Coronavirus Critical

COVID19: The Deep State Has Made Its Move

Economic Collapse is Imminent!
This Is It! Lock And Load... Final Warning!
The Shit Is About To Hit The Fan... Download Our Immediate Action Plan Now!

Home Invasions: All the Ways the Government Can Lay Siege to Your Property

John W. Whitehead
March 4th, 2021
The Rutherford Institute
Comments (11)

This article was originally published by John W. Whitehead at The Rutherford Institute.

EDITOR’S NOTE: It’s time to wake up and stand for the abolishment of the last form of slavery on the planet. Just because it’s “legal” doesn’t make the government anything less than slavery.  No one has a higher claim over your life and property than you do, and we all need to figure that out. The only solution is to abolish slavery. We don’t want to minimize slavery or reduce it. Fewer chains don’t make us any less slaves.  We should all want control and power over people abolished permanently. Period.

How ‘secure’ do our homes remain if police, armed with no warrant, can pound on doors at will and … forcibly enter?”—Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the lone dissenter in Kentucky v. King

Americans are not safe in their homes.

Not anymore, at least.

This present menace comes from the government and its army of bureaucratized, corporatized, militarized mercenaries who are waging war on the last stronghold left to us as a free people: the sanctity of our homes.

The weapons of this particular war on our personal security and our freedoms include an abundance of laws that criminalize almost everything we do, a government that views our private property as its own, militarized police who have been brainwashed into believing that they operate above the law, courts that insulate police from charges of wrongdoing, legislatures that legitimize the government’s usurpations of our rights, and a populace that is so ignorant of their rights and distracted by partisan politics as to be utterly incapable of standing up to the government’s overreaches, incursions, and power grabs.

This is how far the mighty have fallen.

Government agents—with or without a warrant, with or without probable cause that criminal activity is afoot, and with or without the consent of the homeowner—are now justified in mounting home invasions in order to pursue traffic violators, seize lawfully-owned weapons, carry out knock-and-talk “chats” with homeowners in the dead of night, “prevent” individuals from harming themselves, provide emergency aid, intervene in the face of imminent danger, serve as community caretakers, chase down individuals suspected of committing misdemeanor crimes, and anything else they can get away with.

This doesn’t even begin to touch on the many ways the government and its corporate partners-in-crime may be using surveillance technology—with or without the blessing of the courts—to invade one’s home: with wiretaps, thermal imaging, surveillance cameras, and other monitoring devices.

However, while the courts and legislatures have yet to fully address the implications of such virtual intrusions on our Fourth Amendment, there is no mistaking the physical intrusions by police into the privacy of one’s home: the toehold entry, the battering ram, the SWAT raid, the knock-and-talk conversation, etc.

Whether such intrusions, warranted or otherwise, are unconstitutional continues to be litigated, legislated and debated.

The spirit of the Constitution, drafted by men who chafed against the heavy-handed tyranny of an imperial ruler, would suggest that one’s home is a fortress, safe from almost every kind of intrusion. Unfortunately, a collective assault by the government’s cabal of legislators, litigators, judges and militarized police has all but succeeded in reducing that fortress—and the Fourth Amendment alongside it—to a crumbling pile of rubble.

Two cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term, Caniglia v. Strom and Lange v. California, are particularly noteworthy.

In Caniglia v. Strompolice want to be able to carry out warrantless home invasions in order to seize lawfully-owned guns under the pretext of their so-called “community caretaking” duties. Under the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment, police can conduct warrantless searches of vehicles relating to accident investigations and provide aid to “citizens who are ill or in distress.”

At a time when red flag gun laws are gaining traction as a legislative means by which to allow police to remove guns from people suspected of being threats, it wouldn’t take much to expand the Fourth Amendment’s “community caretaking” exception to allow police to enter a home without a warrant and seize lawfully-possessed firearms based on concerns that the guns might pose a danger.

What we do not need is yet another pretext by which government officials can violate the Fourth Amendment at will under the pretext of public health and safety.

In Lange v. Californiapolice want to be able to enter homes without warrants as long as they can claim to be in pursuit of someone they suspect may have committed a crime. Yet as Justice Neil Gorsuch points out, in an age in which everything has been criminalized, that leaves the door wide open for police to enter one’s home in pursuit of any and all misdemeanor crimes.

At issue in Lange is whether police can justify entering homes without a warrant under the “hot pursuit” exception to the Fourth Amendment.

