French President Macron Offers Liberal Americans Sanctuary In France

by | Jun 4, 2017 | Headline News | 82 comments

Do you LOVE America?



    French President Emmanuel Macron, who is also a climate change alarmist,  is offering refuge to American liberals upset at President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

    Speaking in English, the leftist president spoke to American liberals specifically upset that Trump has decided to no longer waste American resources on the far from proven science behind climate change.  According to conservative media, if you want to enter France, all you have to do, is become a Syrian jihadist, or believe in climate change like it’s your religion.

    And Macron’s video, which was posted to Twitter, offers liberals in America a way out.

    “I wish to tell the United States: France believes in you. The world believes in you. I know that you a great nation. I know, your history, our common history. To all scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, responsible citizens who were disappointed by the decision of the president of the United States, I want to say, that they will find in France a second homeland. I call them, come, and work here, with us, to work together on concrete solutions for our climate, our environment. I can assure you, France will not give up the fight.”

    Macron also posted a picture to Twitter, with the words “Make Our Planet Great Again” on a blue background.

    Macron is a 39-year-old far leftist who worked in mergers and acquisitions for Rothschilds bank in Paris and as the economy minister to French Socialist Party President Francoise Holland before rebranding himself as an “outsider” last year and launching a campaign for president. He defeated populist National Front leader Marine Le Pen in May to become the youngest-ever president of France.  But in reality, he’s nothing but a globalist puppet who uses climate change as an excuse to tax and regulate, all while bowing at the feet of the Rothschilds and their globalist agenda. 

    In what was likely the best, or probably the most memorable line from the Donald Trump’s energetic address from the Rose Garden on Thursday, in which he laid out a strong case for exiting the Paris agreement, he said, “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.”  Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate deal has caused much distress among leftists.  “As of today, the United States will cease all implementation of the nonbinding Paris accord and the draconian financial and economic burdens the agreement imposes on our country,” Trump also said.

    And on the subject of climate change, Trump is actually correct.  Figures are forced in the name of money to try to prove climate change because it’s something the feeble-minded can believe in without having actual correlations.

    A data set of figures, however long you compile them for remains just a set of figures unless you correlate them to something to prove a link. So, these ‘how much of a grant did you say I’d get?’ scientists were told what [was] needed to be proven and they said okay, the industrial revolution happened and carbon dioxide rose…it’s all our fault. They either didn’t look back far enough or chose not to include certain rather important chunks of information. More and more people are putting two and two together and coming up with the undeniable truth that climate change is a hell of a good way of raising money. Think Cap and Trade and fines for companies who pump out too many gases. –The Underground Medic

    It’s like those on the left are distressed by the very thought that they might get to keep some of their own hard-earned money and maybe even invest it or donate it to causes they find important; like climate change.  What a radical idea, though.  But, if leftists are overly upset and losing sleep by Trump’s decision to keep American money in the pockets of Americans, they now may seek refuge in France. Good riddance?


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. Looks like he still dabbles in mergers and acquisitions. That blue background is printed in water color on a red shield. Their tears will was it off to reveal the truth.

        • Washing and waiting for the h to drop. The Rottenchild makes everyone miss a few letters but mostly they miss their figures.

          • Macron:

            Americans! Please come to our country. We welcome you. The Jihadist are attacking us daily now. We are running out of infidels for them behead, stab, slash throats, bomb, and shoot. We need you guys to help in this regard. Besides, we are running out of welfare money for our socialist system to support these Islamic terrorists, but alas, we are not Islamiphobes like President Trump. He actually cares about the sovereignty of his country and is doing everything he can to make his country great again.

            We are not. Please come join us and share in our misery and pain.

            • I wish the progressive idiots would do just that. Get the hell out! They do not want to be free anyway as they let their movement think for them. Go to France, land of the slave and peacefully co-exist with the islamic savages fresh off the boats.

              • Menzo… yes, there’s a reason Macron minus the “c” = Moron!!

              • Menzo, spot on. Then the libturd scum can learn what socialism is REALLY like. France can have them all.

            • Good points! Who would you start a business in France when the taxes are 70%? And you will more than likely be surrounded day and night with angry Muslims and Africans?

              At one time (in the 1980s), France did have a very high standard of living and was a cool, funky place to live, with a good health system and beautiful cities. But since the mid-1990s, they have flooded the cities with Muslims and Africans, many of whom live on welfare.

              French women are gorgeous, slim and chic, the cuisine is excellent (though in decline), the wine is great (though new world wines tend to be consistently better), and French culture, where it is still practiced, is more polite and elegant than Anglo-Saxon culture but unfortunately, where this is true is shrinking.

