This article was originally published by Brandon Smith of Alt-Market and first appeared at Personal Liberty.
In my last article, ‘How Globalists Predict Your Behavior’, I outlined the primary method globalists use to measure public consent, or, public dissent. The use of macro-analytics and the hyper-monitoring of web traffic is a powerful tool at the disposal of the establishment for gauging shifts in public consciousness in real time.
For example, in early 2016 the elites were entirely aware of the rise of conservative and sovereignty movements in the U.S. and Europe. In fact, the dangers of growing “populism” were all that elitists and their publications talked about for the first six months of the year. At first, this notion seemed a little odd to me. Generally, when globalists are attempting to manage public opinion, they are careful not to reveal the slightest hint that conservative movements exist beyond an “extremist fringe”. They certainly never suggest that there is a massive undercurrent of nationalism ready to topple the globalist structure.
In fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them or co-opt them. I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 – the mainstream deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul’s existence, because attacking him repeatedly would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and free publicity.
I saw it during the Neo-con co-option of the Tea Party, a movement that I was involved in long before Fox News latched onto it and long before mainstream RINO Republicans not only jumped on the bandwagon but hijacked the horse. In a matter of months the Tea Party became a defunct entity, a shell of its former self. Luckily, most liberty activists simply left it behind and started their own separate groups and projects rather than being absorbed into the Neo-con fold.
I also saw establishment interference on a local and state level during elections in Montana. An associate of mine was running for state office on a liberty platform and was doing rather well in the polls. He was approached by a contingent of political elites running as Republicans who told him in no uncertain terms that he could run on any platform and use any rhetoric he wanted, but if he won, he would be required to follow THEIR direction. They even encouraged him to continue arguing for constitutional government in his speeches and debates, because they felt this was the best way to “sell” his candidacy. But when all was said and done, he was supposed to stab his constituency in the back and take orders from the party leadership.
The point is, the elites dominate the political system. Nothing happens within it without their say. So, for those same elites to suddenly and openly suggest that “populist movements” were threatening to overtake the world and destroy the global economy was suspicious, to say the least.
In order to predict the behavior of globalists and the outcome of future economic and political events, it is important to understand certain dynamics. As just described, the establishment has a stranglehold on the political system. Party politics are a sham built around the false left/right paradigm. However, certain new dynamics are developing, and you must be able to track them.
The best way to do this is to watch what globalists say within their own publications. They often reveal their intentions directly or indirectly. In many cases I think in their arrogance they assume that the masses are too stupid to read these publications and grasp what is being said.
The most important element of predicting globalist actions is to know what they ultimately want; to know their ultimate goals. If you know the specifics of what any group or individual desperately wants, those people become highly predictable, because there are only so many useful paths to get to any goal.
I have used this method to great effect over the years, so I am not merely presenting a theory, I have concrete successes to back my position.
For example, just in the past couple of years I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that Barack Obama would veto it and that congress would override his veto, I predicted that Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican candidate for president of the U.S. and, I predicted that Donald Trump would win the 2016 election.
Except for the China SDR inclusion, I predicted all of these events many months in advance and received a heavy amount of criticism each time from people in the mainstream and even from people in the liberty movement. Hilariously, as soon as these predictions proved true, some of the same people that were fervently opposed came quickly out of the woodwork to claim they “saw it coming all along”. I suppose this is human nature, but it is a problem because it keeps people from learning how to better gauge globalist behavior and come to correct conclusions.
My goal in this article is to make EVERY liberty activist adept at predicting globalist driven events. So, here is a good place to start:
Learn To Play Chess
The elites are obsessed with chess and chess symbolism. Many of their strategies develop much like a game of chess develops. If you don’t know how to play chess, I suggest you learn. You don’t have to master the game, but you do need to understand the basic concepts of winning the game.
For example, if you know the target that your opponent is really pursuing, you can easily obstruct his efforts because all his movements will become predictable. If his goal is to take your Queen, and you know this, then he should never be able to take your queen. This is why the elites go to great lengths to distract their opponents (meaning us) from their true target. They want you to think they are going straight for your King, or your Knight; they want you focused elsewhere. They will use feints often.
Another core strategy of chess is the “forced sacrifice”. That is to say, the best chess players are very good at positioning one of their pieces so that it threatens two or more of your pieces. This forces you to sacrifice one piece for the sake of the others. If they do this often enough, before you know it you have sacrificed your way into defeat. The globalists ALWAYS have a primary target and a secondary target. There is always more than one move developing at any given time.
Knowing chess is key to knowing how the globalists think.
Get In Touch With Your Darker Side
Going by their behavior and their rhetoric when they are unguarded, most globalists display highly narcissistic character traits as well as sociopathy and psychopathy. It is not enough to research these traits in a clinical fashion, you have to tap into the darker side of your own psyche, and think as they think. This means being willing to entertain evil and malicious concepts. You must be willing to ask yourself – “If I were them, how would I go about getting what I want?”
Understanding devious and aberrant psychopathic intent goes a long way in making the globalists predictable. Remember, many psychopaths are actually highly intelligent and intuitive. They don’t have a moral compass and have lost the voice of conscience, but in order to adapt they have learned how to fake it. They are chameleons.
