming now climate change lie scam myth religion.

      27. Let’s say Global Warming is real, that allows me to bring up the important topic of dehydration.

        If I could go into a SHTF situation with only two (legal) medicines I would choose Ibuprofen and something to treat dehydration. Because in a SHTF situation we would be eating iffy food, drinking questionable water and exerting ourselves. Therefore, it is extremely important to stock up something like Medique 03033 Medi-Lyte electrolyte replacement tablets.

        h ttps://

      28. Global warming/climate change is a scam. Period. When you see politicians involved and positioned to make billions of dollars off of legislation, you better be afraid, very afraid. This concept, if approved, will create an international taxing body. It will be set up to take from you and give to someone else in the world. Most of the third world and China will be exempt from the law. It will also set up restrictions on your usage of energy. This is one of the most onerous totalitarian schemes ever conceived.

      29. No inside knowledge, here. Pure speculation —

        In the same respect that soccer clubs are used as cover for gangs, and the church is used as cover for reprobates, and anyone can fly the flag, climate change is just a cultural platform, which can be used for any purpose.

        There is no money shortage. It is a unit of measurement, with no inherent value or meaning. It can be imagined, into existence, at will. (Conservatives are not being objective, when relying on a 5th plank lending monopoly for their capital.)

        The price of a human soul or mind would still be worthless, as the 99% are craven masochists. They always make more. They give, willingly, even to the last, and are forever in search of an outlet, in spite of libertarians.

        So, the scientific community, the money, and (most) people are just passive instruments.

        You might send numbers and words across such a system as a means of communication. They are speaking, in euphemisms, code, or double entendre, about something real, like if it was a police scanner.

      30. We’ve had Global warming for about 12,000 years. When the last Ice age ended. Under water archeology shows that humans lived on the shore and over the years, the settlements have been covered.

        We might be contributing towards warming, but it’s something that happens whether we are here or not.

        Never underestimate con artists to use an unprovable thesis to make a buck.

        • Droughts and famines have been occurring throughout history even documented in the Old Testament. I suppose we could blame it on excess gasses from humans and camels?

      31. OT

        RT show about USS Liberty attack by israel fifty years ago. Very rare criticism of chews- this is hard hitting. Spread everywhere.

        • Awd ball:

          Interesting video. Thank you for posting it.

          __ ?

          PS: nice name

          __ awed bawl


      32. Not worried about global warming. I may be wrong but the triple meltdown at Fukushima seems a potential bigger threat to the US population. Rad counts per minute climb ever higher in most American cities, hundreds of times higher than normal. It does seem obvious TPTB want to greatly reduce population, what better to kick off the culling by something you can’t taste, see or feel until it is too late. The msm never talks about Fukushima. As far as news that the radioactive water will be released into the Pacific Ocean, that has been going on for more than six years.

      33. Can we agree and not pay the 3 Billion?

      34. I see where the first thing out of your mouth was how much it was going to cost taxpayers your no different than the rest of those globalist Steven Hawkins has warned we will turn this planet into a toxic desert I suppose your smarter then him and your not research has proven time and again you can track are planets temperature from the amount of co2 it’s been proven by so many universities and climatologist the stupid one is you you couldn’t find your asshole with a funnel your one of those globalist it’s all about the money isn’t that right what’s that yoda the stupid is strong in this one you don’t care about the people are the planet all you care about is ?

        • I never heard of Steven Hawkins? Now the touted Steven Hawking is dead. He has been dead for many years. The longest anyone has ever lived after being diagnosed with Lou Gerigs disease is twenty years. Any you believe the lie that this guy has lived 50 + years? Who’s stupid? And im certainly smarter than the imposter they have posing as him.

      35. If someone could explain to me why winter started disappearing in my home town in ’06 and completely disappeared during this past “winter”, that’d be great. It was high 40s- low 60s all winter. That’s not normal. I asked old timers ranging from 50-80 years old if they remember winter disappearing before in any other point in their lifetimes and they all said no. I checked average temperatures and snowfall for the months of October-March going back to 1950 and I didn’t find a single winter that’s as hot as they are now. Something is wrong and what’s maddening is people don’t seem to care.

        • He the earth and its climate is constantly changing. There isn’t any normal or optimal climate. And there isn’t any person ,group or agency that has the authority to decide or define what the normal or optimal climate should be. Im 66 and remember extreme’s . Some years where very dry. some very wet, some extremely cold and others very hot. Its simply for the most part caused by how the jet stream flows. Lately for the past few years the jet stream has been very erratic. And my guess is that is because the magnetic poles have been shifting a great amount. That shifting disrupts the magnosphere allowing high speed space wind to enter out atmosphere. and that causes the jet stream anomolys. Why the magnetic poles are shifting is the question. Is it because of NIBIRU? It simply might be a cycle that just happens? Its known that the magnetic poles have shifted and even reversed in the distant past. My theory is that the rotating core of the earth doesn’t make the magnosphere. That’s as dumb as saying the starter on a engine charges the battery. My theory is the sun charges the magnosphere and that makes the core rotate . Nibiru or some planet pushing or pulling on our solar system might be causing the magnetic pole shift. Im certain it isn’t caused by mans activities. Im also certain the USA spending billions on the paris g20 deal aint gonna stop the shift. Trump was correct to cancel that stupid deal.


        One only needs to ask themselves: “Where is all the glacial melt water we are all supposed to be drowning in by now?”
        And the answer is: “There isn’t any — not one drop lapping at our feet.”

