
The Beginning of the End
A Masterstroke of Economic and Geopolitical Brilliance
A Masterstroke of Economic and Geopolitical Brilliance
by Mac Slavo | Apr 16, 2025 | Headline News, War | 0 comments
The United States’ ruling class is considering eliminating funding for the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as part of a State Department budget proposal. This would cut about half of the State Department’s budget.
Citing officials and an internal memo, The New York Times [behind a paywall] reported on Monday that the most recent budget proposal would eliminate “almost all funding for international organizations like the United Nations and NATO.” This news comes as the same ruling class seeks to increase the Pentagon’s budget to $1 trillion.
In Spite Of Claiming To Cut Government Spending, Trump Announces $1 Trillion Defense Budget
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce insisted that the United States’ ruling class remains fully committed to the military bloc, NATO. She stressed, however, that Washington does not see NATO as a tool for waging war, but rather as a deterrent to conflict. “We want to make sure… that the nations in NATO can actually deliver on the mission of NATO, which is to be a deterrent. It is not to help with wars or to help fight them… NATO was meant to be a collection of entities that would stop the bad actors from doing the bad thing,” she said.
The Trump administration has repeatedly pushed NATO members to increase their defense spending, arguing the US bears a disproportionate share of the burden. Trump has warned that the US might not defend NATO members who fail to meet spending targets. –RT
7 Actions That NATO Countries Are Taking Which Indicate That Something Really Big Is Coming
While the rulers seek to cut the State Department’s budget, they are increasing defense spending. It all seems counterintuitive. The Trump administration’s narrative, along with its creation of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), has been to cut unnecessary spending. So why is war spending necessary? Especially since the rulers also stated they’d like to end a war? Is it so that territories can be taken over militarily? What do you think? Sound off in the comments.
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
by Mac Slavo | Jun 16, 2025 | 1 Comment
Donald Trump has ordered that the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carry...
by Michael Snyder | Jun 17, 2025 | 1 Comment
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog under the...
by Tyler Durden | Jun 18, 2025 | 0 Comments
This article was originally published by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge. In the early morning hours of...
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
© 2009 - 2025 Copyright SHTF Plan • Site by 620 Studio • Report a website problem | Disclaimer
Comments