ALL people are inherently capable of evil actions, just as they are inherently capable of great good. You don’t have to become like the elites, but you do have to go to some ugly places in your own mind. An elitist is basically a person who went to those places and discovered that he liked it there.
Read Globalist Publications
As noted above, the globalists have their own media outlets in which they publish their “views”, such as Foreign Policy Magazine, The Economist, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc. Sometimes these views are honest and sometimes they are calculated propaganda. Again, if you know exactly what the elitist targets are, then you can better discern if what they are saying is legitimate or a feint to distract you.
I predicted the success of the Brexit and the Trump win based on the knowledge that:
1) The globalists need a large scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions on society and governance. That is to say, they need to create a crisis so terrifying that people will be willing to accept a fully centralized global economic system and global governance as a solution.
2) The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed. It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.
3) Conservative and sovereignty principles are the primary threat to the dominance of globalism. As long as ideas of individualism, national sovereignty and decentralization exist, globalism can never truly prevail. Therefore, obstructing movements based on these principles is not enough. The globalists must also destroy any positive perceptions of our principles for generations to come.
4) As stated in the section on chess, the globalists like to use the strategy of forced sacrifice, in which they threaten two targets simultaneously, or kill two birds with one stone. I realized at the beginning of 2016 that all the rhetoric by globalists in their own publications on the “rise of populism” was staging the groundwork for the success of the Brexit and the success of Trump. What better strategy for the establishment than to allow conservative movements to take the helm of the political and economic ship just as that ship is about to sink? In this way, the globalists can have the crisis they need, while at the same time scapegoating conservatives and avoiding blame, and, destroying the image of conservative ideals, perhaps forever.
Have No Sacred Cows
This is a hard one for many people. We all have certain biases and these biases can blind us to reality. The overreaching bias within the liberty movement is a desire for heroic leadership. We have grown up on stories of heroes from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson – grand statesmen and military giants that crushed tyranny. The problem is, while men like Washington and Jefferson were indeed instrumental, they were nothing without the hundreds of thousands of unsung patriots working tirelessly for freedom on their own.
The founding fathers were not considered the founding fathers until long after the American Revolution was over. At the time, they were not thought of necessarily as heroes or even great leaders. They were just men, like many other men, gambling life and liberty on a cause that was uncertain at best.
Activists need to STOP looking around for mighty leaders and start taking leadership themselves in their own way. If we do end up with another Washington or Jefferson or Paine or Madison, etc., we will not know who they are until the fight is over and the history books are written.
The globalists take full advantage of the movement’s weakness in seeking out and artificially elevating heroes. Also, when people have this bias, they end up with blinders when examining such heroes with any skepticism. Obviously I am referring to Donald Trump, here.
Sacred cows prevent accurate predictions of major events because a person will refuse to consider them as a potential negative factor.
Moving Beyond Predictions
It is one thing to be able to predict the outcome of social and political events; it is another matter to do something about them. In my next article I will outline solutions liberty activists can pursue on their own and in groups to counter globalist activity. Predicting their tactics is essential, but acting to disrupt those tactics should be the ultimate goal.
The globalists believe that even if some of us do manage to decipher their activities and methods, we will have no means to do anything about them. They see themselves as the “history makers”, as the men who act. They see us as the “history watchers”, or the meaningless masses wafting about with geopolitical tides, helpless and incapable of determining our own destinies. I believe we will become history makers in due course. One weakness of the globalists that will sabotage them is their own hubris. They see people as pawns – but what happens when a piece walks off the chess board completely and acts in an unpredictable way? It is this potential alone that will destroy the globalists in the end.
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected]
If you are going to fight a tiger, you had better know what a tiger is! KNOW YOUR ENEMY! Learn to think like them and predict their actions. That is the only way you will ever be able to stay a step ahead.
I want their scalps hanging from my lodge pole and I still want them breathing when I take it.
Makes me wonder what they know, that we don’t.
You’re Buying, They’re Selling: Big Bank Execs Dump $100 Million In Stock As Market Soared
“Shortly after the melt-up in US bank stocks began following Trump’s election victory, we noted heavy insider-selling (and options expiration) among Goldman Sachs executives.
Well the selling never stopped, as WSJ reports executives at the biggest Wall Street banks (including JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley) have sold nearly $100 million worth of stock since the presidential election, more than in that same period in any year over the past decade.”
ht tp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/youre-buying-theyre-selling-big-bank-execs-dump-100-million-stock-market-soared
Direct link…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/youre-buying-theyre-selling-big-bank-execs-dump-100-million-stock-market-soared
KY MOM,
you got it, by the time the public hears about time to buy, you can bet your A– that those who really know have already done the dirty deed and are elsewhere with there money!been that way for a longtime, actually ever since our government has been bought and paid for!!
This build up and admitted “heavy insider selling” by the major Wall Street banks makes me think back to 2008.
Goldman Sachs was also involved in “heavy insider trading” in 2008. That didn’t end well for the country.
Goldman Fraud explained – April 2010
ht tps://www.rt.com/business/goldman-fraud-explained/
Know what the tiger wants; what each subtle move really means.
I have cats so I know when they are acting casual–like slowly stretching and yawning–they really might have their eye on your dinner plate. But sometimes, they are just stretching.
Have to know the circumstances to understand the difference–just like in the human world.
