fbpx

The Next Recession Will Be The Last!

The Deep State Is Preparing Their CHECKMATE Move
You Must Be Ready To Go On The Attack!
DOWNLOAD THE ULTIMATE RESET GUIDE NOW!

Federal Judge Orders Rhodes, Rice, & Other Obama Officials To Respond Over Clinton Benghazi/Email Scandal

Tyler Durden
January 16th, 2019
Zero Hedge
Comments (26) Read by 2,514 people

This article was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge

In what Judicial Watch describes as a “major victory for accountability,” a federal judge ruled Tuesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice and former deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes must answer written questions about the State Department’s response to the deadly 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, Libya, as part of an ongoing legal battle over whether Hillary Clinton sought to deliberately evade public record laws by using a private email server while secretary of state.

As Fox News’ Samuel Chamberlain reports, the judge’s order amounts to approval of a discovery plan he ordered last month. In that ruling, Lamberth wrote that Clinton’s use of a private email account was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency” and said the response of the State and Justice Departments “smacks of outrageous misconduct.”

Judicial Watch announced last night that United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery can begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath. Senior officials – including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap – will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath. The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan(The court, in ordering a discovery plan last month, ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”)

Judicial Watch’s discovery will seek answers to:

  • Whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a non-government email system;
  • whether the State Department’s efforts to settle this case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith; and
  • whether the State Department adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.

Discovery is scheduled to be completed within 120 days. The court will hold a post-discovery hearing to determine if Judicial Watch may also depose additional witnesses, including Clinton and her former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.

Judge Lamberth ordered written responses under oath to Judicial Watch’s questions from Obama administration senior officials Rice, Rhodes and Sullivan, and former FBI official Priestap. Rice and Rhodes will answer interrogatories under oath on the Benghazi scandal. Rejecting the State and Justice Department objections to discovery on the infamous Benghazi talking points, Judge Lamberth reiterated:

Yet Rice’s talking points and State’s understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points’ development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice’s appearances could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State’s role in the points’ content and development could shed light on Clinton’s motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State’s reluctance to search her emails.

Judicial Watch also may serve interrogatories on Monica Hanley, a former staff member in the State Department’s Office of the Secretary, and on Lauren Jiloty, Clinton’s former special assistant.

According to Lamberth’s order, regarding whether Clinton’s private email use while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA, Judicial Watch may depose:

Eric Boswell, the former Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security.… Boswell’s March 2009 memo to Mills … discusses security risks Clinton’s Blackberry use posed more generally. And Boswell personally discussed the memo with Clinton. So, he plainly has relevant information about that conversation and about his general knowledge of Clinton’s email use. Judicial Watch may depose Boswell.

Justin Cooper. the Clinton Foundation employee who created the clintonemail.com server. In its proposal, Judicial Watch noted Cooper’s prior congressional testimony “appears to contradict portions of the testimony provided by Huma Abedin in the case before Judge Sullivan.” … Cooper repeatedly told Congress that Abedin helped set-up the Clintons’ private server, e.g., Examining Preservation of State Department Federal Records: [before a Congressional hearing] Abedin testified under oath she did not know about the server until six years later.… Judicial Watch may depose Cooper.

Clarence Finney, the former deputy director of State’s Executive Secretariat staff…. [T]his case’s questions hinge on what specific State employees knew and when they knew it. As the principal advisor and records management expert responsible for controlling Clinton’s official correspondence and records, Finney’s knowledge is particularly relevant. And especially given the concerns about government misconduct that prompted this discovery, Judicial Watch’s ability to take his direct testimony and ask follow-up questions is critical.

Additionally, Judicial Watch states that it seeks to go beyond cursory, second-hand testimony and directly ask Finney what he knew about Clinton’s email use. This includes asking about emails suggesting he knew about her private email use in 2014, and emails he received concerning a December 2012 FOIA request from Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington (CREW) regarding senior officials’ personal email use-topics State’s 30(b)(6) deposition in Judge Sullivan’s case never addressed. Judicial Watch may depose Finney.

4. Heather Samuelson. the former State Department senior advisor who helped facilitate State’s receipt of Hillary Clinton’s emails.… [T]his case turns on what specific government employees knew and when they knew it. Judicial Watch must be able to take their direct testimony and ask them follow-up questions. Judicial Watch may depose Samuelson.

5. Jacob Sullivan. Secretary Clinton’s former senior advisor and deputy Chief of Staff. The government does not oppose Sullivan’s deposition.

Regarding whether the State Department’s settlement attempts that began in late 2014 amounted to “bad faith,” Judicial Watch was granted depositions from the State Department under Rule 30(b)(6); Finney; John Hackett, the former deputy director of State’s Office of Information Programs & Services; Gene Smilansky, an attorney-advisor within State’s Office of the Legal Advisor; Samuelson; and others.

Judicial Watch was also granted interrogatories on whether the State Department adequately searched for responsive records, as well as several document requests.

“In a major victory for accountability, Judge Lamberth today authorized Judicial Watch to take discovery on whether the Clinton email system evaded FOIA and whether the Benghazi scandal was one reason for keeping Mrs. Clinton’s email secret,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“Today, Judicial Watch issued document requests and other discovery to the State Department about the Clinton email scandal. Next up, we will begin questioning key witnesses under oath.

