The Real Kamala Harris

by | Aug 13, 2020 | Emergency Preparedness | 4 comments

Do you LOVE America?

    Share

    This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The End of the American Dream. 

    Could the White House soon be occupied by a power-hungry authoritarian that will not hesitate to use the full power of the presidency to absolutely crush political enemies?  And no, I am not talking about Joe Biden.

    There are certainly a whole lot of negative things that you can say about Joe Biden, but I wouldn’t call him an “authoritarian”.  In part one of this series, I called him a “creepy old man that likes to sniff hair and rub up against people at awkward moments”, and at this point, everyone can see that he is in an advanced state of decline.  In fact, one recent survey found that 59 percent of likely voters do not believe that he will even finish a single term in the White House…

    In another illustration of how many Americans are concerned about Joe Biden’s advancing age and declining mental faculties, a new Rasmussen poll has found that 59 percent of likely voters don’t believe he’ll finish a 4 year term in the White House.

    Broken down along party lines, 74 percent of Republicans believe Biden won’t make it through his first term while 49 percent of Democrats agree.

    Of course, that survey question assumed that Biden will make it to election day, and there is absolutely no guarantee that will actually happen considering how rapidly he is deteriorating.

    In any event, it appears that Kamala Harris will take over for Biden at some point, and that should deeply alarm all of us.

    There are some people that get into politics because they truly want to serve the American people, and there are others that get into politics for the fame and the power.  Tom Del Beccaro actually ran against Kamala Harris in California, and he assures us that she is squarely in the latter category

    For Harris, politics is a game of ambition not something of substance.

    She is not a policy person. Her convictions aren’t with respect to the issues; they are with respect to power and the limelight.

    And once she gets her hands on power, she is not afraid to abuse it.

    During her time as attorney general of California, she ruthlessly went after pro-life activist David Daleiden.  You may remember that Daleiden had filmed numerous undercover videos in which Planned Parenthood employees admitted that they make huge profits from the sale of tissue from aborted fetuses, and that upset Harris so greatly that she sent a team of heavily armed agents to his home to seize all of his footage

    Daleiden, the founder of the pro-life Center for Medical Progress and a self-described citizen journalist, made headlines last summer with a series of “sting” videos purporting to show Planned Parenthood clinic employees discussing the illegal sale of tissue from aborted fetuses.

    The videos prompted a congressional investigation and an attempt by GOP lawmakers to defund Planned Parenthood. The women’s health provider also sued the Center for Medical Progress, claiming the videos were deceptively edited.

    Throughout her tenure, Harris seemed to think that the solution to just about any problem was to throw someone in jail.  In fact, at one point she even supported a bill which would have put “parents of truant children” in prison…

    Harris was also fond of overcriminalization. She supported legislation that would jail the parents of truant children. She strongly opposed criminal justice reform measures throughout her tenure in California. She also supported the Golden State’s unconstitutional law muzzling crisis pregnancy centers, which the Supreme Court struck down last year as a clear violation of the First Amendment and an attempt to criminalize the moral and political viewpoints of others.

    During the Democratic debates, Tulsi Gabbard used her record to attack Harris repeatedly.

    In one very memorable moment, Gabbard pointed out that Harris put more than 1,500 people in prison for marijuana violations even though Harris basically admitted that she had used marijuana herself

    I want to bring the conversation back to the broken criminal justice system that is disproportionately negatively impacting black and brown people all across this country today. Now Senator Harris says she’s proud of her record as a prosecutor and that she’ll be a prosecutor president.

    But I’m deeply concerned about this record. There are too many examples to cite but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.

    She blocked evidence — she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California.

    I don’t know about you, but that certainly does not sound like someone that I want in the White House.

    And when she was running for president, Harris actually mocked Biden when he suggested that her plan to impose nationwide gun control via executive order would not be constitutional

    Last year, Senator Kamala Harris may have become the first presidential candidate in history to laugh derisively at the idea that the Constitution limits what a president can do.

    When former Vice President Joe Biden said that her plan for gun control by executive fiat didn’t pass constitutional muster, she scoffed and deployed one of her canned one-liners, “I would just say, ‘Hey, Joe, instead of saying no we can’t, let’s say yes we can!’”

