For The First Time, Wall Street Admits That “Civil Unrest” Could Crash Markets

by | Nov 19, 2020 | Headline News | 5 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    This article was originally published by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge. 

    Earlier today, we reported that sentiment in the latest Bank of America Fund Manager survey was so bullish, even survey organizer, BofA Chief Investment Officer Michael Hartnett, said it’s time to turn bearish for the near-term and “sell the vaccine” because Wall Street has gone “full bull”:

    The most bullish Fund Manager Survey (FMS) of 2020 on the back of vaccine, election, macro; Nov FMS shows a big drop in cash, 20-year high in GDP expectations, big jump in equity, small cap & EM exposure; reopening rotation can continue in Q4 but we say “sell the vaccine” in coming weeks/months as we think we’re close to “full bull”.

    Yet while there were several other observations in the survey (the full report can be found here), all of which confirmed what we had previously seen in the latest AAII survey, namely that virtually every trader is now super bullish…

    … what caught our attention was not among the list of euphoric superlatives, but was hidden deep inside the risk factors.

    We are referring to what the survey respondents defined as the biggest threat: while at the top, for the 8th consecutive month, covid was seen as the biggest “tail risk”…

    … what we found remarkable is that after “tech bubble” in 2nd place in the list of biggest tail risks, “Civil Unrest” suddenly popped into 3rd place, after not being cited as a notable risk in any of the previous BofA surveys.

    So what’s going on here, is Wall Street really starting to worry about what we first said back in 2010 – much to Time Magazine’s mockery – that the Fed’s disastrous policies would eventually push US society to armed conflict and/or to civil war. While it may be easy to dismiss such fears as hyperbolic, consider what otherwise level-headed Bloomberg macro commentator (and former Lehman trader) Mark Cudmore wrote overnight in his latest lament that markets are so broken, that in the end, it will all “end in tears”, either in the form of collapse of fiat currency or through “political revolution”, read armed conflict.

    Which brings us back to square one. Because in a world where a handful of traders are the most bullish they have been in 20 years while the living standards of tens of millions of Americans are absolutely dismal with the economy on the verge of yet another depression-causing shutdown, the flashbacks to the days just before the French Revolution are all too real.

    We leave you with Cudmore’s full dystopian comment on what comes next:

    It has paid off this year to just enjoy the forest rather than study the trees. More than ever before, markets are rewarding investors who have the ability to embrace a strong narrative over those who focus on analysis and details.

    I have rarely experienced such a large gap between my confidence in the future of the largest market drivers and my lack of conviction in where the risk-reward trades lie. There’s a large cohort of the market suffering from the same dilemma but many others are thriving.

    The winners are the people smart enough to recognize the reinvigorated power of an old market adage: “Don’t fight the Fed.” The influence of central banks is now pervasive in all markets — not just bonds, credit and stocks, but also cryptocurrencies and art.

    Ironically, the incredible impact of central bank policies stems from their powerlessness to achieve a narrow mandate. With limited success in boosting inflation in the face of a global pandemic, they have resorted to fueling the only price gains they can guarantee: financial assets and investments.

    Since March, Bloomberg’s Markets Live team has joked internally that the answer to any question is “Buy stonks!” (the typo an intentional reference to the “hodl” meme that successfully encapsulated a similarly unsophisticated winning strategy in crypto) and that any negative news is just a “dip-buying opportunity” in this post-truth world.

    These comments were most often thrown out by the cynics on the team, but it’s the wise minority who realized their power. A month ago I highlighted that risk-reward analysis has become reward-analysis and yet I’ve struggled to embrace this new era myself.

    I too often delve into whether a narrative has become over-priced in an asset class, when such an approach should now only be applied to a small subset of negative stories. For positive ones, there’s no such reason to question their longevity, as they will naturally morph into a fresh bullish narrative — one with different protagonists but a similar outcome, just like in The Neverending Story.

    So where do we stand? Interest rates will stay low for a long time to come; any violent market selloff will be dealt with by extraordinary policy steps; the virus will ultimately be contained but not until after many more fatalities, lost livelihoods and corporate bankruptcies; e-commerce, telecommuting and cashless transactions have seen a permanent boost; the inequality gap grows ever larger and the political frustrations ever deeper.

    What does that mean for investors? No idea! Well, that’s not true. Deep down I think we all know what this means but some are better at embracing this paradigm wholeheartedly.

    The path will be volatile but selloffs are indeed dip-buying opportunities. It will end in tears at some point, maybe through political revolution or perhaps the collapse of fiat currency, but that time could be many years away and shouldn’t influence how you operate today.

    To quote Charles Prince, the CEO of Citigroup until the eve of the financial crisis: “When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance.”

    Sure, he soon resigned and was asked to testify before Congress about the millions of dollars in exit pay he received after the bank lost billions on subprime mortgages. But his words bring to mind this year’s winners who can dance in the forest without noticing the trees.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. if civil unrest do start up i got dibs on the weed store

      2. The Fate of Empires .

      3. This is my prediction for possible civil unrest. It won’t be caused by any one factor, but fueled by a number of combined contributing factors including; forced vaccination, more and more awareness that a Dem. victory in this recent general election was organized, coordinated, and sponsored by both treasonous State entities and a cabal of nameless and faceless entities, coming massive unemployment, the coming significant deterioration of individual rights and freedoms (especially 1st, 2nd including mass private firearms confiscation, and 4th Amendments), coming travel restrictions, breakdown of supply chains, huge new federal power grabs and mandates, and crime caused by a huge increase in illegal immigration, to name a few.
        The decade of the 2020s will be a very interesting decade to say the least. Other items to anticipate in a JB Admin.; look for a conflict between Israel and Iran, the neo-cons will do their damndest to get the US pulled into that one. The good news is that all the investigations into the massive Dem. election fraud will only serve to undermine the legitimacy of a Biden (actually Harris) presidency; so I predict a low favorability rating for them which will motivate them to carry out radical measures, only to prompt even more opposition.
        I do believe we will likely see at least one other item taking place in the US later in this decade, but won’t mention it because some would say it’s a bit far-fetched. I will say however it will probably start becoming apparent in just a few years. All else I’ll say is I hope I’m wrong and look foolish.

      4. Yeah. Civil unrest. That’s it. Has nothing to do with earnings or the economy. Has nothing to do with the fact that they refused to permit econmic activity to take place. Free market capitalism. Maybe in Sweden, Belarus, or Nicaragua! Or the fact that the entire establishment has destroyed every shred of credibility for the rest of their lives. What will be the next excuse? I guess that you could always go to the old standby of Russian hackers, not that anyone would believe that either, but it has been used for blaming everything that goes wrong planned by the retards that are controlling the country.

      5. “any violent market selloff will be dealt with by extraordinary policy steps”

        Some countries just halt trading.

        Although, you could blame crisis actors for the Great Reset.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.