This article was originally published by John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead at The Rutherford Institute.
“If you don’t want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you. Don’t argue with me, don’t call me names, don’t tell me that I can’t stop you, don’t say I’m a racist pig, don’t threaten that you’ll sue me and take away my badge. Don’t scream at me that you pay my salary, and don’t even think of aggressively walking towards me.”—Officer with the Los Angeles Police Department
Americans aren’t dying at the hands of police because of racism.
For that matter, George Floyd didn’t die because he was black and the cop who killed him is white.
Floyd, who died after a Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for more than nine minutes, died because America is being overrun with militarized cops—vigilantes with a badge—who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”
These warrior cops may get paid by the citizenry, but they don’t work for us and they certainly aren’t operating within the limits of the U.S. Constitution. As retired Philadelphia police captain Ray Lewis warns, “The system is corrupt. Police really are oppressing not only the black community but also the whites. They’re an oppressive organization now controlled by the one percent of corporate America. Corporate America is using police forces as their mercenaries.”
Now, not all cops are guns for hire, trained to act as judge, jury, and executioner in their interactions with the populace.
However, the unfortunate reality we must come to terms with is that the good cops—the ones who take seriously their oath of office to serve and protect their fellow citizens, uphold the Constitution, and maintain the peace—are increasingly being outnumbered by those who believe the lives (and rights) of police should be valued more than citizens.
It doesn’t matter where you live—big city or small town—it’s the same scenario being played out over and over again in which government agents, hyped up on their own authority and the power of their uniform, ride roughshod over the rights of the citizenry.
Indeed, if you ask police and their enablers what Americans should do to stay alive during encounters with law enforcement, they will tell you to comply, cooperate, obey, not resist, not argue, not make threatening gestures or statements, avoid sudden movements, and submit to a search of their person and belongings during encounters with the police.
In other words, it doesn’t matter if you’re in the right, it doesn’t matter if a cop is in the wrong, it doesn’t matter if you’re being treated with less than the respect you deserve: if you want to emerge from a police encounter with your life and body intact, then you’d better comply, submit, obey orders, respect authority and generally do whatever a cop tells you to do.
In this way, the old police motto to “protect and serve” has become “comply or die.”
This is the unfortunate, misguided, perverse message that has been beaten, shot, tasered, and slammed into our collective consciousness over the past few decades, and it has taken root.
This is how we have gone from a nation of laws—where the least among us had just as much right to be treated with dignity and respect as the next person (in principle, at least)—to a nation of law enforcers (revenue collectors with weapons) who treat “we the people” like suspects and criminals.
As a result, Americans as young as 4 years old are being leg shackled, handcuffed, tasered, and held at gunpoint for not being quiet, not being orderly, and just being childlike—i.e., not being compliant enough.
Americans as old as 95 are being beaten, shot, and killed for questioning an order, hesitating in the face of a directive, and mistaking a policeman crashing through their door for a criminal breaking into their home—i.e., not being submissive enough.
And Americans of every age and skin color are continuing to die at the hands of a government that sees itself as judge, jury, and executioner over a populace that have been pre-judged and found guilty, stripped of their rights, and left to suffer at the hands of government agents trained to respond with the utmost degree of violence.
At a time when growing numbers of unarmed people have been shot and killed for just standing a certain way, or moving a certain way, or holding something—anything—that police could misinterpret to be a gun, or igniting some trigger-centric fear in a police officer’s mind that has nothing to do with an actual threat to their safety, even the most benign encounters with police can have fatal consequences.
The problem, as one reporter rightly concluded, is “not that life has gotten that much more dangerous, it’s that authorities have chosen to respond to even innocent situations as if they were in a warzone.”
Warrior cops—trained in the worst-case scenario and thus ready to shoot first and ask questions later—are definitely not making us or themselves any safer.
Worse, militarized police increasingly pose a risk to anyone undergoing a mental health crisis or with special needs whose disabilities may not be immediately apparent or require more finesse than the typical freeze-or-I’ll-shoot tactics employed by America’s police forces. Indeed, disabled individuals make up a third to half of all people killed by law enforcement officers. (People of color are three times more likely to be killed by police than their white counterparts.)
If you’re black and disabled, you’re even more vulnerable.
Specifically, what we’re dealing with today is a skewed shoot-to-kill mindset in which police, trained to view themselves as warriors or soldiers in a war, whether against drugs, or terror, or crime, must “get” the bad guys—i.e., anyone who is a potential target—before the bad guys get them.
This nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out with impunity against individuals posing little or no real threat has all but guaranteed that unarmed Americans will keep dying at the hands of militarized police.
Consider just some of the scenarios in which unarmed Americans have been shot and killed by police:
Killed for taking public transit. Oscar Grant, traveling home on a train packed with New Year’s Eve revelers, was pulled off the train while police investigated reports of fighting, shoved against a wall, punched in the head, kneed in the face, then shot and killed by police while lying face down on a train platform.
Killed for standing in a “shooting stance.” In California, police opened fire on and killed a mentally challenged—unarmed—black man within minutes of arriving on the scene, allegedly because he removed a vape smoking device from his pocket and took a “shooting stance.”
Killed for holding a cell phone. Police in Arizona shot a man who was running away from U.S. Marshals after he refused to drop an object that turned out to be a cellphone.
Killed for displaying air fresheners from a rearview mirror. Daunte Wright was shot and killed during a traffic stop over an expired registration and a state law prohibiting motorists from hanging air fresheners and other items from their rearview mirrors. Police claimed to have mistakenly used a gun instead of a Taser.
Killed for behaving oddly and holding a baseball bat. Responding to a domestic disturbance call, Chicago police shot and killed 19-year-old college student Quintonio LeGrier who had reportedly been experiencing mental health problems and was carrying a baseball bat around the apartment where he and his father lived.
Killed for opening the front door. Bettie Jones, who lived on the floor below LeGrier, was also fatally shot—this time, accidentally—when she attempted to open the front door for police.
Killed for being a child in a car pursued by police. Jeremy David Mardis, six years old and autistic, died after being shot multiple times by Louisiana police in the head and torso. Police opened fire on the car—driven by Jeremy’s father, Chris Few, who was also shot—and then allegedly lied, claiming that they were attempting to deliver an outstanding warrant, that Few resisted arrest, that he shot at police (no gun was found), and that he tried to ram his car into a police cruiser. Body camera footage refuted the police’s claims.
Killed for approaching police with a metal spoon. In Alabama, police shot and killed a 50-year-old man who reportedly charged a police officer while holding “a large metal spoon in a threatening manner.”
Killed for holding a tree branch. Georgia police shot and killed a 47-year-old man wearing only shorts and tennis shoes who, when first encountered, was sitting in the woods against a tree, only to start running towards police holding a stick in an “aggressive manner.”
Killed for crawling around naked. Atlanta police shot and killed an unarmed man who was reported to have been “acting deranged, knocking on doors, crawling around on the ground naked.” Police fired two shots at the man after he reportedly starting running towards them.
Killed for hunching over. Responding to a domestic trouble call, multiple officers with the Baltimore County police forced their way inside a home where they proceeded to open fire on an unarmed 41-year-old man who was hunched over in a defensive posture. The man was killed in front of his two young daughters and their mother.
Killed because a police officer accidentally pulled out his gun instead of his taser. An Oklahoma man suspected of trying to sell an illegal handgun was shot and killed after a 73-year-old reserve deputy inadvertently fired his gun instead of his taser. “Oh! I shot him! I’m sorry!” the deputy cried out.
Killed for wearing dark pants and a basketball jersey. Donnell Thompson, a mentally disabled 27-year-old described as gentle and shy, was shot and killed after police—searching for a carjacking suspect reportedly wearing similar clothing—encountered him lying motionless in a neighborhood yard. Police “only” opened fire with an M4 rifle after Thompson first failed to respond to their flash-bang grenades and then started running after being hit by foam bullets.
Killed for telling police you lawfully own a firearm. Philando Castile was shot and killed during a routine traffic stop allegedly over a broken tail light. As he was reaching for his license and registration, Castile explained to police that he had a conceal-and-carry permit. That’s all it took for police to shoot Castile four times in the presence of his girlfriend and her 4-year-old daughter.
Killed for leaving anywhere at all when a police officer pulls up. Deravis Caine Rogers was killed after starting to drive away from an apartment complex right around the same time as a police officer pulled up. Despite the fact that the police officer had no reason to believe Rogers was a threat or was suspected of any illegal activity, the officer fired into Rogers’ passenger side window.
Killed for driving while deaf. In North Carolina, a state trooper shot and killed 29-year-old Daniel K. Harris—who was deaf—after Harris initially failed to pull over during a traffic stop.
