Matt Hancock Created Euthanasia Camps to Create the Illusion of a Deadly COVID-19 Pandemic

by | Aug 9, 2023 | Headline News

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by The Daily Exposé under the title: Matt Hancock Turned Care Homes into Midazolam & Morphine Euthanasia Camps to Create the Illusion of a Deadly COVID-19 Pandemic

    If the world was both fair and just, then Matt Hancock, the former UK Health Secretary who oversaw the pandemic response, would now be in prison.

    That’s because while you stayed at home to “protect the NHS, and (allegedly) save lives”, Matt Hancock orchestrated the mass murder of the elderly and vulnerable in care homes using a drug known as Midazolam and then told you that they had all died of Covid-19; and we can prove it…

    You gave up over two years of your life due to a lie.

    A lie that involved prematurely ending the lives of thousands upon thousands of people, who you were told died of Covid-19.

    A lie that has involved committing one of the greatest crimes against humanity in living memory.

    A lie that has required three things – fear, your compliance, and a drug known as Midazolam.

    We’re told that serious illness in Covid-19 presents pneumonia and accompanying respiratory insufficiency. Therefore typical symptoms include breathlessness, cough, weakness, and fever.

    We’re also told that people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failure and who do not receive intensive care, develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.

    Meanwhile, Midazolam is a drug that has been used in executions by lethal injection in the USA. It can cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing which may lead to permanent brain injury or death.

    Knowing that would you use Midazolam to treat “patients” suffering Covid-19?

    Because that’s precisely what the then Health Secretary, Matt Hancock decided to do.

    Data taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows us that during April 2020 there were 26,541 deaths in care homes, an increase of 17,850 on the five-year average. This is half the amount of alleged Covid-19 deaths during the same period.

    Why were these people in care homes and not in hospitals?

    They were in care homes because Matt Hancock gave the order to put them there…

    On the 19th of March 2020, a directive was sent out to the NHS, with Matt Hancock’s authorization, instructing hospitals to discharge all patients who they deemed to not require a hospital bed.

    They declared that transfers from the ward must happen within one hour of that decision being made to a designated discharge area, and that discharge from the hospital should happen within 2 hours. NHS trusts were told that “they must adhere” to the new directive.

    Why on earth would people already be in a hospital bed if they did not need to be? You attend the hospital because you require medical treatment, not because you want a lie-down and a good night’s sleep.

    This directive meant that people who required medical treatment and attention were discharged into Care homes in the thousands.

    And it allowed Matt Hancock to orchestrate a genocide of the elderly and vulnerable so that he could tell you thousands were dying of Covid-19 and justify the Draconian, totalitarian state that his Government had imposed on the country, alongside many other governments around the world.

    The following exchange took place in a parliamentary committee meeting on the 17th of April 2020 between Matt Hancock and Dr Evans, a Conservative MP.

    The following is an extract from an article that confirms the United Kingdom purchased two years’ worth of Midazolam in March 2020 and was looking to purchase much more –

    Supplies of the sedative midazolam have been diverted from France as a “precaution” to mitigate potential shortages in the NHS caused by COVID-19, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has told The Pharmaceutical Journal.

    A spokesperson from Accord Healthcare, one of five manufacturers of the drug, told The Pharmaceutical Journal that it had to gain regulatory approval to sell French-labelled supplies of midazolam injection to the NHS, after having already sold two years’ worth of stock to UK wholesalers “at the request of the NHS” in March 2020.

    The DHSC said the request for extra stock was part of “national efforts to respond to the coronavirus outbreak”, which included precautions “to reduce the likelihood of future shortages”.

    Why on earth would the United Kingdom need to purchase two years’ worth of Midazolam, a drug associated with respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest, to treat a disease that causes respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest?

    During April 2020 out-of-hospital prescribing for Midazolam was twice the amount seen in 2019 –

    According to official data in April 2019 up to 21,977 prescriptions for Midazolam were issued, containing 171,952 items, the vast majority being Midazolam Hydrochloride.

    However, in April 2020 45,033 prescriptions for Midazolam were issued, containing 333,229 items, the vast majority being Midazolam Hydrochloride.

    That is a 104.91% increase in the number of prescriptions issued for Midazolam and a 93.85% increase in the number of items they contained. But these weren’t issued in hospitals, they were issued by GP practices which can only mean one thing, they were issued for end-of-life care.

    The following is a graph displayed on the UK Government website displaying deaths within 28 days of a positive test result for Covid-19 by date of death –

    The following graph has been created using data on the amount of Midazolam solution produced each month from January 20219 through to March 2021.

    Can you spot the difference? We couldn’t either because there isn’t one.

    The spikes in production of Midazolam solution match the spikes of alleged Covid deaths within 28 days of a positive test.

    • April 2020 – a huge surge in out-of-hospital Midazolam prescriptions out-of-hospital and a huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.
    • April 2020 – a huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.
    • January 2021 – a huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.
    • January 2021 – a huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.

    Throw in the fact that –

    • Hospital beds in April 2020 30% were down compared to the previous year.
    • A&E attendance was 57% down in April 2020 compared to the previous year.
    • Care home deaths were 205% up in April 2020 compared to April 2019.
    • And the vast majority of alleged Covid deaths have been among people over the age of 85.