              • Sarkozy began enforcing France’s demise. He even wanted to enforce miscegenation by government force. The Kalergi Plan is underway in France. One more reason for the left-tards to move there.

                • Somebody, please wipe the smirk off his face! He thinks too highly of himself as he hides behind the dresses of the cougars who surround him!

                  Louisiana Eagle

            • Europe and especially France would be the last damn place I would go thanks to their seriously flawed policies on allowing all of those radical, filthy, violent Muslim trash into the country…NO THANKS!! The U.S. is bad enough with various scum.

            • President Macron you are welcome to all the Libtards we got. You Can Have Em. BTW you look pretty stupid in that picture.

          • Send all the Snowflake libbys Democraps to France. Perfect. Make America Great Again. Load them up on one way ticket ships. And send that copper POS Liberty Statue back to them as well. You can have all the lazy tires Worthless eaters back. Thank you for your support France.

          • Oh France now worried about the environment?? France has more Nuke power plants than most nations in the world. Europe will be one nasty place when it all blows. So yeah a great place for snowflake liberals to be.

        • In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment, told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

          In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

          The people who are pushing this will not tell you 2 things:
          1) This is ultimately about nwo power.
          2) The overall temperature has risen measurably across the entire solar system, due to several factors.

        • The little French macaroon can have ’em. Adios, lefties.

          Here’s an idea, maybe we could trade with macaroon- we’ll give you all of Hollywood for some old Brigitte Bardot posters (before she got old and fat, of course). Throw in 6 cases of chardonnay and we’ll also give you every college professor on America, whadda ya say?

        • Macron is yet another Goldman Sachs crony. I seriously don’t know how these people can live even a single day with a conscience as seared as it is. Reminds me of the Nazis using Xyclon B on people all day, then going home to watch an opera that night with their wife.

          There is a point which God abandons people – and countries even (see Dr. Irwin Lutzer’s When a Nation Forgets God…. Lutzer’s parents were German Russians who escaped to Canada via Afghanistan of all places) to the repeated and consistent decisions they have made. Some of these banksters are truly in Hell now… and at their death that Hell will simply continue at another address. Very scary.

      2. For once I see a population shift I can get behind..Thanks Macron, you will love our liberals as the truly add a new level of shit to your culture and streets…

        • There will be plenty of fertilizer for all those ancient vineyards. The billionaire elite are snapping the vineyards up like hotcakes.

        • If we was to send all are libtards to France. The average IQ of there Libtard population would drop to a single digit number.

      3. Well lefties, you have a way out. By all means go to France. All of us right wingers would like to extend to you a personal invitation to GTFO here. Get out while you can!

        • It’ll be tough to move the lefties out. Just moving Rosie to france will take a C17 and at least a C5 to move Michael Moore. You could always tether 3 chinooks together and carry one em.

          Easier said then done.

          • We could stuff moore and rosie in the hold of an oil tanker and transport them like Kong. On the journey over they would hopefully sink.

            • And hopefully not breed during the trip.

              • That would be ugly!

              • That would be ugly!

        • Amen! I’ll help them pack and get them to row boat. We wouldn’t want to increase the carbon footprint by using one of them ‘big old jet airliners’, now would we? How about this, with the US pulling out of this accord bringing total, world-wide environmental destruction, then what good would it do to move from here? If it’s a global thing, wouldn’t France be affected the same? Oh, maybe it’s just the US that’s going to suffer from the world-wide global environmental destruction…yep, you lefty environmental wackos need to go!

        • Maybe we could crowd-fund some tickets, especially for those ‘most deserving’.

      4. Don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya….

      5. Well,France helped us during the revolution,gave us a nice statue ect.Pay back,WW1/WW2/Vietnam,were even.That said,tis nice of France to open their borders even wider and help us clear out the progressives,Thanks France!

