Gun control advocate, Jamie Lee Curtis has become an icon for armed self-defense with her participation in the new Halloween movie sequel. She may have done so unintentionally, but the movie no doubt shows why those who are could become victims should arm themselves.
Breitbart originally did a run-down about Curtis’ character and the how and why she became an icon for armed self-defense. In the new Halloween sequel, she plays the central role she made iconic in the 1978 original. Rotten Tomatoes noted that “Jamie Lee Curtis returns to her iconic role as Laurie Strode, who comes to her final confrontation with Michael Myers, the masked figure who has haunted her since she narrowly escaped his killing spree on Halloween night four decades ago.”
Curtis’ role includes the use of firearms for self-defense, which is odd considering Curtis’s efforts to restrict normal and everyday Americans’ right to possess the guns they need to defend themselves and their families. After announcing her desire to take self-defense rights away from others, Curtis later made it clear that she was refocusing her energies to get women elected in place of men for the purposes of securing gun control, among other things.
Now she is starring in Halloween and using a gun for self-defense. In the trailer for the film, viewers can hear Curtis’s character mention the need to protect her family and they see her with numerous guns, including a revolver and a lever action rifle, the latter of which she shoots repeatedly. Let’s be honest here now, an AR-15 would be immensely more effective…just sayin’…
As the film’s climactic finale nears, Curtis says, “He is a killer, but he will be killed tonight.”
When asked why movies about demonic possession are more terrifying than “slasher flicks” the answer is simple: one cannot simply shoot a demon. One could shoot a violent serial killer.
Although the website is simple, it lays out a basic and easy to read fundamental moral: Self-defense is a basic human right. Whether the Constitution lists our rights or not makes no difference. We are all born with those same basic rights because we were born human beings. You have the right to use a tool to defend your life because you are a human. You have a right to speak your mind because you’re a human. Governments can only list your rights; they and others do not get to decide what your rights are and therefore, cannot take them away regardless of the laws they write mandating such. –SHTFPlan.com
Self-defense is a basic human right.
She looked fine in Trading Places but can’t hold a candle to her mother Janet Lee. Actually, considering her gene pool she bottom fed the DNA that was available.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is a real faggot lately. Maybe he got brain damaged from the heart attack.
Supplicating to PoundMeToo, cucking hard on 80 IQ apes from Mexico invading, carbon tax supporting, defending the Special Olympics from trolls, where does it end?
Fucking Boomer needs to get his low T checked. Too many soy milkshakes. Hes kind of getting fat, actually.
And what’s up with Trump ordering his steak well done with ketchup and teetotaling?
Fucking girly man poseurs.
(((Jamie Curtis))), daughter of (((Bernard “Tony Curtis” Schwartz))).
Who is surprised? Gun control = GENTILE control.
Another try: https://tinyurl.com/y72smlbx
Agreed. Self defense is a basic human right.
Jamie Lee has some of the best tits ever seen on the big screen. If she cares anything about women like herself she would want them to be able to defend themselves, tits and all.
Too bad Psycho was filmed in 1960. I do believe those boobs were inherited from a superior source.
At the opposite end of the beauty scale, Rosie O’Donell championed for banning guns while having armed private security. They lost their supposed “moral high ground” with their hypocrisy and dishonesty.
B, good points. If Jamie Lee came for my guns, I would still resist, regardless of what she looks like. She wants to get us all disarmed but has no problems using guns for her character in a movie to make her living. She and a bunch of other ‘celebrities’ do that all the time. What hypocrisy. I still say NEVER EVER, EVER, EVER GIVE UP YOUR FIREARMS just like Matt Bracken said.
the (((boss))) tells them which views are acceptable
you want $$$, you speak against guns
Some actors / celebrities are so in demand that they can deviate from that program. Some I believe want acceptance of their peers. But yes there is pressure to ‘toe the line”.
Leftists expect to be violent, gluttonous, rapey, and racist. Just for them.
I think, that same, basic, moral code — let’s call it triumphalism or pyrrhic victory — applies to all religions, political views, and in-groups of any kind.
I bet, yours, too.
Someone telling you to cool it is usually making headway.
Mac is a First and Second Amendment (((hypocrite))) for filtering all links to my site: tiny url dot com/y72smlbx
Regardless of whether we share the same history, (((I))) am utilitarian, so expect people to have objective morality.
B from CA
You take the breast….I’ll take the rest.
Jamie has the wheels and we know where they connect.
Jamie Lee Curtis had the best tits in the 1980s.
She carried two .38’s and two guns.
JS, I don’t give a damn what the celebrities look like. Any of them who promote gun control are just as dangerous and treacherous as the rest of the gun grabbers and need to be eliminated.
You all know she or she is a Hermaphrodite. It has two sex organs male and female. Generally they usually choose to be female in life and just have the extra tool.
Yes indeed. Perhaps as a result of a chemical called “atrazine” in the drinking water.
Its like an infestation of ants. We fight ants individually and in groups but the problem is at the nest. The US Supreme Court is supposed to make this moot. The Second Amendment is there, the entire bill Of Rights are there, move on. We vote to keep administrations in that will not violate the Constitution / Bill Of Rights (or as minimum as possible). In effect we’re forced to continuously reaffirm a document that is 231 years old because the US Supreme Court refuses to do its job by ignoring or reinterpreting the obvious. If Rights aren’t absolute they’re not Rights. If words can be redefined then intent is lost. Jamie Lee Curtis, nice boobs and all, is not where the battle is won or lost.
Not surprisingly, the article fails to mentione JLC almost comparing Michael to Justice Kavanaugh this week. She sort of backed off, but not quite. She is a standard Hollywood lib. I remember when I saw TRUE LIES and got mad that her character was treated like a sexual plaything by Ah-nuld. His misogyny is legendary. I was a lib back then. I always liked her, but compared to her mama in THE GREAT HOUDINI or THE VIKINGS – well, no comparison.
Curtiss… Butch haircut with a face like Diane Feinstein. No thank you, I’ll PASS.
Thank you Bert for using your real brain instead of the one between your legs. Sorry to be so blunt, but sometimes that’s what it takes to wake people up. Let’s place value on the complete person, not just on cosmetic value.
if she shaved her head she’d look like Uncle Fester.
Self-defense is a basic human right (for leftist interests, only).
Just another communist-hypocrite-double-standard-hollywood-nutjob.
Meanwhile, Trump wants to ban bump stocks, with Executive Orders.