U.S. Considers Eliminating UN and NATO Funding

by | Apr 16, 2025 | Headline News, War | 0 comments

Do you LOVE America?

    Share

    The United States’ ruling class is considering eliminating funding for the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as part of a State Department budget proposal. This would cut about half of the State Department’s budget.

    Citing officials and an internal memo, The New York Times [behind a paywall] reported on Monday that the most recent budget proposal would eliminate “almost all funding for international organizations like the United Nations and NATO.”  This news comes as the same ruling class seeks to increase the Pentagon’s budget to $1 trillion.

    In Spite Of Claiming To Cut Government Spending, Trump Announces $1 Trillion Defense Budget

    State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce insisted that the United States’ ruling class remains fully committed to the military bloc, NATO. She stressed, however, that Washington does not see NATO as a tool for waging war, but rather as a deterrent to conflict. “We want to make sure… that the nations in NATO can actually deliver on the mission of NATO, which is to be a deterrent. It is not to help with wars or to help fight them… NATO was meant to be a collection of entities that would stop the bad actors from doing the bad thing,” she said.

    The Trump administration has repeatedly pushed NATO members to increase their defense spending, arguing the US bears a disproportionate share of the burden. Trump has warned that the US might not defend NATO members who fail to meet spending targets. –RT

    7 Actions That NATO Countries Are Taking Which Indicate That Something Really Big Is Coming

    While the rulers seek to cut the State Department’s budget, they are increasing defense spending. It all seems counterintuitive. The Trump administration’s narrative, along with its creation of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), has been to cut unnecessary spending. So why is war spending necessary? Especially since the rulers also stated they’d like to end a war? Is it so that territories can be taken over militarily? What do you think? Sound off in the comments.

    Pentagon Announces “Bold Steps” To Seize The Panama Canal

    URGENT ON GOLD… as in URGENT

    It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point

    Gold has been the right asset with which to save your funds in this millennium that began 23 years ago.

    Free Exclusive Report
    The inevitable Breakout – The two w’s

      Related Articles

      Comments

      Join the conversation!

      It’s 100% free and your personal information will never be sold or shared online.

      0 Comments

      Submit a Comment

      Commenting Policy:

      Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.

      This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.