      6. If they won’t go the shorter distance north, they won’t cross the pond. They’ll just move to Texas.

      7. Any of you red commie bastards need help packing?? My five boys and I are here to help!

      8. I say the word nigger all the time. I’m prejudice (they call it racist) and proud of it. I say a lot of other words too. Like faggit, whore, bitch, perv, white trash, hic, spic, asshole, lezbe, etc….its perfectly legal and protected under the 1st amendment. It may be offensive or inappropriate, but that’s my decision. You don’t have the right not to be offended in the USA. And you can offend me back, and call me fatass, baldee, honkey, nerd, freeako, etc…its called liberty…….and if they ever pass hate speech laws here, (like the UK), were finished. There will be no end, and the final result will be concentration camps and genocide of the white race. As you know, only whites can be accused and charged with hate crimes. Its Orwellian, and it must be stopped. Everybody must chime together and offend at will. They’ve already got you brainwashed to never say the word nigger. Even in the context of calling it an offensive word. None of the castrated sheeple in this country dare utter that word. Because you have all been brainwashed. I haven’t. I know the game. And I know the road we’re on. And I know how it ends.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • Right you are, J. Freedom of speech is important.
          Of course, being a ‘sensitive’ redneck myself, I never say the n-word. However… spook, spear-chucker, porch monkey, jungle bunny, jigaboo, yard ape, rastus, nappy head, well-done, crispy creme, biscuit-lip, missing link, and a few others do come in handy.
          As far as the things others have called me- in-bred, red neck, white trash, neanderthal, and… my all time favorite: “you racist prejudiced intolerant SOB!”
          On the other hand, cracker really did hurt my feelings. I had to go to counseling afterwards.

        • I use pretty much all of those words, hell probably daily and sometimes many times in 1 day…I will not allow PC bullshit to rain on my parade. Piss off if you don’t like it 🙂

      9. The problem is that the left is like cancer, you can never get rid of it, just repress it

      10. The Financial Stability Board recently stated that $73 freaking TRILLION was going to be spent on faux global warming (there has been ZERO global warming since 1998). NO wonder the fraud wants the beaucoup bucks. Goldman Sucks, JPM, all the big crony capitalists are in on the scam.

        Australian Joanne Nova had the temerity to follow the money, and found that trail led to – surprise! – the warmers. Brobdignagian Big Government and its horde of public cash, along with their buddies, Big Finance (who, also have a stake in global warming) which utterly dwarfs relatively tiny Big Oil. Nova notes at deep-pocketed Greenpeace searched high and wide for Big Oil money, and found $23 mm paid by Exxon over 10 years, which has stopped. They found nothing more. Moreover, Nova’s article points out that while Big Oil may not prefer emissions to be traded, it’s not the end of the world if they are, as any taxing of Big Oil will just be passed on to the consumers, and past experience shows that even with higher prices, consumers still have to use fuel, so profits will not be impacted.

        In contrast to Exxon’s $23 mm, consider the carbon-mongers’ budgets, such as Stanford’s Global Climate and Energy Project for $100mm. Meanwhile, the co-opted government has spent $79 billion on climate initiatives since 1989, and this figure is only the U.S. alone, and also does not include private concerns. Even Australia put out one quick advertising campaign at $13.9 mm recently. And what is England’s BBC, if not one big, publicly funded advertising arm for the warmers? In sum, Nova notes “There is no question that there are vastly more financial rewards for people who promote a carbon-made catastrophe than for those who point out the flaws in the theory.” Worse, there is no group or government funding designed to check flaws in the warmers’ work, and the very logic of government funding steers the researchers to do what they were mandated to do – look in one direction for warming, as their grant applications ask them to.

        As Nova states in her article, “It’s possible that honest scientists have dutifully followed their grant applications, always looking for one thing in one direction, and when they have made flawed assumptions or errors, or just exaggerations, no one has pointed it out simply because everyone who could have, had a job doing something else. In the end the auditors who volunteered—like Steve McIntyre and AnthonyWatts—are retired scientists, because they are the only ones who have the time and the expertise to do the hard work.” While there are massive numbers of heavily funded organizations looking for global warming, I have yet to hear of even one “National Institute for Natural Climate Change.”

        Need another example? Mr. Hockey Stick himself, Michael Mann, while at Virginia State Univ. received almost a half million dollars in funding prior to his departure to Penn State. And while people like Peter Gleick talk about Heartland Inst. receiving $7 million in annual funding (with only a very small fraction coming from corporations having anything to do with the global warming, James Taylor points out, in contrast, :the Natural Resources Defense Council receives close to $100 million in annual funding, Greenpeace receives close to $200 million in annual funding, the World Wildlife Fund receives approximately $600 million in annual funding, etc., etc., etc. Which groups, indeed, are the “well-funded” entities “focused on protecting narrow financial interests?”

        Meanwhile, Nova stated that according to the World Bank, carbon trading reached $126 billion in 2008, and PointCarbon came in with $130 billion in 2009. (It’s only got a thousand times worse than back then) If warmers whine about involvement of “Big Oil,” what about the involvement of Big Finance, who stand to make money when carbon is bought or sold? Could it be that those shouting at skeptics are in the employ of Big Finance? Nova writes “Banks are keen to be seen as good corporate citizens (look, there’s an environmental banker!), but somehow they don’t find the idea of a non-tradable carbon tax as appealing as a trading scheme where financial middlemen can take a cut. (For banks that believe in the carbon crisis, taxes may well “help the planet,” but they don’t pay dividends.)”