The case arose after a California cop followed a driver, Arthur Lange, who was honking his horn while listening to music. The officer followed Lange, supposedly to cite him for violating a local noise ordinance, but didn’t actually activate the police cruiser’s emergency lights until Lange had already arrived home and entered his garage. Sticking his foot under the garage door just as it was about to close, the cop confronted Lange, smelled alcohol on his breath, ordered him to take a sobriety test, and then charged him with a DUI and a noise infraction.

Lange is just chock full of troubling indicators of a greater tyranny at work.

Overcriminalization: That you can now get pulled over and cited for honking your horn while driving and listening to music illustrates just how uptight and over-regulated life in the American police state has become.

Make-work policing: At a time when crime remains at an all-time low, it’s telling that a police officer has nothing better to do than follow a driver seemingly guilty of nothing more than enjoying loud music.

Warrantless entry: That foot in the door is a tactic that, while technically illegal, is used frequently by police attempting to finagle their way into a home and sidestep the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.

The definition of reasonable: Although the Fourth Amendment prohibits warrantless and unreasonable searches and seizures of “persons, houses, papers, and effects,” where we run into real trouble is when the government starts dancing around what constitutes a “reasonable” search. Of course, that all depends on who gets to decide what is reasonable. There’s even a balancing test that weighs the intrusion on a person’s right to privacy against the government’s interests, which include public safety.

Too often, the scales weigh in the government’s favor.

End runs around the law: The courts, seemingly more concerned with marching in lockstep with the police state than upholding the rights of the people, have provided police with a long list of exceptions that have gutted the Fourth Amendment’s once-robust privacy protections.

Exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement allow the police to carry out warrantless searches: if someone agrees to the search; in order to ferret out weapons or evidence during the course of an arrest; if the police think someone is acting suspiciously and may be armed; during a brief investigatory stop; if a cop sees something connected to a crime in plain view; if police are in hot pursuit of a suspect who flees into a building; if they believe a vehicle has contraband; in an emergency where there may not be time to procure a warrant; and at national borders and in airports.

In other words, almost anything goes when it comes to all the ways in which the government can now invade your home and lay siege to your property.

Thus we tumble down that slippery slope which might have started out with a genuine concern for public safety and the well-being of the citizenry only to end up as a self-serving expansion of the government’s powers that makes a mockery of the Fourth Amendment while utterly disregarding the rights of “we the people.”

Frankly, it’s a wonder we have any property interests, let alone property rights, left to protect.

Think about it.

That house you live in, the car you drive, the small (or not so small) acreage of land that has been passed down through your family or that you scrimped and saved to acquire, whatever money you manage to keep in your bank account after the government and its cronies have taken their first and second and third cut…none of it is safe from the government’s greedy grasp.

At no point do you ever have any real ownership in anything other than the clothes on your back.

Everything else can be seized by the government under one pretext or another (civil asset forfeiture, unpaid taxes, eminent domain, public interest, etc.).

The American Dream has been reduced to a lease arrangement in which we are granted the privilege of endlessly paying out the nose for assets that are only ours so long as it suits the government’s purposes.

And when it doesn’t suit the government’s purposes? Watch out.

This is not a government that respects the rights of its citizenry or the law. Rather, this is a government that sells its citizens to the highest bidder and speaks to them in a language of force.

Under such a fascist regime, the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which declares that no person shall “be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,” has become yet another broken shield, incapable of rendering any protection against corporate greed while allowing the government to justify all manner of “takings” in the name of the public good.

What we are grappling with is a government that has forfeited its purpose for existing.

Philosophers dating back to John Locke have long asserted that the true purpose of government is to protect our rights, not just our collective rights as a people, but our individual rights, specifically our rights to life, liberty, and property. As James Madison concluded in the Federalist Papers, “Government is instituted no less for the protection of the property than of the persons of individuals.”

What we have been saddled with is a government that has not only lost sight of its primary reason for being—to protect the people’s rights—but has also re-written the script and cast itself as an imperial overlord with all of the neo-feudal authority such a position entails.

Let me put it another way.

If the government can tell you what you can and cannot do within the privacy of your home, whether it relates to what you eat, what you smoke, or whom you love, you no longer have any rights whatsoever within your home.

If government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, gathering with friends to worship in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of your property.

If school officials can punish your children for what they do or say while at home or in your care, your children are not your own—they are the property of the state.