One more thing. Recall the book, “Games People Play”; lots of the same thing goes on at high levels. Just transpose the person-to-person templates written out up to the globalists level.
People are more complicated than the simple schemes in the book. There’s often several games going on along with feints and side-steps. However, no matter the variation on the ‘game’, there is always, always a payoff or winnings of some sort. The payoff can be simple attention-getting or attention deflecting or something bigger like power.
As noted elsewhere, the ‘game’ cannot be played if someone refuses to play along.
Be watchful and aware.
Trump needs to order every Fed Dept to produce a ZERO Based Budget. And find all the missing money and put some in Jail. 25% of the Pentagon’s Budget cannot be accounted for. Get a list of Fed Properties and percentage of occupancy. Time to cut a big slab of fat Off this Govnt. Federal Facilities do not pay Taxes.
I’m not bad, but I’m not real good at chess. It seems to me our biggest problem is American Democrats who play chess described as “a bird jumping on the board, knocking over the pieces, shitting all over everything and then claiming they have won”. I don’t know who to attribute that quote to(I paraphrased), but it seems like a good anecdote.
I always liked forced sacrifice as a chess tactic, but in real life that isn’t one’s first choice in a war. Many Chess games end with most of your “soldiers” dead. In life I tend to think, Machiavelli’s and Sun Tzu’s advice are better tactics. You kill most the enemy(90% or more), while preserving 90% of yours.
Like General Patton said, “Make the other poor bastard die for his country. Not you.”
Adapting, let the liberal elite globalists die for their fascist cause, not me.
Free Slave:
General Patton also said, “we fought the wrong enemy”. That same day Patton wrote a letter to his wife telling her that if we, Americans, did not attack Russia and defeat the forces of chew Bolshevic Communism, that the chews and their Communism would infiltrate and take over America. That is exactly what happened. General Patton was murdered. His neck was broken. The army still won’t release his autopsy report. The chews claim he died in an automobile accident. Kind of hard to drive when some murderous chew is breaking your neck.
Know your enemy.
Watch on YouTube
by:
Dennis Wise
“Communism By The Back Door”
••••• And •••••
“Hitler, The Greatest Story Never Told”
__
Yes you are absolutely correct. Almost all US history is a lie just like the MSM.
it is worse than just the USA history it the WHOLE worlds history has been severely altered!!
Absolutly true!
And worse: The US government is what brought back the Frankfurt school to Europe. The triumph of cultural marxism started with this act.
Rellik; I think you paraphrased Putin and he hit it on the head. I think if people read Alinsky and Cloward&Piven that will give you an insight into what our opponents are thinking.
rellik, RE; Chess, have you ever played the video game “Delta Force II” Online, with players across the world? Its a real game, real people, all equals with weapons, and it comes down to tactics, stealth, and fast thinking. I would get somebody to start chasing me, I would run around the corner, stop and set up a quick motion detector claymores. Sure enough the dope would run around the corner and get blown up. The human decision making process is predictable, even in battle, however, however we will all find our match. Learn how to slice the pie, and flank. Always play live instead of some static video game. That’s how you get sharp playing against real human elements.
The snipers in Stalingrad would set up for days to get that one shot. Trump ~ “He’s no hero, he got captured. I like soldiers who don’t get captured.” Referring to John McCain POW Hero status. lol That was a Trumpster Classic.
TD;
I’m on satellite, so I’m data and bandwidth limited. Video eats my allowance up really fast. I don’t even watch the videos posted here on SHTF. I operate mostly as text only.
It is a bitch living on the edge of technology, but it is 75 degrees today, and I’ll have garden fresh Broccoli with dinner tonight.
Rellik, believe me, tech is over rated, its going to be another nice day today and the only thing i will use my phone for is figuring out what time it is, i find the less time i spend with tech the better i feel,,,
McCain is no hero, heros dont push for war on other peoples shores,
“The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed. It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.”
If this is true, (and I believe it is), then punishment is the only move we can make. Take stock of who did what and when…then lock and load. It’s going to be a french style revolution.
I want my frickin’ cake dammit!
Speaking of murderous treasonous Globalist Corporatist psychopaths, we have Andrew Puzder of Hardee’s fame, about to assume another position on the Corporatist Fascist Military Junta Death Squad. Ole murderous treasonous psychopath Andy, he likes the sexy racy commercials that get the drunken fat ass toxic dump men that are 9 months pregnant with a toxic belly full of deadly garbage leading them to an early disease ridden life of hell…Ole Andy gets the drunken bum male dumps all excited, so they run out and buy a huge dose of chemical filled garbage, and then immediately try to get to the bathroom before they shit their pants, all the while thinking they actually have a chance to screw anything except their worn out hands.
I think the Globalists are trying to sell their Globalist Slavery, but Nobody is buying it anymore, as more and more nations have woken up, and are following Trumps lead and helping their nations, as well as our become sovereign again. And shedding these Globalist slave chains of Libby Communism to enrich the elitists. The NY Times is Livid that Trump Voided out TPP. Game Over!!
My Mother 79 yrs old, said the news paper is getting soo small it looks like a few page flyer. I said nobody is buying their lies anymore Mom. Why are you still getting the newspaper? She said to see the obituaries. lol Like when you get old, you sit and wait around every day for the news to see who just died. WTF? And how mysterious, they all die in alphabetical order every day. Truly amazing.