      11. BIG GREEN MONEY indeed!

        So, in sum, is seems there are some generally unpaid skeptics who are taking on massive business interests and groups of warmers who have a vested interest to continue getting their grants and trips to exotic locales for meetings (anyone wonder why the don’t row there?). No one seems to mention they also have to fight “Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Barclays, Morgan Stanley, and every other financial institution or corporation that stands to profit like the Chicago Climate Exchange (before it imploded from its own poison gas emissions, see ), European Climate Exchange), PointCarbon, IdeaCarbon (and the list goes on… ) as well as against government bureaucracies like the IPCC and multiple departments of Climate Change.” CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton even stated a few years back in the near future he could “ see carbon trading being a $2 trillion market… the largest commodity market in the world” while Richard L. Sandor, chairman and chief executive officer of Climate Exchange Plc, who received $1.1 million in grants from the leffist Joyce Foundation to launch the CCX, agreed and predicted trades eventually would total $10 trillion a year – that is, until Cap and Trade blew up – at which point, Mr. Sandor received $98.5 million for his 16.5% stake in the CCX (Chicago Climate Exchange) when it was sold. Not too shabby for a failed enterprise that somebody else financed.

        And Mr. Sandor isn’t the only one making off with big bucks. There’s good ol’ billionaire greenie Nat Simons. Brian McNicoll notes “He’s in the energy business, and he’s not afraid to throw money around to get government policies that help his bottom line. He buys scientists to crank out favorable research. He pays think tanks to formulate policies that fatten his wallet. He contributes vast sums to politics – both in direct support of candidates and in advocacy. He doles out tens of millions of dollars per year to groups to forward his energy views, and the source of much of this money is the darkest of secrets. And to top it off, he rides to work on a yacht – a 54-foot, 1,550-horsepower craft with a 550-gallon fuel tank (which I think is around the same size as John Kerry’s yacht). McNicoll goes on to note that Simons Sea Change Foundation doled out more than $100 million in 2011 and 2012 to groups such as the Sierra Club, the Natural Resource Defense Council, Food and Water Watch, the League of Conservation Voters and the Center for American Progress. Just more, you know, of the BIG GREEN MONEY cabal. And it is all funded by some secretive, Bermuda based organization called Klein, which gave Simons Sea Change $23 million recently. And where does Klein get its money from? Why, from ““executives with deep ties to Russian oil interests and offshore money laundering schemes involving member of President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.” States Lachlan Markey of the Washington Free Beacon. And of course the Russians want something for this dough – namely a carbon tax in the US, which would drive US energy costs higher, and help… well, you get it.

        Perhaps most revealing is the 2017 article in WattsUpWithThat,where the vice chair of the Financial Stability Board disclosed that “the world will have to spend $93 trillion over the next 15 years – five times the size of the entire 2015 US economomy – on “renewable, sustainable” energy and low-carbon infrastructure programs, as part of the Climate Crisis, Inc. plan to de-carbonize and de-industrialize the planet. Naturally, most of that money will flow to its crony corporatist allies. Their ultimate goal is to enrich and empower themselves … and fundamentally transform the global economy – to our detriment, and especially the detriment of the world’s poorest families – using our taxpayer, consumer, and investment, retirement, insurance and pension fund money!” As one example, this article notes the big green money banksters include “UBS Financial Services and the $5-trillion BlackRock global financial management firm, which now has an index fund for people and organizations that want to divest from companies that BlackRock, AXA and the Cabal have targeted with their anti-carbon campaigns. The tax-exempt anti-carbon pressure group Natural Resources Defense Council has put $70 million into the fund.”

        In fact, in 2000-1, Discoverthenetworks noted in a Dec. 1, 2015 article that the Joyce Foundation – on whose board Obama sat at the time – had made a tidy little $1.1 mm grant to get the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) off the ground, which was to be “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.” As they said in the Depression (the 1930s one, not Obama’s one), “nice work if you can get it.”
        Total money given by Sea Change from 2007 to 2012 to push carbon tax or cap and trade totaled a cool $173 million, reports McNicoll which help both the Russians as well as Simons green energy scams. Nice work if you can get it. And, concludes McNicoll, Simons’ “green groups thrive on a panoply of government grants, low- or no-interest loans and breaks from bureaucrats who save their regulatory zeal for fossil-fuel projects.” And the left has the lying temerity to accuse others of being in the back pocket of big oil! In fact, the back pockets are in the BIG GREEN MONEY pants: in 2014, New England started down the green path – and saw energy prices rise 40% (see Forbes 12/12/14). Somebody is making a bundle off that increase. I’ll leave you to do the research on that one.