If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government.

If police can forcefully draw your blood, strip search you, probe you intimately or force you to submit to vaccinations or lose your so-called “privileges” to move about and interact freely with your fellow citizens, your body is no longer your own—it is the government’s to do with as it deems best.

Likewise, if the government can lockdown whole communities and by extension, the nation, quarantine whole segments of the population, outlaw religious gatherings, and assemblies of more than a few people, shut down entire industries and manipulate the economy, muzzle dissidents, and “stop and seize any plane, train or automobile to stymie the spread of contagious disease,” then you no longer have a property interest as master of your own life, either.

This is what a world without the Fourth Amendment looks like, where the lines between private and public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control, manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord.

If we continue down this road, the analogy shifts from property owners to prisoners in a government-run prison with local and federal police acting as prison guards. In such an environment, you have no rights.

So what can we do, short of scrapping this whole experiment in self-government and starting over?

At a minimum, we need to rebuild the foundations of our freedoms.

What this will mean is adopting an apolitical, nonpartisan, zero-tolerance attitude towards the government when it oversteps its bounds and infringes on our rights.

We need courts that prioritize the rights of the citizenry over the government’s insatiable hunger for power at all costs.

We need people in the government—representatives, bureaucrats, etc.—who honor the public service oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Most of all, we need to reclaim control over our runaway government and restore our freedoms.

After all, we are the government. As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, “we the people” are supposed to be the ones calling the shots. As John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States, rightly observed: “No power on earth has a right to take our property from us without our consent.”

[DISPLAY_ULTIMATE_SOCIAL_ICONS]

President Trump is Breaking Down the Neck of the Federal Reserve!

He wants zero rates and QE4!

You must prepare for the financial reset

We are running out of time

Download the Ultimate Reset Guide Now!

    Author: John W. Whitehead
    Views:
    Date: March 4th, 2021
    Website: https://www.rutherford.org

    Copyright Information: This content has been contributed to SHTFplan by a third-party or has been republished with permission from the author. Please contact the author directly for republishing information.

    SHTFPLAN is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

    11 Comments...

    Vote: Click here to vote for SHTF Plan as a Top Prepper Web Site
    1. Darth Skippy says:

      slightly paraphrased —
      ‘What this will mean is adopting an apolitical, nonpartisan, zero-tolerance attitude towards the [democidal] government when it oversteps its bounds and infringes on [the rights of the disarmed populace].’

      You would ultimately have to disarm the govt, which robs Peter to pay Paul.

      A logical extreme. It sounds an awful lot like a BLM talking point about a dictatorship of the proletariat.

      Except, I’m not Antifa.

      This legally disbands and defangs those two wolves, deciding what to eat for dinner.

    2. cranerigger says:

      Darth Skippy, thanks for the very thoughtful reply to a very thoughtful article. My difficulty is that I see the need for police but I don’t support violation of a home’s sanctuary by those police. I think the powers that be need to review the Constitution & BILL OF RIGHTS.

      • Darth Skippy says:

        I realize that what I am saying is highly abstract and speculative. I am just saying it in the form of a thought experiment.

        This country began with a tradition against red coats, standing armies, or the praetorian caste.

        Whose job was it, then?

    3. Darth Skippy says:

      My region of southern CA is arid and has many freeways. Fire is our most common disaster, in my experience.

      I walk to a sportspark, with a running track. The smoke is right over everyone’s heads. It gets lower and lower, until you can no longer breathe. Everyone is too nonchalant to see whether someone is trapped somewhere nearby or even to call on their cell phone. At the point, when it is about waist-high, and you can no longer see what is impending, there were sirens.

      I see another one of these, very recently, near a parking lot, and literally have to tell someone not to leave their car alone, right next a growing column of smoke. They said, it was a good idea. Where am I going?

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      Once, I saw a youth pastor rendering assistance.

    4. Those warrantless searches will cost some lives of offending cops and scare the rest from doing so. Governments will keep finding ways to extract money out of tax payers until there is nothing less to extract. At that point the taxed will have nothing to lose by rebelling against the taxing authority. People will move to other areas and the government being incompetent will squander what they now own but with no return.

    5. Andrea.Iravani. says:

      Objective Truth Verses Subjective Reality

      These are objective truths- there is no such thing as covid-19, 
      RT-PCR tests have been contaminated causing false positive results, since there is no such thing as covid-19, any positive covid test is 100% false, covid-19 vaccines are fatal and killing recipients in large numbers.

