This report was originally published by Daisy Luther at The Organic Prepper

After a company in Wisconsin fitted each of their employees a microchip and claimed they absolutely loved it, many people were adamant that nope, no way, theyâd never get chipped like a dog. Some people claimed religious objections (mark of the Beast) while others feel that their privacy has been already been invaded quite enough with the advent of âsmartâ technology and advertising cookies on the internet.
If you swear to the skies that youâll never get chipped, several experts quoted in an article on USA Today are here to tell you that youâre wrong.
Associate professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Noelle Chesley said, âIt will happen to everybody. But not this year⊠Maybe not my generation, but certainly that of my kids.â
Professor Chesley isnât alone in her prediction. Gene Munster of Loup Ventures had a lot to say about the possibility of everyone getting a microchip. He believes itâs about 50 years away.
 âIn 10 years, Facebook, Google, Apple, and Tesla will not have their employees chipped,â he says. âYouâll see some extreme forward-looking tech people adopting it, but not large companies.â
The idea of being chipped has too âmuch negative connotationâ today, but by 2067 âwe will have been desensitized by the social stigma,â Munster says. (source)
The article gushes about the âbenefitsâ of getting a microchip embedded in your hand.
This would go beyond paying with your smartphone. Instead, chipped customers would simply wave their hands in lieu of Apple Pay and other mobile-payment systems.
The benefits donât stop there. In the future, consumers could zip through airport scanners sans passport or drivers license; open doors; start cars; and operate home automation systems. All of it, if the technology pans out, with the simple wave of a hand. (source)
Seriously, how much lazier are humans going to get?
Theyâre right about the desensitization, though. There are things going on these days that never in a million years would have been okay decades ago, and thatâs because popular culture, television, and the internet make it seem A-OK and perfectly normal. When They Who Rule decide that microchipping is the best way to ensure their total control, you can bet that there will be tv shows and movies and celebrities that all demonstrate the ease and joy of having a microchip.
Everyoneâs talking about the âbenefitsâ of getting a microchip.
Tech companies are practically waxing poetic about the joys of having a microchip implanted in oneâs body.
In Sweden, BioHax says nearly 3,000 customers have had its chip embedded to do many things, including ride the national rail system without having to show the conductor a ticket.
In the U.S., Dangerous Things, a Seattle-based firm, says it has sold âtens of thousandsâ of chips to consumers via its website. The chip and installation cost about $200.
After years of being a subculture, âthe time is nowâ for chips to be more commonly used, says Amal Graafstra, founder of Dangerous Things. âWeâre going to start to see chip implants get the same realm of acceptance as piercings and tattoos do now.â
In other words, theyâll be more visible, but not mainstream yet.
âIt becomes part of you the way a cellphone does,â Graafstra says. âYou can never forget it, and you canât lose it. And you have the capability to communicate with machines in a way you couldnât before.â
That guy who wants to communicate with machines clearly hasnât been watching the same sci-fi movies that I have. Nor has he read Stephen Quayleâs terrifying book, Terminated.
Graafstra isnât the only one who thinks the whole thing is fabulous. One guy even has parties were people can âbondâ over getting microchipped.
At a recent tech conference, Hannes Sjöblad explained how a microchip implanted in his hand makes his life easier. It replaces all the keys and cards that used to clutter his pockets.
âI use this many times a day, for example, I use it to unlock my smart phone, to open the door to my office,â Sjöblad said.
Sjöblad calls himself a biohacker. He explained, âWe biohackers, we think the human body is a good start but there is certainly room for improvement.â
The first step in that improvement is getting a microchip about size of a grain of rice slipped under the skin. Suddenly, the touch of a hand is enough to tell the office printer this is an authorized user.
The microchips are radio frequency identification tags. The same technology widely used in things like key cards. The chips have been implanted in animals for years to help identify lost pets and now the technology is moving to humansâŠ
âŠSjöblad said he even organizes implant parties where people bond over getting chipped together. (source)
Will microchipping parties be the next generation of those outrageously expensive candle parties? Will folks be pimping microchips like they do those scented wax melts? Will it become some kind of MLM thing to make it even more socially acceptable?
What about the dark side of being microchipped?
Of course, they didnât mention how easy it would be to shut off the microchipped personâs access to all of those things. And it isnât like you could just not use your chip if itâs embedded in your body. If you were ever in a situation in which you didnât wish to be identified, tough luck. Everything would be right there in a little device implanted under your skin.
Although the current breed of microchips does not have GPS tracking capability, analysts contend that they will one of these days in the not-so-distant future. Anyway, how do you KNOW that there is no GPS tracking technology in that teeny little chip? Just because they tell you so? And gee, who doesnât want their every move being tracked?
Not every professor or tech expert thinks getting a microchip is a good idea. Mercifully, there are a few voices of reason.
Alessandro Acquisti, a professor of information technology and public policy at Carnegie Mellon Universityâs Heinz College, warns that this might not be a good idea. (Although it doesnât take a Ph.D. to realize this.)
