CIA Whistleblower “Professionally Tied” To 2020 Dem Candidate; 2nd Whistleblower Was First One’s Source

by | Oct 9, 2019 | Headline News | 5 comments

Do you LOVE America?


    The news surrounding the whistleblowers’ complaints about President Donald Trump’s request that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden for corruption has gotten even more laughable.  The CIA employee who lodged a whistleblower complaint has a “professional relationship with one of the 2020 candidates,” according to the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York.

    York was citing a source familiar with last Friday’s impeachment inquiry interview with Inspector General Michael Atkinson. According to a report by ZeroHedge, York’s source said:The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates.

    Now we know why House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) won’t release the transcript! Maybe this whole situation could get more ridiculous, but it’s difficult to see how…

    “What [Atkinson] said was that the whistleblower had self-disclosed that he was a registered Democrat and that he had a prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate,” said a third person with knowledge of the testimony.

    All three sources said Atkinson did not identify the Democratic candidate with whom the whistleblower had a connection. It is unclear what the working or professional relationship between the two was.

    In the Aug. 26 letter, Atkinson said that even though there was evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower’s part, “such evidence did not change my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern ‘appears credible,’ particularly given the other information the ICIG obtained during its preliminary review.”

    Democrats are certain to take that position when Republicans allege that the whistleblower acted out of bias. Indeed, the transcript of Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is a public document, for all to see. One can read it regardless of the whistleblower’s purported bias. –Washington Examiner

    In short, a registered Democrat on the CIA payroll went to Adam Schiff’s committee, who referred him to a Democratic operative attorney, who helped him file a whistleblower complaint on a form that was altered to allow second-hand information.

    Not only is this whistleblower tied to a democrat running against Trump in 2020, but former State Department official Peter Van Buren told Tucker Carlson on Monday that the second ‘whistleblower’ is simply the source for the original ‘second-hand’ complaint.

    President Trump wasted no time in responding via Twitter:

    It looks like if it isn’t yet, this impeachment fantasy could soon be over for Democrats.


    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles


      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.


      1. #1 and #2 that not a whistle you are blowing!

      2. What the hell everything I put on here is moderated. This keeps up I’ll stop commenting.

        • Stop posting anonymous, make up a fake name and email address and use it consistently. It should end your moderation issues. However there are certain key words that put your posts into moderation, just avoid them or use pseudonyms.

          Yes, posting Anonymous always put

      3. We are about to witness the first ever coup d’etat of an American president and the American Sheeple are going to let it happen.

        Every servicemember will forget their oath and let it happen and our republic will be a complete sham instead of mostly a sham with a tiny flicker of hope left.

      4. Thank you Mac.

        As we post less, you need to post more. Do you have a plan to vanish.

        The days are upon us.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.