I check the Obits on line every day. When you get old you check them. the goal is to outlive those you don’t like. Read their obit find out where they are buried so you can go piss on their graves.
If the elites actually were lizardmen with tiny PP’s what would they do differently?
Thanks Brandon, for another extremely thoughtful essay.
“The Book of Five Rings” and “The Art of War” are both must reads, along with Alinsky and Edward Bernays (who invented “public relations.”) In passing I suggest folks also learn to play “Go” the Asian board game that is entirely different from chess. I opine that the folks in Beijing are using the precepts and tactics from this game right now in the South China Sea.
As I’ve commented before, “The Fourth Turning” is also an amazingly predictive book, published in 1966. I also recommend Charles Mackay’s “Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds,” written in 1848 about manias, both financial and otherwise.
TN.:
Some quotes from Mackay, to add to your post:
“In reading The History of Nations, we find that, like individuals, they have their whims and their peculiarities, their seasons of excitement and recklessness, when they care not what they do. We find that whole communities suddenly fix their minds upon one object and go mad in its pursuit; that millions of people become simultaneously impressed with one delusion, and run after it, till their attention is caught by some new folly more captivating than the first.”
and
“Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.” (Those mindless “Yes we can/Yes we have no bananas” Obama chanters, anyone???
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841) Charles Mackay.
The globalists need a large scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions” and “The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis.
This is probably true. But even if it is not, the purpose of those who love liberty are the same: We must **educate** and inform. To wit: Globalists, in their love of death, or big Malthusians. Do some research on this. E.g., google the Julian Simon/Paul Ehrlich wager, find out who won, and why. Truth is, minds matter more than mouths. Malthusianism, like socialism, will always “come true manana,” and “It’s just around the corner.” Don’t believe me?
As Blaise Pascal once noted, once science is divorced from ethics, scientists will use their skills to pursue power, not truth. The 1974 Club of Rome report titled, Mankind at the Turning Point stated, “The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” (Not the authors of course… they are ***special***. It’s you and me in their crosshairs). Their solution was simple – engineer a massive reduction in population and utterly change the socio-economic system through centralized planning via total government control. And yes, this does smack of being called “The Final Solution” to me, too. This “man is the enemy” was reiterated by the Club of Rome in 1993, as well, when they stated in their The First Global Revolution, downloadable at http://www.scribd.com/doc/2297152/Alexander-King-Bertrand-Schneider-The-First-Global-Revolution-Club-of-Rome-1993-Edition that “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
“We came up with the idea??” In other words, a conclusion had already been reached, and now they needed to create a “reason” to support their unsupported – and as Julian Simon provisionally demonstrated, possibly false – a priori assumptions. Do not try this technique in any school paper you may attempt, or you will be failed!
As Robert Zubrin observed, to the warmers, “… each new life is unwelcome, each unregulated thought or act is menace, every person is fundamentally the enemy of every other person, and each race or nation is the enemy of every other race or nation.” Perhaps it is put most clearly by the World Wildlife Fund Living Plant Report of 2012, which Lewis Page summarizes in the May 16, 2012 edition of the Register that “economic growth should be abandoned, (and) citizens of the world’s wealthy nations should prepare for poverty.” The rich, of course, are especially bad, as the Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit, by Rosalyn McKeown, found at http://www.esdtoolkit.org/ tells us: “Generally, more highly educated people who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people, who tend to have lower incomes. In this case, more education increases the threat to sustainability.” Of course, individual rights are verboten, given the Malthusian threat to the earth. As Harvey Ruvin, Vice-chair of International Committee for Local Environment Initiatives (ICLEI), a group that wants to impose the green agenda on everyone has noted, “Individual rights must take a back seat to the collective.” Pol Pot, move over.
(Incidentally, the Malthusians might want to get a clue, as between 30 and 50 percent of all food produced globally, equivalent to two billion tons, is thrown away each year according to a recent report written by the UK-based Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IME), titled ‘Global Food; Waste Not, Want Not’, found at http://www.imeche.org/Libraries/Reports/IMechE_Global_Food_Report.sflb.ashx.
Of course, per the usually PC Time Magazine, the Malthusians are doubly wrong, as “…it turns out the world’s population isn’t growing nearly as fast as it once did. In fact, experts say the rate of population growth will continue to slow and that the total population will eventually — likely within our lifetimes — fall.” http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/01/11/overcrowding-nah-the-worlds-population-may-actually-be-declining/
Hate to say it but they are right: human beings are the most dangerous thing on this planet bar none. You can have a low IQ whale or a low IQ newt, but their behaviour and actions will not irrevocably ruin the planet. But a low IQ human being? Put an AK-47 in their hands, tell them they can make money selling crack cocaine, and they will do anything to anyone for the money. Or stick a simple pen knife in their hands and look at them the wrong way, and they will kill for that look.
The big danger we have at present is the exploding population of low IQ people. Populations are out of control in the very places where IQs are the lowest, where educational levels are the lowest, where the people have no cultural memory of high achievement, where the few wise elders in their populations can’t make up for the fact most men die by the time they are 40, thus knowledge, wisdom and intelligence are not accumulated by these societies. Few young men have any decent male role models to guide them. This is only made worse by the fact these are primarily not reading cultures. So, the knowledge not passed on by wise elders is also not picked up by reading books.