Killed for shopping at Walmart. John Crawford III was shot and killed by police responding to reports of an armed man in an Ohio Walmart. Crawford, shopping and talking on his phone, had been holding an unpackaged pellet gun that had been sitting on a store shelf.
Killed for being homeless. Los Angeles police shot an unarmed homeless man after he failed to stop riding his bicycle and then proceeded to run from police.
Killed for brandishing a shoehorn. John Wrana, a 95-year-old World War II veteran, lived in an assisted living center, used a walker to get around, and was shot and killed by police who mistook the shoehorn in his hand for a 2-foot-long machete and fired multiple beanbag rounds from a shotgun at close range.
Killed for playing in a park. Tamir Rice was shot and killed in an Ohio park when a police officer mistook the 12-year-old’s toy airsoft pistol for a real gun.
Killed for having your car break down on the road. Terence Crutcher, unarmed and black, was shot and killed by Oklahoma police after his car broke down on the side of the road. Crutcher was shot in the back while walking towards his car with his hands up.
Killed for being in your own apartment. Botham Jean was shot and killed when a police officer entered Jean’s unlocked apartment, mistaking it for her own and mistaking Jean for a burglar.
Killed for staying up late. Atatiana Jefferson, up late playing video games with her 8-year-old nephew, was shot and killed after neighbors who were concerned about that the lights were on in the house asked police to do a wellness check.
Killed for holding a garden hose. California police were ordered to pay $6.5 million after they opened fire on a man holding a garden hose, believing it to be a gun. Douglas Zerby was shot 12 times and pronounced dead on the scene.
This is what constitutes “law and order” in the American police state.
Making matters worse, when these officers, who have long since ceased to be peace officers, violate their oaths by bullying, beating, tasering, shooting, and killing their employers—the taxpayers to whom they owe their allegiance—they are rarely given more than a slap on the hands before resuming their patrols.
This lawlessness on the part of law enforcement, an unmistakable characteristic of a police state, is made possible in large part by police unions which routinely oppose civilian review boards and resist the placement of names and badge numbers on officer uniforms; police agencies that abide by the Blue Code of Silence, the quiet understanding among police that they should not implicate their colleagues for their crimes and misconduct; prosecutors who treat police offenses with greater leniency than civilian offenses; courts that sanction police wrongdoing in the name of security; and legislatures that enhance the power, reach and arsenal of the police, and a citizenry that fails to hold its government accountable to the rule of law.
Indeed, not only are cops protected from most charges of wrongdoing—whether it’s shooting unarmed citizens (including children and old people), raping and abusing young women, falsifying police reports, trafficking drugs, or soliciting sex with minors—but even on the rare occasions when they are fired for misconduct, it’s only a matter of time before they get re-hired again.
Much of the “credit” for shielding these rogue cops goes to influential police unions and laws providing for qualified immunity, police contracts that “provide a shield of protection to officers accused of misdeeds and erect barriers to residents complaining of abuse,” state and federal laws that allow police to walk away without paying a dime for their wrongdoing, and rampant cronyism among government bureaucrats.
It’s happening all across the country.
This is how perverse justice in America has become.
If you’re starting to feel somewhat overwhelmed, intimidated, and fearful for your life and your property, you should be, because as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the only truly compliant, submissive, and obedient citizen in a police state is a dead one.
John W. & Nisha Whitehead, you present a great argument – interactions with law enforcement have gone astray of Constitutional values. As a veteran of large-city-residence, I look at this issue from a slightly different perspective. Bad actors like MS-13, other crazy people, criminals that are NOT punished by our legal system, and others have placed society’s protectors (POLICE) in a horrible position. Police frequently interact with bad actors and they are necessarily trained to control a situation. Those that attack police, resist arrest, use lethal weapons, etc. may not be ignored. The real problem is SCOFFLAWS WITH NO MORAL COMPASS. Try to see the problem from SOCIETY’s POLICE PERSPECTIVE.
With that said, I encourage all Americans to challenge any unconstitutional police encounter IN THE COURTS.
All pigs must die.
‘Indeed, if you ask [redcoats] and their enablers what [colonists] should do to stay alive during encounters with [King George’s retinue], they will tell you to comply, cooperate, obey, not resist, not argue, not make threatening gestures or statements, avoid sudden movements, and submit to a search of their person and belongings during encounters with the [redcoats].’