      12. Fun Science Facts for Fraud Mssr. Macron (not that he would want to betray his handlers at Goldman actually consider REAL science):

        what is the actual presence of CO2 in the atmosphere? Just over 400 ppm or less than 0.04%, up from 320 ppm, or 0.032% 50 years ago. Of the remaining percentages, nitrogen amounts for 78%, oxygen 21%. Of the 1% that then remains, 90% of that is argon, with less than 4% of that 1% being carbon dioxide (these percentages exclude highly variable water vapor, which is usually around 1 – 4% of the atmosphere – and a much more major contributor to global warming, estimated at being 50-90% of the greenhouse effect). Of course the logarithmic effect of CO2 means each additional increase has less impact that the prior, same sized increase. And of course, the extra CO2 has helped crop, forest and grassland plants more drought resistant, helping them grow faster and better, and “greening” vast areas that had been brown and barren. Even more, about 96 to 97% of carbon dioxide comes from natural sources, such as animals, plant decay and volcanoes.

        In fact, relative to volcanoes, former FDA investigator Dr. Arthur Evangelista, noted that the 2010 eruption of Eyafjallajokull in Iceland emitted, in four days, enough CO2 in four days to negate every single effort mankind made that year to reduce CO2. But this volcano was a piker compared to Mt. Pinatubo, which when it erupted in the Philippines in 1991 “spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in its entire 40 MILLION YEARS on earth.” And this doesn’t include that fact that, as he notes the “bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.”

      13. More science fact for global warming frauds like Macron:

        Farley Mowat, the noted Canadian leftist and Greenpeace activist, wrote in his book West Viking (written while we were still in the global cooling scare) that there were probably at least dwarf forests growing in Greenland when the Vikings arrived in 985 AD and the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History reports “… Erik the Red discovered two areas of southwest Greenland which were suitable for farming, with grasslands and small stands of alder and birch.” You will note that it is too cold today for any type of forests to grow in Greenland, and there is zero ability to farm, unless modern technologies are utilized – and even then, crop selection is very minimal. Mowat also reported the Arctic pack ice was much less in that Viking discovery era than today. Dr. Fred Singer writes that when the Vikings first settled Greenland, they grew vegetables, and it was warm enough to allow the population to grow to 3,000 people and by 1100 AD the place was thriving enough that they had their own bishop and twelve churches. ***** And Nature reported in a 2010 article that clamshell studies also confirm Norse records. Meanwhile, the Archeological Survey of Canada has also noted around “A.D. 1000, a warmer climate resulted in the tree line advancing 100 kilometres north of its present position.” *****

        Indeed, when I was visiting Iceland at Skaftafell Nat’l Park two years ago, Icelandic historians know from extant deeds – and have put in the displays at the park – that somewhere around FORTY old Viking era farms are currently buried under the Vatnajokull glacier system (the largest in the world outside of Greenland and Antarctica). In other words, it was simply much warmer in the Icelandic settlement era than it is today. We are routinely informed of the melting of Greenland glaciers today at lower altitudes, but demonstrably there are at bare minimum low altitude glaciers in roughly the same geographic area that had seen more melting and more pronounced glacial recession one thousand years ago than we see today. Al

        More evidence: There are records of grape growing occurring in places in northern Europe back during this optimum where they can’t grow today. Gregory McNamee, in the Weather Guide Calendar (Accord Publishing, 2002) noted that wine connoisseurs might have gone to England for fine vintages (can’t grow fine vintage grapes there today!), that heat loving trees like beeches carpeted Europe far into Scandinavia, and Viking ships crossed iceberg free oceans to ice free harbors in Iceland…”. Art Horn writes that “In the winter of 1249 it was so warm in England that people did not need winter clothes. They walked about in summer dress. It was so warm people thought the seasons had changed. There was no frost in England the entire winter. Can you imagine what NOAA would say if that happened next year? “