It is not enough to fixate on population numbers. It is necessary to fixate on how that population chooses to live and use resources. Highly sophisticated societies tend to live ‘clean’: they have garbage removal, they clean the streets, they do not have open fires everywhere, they defecate in toilets, not on the street or in plastic bags. But unsophisticated societies live ‘dirty’: people do not wash their hands, they do not hygienically prepare food, they defecate on the street or fling their crap in a plastic bag, they just drop garbage where they stand (you can see this even with third world origin taxi drivers, who just dump the crap in the cab on the street, or their piss in a bottle). And there are more of these people in the world than the others – and their numbers are going exponential.
Now, think of what state the planet is going to be in with this population.
Frank, good points. Hard to read and picture Earth’s future the way you put it.
I’m glad we (most of us here) had the run we’ve had, seen good times and some bad ones, mostly good.
But without a younger generation to learn things like we discuss here, (TPTB/globalists), and about the history of a free republic, (and how it SHOULD be) I think USA’s best times are not ahead, but in the rear view mirror.
Are these people above alone? Hardly. Maurice Strong, the leftist hero of global governance, and former Secretary General of the UN’s Conference on Environment and Development, stated in his 2000 autobiography, Where We Are Going, that by 2031, two thirds of earth’s population might be wiped out. A tragedy? Not to the left. He describes this possibility as “A glimmer of hope for the future of our species and its potential for regeneration” (think the evil Professor Weston here in CS Lewis’ Out of the Silent Planet and Perelandra). As James Delinpole observes about Strong’s comment: “See: It’s perfectly OK to fantasize about the deaths of maybe 5 billion people – as long as you show at the end that you really care: you’re thinking about humanity.” Exactly what the leftists said as they wiped out over 60 million in the Soviet Union, Pol Pot with his millions in Cambodia, or Mao with his toll of perhaps 20 million. And this will be done with or without your consent, as Strong again notes: “Our concept of ballot box democracy may need to be modified (Agenda 21, anyone? I think we can agree “Abolished” will be the operative word, not “modified,” once the left is through) to produce strong governments capable of making difficult decisions, particularly in terms of safe-guarding the environment.” Strong’s United Nations Environment Programme also had a decidedly socialist mandate, stating in their 1976 report “Private land ownership is a principal instrument of accumulating wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice Public control of land is therefore indispensible,” and “public ownership of land is justified in favour of the common good, rather than to protect the interests of the already privileged.” And for good measure, Strong also wanted a “collectivist global government.” Unknown is whether Strong wanted a Pol Pot style collective, a USSR style collective, or a Maoist collective. We can be sure, however, that the private property and zillion room mansions of the Hollywood Learjet leftists won’t be affected, nor the leftist limousine liberals in New York’s Hamptons or Martha’s Vineyard, nor Michele Obama’s uber luxe monthly vacations.
But Strong didn’t stop there. As Discover the Networks noted, Strong felt that industrialized countries benefitted “from unsustainable patters of production and consumption, which have produced our present dilemma,” with all the environmental problems emanating from our Western middle class lifestyles (that Strong, himself, had no problem personally enjoying!) which includes “high mean intake, consumption of of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work palce air conditioning, and suburban housing” – all of which were not sustainable. Concluded strong about his delusional dilemma: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring it about?”
Thankfully, Strong had feathered his own nest very, very well before his death, making off – Solyndra/Bernie Madoff-like – with $15.3 mm in shares sold just before one of his failed green energy companies, Molten Metal Technologies was exposed for the scam it was. Strong sold at $35/share, while the common man who invested saw his investment drop to $5/share. Stockholders filed an insider class action suit against MMTI, which was similar to another, previous lawsuit Strong was involved with. And let’s not forget Strong’s heavy involvment with the corrupt Oil for Food scam with Saddam Hussein (he initially denied involvement… until investigators confronted him with a cheque endorsed with his own signature. Nothing ever came of this…. but, of course, nothing ever does with connected leftists. Witness Obama buddy Jon Corzine “losing” $1.6 billion in private investor funds, and getting a tiny slap on the wrist, Hilary’s home email server antics, or Bill Clinton’s blatant perjury in a court of law – which would put any normal person in prison .
Globalists don’t need to sell global slavery people’s worship of $ seals the deal. Didn’t soros say control the $ and you control the world. They made a system the requires the individual to have $ the corporate slave masters give you a job. You now belong to that slave master. Of course your free to leave. However you still need $ to pay your bills so you will seek another owner to draw a salary from. The corporate slave masters know they have you where they want and they exploit your talents for as low pay as they can. Essentially they use you as a stepping stone to build their wealth. As they get bonuses and elevate their way of life yours stays the same or your forced to take a pay cut. You fall into the working poor rut and it’s by design it happens everywhere you go to discourage you from leaving your slave master. Eventually you will give up you desire to get ahead because what’s the use. This is the corporate elites plan and they are all in on it trump too. He cares about his corporate buddies more than the poor workin slave. Corporations have taken capitalism to the point of corrupt cronyism. Look I’m not against making a buck but the corporations have too much power they need to be shrunk just like big gov. Down with corporations.