The same, verbal substitutions work with any forcible tyranny, and when common criminals put you in danger.
What if you cooperate?
Nobody believes in a constitutional version of policing from before the era of standing armies. Neither, did you vote for countless, petty tyrannies, inflicted by what amounts to road pirates with some writ of marque.
The minorities had a generically-correct idea, in community policing, except for how extreme it is, in their shithole countries of origin.
How does separate-but-equal work for whites.
Before freedom and integration were inflicted by the military, so impartially.
The discussion of race had always ultimately led to some version of Liberia, not to demographic replacement in the voter rolls and courthouses and realtor, so that St. Skittles could lord it over lesser whites, where he had been redlined into no-go zones.
Darth Skippy, regarding the “paraphrased” paragraph. Awesome comparison between colonial abuses & today’s tyranny. My admonition to the many scofflaws (those without well thought out positions on tyranny) in our nation is merely an effort to keep them alive until “wisdom” is achieved. Until folks are willing to jump off that cliff of open conflict & long-term hardship, we all have to live within the existing system. A few Sam Adams clones will have to jump into the fray before most Americans will give up the comfy life.
Good information. I know the truth about the SNORTS. FTP
But I’m old. I used to actively protest them as a self-described sovereign. But that doesn’t do me any good anymore. Let the young continue with the fight. Nowadays, I have shelved the critical thinking and gone with the flow. I only hope the peace lasts locally until I die. Logic demands I overlook my beliefs and overlook the oppressive bosses in order to make it to the end of my days.
Over course of human events during the past couple of hundred of years there have been many models put forth to describe the earthly political power structure that is the guiding force of humanity here on terra firma. While it would be difficult to put forth an exhaustive list some of them include; The Committee of 300, The Illuminati, The Free Masons, the Church, The Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, and many more. As I am bit of a student of History I have come up with yet another that I call the Medical Order (MO). While it may be true that bankers or even others may be at helm to inspire with ideas and money, the MO is the fulcrum upon which our current circumstance of tyranny is dependent. Thus it is that awareness of MO must be brought to the forefront if it is to be that our state of despotism can ever be defeated.
In the paragraphs that follow it may seem that I am disrespectful or even unkind toward cops and doctors. In all actuality I do respect cops and doctors. It pains me to be critical of them and of course I want to like them. I’m sure their jobs are more difficult than I could ever know. So while at times my tone may offend it is my intent to put forth solutions. As you read please bear in mind that facts are facts and as somebody famous once said, “Facts are stubborn things.” In my course of having spent well more than half a century on the planet there has been a steady decline in the state of our world while at the same time there has been a correlating trend toward the systemic dismantling of our constitutional and human rights. In a society that has no respect for life with regard to those living in the womb, that the leaders declare they recognize no “constitutional rights as absolute,” that a world leader would have the audacity to say “you will own nothing,” cops spend their days accosting citizens on shake down papers please fishing expeditions as though they are disgruntled common street thug peddlers in an effort toward revenue enhancement, there is no right to speak or peaceably assemble for redress of grievances, no right to be secure in your person, papers or home, and nowadays no right to gather and worship God, no right to travel outside of your home whether it be by plane or in some cases a simple trip for goods or services and so much more has simply been relinquished by those willing to constantly barter it all away for promised but never realized security and safety. Thereby the very thin line of what freedom from slavery we have is quickly and incrementally ever dwindling nearly extinguished from the spark in humanity to be placed deeper and deeper into the dark clutches of our slave master overlords. In the meantime, it is expected that people allow three inch needles to be pierced through their skin deep into their muscular tissue and injected with unknown ingredients for reasons they do not understand are unproven and disagreed with. And in the meanwhile, all are expected to risk their health and possibly their lives by inhibiting their breathing with face coverings again for reasons not understood, proven or wanted. How could a person respect themself in a society such as this? How can you expect that people would respect other people in a society such as this? Now, I am aware that in the aftermath of the Derek Chauvin trial there has been an onslaught of media coverage depicting a cop miraculously showing up just in time to make a shoot saving the lives of innocents being chased by a crazy aggressor wielding a butcher knife. Well to this I say bring back the 2nd Amendment and strong communities. Further, building strong communities requires a restoration of civil liberty and dignity. In any event, if you are a person who thinks that our current MO police state is justified I say to you our society has allowed for the degradation of our constitution to the point that if you are not currently threatened by the police state I suspect that given time you will be. In the recent immortal words of Pastor Artur Pawlowski in his description of how Poland finally broke free from the communist “people put aside their differences in solidarity for the sake of Freedom.” Perhaps it is time for such action here. Is it even possible?