    As bad as Hillary Clinton was, she never proposed using an executive order to institute a nationwide gun grab.

    If Harris really does become president, I anticipate that there will actually be discussion in some red states about the possibility of declaring independence from the federal government.

    Yes, I do think that things could really get that bad.

    As our society continues to literally come apart at the seams, one of the last things that we need is a power-hungry authoritarian in the White House.

    I don’t understand why Joe Biden would make such a choice, and if he wins in November we are going to be stuck with her.

    Having Kamala Harris just one heartbeat away from the presidency is truly a nightmare scenario because Joe Biden’s health would be the only thing standing in the way of a reign of terror, unlike anything America has ever seen before.

    ***It is finally here! Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com.***

    About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com.  By purchasing the book you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe.  I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream, and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe.  I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article.  In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The EndGet Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned)  The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial, or health decisions.  I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook and Twitter, and anyway that you can share these articles with others is a great help.  During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.

    URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles

      Comments

      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

      4 Comments

      1. Frank Thoughts

        Kamala Harris is that type of boxy shaped bull dyke woman you get either in the US C-Suite or guarding prisoners, or in the old Soviet Union guarding the entrance to the apartment building. Under the Nazis these women were first choice for working at the death camps.

        Never trust a woman who lets herself go and drifts into the pant suits. I have respect for Nikki Haley, for example, or Sarah Palin: these women are hot and still keep themselves in great shape while doing high-pressure roles. I don’t trust the bull dyke types who let themselves go, bark orders at people,

      2. Cal

        “… it appears that Kamala Harris will take over for Biden at some point,”

        She cannot lawfully be a US President, since she cannot meet the 3 requirements (as Obama did not meet them and was never lawfully a US President, many crimes, even treason was committed by ALL who served within our government in that period) not sure she can be a VP, since the person who serves within that position must be able to legally be able to take over as Prez. Here is why…

        US Constitution, Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”
        The ONLY exception to the Natural Born Citizen requirement was that the President must be a “Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution.” Joseph Story in his “Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833” explains that this was to ensure that people who were “Patriots of the Revolution” could be considered for this office.
        Natural Born Citizen meant, to our framers, a child born of two parents who were citizens of the United States at the time of the birth of that child. A person who is born of just one parent who is a citizen of the United States is a citizen by birth, but not Natural Born Citizen. Someone cannot hold or have held dual citizenship with a foreign country and be a Natural Born Citizen. Just as the birth of a child on US soil does not create citizenship in the parent, the birthplace of the child does not establish the status of Natural Born Citizen. Throughout history citizenship has been based upon the criteria of the parents. It has not been linked to the child. This criteria of Natural Born Citizen does not deviate from that norm.
        The reason the president must be a Natural Born Citizen is because our framers had a history full of foreign kings imposing foreign law and foreign favor upon the people and they knew how dangerous foreign influence was to Liberty. The US President, when Commander in Chief, could have no fractionalized loyalty. The Commander in Chief must be loyal to the United States, first and only.

        George Washington explains this fact in his Farewell Address: “Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other.”

        Alexander Hamilton: “Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one querter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”

        SCOTUS, 1875, ‘the writers of our Constitution used this definition’ – “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, (1874).

        • Anonymous

          Some claim that the 14th amendment clarified the citizenship question saying that anyone born in the US, or naturalized as a citizen, is eligible for the presidency.

          It actually seems to cloud the question even more.

      3. Andrea.Iravani.

        Will Harris ever get around to prosecuting the real 9/11 attackers and the psychopaths responsible for the $21 trillion in Pentagon “accounting errors”? Sorry, but it is just not possible to be that incompetent to have $21 trillion in accounting errors! Of course all of the psychopaths perpetrating the recent covid response of lockdown and treasury lootng would also be prosecuted, as well as the medical mafia for scientific and medical fraud, which there was alrady $800 billion a year in medical fraud prior to the lockdown! Those crimes are as big-league as it gets, and to overlook them is to make a mockery of government. The government and Wall Street have make the mafia look like the Boy Scouts!

        Andrea Iravani

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.