“Trump and his advisors regard the Pacific and Atlantic partnerships as trade deals like NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement that sent American jobs to Mexico at the expense of Americans.
However, the most strategic part of these agreements is that they make global corporations immune from the laws of the countries in which they do business if those laws adversely impact the profits of the global corporations.
Who decides the question? Not the courts of the countries or a world court.
The question is decided by a corporate tribunal staffed only by corporations.
In other words, the sovereign laws of sovereign countries, such as France’s laws against GMOs, are subject to damage suits decided by corporate tribunals, which means the end of the legal sovereignty of countries.”
Paul Craig Roberts in http://kingworldnews.com/paul-craig-roberts-terrifying-warning-timely-message/
Long time ago was part of a “pentagon study group” and “war gamed” this out.. EMP.. only way for the globalists to take out America.. 90% die off in 2 years.. Trump is the wildcard they didn’t expect.. they’re getting desperate and i fear EMP is on the horizon.. who it’ll get blamed on doesn’t matter.. 9 of 10 people you know will still be dead 2 years out from “BANG”..
Its all gonna be a sh*tshow if they are able to pull it off..
keep prepping people..
God bless. Stay safe
You don’t need an EMP to crash the dollar. It would have the same effect of mass starvation without the damage to infrastructure. Also, the banksters completely expected Trump. He’s their scapegoat for the next crash.
Expedient Faraday cage is a galvanized trash can. Make sure there are no gaps. I used metallized tape to seal (is very cheap).
Tell us more about your work, Navy… at least as much as you can.
Nice work, Obama. The website Dollar Collapse today noted, in part:
————————————————————-
Obama took the debt from $10 trillion to “$20 trillion, which is the level the US federal debt will exceed sometime around June of this year. Here’s the current total as measured by the US Debt Clock:
To put $20 trillion into perspective, it’s about $160,000 per US taxpayer, and exists in addition to the mortgage, credit card, auto, and student debt that our hypothetical taxpayer probably carries. It is in short, way too much for the average wage slave to manage without some kind of existential crisis…
The other meaningful number is 6.620. That’s the average interest rate the US government paid on its various debts in 2000, the year before the great monetary experiment of QE, ZIRP and all the rest began. When talking heads at the Fed and elsewhere refer to “normalizing” interest rates they’re proposing a return to this 6% average rate.
But of course the last time that rate prevailed our debts were just a little lower. Run the numbers on today’s obligations and you get, well, let’s see:
$20 trillion x 6% = $1.2 trillion a year in interest expense. To put that in perspective…
• It’s $15,000 a year per family of four, or about a fourth of what the typical American family earns.
• It’s 31% of the federal budget, which would mean massive cuts in every other spending program.
The conclusion: It can’t happen without causing one of the following:
• Government spending cuts and/or tax increases that impose Greek-style austerity on Americans who won’t respond well to their sudden demotion to Third World status.
• A new round of monetary experiments involving the “forgiveness” of the government’s debts, financed with newly-created dollars. This will work – as long as dollars remain universally accepted as a store of value. History offers no examples of such a thing.
• An overt effort to devalue the dollar, with the goal of paying the interest in full, but (again) with newly- created, much-less-valuable currency.
The resulting dilemma: If we hope to live within our means interest rates can never be allowed to rise. But if interest rates don’t rise, the Fed is forced to create a tsunami of new dollars to keep rates low, and must take its chances with inflation, currency war, crack-up boom, and all the other black swans that live in the land of monetary excess.
Which is why the sound money community keeps harping on gold. All the politically-acceptable policy options have inflation/devaluation at their core, and those things are always and everywhere great for real assets.”
Cited from the very helpful http://dollarcollapse.com/interest-rates-2/2017s-real-milestone/
Certain premises are required. Our enemy already knows us. We must know our enemy equally well. The best way to stop a forced sacrifice move is to ensure that the enemy also must sacrifice; but, to a greater extent – each time. The end game must always be the goal. All steps to that, regardless of number, must be efficient and executed properly.
As is – too much emotion is being voiced and not enough action based on rational and logical thought. Our enemy uses our wishes, desires, hopes and dreams as tools to exact our ruin. We must do the same.
One thing Brandon is wrong about is the blanket statement about the co-option of the Tea Party. This is NOT a monolithic movement, by definition, so there is no “party” to co-opt. No doubt certain Tea Party groups have compromised, some co-opted, some just trying to find a way to be most effective, which MAY at times require some compromises (cf. William Wilberfores’ work).
I am heavily involved with the Tea Party in Illinois, and I can categorically tell you they are NOT co-opted, as a rule (of *course* there are exceptions. We get it). Most of what Brandon writes is extremely important and perceptive. In fact, he is probably right to some degree with certain subsets of the Tea Party. But to make a blanket statement like he did is not only irresponsible, but wrong. Brandon, like all of us, is not infallible. Here was a case in point.
Moreover, even if the Tea Party were co-opted, then it is up to us hoi polloi to go back in and take it back. Given the decentralized, city/locale specific nature of it, this is easy to do.
how about this for a program ? whenever someone is trying to reduce your freedom liquidate them
Forstchen’s newest novel, THE FINAL DAY, is gut-wrenching, page-turning. It tells what happens to some “elites.” There is even a veiled reference to the shenanigans of HRC in Chapter 6. This author gets it. He really gets it.