      All of the above statements are verifiable through scientific hard evidence. 

      An objective truth would be the current temperature ouside, or inside a place. A sujective reality would be whether or not the temperature is comfortable, if it is within the range that human life can exist in. An objective truth is not an opinion. While I may be most comfortable in 60 degree whether, if I were to argue with an elderly person, or with someone from a warmer climate that said that they were cold, in 60 degree weather it would be considered idiotic, or just plain mean if I insisted that they were not cold because I am comfortable and we are both in the same vicinity, or suggest that they are lying for saying that they are cold since I am not.

      I have no doubt that people are getting sick and dying from and with respiratory illnesses. They always have. What has been proven 100% is the scientific fraud of all of the following : covid-19, the lockdowns, mask wearing, social distancing, efficacy of covid-19 vaccines. It has also been proven that all of the practices that have been forced on everyone are murder through mal-practice and Munchausens Syndrome Eugenics psy-op of targeted assasinations though lethal injection referred to as covid-19 vaccines.

      People cannot claim that an objective truth is an opinion and maintain that they are reasonable individuals. It would be just as idiotic to suggest that it is reasonable to debate objective truths, as it is to argue over subjective realities. It could go on forever. I could say, you have to prove to me that 1+1=2, so, then you prove it by showing me two items, and I say, well, maybe it is just a fluke, or an anomoly, specific to this particular time and place. How do I know if it is the same everywhere, and if it is constant, and not subject to changing. I could insist until you or I die, that regardless how many times and in how many locations that you prove to me that 1+1=2, that you really have no way of knowing with absolute certainty that it will always be the same. This is the mentality that the covid cultists are using on us. Claiming that these objective truths are opinions and are debatable, They are not debatable any more than 
      1+1=2 is debatable.

      The following proves all of my statements relating to covid-19:

      Pseudo-intellectuals, and propagandists claim that covid exists, but it has been proven that covid does not exist when 1,500 covid samples were examined by seven different universities using electron microscope examination which revealed that all of the samples were infulenza A or influenza B. Dr. Derek Knauss also called the CDC and asked for the covid virus genetic sequence, which the CDC said that they do not have.

      Shown here:
      https://libertyinternational.wordpress.com/category/health/

      High false positive RT-PCR test reults were exacerbated by tests contaminated with N1, N2, N3 are all found in strains of influenza A, and of course they are not testing for covid19, since they do not even know the genetic sequence of it! These tests are reflecting N1, N2, N3, positivity, which could be just about anything, particularly influenza A. 

      Britannica.com:
      “foreign proteins)—hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N). Therefore, H1N1 represents a subtype of influenza A. This subtype is further differentiated into strains based on minor variations in RNA sequence.”

      https://www.britannica.com/science/influenza-A-H1N1

      Britannica.com on Neuramindase:

      “Neuraminidase, also called sialidase, any of a group of enzymes that cleave sialic acid, a carbohydrate occurring on the surfaces of cells in humans and other animals and in plants and microorganisms. In the 1940s American scientist George Hirst identified in samples of influenza virus mixed with red blood cells (erythrocytes) a substance that broke down receptors on the surfaces of red cells. Shortly thereafter, German-born British biochemist Alfred Gottschalk discovered that these receptor-destroying enzymes were neuraminidases. Today, these enzymes are known to occur as antigens (foreign proteins that stimulate the production of antibodies) on the surfaces of certain viruses, namely those of the families Orthomyxoviridae and Paramyxoviridae, as well as on the surfaces of some infectious bacteria and other microorganisms.”

      https://www.britannica.com/science/neuraminidase

      Contaminated RT-PCR tests reported by WaShington Post:
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/cdc-covid/2020/12/25/c2b418ae-4206-11eb-8db8-395dedaaa036_story.html

      CNA James, whose video the criminal psychopathic hacker prevented me from watching, has stated that people are dropping like flies from vaccines in the nursing home that James is employed in.