    Then it’s quite simple to see how Matt Hancock orchestrated what amounts to the mass murder of the elderly and vulnerable by forcing them into care homes, refusing them proper medical care, putting them on the end-of-life pathway, overprescribing midazolam and then falsely labeling the deaths as being due to Covid-19.

    Did you really believe there’s a virus so clever that it knows to kill people who are disabled? Just look at the ONS statistics.

    Three in every five alleged Covid-19 deaths occurred in those who suffered learning difficulties and disabilities (see here).

    In relation to deaths of people with learning difficulties, the ONS said – ‘the largest effect was associated with living in a care home or other communal establishment.

    Having a learning difficulty and being in care doesn’t mean you are more likely to die of Covid-19. What it means is that you are much more likely to have a DNR order placed on you without informing yourself or your family, which Carers / NHS staff then use as permission to put you on end-of-life care, which involves the administration of Midazolam.

    We know this happened because an Amnesty report and CQC report said so.

    The Amnesty report states that –

    ‘Care home managers and staff and relatives of care home residents in different parts of the country told Amnesty International how, in their experience, sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused by hospitals, ambulance teams, and GPs. A manager in Yorkshire said: “We were heavily discouraged from sending residents to hospital. We talked about it in meetings; we were all aware of this.”’

    Another manager in Hampshire recalled:

    There wasn’t much option to send people to hospital. We managed to send one patient to hospital because the nurse was very firm and insisted that the lady was too uncomfortable and we could not do any more to make her more comfortable but the hospital could. In hospital the lady tested COVID positive and was treated and survived and came back. She is 92 and in great shape.

    She explained that:
    There was a presumption that people in care homes would all die if they got COVID, which is wrong. It shows how little the government knows about the reality of care homes.

    ‘The son of one care home resident who passed away in Cumbria said that sending his father to hospital had not even been considered:

    From day one, the care home was categoric it was probably COVID and he would die of it and he would not be taken to hospital. He only had a cough at that stage. He was only 76 and was in great shape physically. He loved to go out and it would not have been a problem for him to go to hospital. The care home called me and said he had symptoms, a bit of a cough and that doctor had assessed him over mobile phone and he would not be taken to hospital.

    Then I spoke to the GP later that day and said h would not be taken to hospital but would be given morphine if in pain. Later he collapsed on the floor in
    the bathroom and the care home called the paramedic who established that he had no injury and put him back to bed and told the carers not to call them back for any Covid-related symptoms because they would not return. He died a week later.

    He was never tested. No doctor ever came to the care home. The GP assessed him over the phone. In an identical situation for someone living at home instead of in a care home, the advice was “go to hospital”. The death certificate says pneumonia and COVID, but pneumonia was never mentioned to us.’

    A care home manager in Yorkshire told Amnesty International:
    In March, I tried to get [a resident] into hospital—the ambulance had employed a doctor to do triage but they said, “Well he’s end of life anyway so we’re not going to send an ambulance” … Under normal circumstances he would have gone to hospital … I think he was entitled to be admitted to hospital. These are individuals who have contributed to society all their lives and were denied the respect and dignity that you would give to a 42-year-old; they were [considered] expendable.

    The CQC felt it necessary to issue a statement in August 2020 addressing the issue of inappropriate DNR’s being placed on care home residents without informing residents or their families –

    ‘It is vitally important that older and disabled people living in care homes and in the community can access hospital care and treatment for COVID-19 and other conditions when they need it during the pandemic … Providers should always work to prevent avoidable harm or death for all those they care for.

    Protocols, guidelines and triage systems should be based on equality of access to care and treatment. If they are based on assumptions that some groups are less entitled to care and treatment than others, this would be discriminatory. It would also potentially breach human rights, including the right to life, even if there were concerns that hospital or critical care capacity may be reached.’

    That statement was issued because the CQC found that 34% of people working in health and social care were pressured into placing ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders on Covid patients who suffered from disabilities and learning difficulties, without involving the patient or their families in the decision.

    It was decided in 2013 after a review that the ‘Liverpool Care Pathway‘ was to be abolished. The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was a scheme that we’re told intended to improve the quality of care in the final hours or days of a patient’s life.

    Its alleged aim was to ensure a peaceful and comfortable death. The LCP was a guide to doctors, nurses, and other health workers looking after someone who was dying on issues such as the appropriate time to remove tubes providing food and fluid, or when to stop the medication.

    The reason it was decided it should be abolished is that the review found hospital staff wrongly interpreted its guidance for care of the dying, leading to stories of patients who were drugged and deprived of fluids in their last weeks of life.

    The evidence suggests that the Liverpool Care Pathway returned with a vengeance in April 2020 under the direction of Health Secretary Matt Hancock, Government Advisors and NHS Chiefs, and it looks as if it was used to manipulate you into giving up two to three years of your life under the pretense that you were staying at home, to protect the NHS and save lives.

    But in reality, while you did that as you were told, Matt Hancock orchestrated the mass murder of the elderly and vulnerable in care homes with a drug called midazolam and then falsely told you that they had all died of Covid-19.

    This is why ‘Midazolam Matt’ Hancock should be in prison right now.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.