Joe Biden Lies AGAIN! Says 150 Million Killed By Guns Since 2007

by | Feb 27, 2020 | Headline News | 11 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    When democrats open their mouths, lies come out. It just happens.  And Joe Biden is no different.  The presidential candidate and former Vice President said that 150 million people have been killed by guns since 2007.

    What’s odd here, is that guns just don’t go out and start murdering people. So to say they have killed anyone is erroneous at best and a propagating to the emotionally weak at worst. The other thing that happened (that’s not really so strange): no other democrat or moderator called out Biden after made the false claim in the democratic presidential debates. The Washington Examiner stated that that was because misinformation and factual errors are par for the course in the Democrats’ anti-gun narrative.

    The United States government, of which Biden is an establishment member has killed more people than any private sociopath could.  But if you Google “how many people has the U.S. government killed,” you get unsurprising results, and very few of them.  It’s more than obvious that that information is not available to the general public and that’s because they know we’d turn on them if they told us just how diabolical they really are. (They are manufacturing your consent.) The U.S. military-industrial complex is a mass-murdering machine of war and death, and that’s simply not debatable.

    What we do know for a fact, is that democide (death by government) has killed over 260 million people the 20th century, and on a path to far surpass that number in the 21st century.

    Democide: Government Killed Over 260 Million in the 20th Century, Poised to Kill Billions More in the 21st

    So for Biden to claim half the U.S. population has been killed by guns, is laughable. What’s worst, is Biden, who was part of the administration the drone bombed countless innocent people, including children, is saying the problem is the general public. He’s not the murderous psychopath, that’s everyone else because he fabricated the numbers to prove it.

    Anti-gun activists also routinely use imaginary or misleading language in the gun debate. As Adams notes, there is no such thing as “rapid-fire magazines” or “gas-assisted receiver firearms,” and it is not, in fact, easier to buy an AK-47 than it is to buy cough medicine.

    All of this is to say, Biden’s debate stage error about half the U.S. population dying from guns isn’t just one gaffe in a vacuum — it’s standard Democratic fare when talking about guns.

    Self-Defense Is A Basic Human Right: A Website That ENDS The Gun Control Debate For Good

    This is R. J. Rummel’s fourth book in a series devoted to genocide and government mass murder, or what he calls democide. He presents the primary results, in tables and figures, as well as a historical sketch of the major cases of democide, those in which one million or more people were killed by a regime. In Death by Government, Rummel does not aim to describe democide itself but to determine its nature and scope in order to test the theory that democracies are inherently nonviolent.

    The underlying principle is that the less freedom people have, the greater the violence; the more freedom, the less the violence. Thus, as Rummel says, “The problem is power. The solution is democracy. The course of action is to foster freedom.”

    Death by Government is a compelling look at the horrors that occur in modern societies. It depicts how democide has been very much a part of human history. This riveting account is an essential tool for historians, political scientists, and scholars interested in the study of genocide.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Half the population of the United States??

        … I mean. You’d think we’d kind of notice. Maybe.

      2. (They are manufacturing your consent.) The U.S. military-industrial complex is a mass-murdering machine of war and death, and that’s simply not debatable.

      3. (They are manufacturing your consent.) The U.S. military-industrial complex is a mass-murdering machine of war and death, and that’s simply not debatable.”

        Actually those who serve within our federal government are NOT allowed to have the USA in wars of any type, length, etc without a congressional declaration of war, and even with that declaration it is not to be funded beyond 2 (two) years. Yes this is all in writing. No one else can send Americans to war.

        US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11, The CONGRESS shall have power: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”. (my caps)

        Clause 12: “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years”.

        James Madison: “The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature … the executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war.”

        James Madison: “No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare”.

        George Washington: “The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”

        James Madison: “In time of actual war, great discretionary powers are constantly given to the Executive Magistrate. Constant apprehension of War, has the same tendency to render the head too large for the body. A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defence against foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people.”

        John Quincy Adams: “America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She well knows that by enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standards of freedom.

        George Washington: “It is our true policy to steer clear of entangling alliances with any portion of the foreign world. The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.”

        Thomas Jefferson: “I have ever deemed it fundamental for the United States never to take active part in the quarrels of Europe. Their political interests are entirely distinct from ours. Their mutual jealousies, their balance of power, their complicated alliances, their forms and principles of government, are all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal war. “

        James Madison: “Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied: and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people. The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manners and of morals, engendered by both. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.

      4. So what Joe is actually arguing for in his own inept way is for the government not to have any authority over the use of weapons, and who ought to be the target of murder by guns, since they are incapable of resisting the use of deadly force, or incapable of commanding others to use deadly force with guns, like an alcoholic blaming the brewery for his/her alcoholism.

      5. Nice, half the country’s population dead by “gun violence” in the last 13 years. So Joe, why aren’t Baltimore, Detroit and Chicongo ghost towns already? …and this guy was the supposed “front runner” out of the box? Nothing like electing a senile septuagenarian to run your country. Hey Demonrats, here’s clue: promising to take everyone’s guns is a LOSER position.

      6. I just saved myself and others….drowned my guns in the lake. Better now?

      7. Think he was adding in the hundreds of millions killed by Russia!!!
        They’re the ones that kill their own people more than any other country.

      8. went to that website you promoted THAT ENDS THE GUN DEBATE and have a question. The writer states that he came from Russia in 1990, did not get a bb gun until a few years later, yet protested the Vietnam war in his early twenties. By my calculations he would have to been born at least in the early 1950s. So that means his dad bought him his first bb gun in his forties and he is now hitting around 70. Yet the picture I keep seeing showed a guy in his late twenties or early thirties. Just saying………..

      9. 150 million?

        Pffft….it’s as believable as 6 garillion….so why not?

      10. I Think what Slow Joe Biden Really MEANT to say was ” a hundred and fifty million have been THRILLED by guns” !!!

      11. It has gotten to the point now that the only thing that politicians do is lie. What is the point in listenning to any of them at all?

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.