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/cna-nursing-home-whistleblower-seniors-dying-like-flies-after-covid-injections-speak-out/5735639

      Well, It sure as hell appears that the vaccines are killing many more people than they are reporting because on November 16, 2020 there were 2,487,350 annual total deaths until November 16,2020. Verses 2.7 million to 2.9 million total deaths per year between 2015 and 2019. On December 22,2021, they report that there have been 3.2 million total deaths in America. So, between November 16,2020, and December 22,2021 there were 712,650 deaths. So, once again, medical error is the third leading cause of death in America, but they are claiming that it is covid. It is their treatment and prevention of covid that is responsible for far more deaths than “covid”! Of course they claim that the Novemeber numbers might not be accurate, because it is nearly impossible for the government employees to be able to count to over two million and get it right the first time. That is just expecting far more from government employees than they are capable of doing!

      https://apnews.com/article/us-coronavirus-deaths-top-3-million-e2bc856b6ec45563b84ee2e87ae8d5e7

      https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/dec/11/facebook-posts/chart-comparing-2020-us-death-toll-previous-years-/

      German Death Camps Formerly Referred To as Nursing Homes Assassinating Patients En Masse With Vaccines! 25% of nursing home vaccine reipients have died and 36% have suffered serious complications from vaccines:

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/whistleblower-25-residents-german-nursing-home-died-after-pfizer-vaccine/5738701

      Reported cases of fatalities after covid-19 vaccines:
      https://www.globalresearch.ca/cya-fraudulent-marketing-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-unapproved-product-permitted-use/5738844

      Now The Atlantic Council is worried that there may be a pandemic, and are insisting on DoD spending. Deja vu! Where did they ever come up with that idea?! Let’s not and say we did, since we already did that, and it did not work, a few times, in 2020, 2009, & 2003. They consider themselves to be ideas people and a think tank. 

      https://www.mintpressnews.com/atlantic-council-braces-for-bioterrorism-attack/275361/

      https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-h1n1-swine-flu-pandemic-manipulating-the-data-to-justify-a-worldwide-public-health-emergency/14901

      I also discovered that in 2017, the Trump administration issued an edict that all conversations by any scientist that works for the government, including the CDC employees must be cleared through the Atlanta Communications office, which was then required to be cleared by Mike Pence after the scamdemic, according to Harvard Law Edu:

      “Motivating the Knight Institute’s concern in this instance is a record of severe restrictions on the rights of government scientists to speak freely to the press. In 2017, Axios published an email from Jeffrey Lancashire, a public affairs officer, to the National Center for Health Statistics, announcing that for every employee of the CDC “any and all correspondence with any member of the news media, regardless of the nature of the inquiry, must be cleared through CDC’s Atlanta Communications Office.”

      “According to recent news stories, scientists and health officials at the CDC must now coordinate with the Office of Vice President Mike Pence before speaking with members of the press or public about the pandemic,” the complaint reads. “These stories have raised concerns that public health experts who know most about the risks to the public are not being permitted to speak candidly and that the information the government is now conveying may be incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading.”

      https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/cdc-sued-to-disclose-restrictions-on-scientists-right-to-speak
      .
      The mRNA vaccines reprogram RNA to attack viruses with a programmed immune response and invade cells with in the body when contracted, so the reprogrammed RNA would attack the cells within the body.

      It will create the dreaded cytokine storm, and trigger auto-immune reactions, and the body will in effect become allergic to itself when in contact with a virus.

      I would not be surprised if half or more of the US population dies within the next two years if the vaccines are not immediately stopped! 

      Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer CEO confirmed my worst fears when I had read on Global Research that all cats that had received the m-RNA covid vaccines survived and tolerated the 
      vaccines well, but when they came in contact with natural viruses found in the wild, that are typically not life threatening, they had all died.

      There is no logical, scientific, or medical reason for anyone to get the SputnikV which Putin was reported to have taken when it was first developed, and then it was suddenly reported that he has not yet received it. Both obviously cannot be true. 

      What could explain such denial?! 

      Evidently, this article by Chris Hedges explains it all. The ends justify the means mentality.  The Scamdemic is cold blooded, pre-meditated, mass murder which will inflict immense human suffering, and mourning the loss of loved ones.

      Chris Hedges and apparently many others in the alternative left media, including Sputnik have evidently colluded in a conspiracy to commit mass murder for the purpose of reducing the population almost over night in an attempt to thwart climate catastrophy, which they claim is mass murder. People living their lives is not pre-meditated cold-blooded mass murder. Apparently the climate alarmists on the left feel justified in their Fabian Society, Malthusian mass murder and have appointed themselves as unelcted praeyorian guards that would pick and choose who lives and who dies and have decided to play God, and not call it a war. Chris Hedges is a Christian Minister that has evidently conspired in committing mass murder, though covid vaccines yet somehow believes that he is not a Christian fascist. 

      https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-age-of-social-murder-ruling-elites/275801/

      The Club of Rome is suggestimg that the population be reduced to
      300 million people. The entire world is acting like crazed, zombified, banana republic inhabitants over “covid.” 

