YouTube Shooter Identified As Nasim Aghdam

by | Apr 4, 2018 | Headline News | 46 comments

Do you LOVE America?

    Share

    This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge

    As it turns out, Tuesday’s shooting at YouTube headquarters (which has so far resulted in zero deaths other than that of the shooter, who committed suicide) had nothing to do with domestic violence and everything to do with blowback to YouTube’s demonetization efforts – as many initially feared.

    The shooter was identified as Nasim Aghdam who slammed YouTube for purportedly censoring her after she claimed that they demonetized her channels, including an exercise one devoted to exercise videos and another devoted to veganism. Aghdam channeled her anger toward YouTube into a paranoid manifesto published online. She wrote in her purported manifesto: “Be aware! Dictatorship exists in all countries but with different tactics! They only care for personal and short-term profits and do anything to reach their goals even by fooling simple-minded people, hiding the truth, manipulating science and everything, putting public mental and physical health at risk, abusing non-human animals, polluting the environment, destroying family values, promoting materialism and sexual degeneration in the name of freedom and turning people into programmed robots!”

    She identified herself as an Iranian activist as well as an animal rights activist. Shortly after she was identified, photos of her holding signs with anti-YouTube messages were found online and shared.

    Along with her now-deleted Instagram…

    …One now-deleted YouTube page bore anti-YouTube messages.

    She recently published a video ranting about her treatment by YouTube, complaining that they’d deprived her of views. She said the practice was tantamount to censorship. She also maintained a website that remained live late Tuesday evening. It lists five channels for Aghdam.

    And driving that point home, she published a video debating whether the US or Iran did more to protect freedom of speech.

    A Facebook artist page she created had more than 1,600 followers according to a cached version from archive.org. The Facebook page contains a trove of videos. They range in subject matter from lighthearted and comical to recipes for helping people eat vegan, as well as her exercise videos.

    Contrary to initial reports, ABC said Aghdam wasn’t in a relationship with anyone at the facility (so much for those initial suspicions).

    She did not have an ID badge, and was carrying a purse. Aghdam was apparently a prolific maker of YouTube videos, maintaining several accounts for videos of different subjects.

    URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles

      Comments

      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

      46 Comments

      1. Only good Iranian is a dead one.

        • Look for the silver lining. I predict that Goole, Youtube, and Facebook will now have second thoughts about censorship and crushing the little people in their giant threshing machines. 🙂

          • You mean after these rouge companies restore their employee’s Constitutional rights of free speech and freedom of expression? [sarcasm]

        • This lady was a (((Chew-ish))) Iranian. The Media is ignoring this fact. Her (((Chew))) upbringing, mixed with Iranian terror, thus Jihad Jane.

          Ytube is turning evil with its Globalist Angnda selective censorship. Its not a free speech platform any more.

          Lots of our words we choose on this site censors our free speech. Thats why we have to talk in (((Slang Code))). So you know (((Who))) we are refering to.

          About 3500 google employees protested googles ties to the Dept of Defense for using personal data to fight global war. Googles massive massive intellegence database is being shared with the DOD for genocidal war. Google app on your phone can wipe all your data off your phone if they want. Turn off the Google Administrator on your cell phone settings mode. It can track your exact GPS location travel routes and create a log map.

          And look at FraudBook. The biggest deception of stupid people who use the forum. F/B App on your cell phone and captures every text, phone calls recorded and can listen to every one of your conversations with an open mic even when you are not even on your phone. Digital mapping of your face for facial recognition.

          1984 is here bro.

      2. & muslims wonder why no one trusts them, yet most terrorists turn out to be muslim. They should for a change embrace peace instead of violence

        • Wait, so when white american men shoot up vegas or a school or a church, its IMMEDIATELY a false flag, but when a Muslim woman shoots up youtubes offices its IMMEDIATELY terrorism? Even when said woman has a list of valid, public, outspoken grievances against YT’s censorship that (if coming from the mouth of a white dude) would otherwise resound with you?

          Fascinating.

          • prove those shootings weren’t FF
            prove anyone died

            • Why do I have to prove or disprove anything? The only thing I’m claiming is anon is quick to judge one shooting while being quick to dismiss another. I’m smart enough not to get drawn into arguments defending blanket statements without proof, unlike some.

              • …and now knowing she wasnt even muslim, it makes anons generalization even less credible.

          • Im not saying it was a false flag, but I DO find it odd that a Baha’i religion following, California vegan got a GUN and shot people for demonetizing her YouTube channel??? Doesnt that sound at least a little bit odd to you ?

            • Once again, three cheers for California’s vaunted gun control. [heavy sarcasm]

            • no, people snap or get fed up. Hell look at all the people here who say “if one more right is taken away, I’ll get my gun”.

              How many are blowhards, I’ll never know, but it does happen

        • She was not Muslim or religious fundamentalist.

        • The lady was a (((Chew))) Iranian not a Muslim Iranian. Do your research moron.

      3. Compare the pictures of Nasim Aghdam to David Hogg. Same nut case look on their faces, scary.

        • Cant: We need to bring back the days of Public HANGING: And that lil sock-puppet Hogg could be the lucky candidate…And HUGE SURPRISE, another violent, crazy mooooslim.

          • Muslims just aren’t use to living under the yoke of corporate cultural Marxism the Americans are. Pity. [sarcasm]

            • This lady is a (((Chewish))) Iranian. I know this caught my attention also. Not all Iranians are Muslims. All Muslims are not terrorists.

              About time the ignorant stop their bashing BS and get the facts.

              You sure wont hear it in the MSM chanels this Iranian lady was a (((Chew))). So this was (((Chewish Jihad.)))

        • the difference being one is screaming to take away your rights, the other is railing against rights being taken.