        On the other side of the world, research by Panin and Nefedov in 2010, where they analyzed rivers and lakes in the Upper Volga and Upper Zapadnaya Dvina areas in Russia, also found evidence of a Medieval climatic optimum in that part of the world Even worse for the warmers, recent research has found evidence for the Medieval Climatic Optimum in the central Peruvian Andes, southern South America, China, see,, where the author XJ Zhou notes “temperatures in the Medieval Warm Period are comparable to those in the current warm period over China,” and Antarctica, Li, Y., Cole-Dai, J. and Zhou, L. 2009. Glaciochemical evidence in an East Antarctica ice core of a recent (AD 1450-1850) neoglacial episode. Journal of Geophysical Research 114: 10.1029/2008JD011091 (summarized at Amazingly, there is even clear evidence of the LIA and MWP in Antarctica- see as well as Western Canada, as illustrated by the picture of a white spruce (picea glauca) found on Canada’s Arctic Ocean, on the Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula in tundra (where I have a friend in the RCMP) ***
        some 100km north of the current treeline.*** Radiocarbon date was 4940 ±140 years Before Present (BP), and was featured in Hubert Lamb’s classic work Climate, Present, Past and Future. See for this picture, as well as other AGW info.

        Similarly, two recent papers, reported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, one in Earth-Science Reviews and the other is in Chinese Science Bulletin, reported studies of “key chemical contents in micro-drilled giant clams shells and coral samples to demonstrate that in the South China Sea the warm period of the Middle Ages was warmer than the present. The scientists examined surveys of the ratio of strontium to calcium content and heavy oxygen isotopes, both are sensitive recorders of sea surface temperatures past and present. The aragonite bicarbonate of the Tridacna gigas clam-shell is so fine-grained that daily growth-lines are exposed by micro-drilling with an exceptionally fine drill-bit, allowing an exceptionally detailed time-series of sea-temperature changes to be compiled – a feat of detection worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself. By using overlaps between successive generations of giant clams and corals, the three scientists – Hong Yan of the Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Yuhong Wang of Fudan University, Shanghai – reconstructed a record of sea-surface temperature changes going back 2500 years. The Roman and Mediaeval Warm Periods both showed up prominently in the western Pacific and East Asia. Sea surface temperatures varied considerably over the 2500-year period.” Dr. Soon concludes :” “The UN’s climate panel should never have trusted the claim that the medieval warm period was mainly a European phenomenon. It was clearly warm in South China Sea, too.”

        Another study, by earth sciences professor Zunli Lu (formerly of Oxford, now at Syracuse Univ.), studied samples of crystal called ikaite, which forms in cold water, and will melt at room temperature. Samples were taken by Lu and colleagues, examined for variation caused by temperature fluctuations during formation, and dated. The result? Lu writes: “This ikaite record qualitatively supports that both the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age extended to the Antarctic Peninsula.” What does this mean? It means that the MWP was not simply a localized event in northern Europe, or even the northern hemisphere. And if it was as warm 1,000 years ago as now all over the world, Al Gore is simply wrong. Study summary by the UK Register at

        • TEST, those were some very interesting posts you made about the scam behind global warming. You can bet that Trump will be the #1 subject at the next Bilderburger meeting. I smell a possible attempt on Trump’s life. If that happens, it will be GAME ON.

      14. For this, I would welcome a tax increase.

        To pay for each liberal to be sent over to France?? You bet.

        Best idea I’ve heard in a while.

      15. Wait til they get their tax bill,have to learn french and put up with many more muslims with attitudes and more terrorism. Yep, the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. Go for it.

        • That’s one of the many problems with society today “Jim From Va.” So many people think that the grass is always greener on the other side but fail to realize that grass also must be kept up,or else it turns to weeds..Hollywood has always hyped this mentality and have brainwashed millions into believing the grass is always greener on the other side.Case in point,immigrants.I wonder how many immigrants came to the US and ended up being no better off than if they would have stayed where they were? Libs only want immigrants to come here because they want their VOTE…France is wasting their breath telling Libs they can move there..98% of Libs wont even consider this offer,and why should they,they have it made here..Move to France and Libs wouldn’t,or should i say shouldn’t,have much to bitch about..

      16. I hope they go and don’t come back. …. I recall when Johnny Depp left (had a French “partner” at the time). But when Paris was blowing up, he fled back to the States.

      17. fantastic idea start filling up the transport ships March them to the sea. Start with the governor of Oregon who has made the state safe for left wing rioters to terrorize small kids and young women. A lesbian communist she will follow the Paris accords regardless of the voters. She is anti gun, anti mining, pro sales tax, water well tax, higher gasoline tax, higher income tax, road use tax based on time of day, tax on taxes etc. Send them to france fast they need them

        • rockmanr, sounds like your governor would fit right in with the EU.

      18. Macron was seduced as a minor (aged 15), lost his cherry to her, and then married her. He still keeps the crypt-keeper around. While most guys would be happy to sleep with an older woman, it does speak to who has the power in the relationship.