âCompanies often claim that these chips are secure and encryptedâŠBut âencryptedâ is âa pretty vague term,â he said, âwhich could include anything from a truly secure product to something that is easily hackable.â
Another potential problem, Dr. Acquisti said, is that technology designed for one purpose may later be used for another. A microchip implanted today to allow for easy building access and payments could, in theory, be used later in more invasive ways: to track the length of employeesâ bathroom or lunch breaks, for instance, without their consent or even their knowledge.
âOnce they are implanted, itâs very hard to predict or stop a future widening of their usage,â Dr. Acquisti said. (source)
âThis is serious stuff. Weâre talking about a nonstop potential connection to my body and I canât turn it off, I canât put it away, itâs in me. Thatâs a big problem,â said Ian Sherr, an executive editor at CNET.
âItâs very easy to hack a chip implant, so my advice is donât put your life secrets on an implant, Sjöblad saidâŠ
âItâs about educating the people and giving every person the toolsâŠnot only how to use the technology but, more importantly, when itâs being used against you,â Sjöblad warned.  (source)
Yeah. Microchips are fabulous.
Hereâs how it could go down.
Some people actually want to be microchipped like a dog. Theyâre lining up for it. It if isnât available to them, theyâre totally bummed out.
Certain folks wonât be happy until everyone has a computer chip implanted in them. Hereâs how this could go.
- Initially, it would be the sheep who blindly desire to be chipped for their own âconvenienceâ leading the way.
- Then, it would become remarkably inconvenient not to be chipped â sort of like itâs nearly impossible to not have a bank account these days.
- Then, the last holdouts could be forcibly chipped by law.
The push may be soft at first. It may begin with peer pressure in the workplace.
Three Square Market said the chips are voluntary, but Chesley says that if a company announces a plan to be chipped, the expectation is that you will get chipped â or risk losing out on advancement, raises and being a team player.
âThatâs what weâre worried about,â says Bryan Allen, chief of staff for state Rep. Tina Davis (D), who is introducing a bill in Pennsylvania to outlaw mandatory chip embedding. âIf the tech is out there, whatâs to stop an employer from saying either you do this, or you canât work here anymore.â
Several states have passed similar laws, while one state recently saw a similar bill die in committee. âI see this as a workerâs rights issue,â says Nevada state Sen. Becky Harris (R), who isnât giving up. âThis is the wrong place to be moving,â she says.
Should future corporations dive in to chipping their employees, they will have huge issues of âtrustâ to contend with, says Kent Grayson, a professor of marketing at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
âYouâve got to have a lot of trust to put one of those in your body,â Grayson says. Workers will need assurances the chip is healthy, canât be hacked, and its information is private, he says. (source)
So what if it meant youâd lose your job if you refused to be chipped? What if you had a family to take care of and health insurance you couldnât afford to lose? The question of would you or wouldnât you just got a whole lot more variables.
This horror movie gets even scarier. There is already a law on the books that could allow human beings to be forcibly chipped.
Oh, itâs couched in warm, fuzzy language and they say itâs just to help keep track of folks with Alzheimerâs or other developmental disabilities, but remember that the most unpatriotic law ever passed was also called the Patriot Act.
H.R.4919Â was passed in 2016.
It directs the Department of Justiceâs (DOJâs) Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) to award competitive grants to health care, law enforcement, or public safety agencies, and nonprofit organizations, to develop or operate locally based proactive programs to prevent wandering and locate missing individuals with dementia or children with developmental disabilities. The BJA must give preference to law enforcement or public safety agencies partnering with nonprofit organizations that use person-centered plans and are directly linked to individuals, and families of individuals, with dementia or developmental disabilities. (source)
Despite the fact that the bill requires everyone to use privacy âbest practices,â itâs not that much of a stretch to see what a slippery slope this is. Who gets to decide whether a person âneedsâ to be chipped for their own good? Law enforcement? Scary.
Could this lead to a cashless society?
If âeveryoneâ is getting microchipped like these experts predict, that could be the next step in the push toward a cashless society. Think about the lack of privacy then. If everything is purchased via a chip unique to you, then no purchases could be under the radar. Whether a person was stocking up on food, watching X-rated movies, reading books on revolution, or buying ammo, it would all be recorded in a database. Our purchases could be used in some kind of pre-crime technology, ala Minority Report, or they could be used to profile us in other ways.
If there is no way to make purchases but with a chip, many people will have to reluctantly comply. The same chips could be a requirement for medical care, driverâs licenses, jobs â you name it. No matter where you tried to hide, your GPS locator would mean that you would be found. It would be like everyone being forced to have one of those ankle bracelets that criminals wear, except it would be inside your body.
If you think the atmosphere of control is unnerving now, just wait. When everyone is microchipped, the net will be even tighter.
Between the looming robot apocalypse and forcible microchipping, it seems like we wonât have to wait for âclimate changeâ or a war of Mutually Assured Destruction to get us. Technology just might be the end of humanity.
Please feel free to share any information from this article in part or in full, giving credit to the author and including a link to The Organic Prepper and the following bio.
Daisy is a coffee-swigging, gun-toting, homeschooling blogger who writes about current events, preparedness, frugality, and the pursuit of liberty on her websites, The Organic Prepper and DaisyLuther.com She is the author of 4 books and the co-founder of Preppers University, where she teaches intensive preparedness courses in a live online classroom setting. You can follow her on Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter,.








0 Comments