“You Have To Go To Some Ugly Places In Your Own Mind”
One just needs to look at the wars and genocides in the 20th century and the globalists either facilitated it or capitalized off of it allowing it to continue as long as possible. They give bacteria a bad rap as there is good bacteria.
Exactly: I really do not think they want to live on a planet populated by an exploding population of low IQ people. At some point the elite are going to have enough and want to make some more room. How they get rid of people is down to speculation, but there are many ways to do it without harming the planet. Hustling people into smaller and smaller spaces definitely seems to be part of the plan. Easier to keep an eye on them and easier to round them up or kill them off. Much harder if they are spread across the countryside on little farms. You can effectively gas them with air pollution (like China does) or poison them with carcegenic foods and water.
If one is to look at science and technology, it has already reached the point where it can provide for all the needs of a smallish global population of a billion or less. If one is to be crude, the quantity of people on the planet who really contribute to intellectual advancement is very small. So, most of the rest of the world population is just existing: consuming resources. Which is fine except the world can’t take it. In the next ten years, much of the elderly population in the wealthy countries will die off. This will leave very large young populations in the third world and a youngish population in the wealthy countries. While the youngish population in the wealthy countries will have at least grown up programmed to function in highly advanced societies, the other part of the world will have not. Now throw in modern weaponry, modern addictive synthetic drugs, and people being crammed into urban areas. What do you think will happen? Well, we know what will happen because the US experienced this in the 70s and 80s. People will get high, and people will get guns and kill each other to get the money from getting high. They will have copious amounts of unprotected sex, spreading god knows what diseases. This will not be called civilisation and you need civilisation to make advanced societies function and to create wealth.
Survival of the fittest,,, there are some positives to that, i doubt im in the survive collumn but think about it, those who survive will most likely be self reliant types, and folks who are industrious, i am not so much a fan of useless eater baby makers either,,,,
Copious amounts of sex sounds pretty good to me,,,
In the end as technology makes workers obsolete then people are obsolete. “Useless Eaters” starts at the bottom with masses scratching out their existence from the land producing just enough to perform the next days work. Then the factory production workers displaced by robotics are no longer needed. The crude method of war destroys too much infrastructure. Cultural changes perpetuated by TPTB that are voluntarily accepted by the masses to reduce the birth rate to negative number over time achieves the goal. Society acceptance of euthanasia of the terminally ill and those too old to be productive facilitates the population reduction too.
We’re being transformed into an insect colony where individuality is scorned for the greater “good” of the collective.
It doesn’t have to be that way: we can get the global population down quickly and in a humane way. The first step is to turn over breeding to gene facilities in the Western, developed countries. They can ensure the next generation are free of diseases and make sure to only have high IQ births and to not have racial imbalancing.
As for the over-populating countries, a simple biological sterilant combined with binding international agreements to bring populations in line with the natural carrying capacity of a country or region. That means restricted food imports and other means that artificially distort populations. For example, Egypts population would be nowhere near what it is if they did not get free money from the US and food aid. Also, an end to the practice of exporting surplus populations, as is common across the developing world.
A gentle, humane programme of elder reduction would also save vast resources and help to improve quality of life in later life.
Now, since we are in the 21st century, the economy will, by its nature, become more pleasure-based. This means sex should purely be for pleasure. In order to keep people from random breeding, non-breeding Pleasure-Givers will be deployed in many forms. Some will be human, many will be synthetic and digital. These can be finely calibrated based on personal preference and maximum pleasure (role play, fantasy etc.).
All these measures would see dramatic population reductions in 10 years. In 20 to 30 years, the world population would be coming down dramatically overall. And the planet would breathe a sigh of relief…
Frank Thoughts
“It doesn’t have to be that way: we can get the global population down quickly and in a humane way.”
“restricted food imports and other means that artificially distort populations”
Starving people isn’t well known as being humane. Regardless the third world has large families to pull labor to support those that get older. As affluence increases family size decreases as is seen in the US and Japan. In the end those who can least support children have the most of them. My concern is who decides what is the optimum population number? What are the standards? If people aren’t needed to produce the goods how is compensation, wages distributed?
We’re in for changes as profound as has ever been seen effecting everyone everywhere.
FT,
When you reach that magic elder age number be sure to take your own advice.
I believe in non-violence. In contrast, the left is the group that murdered 100mm last century. Hilary wanted war; Trump does not.
You do the math.
My thoughs are it is all bullshit. Nobody is going to fight in any civil war 2, there aint gonna be martial law. Aside from walking down the street in a black or latino neighborhood at night There is nothing for white conservatives to worry about.even then im armed and trained to use lethal force so im not too worried about that either. What do we have to prep for now that obama is gone do we really think the liberals are gonna rise up with their newly bought shotguns and take over? I dont. I would welcome them to try something but i dont beleive they have the nuts.
Great comments guys. I will be looking up a lot of the stuff mentioned. I think Trump is sincere, but like many of you have mentioned, it can’t be a heroic figure that makes it all work. And I don’t think it is. He didn’t get there without some level of participation on a huge scale. But I do see the situation that Brandon is talking about, and I am concerned that, although Trump embodies the awakening, he is supported by, mostly, newbies to the awakening. How much can that be relied upon? I don’t know. I think that same crowd might just as easily turn when the event is brought on. I pray no, but I prep for yes.