      19. America – Love It Or Leave It

      20. I noticed he only invited the engineers, scientist, entrepreneurs, and responsible citizens; so that means he doesn’t want all the snowflakes, rioters, Mexicans on welfare, and Muslims. He’s only wanting the upper classes. We want him to take them all that are not Constitutionalist. We would be happy to split their cost of exit tickets with the new French President. Macron, tu es bete!

      21. France, as a nation has not won a war since Napoleon. Once they mounted the Crusades, and could field real fighting armies for centuries. Though they gave it a great effort in the Franco-Prussian war and WW I, it finished off their martial heritage. Now, after generations and centuries of wars they have killed off and wiped out their warrior gene pool. Same for Germany and most of Europe. This, combined with the fact they are essentially socialist means France and Europe in general are pacified. This can be shown as; they keep tolerating terrorism, they don’t contribute their share to NATO, they have tiny and insignificant military budgets. They have almost stopped having children, they simply won’t stop the human flood of immigrants, and their Christian heritage is long gone. You can see videos on-line showing men watching women and children getting raped or beaten up and the men just walking away, even as a group. There is even a video showing a member of the German parliament saying her wish is the German gene pool would go extinct, and Germany would cease to exist. European culture is dying out, and they will not even defend themselves, they are literally committing voluntary national suicide.
        By 2100 Europe will be nothing more than part of the Middle-Eastern and African world with only pockets of native Europeans remaining.

      22. Yes! Is there anywhere I can donate some money to help some poor crying anti Trump liberals get to France? No, seriousl, this is FANTASTIC!

        You may ask why? Here is why: In the next few years the place will be the new hotbed of terrorism with millions of people dying. I go around my area all the time saying, “Wow! It sure would be nice if stupid was painful. These morons would quickly learn.” Well, I’ve been wrong. Some morons never learn. They voted, again, and they voted for Clinton (A fascist) or Bernie (“Fascist Lite” – AKA “Socialist”) and they don’t learn. Those that have learned voted for Trump. The ones that didn’t vote for Trump are just causing problems. Instead of helping repair this country after getting it “Obama’d” they’re continuing to screw the place up.

        Enter Macron.

        I don’t wish terrorism on any country but if terrorism has to happen, let it happen to the people who REFUSE to recognize it, REFUSE to combat it and, at the same time, disarm their people and make them vulnerable.

        In 6 words:

        Fuck you France. Fuck you Progressives.

        Normally, I am not this blatant, however, they’ve been begging for it.

      23. (Sorry, Mac. Please delete previous comment.)

        Yes! Is there anywhere I can donate some money to help some poor crying anti Trump liberals get to France? No, seriousl, this is FANTASTIC!

        You may ask why? Here is why: In the next few years the place will be the new hotbed of terrorism with millions of people dying. I go around my area all the time saying, “Wow! It sure would be nice if stupid was painful. These morons would quickly learn.” Well, I’ve been wrong. Some morons never learn. They voted, again, and they voted for Clinton (A fascist) or Bernie (“Fascist Lite” – AKA “Socialist”) and they don’t learn. Those that have learned voted for Trump. The ones that didn’t vote for Trump are just causing problems. Instead of helping repair this country after getting it “Obama’d” they’re continuing to screw the place up.

        Enter Macron.

        I don’t wish terrorism on any country but if terrorism has to happen, let it happen to the people who REFUSE to recognize it, REFUSE to combat it and, at the same time, disarm their people and make them vulnerable.

        In 6 words:

        Fuck you France. Fuck you Progressives.

        Normally, I am not this blatant, however, they’ve been begging for it.

      24. His pic is worth a thousand words.

      25. He has graciously offered to requeen the hive.

      26. GOOD GTFO.

        And you can pay all their Welfare.

        But I am le tired…

      27. Mr Macaroni. Please consider offering free [One Way] tickets to france.

      28. The Brits deserve everything their getting…..the liberalism, deChristianization, and the nanny state has made castrated sheeple out of a once great empire. The metro-sexual faggits in the UK are not able to defend themselves, their woman, or their children from the barbarians that were and are being ushered into the country by their traitorous leaders. And so we will watch the UK (and much of Europe) being absorbed into the Islamic caliphate…..and hope the witness to this invasion and takeover of Europe will wake up Americans, before its too late.!!!!!!!

      29. Bye Y’all. Hope not to see you around anytime soon.

      30. I love all the above posts. Some made me lol.
        So true, and I agree.

      31. The Paris deal was a disaster for America and a nothing-burger for climate.

        Dropping out of the agreement will let the U.S. avoid several deleterious effects of the agreement.