      They are climate alarmists. Even if the population is reducec to 300 million, there is still the issue of nuclear waste. That is not going to go away. It cannot be poured underground. It will rise to the surface because heat rises, even underground, which is why volcanic eruptions occur. 

      The earth is getting warmer because we were or still are in a glacial or inter-glacial period depending on how it is interperated. Some scientists say that we are entering another one, other say that we are not. We do not know. Nobody has that knowledge with certainty. There is also evidence that the earth is undergoing magnetic reversal which is long over due. It is a slow process. The earth is a dynamic live planet under going constant change. We should do what we can to protect it. The biggest climate alarmists are doing this strictly for their own purposes. The Rockefeller Foundation and its subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations are pushing this, and everyone knows how the Rockefeller family has really acted. Actions speak louder than words. 

      Everyone that I have spoken with in health care and government seem totally unphased, or they hang up before completing my first sentence  stating that the CDC does not have the genetic sequence to covid-19, that Dr. Derek Knauss, a university virologist with 30 years experience along with 6 other universities have confirmed by electron microscope exam that 1,500 RT-PCR tests that showed positive results for covid were all Influenza A or B, that all RT-PCR tests have been contaminated with N1, N2, and N3, reported by Washington Post, and that the vaccines are killing people in large numbers and are not FDA approved. 

      How did they get everyone to be so complicit? Peter Koening, former WHO, UN, WEF economist mentioned that The Great Reset was going direct, whatever that means, is left to interpretation. Was everyone promised survival and status after a mass depopulation? It seems to be the case. America has 23 million governement employees and 20 million healthcare workers. Add 8.4 million university employees, 12.1 million tech employees, 6.9 million scientists and engineers, and all of there families and parents, and you will see how quickly that the 300 million threshold tbat the Club of Rome is calling for is quickly breached, with those employees mentioned totalling 70.4 million, adding 4 family members each to that, and the number is already 352 million people, and that is just in the United States in a global conspiracy. They also spoke of solidarity trials. It appears as though someone contacted every individual and promised them survival and status in exchange for silence. What has could explain it? That does not even include the media, whose number of employees I could not immediately find, but 36% of media employees lost jobs or had pay cuts from the lockdowns, followed by a 50% cut between 2008-2012. 

      https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/07/covid-19-has-ravaged-american-newsrooms-heres-why-that-matters/

      One thing is clear. This is a conspiracy of silence and lies. Why trust a liar that has confessed that they are lying to the global population about a global mass murder? Trusting a mass murderer to be honest with you would be extremely idiotic! 

      Andrea Iravani

    6. Darth Skippy says:

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

      (R/K Selection Theory)

      Analogous to the weeds vs. elite of the social foodchain.

      You self conscious readers can’t:
      — save them all (The 99%.)
      — keep them from all walking in front of moving trains
      — advise every last one against timeless sucker bets, old as empire itself

      Biding for time, just keeping yourself healthy and sane and free of encumbrances, you are bound to outwit someone in a scarcity of resources.

      It might not be a trophy buck, but definitely the slowest, drooling wildebeest with a gimp, that shouldn’t be in the same hiring pool.

    7. Should I cry? says:

      “This is not a government that respects the rights of its citizenry or the law. Rather, this is a government that sells its citizens to the highest bidder and speaks to them in a language of force.”

      Well said. While I like cops and believe we have a need for them I’ve decided I will no longer feel sympathy for them.

    8. Lorraine says:

      Can someone please tell me why God keeps allowing people to do these things to other people? Who gave certain people permission to rule over the rest of us? God? I was taught that man shall be ruled by God, not by the will of man. This is a question that I’ve been asking for a long time.

    9. jerry johnson says:

      Lorraine,
      God has removed His protection of us because we have turned our backs on Him. God is still in control. Our world steeped is in evil. If you want to save yourself, follow the commandments. There is going to be a cleansing of biblical proportions. For more perspective, read The Warning, by Christine Watkins. Beg God for enlightenment.

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

    Commenting Policy:

    Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn't immediately available. We're not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you're not a robot posting random spam.

    This web site thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.