After watching all the lefties freaking out, I determined that only massive deprogramming could save them. Maybe some would need the electric shock therapy. Those that can’t be saved need to be put to sleep, for the good of the entire world. Spoke with some women protesters last night. They say Trump is going to take everything they have and they’re soooo scared. When asked what he could possibly take from them, they couldn’t be specific. This is the answer one would expect from people who’ve been brainwashed. I’ve never, in my entire long life, ever seen anything like this.
These people have got to have mental health issues, I can see why a lot of them would be leary of Trump, but they are way too extreme. Most think Obama was wonderful,don’t they see that there was a take over going on in this country?A lot thought that if Clinton got in that things would be the same as in the 90’s, but that was not in the plan. The open borders plan has changed since then. Somebody owns them. These are not the same people, more power and money. I think they were selling this country. Some of these people on facebook and the things they put out, What the hell do they think Trump is going to do. He has people all around him,to help him, very qualified people at that. I am sure there are always going to be things people don’t approve of, we all have a different plan. These so called elite people have drained this country dry. They were so experienced, so i say give Trump a try and lets see how someone who is taking charge can do. The economy is going down,the reset has been planned, world bankers met back in October2016.They will try to blame Trump but anyone with a clue will know its been in the works for along time, you would of had to been in a coma for the last 5 years.
We are a product of our raising. The very basic constant of man is conquest. Conquest is not limited to being king of the hill, it also means control of the truth and it’s been going on for centuries.
“How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us.” Pope Leo X (1513-1521)
Eventually, dangling the carrot of a promised afterlife for good behavior gave way to money and hierarchical idolatry.
Mankind, or people in general have been useful, until the advent of technology has done away with the need for a large manual labor force. This also includes technology that reduces war to a no-win ultimatum. Going forward, any substantial war would essentially kill the host.
There exists technology that can essentially create a Utopian society, obsoleting our current need for economy. However, there simply is not enough to share with everyone and a major reset is required.
Therefore, it is necessary to use other means to reduce the population, (and we are seeing many examples of that today).
In keeping with the tone of the article, we simply no longer factor in as assets on the global balance sheets. Many of us, because were American’s have enjoyed a greater share of the wealth. That is going to change.
For instance. The 7th century minded dogs of Islam have been an effective tool in laying waste to populations, religious artifacts and ancient technologies. The teachings of their deity is a battle plan for extermination.
Another example is the “me” culture, weaponized by entitlement and the right to take and be fed for free.
We live in interesting times as all these truths are laid bare and easily researched. However, many of you fail to even bother to understand this, because the draw of free money has lulled you into a trance.
I could go on, but what’s the point? We all still possess an open mind with free will to choose. Some of will choose to prepare and rest will beg the government to take care of them.
Finally, I suggest that you don’t eat the tuna.
Anyone who won’t say things like “I could be wrong” or “I’m not an expert on this” is the enemy of humanity regardless of whatever political theory they follow. How should the world and humanity be organized and function? I have absolutely no idea except a religious response. I do have ideas on specific theories and beliefs. I have ideas on groups of people that the world would be better off without. I’d rather they change but if I could magically make them disappear, it would be very tempting to do so. That is playing God so forget it! Globalists are guilty of playing God and knowing it all.
Ive spent time searching for what DJT called a global movement. The most interesting thing I found was in a country in Africa where citizens marched in celebration of his winning. Same thing in India. However in the West the MSM wants you to believe this was a polarizing election. The rioters were covered in Mass. That was a double edged sword. Yes they got to show just how stupid and destructive they are. A message everyone can embrace, not so much. These are the Elites/Globalist People!
Now counter that with a mass of silent majority who are diverse in race that are sick of being used by Globalists.
The silent majority is no just in the US it is global but suppressed or now.
The elite need to slither back in their holes and regroup. Everyone is expecting and in some cases hoping they bring it on so it can be settled quickly for the next century or two. The elite and their groups may give a fight but they will go down in ashes!
Meanwhile at the whitehouse….
My work takes me to Africa regularly and they definitely do not share the SJW laissez-faire, gay-friendly views we are told by the likes of Obama are cool.
The Africans I have met have not been cool about transsexuals and gays, they believe in having a family, they believe in hard work and education, they are usually very upbeat and positive people, and they usually ask with curiosity why we let migrants to live like they are in the third world in the first world. They really don’t get that part. They also giggle when they see pictures of tiny Barrack beside big Michelle.
It’s only lefty flakes in the West who pass this stuff off as what people in the developing world want. They definitely do not want, after struggling to get to a Western country, to be sharing the can with a trans person…
As I sit here coughing through what is probably the latter stages of acute pneumonia, I can only surmise the preferred way of the true elitists is to kill us off. I am a swimmer and singer. I have strong lungs and diaphram. If I didn’t, and did not have my own meds and medical know how, I’d be in the hospital or dead right now. Over the past few days I’ve reflected once more on what kind of crap they spray on us every day. This bout of illness has only strengthened my impulse to prep medically.
The young Rothschild heir who builds rafts out of plastic bottles says that nature has its way of reducing population. Yep. That’s called plague… and that’s the ugly place in the minds of the elitists. Ugly… because, they probably have a vaccine and the target population does not.