        The United States and wealthy European nations would have adopted and implemented severe climate change rules while many of the world’s governments would avoid doing anything that would slow their own economies.
        The agreement basically made the U.S. economy and Europe’s strongest economies sacrificial lambs to the cause of climate change.
        The regulations would have cost the U.S. industrial sector 1.1 million jobs.
        Big businesses in America strongly backed the Paris climate deal. Backers of the climate deal: Apple, General Electric, Intel, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, General Mills, Walmart, DuPont, Unilever, and Johnson & Johnson. Smaller businesses would be hurt by the increased costs of compliance and rising energy costs.
        The Paris agreement would have increased electricity costs of an American family of four by between 13 percent and 20 percent annually, and a loss of income of $20,000 by 2035. American families would be paying more while making less.
        The overall effect of the agreement would have been to reduce U.S. GDP by over $2.5 trillion, eliminate 400,000 jobs by 2035 and increase reliance on government to support households.

        Every Bad Thing We Will Avoid By Rejecting the Paris Climate Accords
        ht tp://

      32. Trump did exactly right to reject the paris deal. All the other countries need to STFU about it.

      33. Anginas here’s your big opportunity. Jump on it.


      34. Let’s all chip in and buy them all one way tickets?

      35. I’ll admit that I don’t fully understand Global Climate Change. The people screaming Global Climate Change don’t understand it but they won’t admit it! They are simply climbing on board something they don’t understand.

      36. Climate Change, which replaces Global Warming, as the planet’s biggest threat is very dangerous. There is a real need to be environmentally responsible, so like a lie with a kernel of truth, it hijacks a legitimate cause and perverts it. Furthermore, these psychotic pieces of waste are deliberately causing environmental catastrophe in order to use the results as justification for land grabs, cattle stealing, and an end to the freedom of private vehicle autonomous owner operated cars and trucks.


      37. Oh please Macron. Take all of our commie libturds, muslims and take Puerto Rico while you
        are at it. If they voted for Bernie or Killery, take them. Please give them French citizenship.

      38. Don’t come back.

      39. Liberals, please move to France, England, Canada, wherever. We are sick of you. You won’t be missed. This country will be a better place without your whining, nasty verbal abuse.

      40. Still no mention of how Fukushima nuclear reactor is completely killing the food chain in the Pacific Ocean.

        • Fukushima is a HUGE huge huge problem, such that they try to ignore it and think and hope it will some how just go away..yeah right! Leaking all that poison every single minute of every single day guys, think about it . . . . .

      41. democrats move to surrender monkey land they need and want you so get on the winning team(team muslim appeaser).
        we’ll manage somehow in your absence it won’t be easy but can we do it …… yes we can. so give those people hope by changing your country.

      42. Why France? Our wonderful Liberal friends can move to Mexico, its much closer and a truly colorful culture as well.
        I’m retired.
        My wife and I would love to move to France if Mr Macron would send us a round trip ticket to visit first. With all the money in social security we’d be spending in gay, Muslim Paris I’d also like to have a free guided tour of the city while were there for a week. I’m sure the French know about ‘free’, its what their immigrants are given for_____ (their actual contribution).
        We’ll make up our minds to move after returning to deplorable Main Street, USA. 😀

      43. Great idea President Macron!

        a couple thoughts…

        Can we give him an award for this?

        Can we specify one way tickets?

      44. Make California Great Again

      45. July 07, 2014 57 Years Ago: U.S. and Britain Approved Use of Islamic Extremists to Topple Syrian Government

        Newly discovered documents show how in 1957 [former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom] Harold Macmillan and President Dwight Eisenhower approved a CIA-MI6 plan to stage fake border incidents as an excuse for an invasion by Syria’s pro-western neighbours, and then to “eliminate” the most influential triumvirate in Damascus.

      46. Liberals, your sh*t stinks too! Start questioning what other liberal “experts” have told you! Yes, climate is changing! Climate has always been changing! Think for yourself. Don’t just read the opinions of people who agree with you. The same holds true for conservatives.

      47. I helped a female relative watch the 2017 version of”Beauty and the Beast.” (Sorry.) It is supposedly set in ‘the secret heart of France’, during the rococo era, at which time, there were black opera singers (sarc) and assorted townspeople. Belle is persecuted for women’s literacy and gives mechanical help to the disoriented menfolk.

        I am aware of some secular, humanist Enlightenment, liberating artwork, so that commoners would be able to view it, yet cannot think of a liberal, social venue which pro actively creates these masterpieces.

        Global warmism and reversing the Crusades are not examples of progress or moral free agency.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.