      4. Hmmm yet another peaceful, kind, gentle MUSLIM!! God, they are all the same – wild, vile, dangerous and violent and most important: NOT right in the head.

        • CC: That’s what is to be expected since Islam is a satanic religion (death cult), now it is quickly taking over Europe by consent.

          • do your generalizations still apply since she’s not Muslim?
            Or is it that she “looks” like “one of them” because she’s an Iranian Bahá’í ?

            seriously folks…

      5. Wait, so when white american men shoot up vegas or a school or a church, its IMMEDIATELY a false flag, but when a Muslim woman shoots up youtubes offices its IMMEDIATELY terrorism? Even when said woman has a list of valid, public, outspoken grievances against YT’s censorship that (if coming from the mouth of a white dude) would otherwise resound with you?

        Fascinating.

      6. whoops, ctrl-c lol

      7. She is CORRECT! YT and Google are EVIL! They want total control of our minds and thoughts. Their logarithms program the way we think because we can only find the info they desire us to find. Once we find “their” info and read it we “think” we learned something of value. FALSE! We only learned how to eat out of the trough. Good little piggies.

        • Although she had some valid complaints about youtube she never should’ve gone on that rampage. She’s an evil-looking bitch.

      8. Well, now we all know why the religion of peace keeps the girls in burkhas. This one actually had valid points as to online censorship. Just one lousy way of pointing them out. Maybe if she’d just cultivated a taste for porkchops or something. Thank God she was a crap shot. Maybe I’ve missed the news today; but, 3 were hit; but, I haven’t heard that anyone died. Save for her.

      9. If we just take what she was saying all by itself, alone, and separate from the woman saying it, she is absolutely correct.

        “They only care for personal and short-term profits and do anything to reach their goals even by fooling simple-minded people, hiding the truth, manipulating science and everything, putting public mental and physical health at risk, abusing non-human animals, polluting the environment, destroying family values, promoting materialism and sexual degeneration in the name of freedom and turning people into programmed robots!”

        How do you argue with this statement. It’s a fact.

        The only thing she left out is how “they” also make you batsh*t crazy.

      10. Her manifesto should sound familiar around here. See how dangerous ranting about being deprived of “rights” you don’t have can be?

        • We have gotten to the point where the Bill of Rights just means we have no rights just privileges.

          We gave them time and more than sufficient opportunity, and now those privileges are being called into question — especially when they are white privileges, or Christian privileges, or white male privileges.

          Tomorrow, don’t be surprised if you wake up with no rights, no privileges, no borders, no country . . . .

          You see where this is going don’t you? Don’t you?

      11. I don’t agree with what she did, but this is just another example of what happens when people are pushed too far.

        Also saw a good example of how the MSM manipulates the words to fit the agenda. My wife was watching GMA this morning and they had coverage of the shooting on. Cop pulls up and jumps out of his SUV with an AR-15. The commentator says here you see an officer getting out with a long gun. It would have been an assault rifle if it would have been a civilian getting out of a vehicle with it.

        • I saw the same clip.

          If it had been a citizen getting out of a car with an AR-15 the MSM would have called it an “assault weapon,” but since it was only a member of our militarized police force the weapon was a “long gun.”

          This country reeks of corruption, lies and propaganda.

          • If one us is holding it, it’s an “assault weapon”. If some .gov puke is holding it, it’s a “personal defense weapon”.

      12. One more crazy Muslim bites the dust. Like roaches scurrying around, turn on the lights they scatter like in Joe’s apartment.

      13. Hard to take sides on this one. Or just another false flag?

        • YouTube and Facebook just dumped millions of dollars in major security upgrades to their “campuses.” All to create fortresses of freedom? [Yeah. Right.]

          And to top it all off let’s have some mass shooter come in and kill nobody but herself. The thing reeks.

          You have to ask: If YouTube and Facebook’s gross betrayal of the Rights of Privacy is “so bad” then why is MSM still connected to them? Why hasn’t “The New York Times” and the “Washington Post” dropped them?

      14. It must really suck living in a land and culture that you just outright hate,

        I’m talking to you victim card blacks, latinos, muslims in the USA.

        The solution is simple, get the fuck out of my country.

        • It matters not what one hates; it matters when it hates you.

      15. This what happens when you don’t eat MEAT!!!
        Muslims solve all their trouble with violence.

        Sgt.

        • She is just braver than you, she is willing to go against people who depriving us our constitution. I doubt you served, but I did, and this girls bravery puts me to shame. She is actually fulfilling our oaths.

      16. She has got some good points, she should have practiced before she went in. I am behind her 100%. She is absolutely right and went toe to toe against the people trying to deprive us of our constitution. Million times more brave than about 7 million veterans including me who know we need to act before the republic is lost forever.

      17. She was Bahai, not Muslim.

      18. Sarge, I’ve been a meat-eater all my life and always will be. Went out to a steakhouse with the family for dinner earlier this evening. Had a 13-oz. ribeye, baked potato, bread. Lemon icebox pie for dessert. YUM YUM YUM! Best meal I’ve had in a long time.

      19. I don’t condone violence except in cases of pure, legitimate defense of oneself, one’s family, community or country. On one hand in this case, though, there was the evil, far-left, new world order social media giant and on the other hand there was this evil, deranged, weird muzzette running amok with a gun. It’s almost kind of a tough choice.

      20. Of which we were aware, her political views were never targeted for de-monetization. She was apparently a useful idiot or crisis actor, meant as a stand-in for conservatives. Notice, that authoritarians are forever incapable of profiling, which is the bad kid, who ruins it for the rest of the class.

        I should also ask, where is the independent, conservative, media platform, where Nasim is not allowed. You were supposed to believe against being unequally yoked, and I cannot think of a better example. How do you intend *not to compete with her, for equal time.

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.