Before moving on I want to preface that I believe our construction and nation the greatest achievement in all History. Assuredly, some suffered more than others and there has been an extreme amount of injustice with regard to slavery and racism but certainly we must recognize that nearly all were slaves before the constitution. It is our constitution and those who have fought for it that gained the foothold toward freedom and liberty for all. There is no doubt that much has been done and there is much to do in the ever progressing march for truth and justice but I ask you, what good does it do from where we are to release the manacles upon the wrist but then bound the ankles with shackles?
Whitehead has gone off the deep end…the one listed about the welfare check was clearly stated the woman had a gun that was visibly seen…if you are going to speak truth, speak the whole and not your narrative.
also if someone came at me with a bat, you can bet dollars to donuts I would lay out the perp…
The twisting of these stories just goes to shows a bias on the part of whitehead….
Now why is all this happening that is the question….these days were ordained by the Lord God and one simple verse says it all….God is not the author of SIN, yet He created even the wicked for His purpose…yea even the wicked for the day of evil….
and evil days have been on this earth from the time Satan was cast from God’s holy mountain in heaven…
And to that a true child of God will say come quickly Lord Jesus, come quickly.
New American Standard Bible
21 He said, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb,
And naked I shall return there.
The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away.
Blessed be the name of the Lord.”
Direct from the word of God…
Acts 17:26 and He made from one man, every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined [their] appointed times, and the boundaries of their habitation.
Job 12:23 “He makes the nations great, then destroys them; He enlarges the nations, then leads them away.
Are we something to God?…God needs nothing from us…for these words in Isaiah speaks this truth.
Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, He taketh up the isles as a very little thing. And Lebanon is not sufficient to burn, nor the beasts thereof sufficient for a burnt offering. All nations before Him are as nothing ; and they are counted to Him less than nothing, and vanity. To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto Him? (Isa 40:15-18).
How vastly different is the God of Scripture from the “god” of the average pulpit! The modern day Pharisee (pastor) has turned the Lord God into a genie in the bottle to stroke at their will…yet God is stroking the world with His wrath and indignation.
May the Lord in His wrath, show us mercy.
Yes, it has a different ‘State Entity’, but the outcome is basically the same – tyranny.
It matters not who’s wearing the boot that’s on your neck and head – but to remove that threat, you either fight or die.
Same scenario, different actors.
Every form of tyranny requires collusion from select individuals or organizations willing to do the bidding of the entity trying to subjugate the populous in question.
Remove the boot from your face(s), and stick up their asses.
Same scenario, different actors.
Every form of tyranny requires collusion from select individuals or organizations willing to do the bidding of the entity trying to subjugate the populous in question.
Remove the boot from your face(s), and stick up their asses.
Whitehead has a history of pushing the if anybody in anyway resist then they deserve to die. Which is probably true if they want to live. In this article, Whitehead appears to be using sarcasm to make his point that when police kill people it is justified. In at least one other article I have seen Whitehead make the argument that Floyd was on drugs and therefore the murder was justified. Other’s make the same and similar arguments
Many of you may be wondering how things should have gone the day Chauvin murdered George Floyd. What should have been the rightful outcome? In the midst of your bewilderment many of you turn to the medical establishment owned meadia and read the opinion pieces and listen to the pundits. You know who they are. For them if any illicit or even any legally prescribed drug is found in the body of the deceased it is said to the effect that they got what they deserved. For them this tells them all they need know and the case should be closed in Defence of the cop. Others say and perhaps with some legitimacy that any resistance to the cop whatsoever is justification for killing a citizen whether it be a child or adult. That all should go along willingly with the medical establishment owned enforcement tool. That way, the accused will have their day in the medical establishment owned court. Hendrickson sescribes it “(Let me offer one comment on resisting arrest: Everybody—regardless of age, gender, race—please, please don’t resist arrest. Doing that increases the danger to your life, and it just isn’t worth it. And to those who argue that police officers should let those they are trying to arrest run away and not use force to detain them, what kind of disrespect for the law, what kind of anarchy are you promoting? When an officer arrests a person, it isn’t an invitation that a person may accept or decline. There’s no option for the detainee to say, “No thanks, officer, I’ve got other plans for today, so see you later.”