        Then one needs to ask: “What is the motivation behind the false narrative of a warming earth that was supposedly melting the glaciers to drown us all?”
        And the answer is: — “Global wealth redistribution.”

        The far-left elite has this grandiose plan of the global redistribution of wealth. But they knew they could not sell this to the global community of nations, especially the US. So they camouflaged it as a solution to fictional global warming they planned to create.

        About twenty years ago, the far-left’s global warming fiction was released on the world. Their models consisted of some real data that was doctored to present a false history of an alarming increase in temperatures worldwide, and a projection for an accelerated doomsday heating.

        And about the same time, the far-left presented their solution to the fictional global warming — Trade in Carbon Credits. This plan entailed a scheme where by each nation would pass legislation that ceded to the UN the power to set Carbon emissions limits, which, if exceeded, would obligate the offending nation to purchase the “excess” carbon credits of the underdeveloped nations.

        Anyone with half a brain who read the details of Trade in Carbon Credits should have seen through the scheme as doing nothing for reducing global warming (if it were real.) But the mainstream media was curiously silent on it.

        Then the global warming claim was exposed as a hoax, and Trade in Carbon Credits ran into a political hailstorm of rejection in the US. Undaunted, the far-left changed the name from “global warming” to “climate change.” And they also begin creating pseudo-scientists, at first calling themselves “Climate Change scientists,” later shortening that to “climate scientist.”

        But another problem developed for the far-left — there already was a long-established branch of science for studying climate change — called climatology, And it’s scientists are called climatologists. And they do not agree with the far-left’s global warming claims.

        Enter the so-called mainstream media to aid the far-left’s scheme. Their role — just like their silence on the true effect of Cap & Trade, they were to black out the climatologists contrary reports and claims, and only repeat the global warming warnings of the fake “climate change scientists.”

        And then we also got Al Gore’s now infamous book “An Inconvenient Truth,” which turned out to be a very convenient lie.

        So here we are now, thanks to alternate news and information sources on the internet, with a very discredited mainstream media, and the lie that is global warming exposed, but not yet dead.

        The idea of global wealth redistribution is still a dream of leftist states like Canada and Europe, and all the third world’s so-called nations who would reap the benefits of Cap & Trade. So the fiction of global warming lives on with them — because without it, Cap & Trade — however it might morph in name — can not be justified.

        Stay alert my friends, because the far left is not done trying to ram this parasitic worm down our throats.

      37. Human Guinea Pigs: Congress Slams Door On Pentagon Biochemical Weapons Testing Declassification

        “In the 1960’s and 1970’s the US government tested chemical and biological weapons on US troops in still little known secret programs called Projects 112 and SHAD (Shipboard Hazard and Defense).”

        “As 6000 possibly sick US veterans got the door slammed in their faces yesterday regarding project SHAD, we must ask: what is the Pentagon hiding?”

        ht tp://

      38. Preppers are fond of acronyms like SHTF, WROL, and TEOTWAWki. One other is IBS_D which is Irritable Bowel Syndrome(diarrhea varietyJ. It should be of great concern to everyone but especially in an SHTF situation. Our large and small intestines are designed to extract the maximum amount of nutrition possible from our water and to recover as much water as possible for reuse by the body. If the intestines are irritated, the food moves to fast for the intestines to do so. The result are watery bowel discharges know as diarrhea. Our bodies are all different and we react differently to the foods in our diet. Obviously, if you have any medical conditions marked by diarrhea, you need to stock any anti-diarrheal prescribed for you but also over-the-counter medicines as well. Your choice of food preps should exclude foods that promote IBS-D for you and your family. Keeping track of the foods eaten and reacted to will help you figure this out. There are a lot of good books about this. Diarrhea will dehydrate you superfast and if the world is drying up you need to deal with before SHTF occurs.

        Educating ourselves on how our digestive systems work and the anti-nutrient defenses of plants against predators is worth learning. Several good authors are Ronald Gundry and Raymond Francis. If you learn from the internet and do searches, some key words are lectins, phytates, and enzyme inhibitors. If the fresh water sources are drying out, it is critical that out digestive systems recover as much water as possible. Good luck!

      39. Ive lived on the eastern coast all my life 64 years no rise in water is noticeable Miami must be sinking or that guy is a liar . I suspect him to be a liar and a charlatan

      40. There has been no sea level rise I live on the eastern coast of North America.
        That loon is a crack head or a liar and a charlatan .
        The only thing that warms planet earth is the sun and cosmic rays human activity has a very negligible effect.
        Charlatans like that guy want a one world govt based on austerity and communism. that is the only reason for the climate change nuts.
        Take the names of all those pushing this baloney for they are your enemy.

      41. This wasn’t actually peer-reviewed (“agreeing” with the findings is not peer review), and it was initially put out by the Cato Institute, of which Idso is a member. D’Aleo’s degree is honorary. And the charts given in the “report” show changes between two sets of corrected data, not the raw data itself, which would undermine the authors’ conclusion.

      42. Brian:

        Chia seeds are helpful. After food is cooked, throw in a teaspoon and it will absorb liquid from the dish. It absorbs the flavor, too.

        Inside the digestive tract it normalizes the process, aiding one by eliminating both extremes. Not too hard, not too soft. Goldilocks feeling much better.

        ☺️ It’s all fun and games until TSHTF.


      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.