The court-ordered discovery is the latest development in Judicial Watch’s July 2014 FOIA lawsuit filed after the U.S. Department of State failed to respond to a May 13, 2014 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch seeks:

  • Copies of any updates and/or talking points given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency concerning, regarding, or related to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
  • Any and all records or communications concerning, regarding, or relating to talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency.

The Judicial Watch discovery plan was in response to a December 6, 2018, ruling by Judge Lamberth.

Incredibly, Justice Department attorneys admit in a filing opposing Judicial Watch’s limited discovery that “Counsel for State contacted the counsel of some third parties that Plaintiff originally included in its draft discovery proposal to obtain their client’s position on being deposed.” This collusion occurred despite criticism from the Court that the DOJ engaged in “chicanery” to cover up misconduct and that career employees in the State and Justice Departments may have “colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.”

Judicial Watch countered that “[t]he government’s proposal, which is really nothing more than an opposition to [Judicial Watch’s] plan, demonstrates that it continues to reject any impropriety on its part and that it seeks to block any meaningful inquiry into its ‘outrageous misconduct.’”

As a reminder, this Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

President Trump is Breaking Down the Neck of the Federal Reserve!

He wants zero rates and QE4!

You must prepare for the financial reset

We are running out of time

Download the Ultimate Reset Guide Now!

The Finger is on the Nuke Button | Future Money Trends

Author: Tyler Durden
Views: Read by 2,514 people
Date: January 16th, 2019
Website: https://www.zerohedge.com/

Copyright Information: This content has been contributed to SHTFplan by a third-party or has been republished with permission from the author. Please contact the author directly for republishing information.

CBD Oils, Isolates, Supplements And Information

26 Comments...

Vote: Click here to vote for SHTF Plan as a Top Prepper Web Site
  1. Manny Sanchez says:

    Put her in jail!

  2. Infidel says:

    The next judge to “disappear”?

  3. Anonymous says:

    These orders are typically ignored or given responses so vague, evasive, and watered down they become useless for any practical investigative purposes.

  4. Eisenkreutz says:

    Get a cookbook from the 1920s. Portion sizes are 4x bigger now. And you wonder why people are fat. You can’t outtrain a bad diet. Never. I am fit and always will be till the day I die.

  5. The Deplorable Renegade says:

    Infidel, that’s what I’m thinking. He better have protection 24/7 and PRAY that the Clintons didn’t “buy” the protection. I can appreciate what he’s trying to do but I doubt if it gets anywhere.

  6. reper sleepr says:

    just bread scraps thrown to us Jaybirds. Ain’t going nowhere.

  7. aljamo says:

    The Clintons do what they are told to do as the reflection of higher ups. Just like the rest of the sellouts who proclaim to be “serving the public” while stuffing their pockets with payoff bribes.

  8. Consider this. 4 US troops were killed in Syria by a suicide bomber. I read it on Russian news several hours before our handlers felt it was necessary to put it on US news outlets. Ask yourself what kind of government is this that feels it must withhold info from us? It’s not our government. It belongs to and is run by Globalists. Did the killings came just in time to prevent the US pullout from Syria? How convenient.

  9. Bert says:

    Two weeks from now, this too all forgotten

  10. Maranatha says:

    What do you bet a whole lot of these folks slip on the ice, drink and drive, fall asleep with the pillow on their face, have heart attacks, accidentally drown, etc?

  11. blinky says:

    Sounds to me like everyone in the Obummer administration is going on a tropical trip.
    The not so lucky ones might get a black sack over the head and walked up the stairs.

  12. Rock Roller says:

    We’ve been hearing for months now that Trump is going after all the deep state traitors, that there’s rooms for them all at Gitmo, blah blah blah but nothing ever seems to happen.I’d love nothing more than to see justice being served to those evil rotten tyrants but I’m beginning to wonder if their just jerkin’ our chains.And we all know what happens to anyone who’s set to testify against the Clinton’s!

    • Maranatha says:

      Look up the Reduction in Force of the Senior Executive Services due to the extended government shutdown.

      It takes time to win playing advanced chess against the Lucuferians. This is not a game of checkers.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Somebody’s gonna get Arkancided.

  14. Dave says:

    lol. A big nothing burger. How many times do we have to see nothing come from it, before we believe nothing will come from it. The only one to pay will be Trump and America. Because satan runs the show now.

    • Annoying2 says:

      Mr T won’t pay, he will just get bailed out of the bankruptcy once again since he is such a smooth businessman. So that just leaves America to pay. And if Satan runs the show now, he will just print more money after all the other money is swept into the gutter.
      Yep it’s just a big nothing burger. That’s why people in the know are thin. And the people that eat this stuff up are real fat.

  15. Mrbud says:

    Public hangings for the guilty

  16. Beaumont 2.0 says:

    Innocent people have a way of being practical and natural, without even trying.

    On the other hand, that administration sent a flamer and a womyn diplomat to the patriarchal, Bronze Age, death cultiststs, so the arms dealing would not be subtle.

    HRC repeatedly went on msm outlets, to take credit for creating terror groups, against Russia. No leaks, fringe, or trails of bread crumbs. Leaves nothing to your imagination. Free on y/t, all day long.

    You censor conservative pablum. You don’t censor the leftists and neocons, taking full credit for everything they do.

  17. Get Real says:

    If the Clinton’s have not been locked up by now for their high crimes they never will be. Seriously.

    Given all they’ve gotten away with to date, its obvious they’ll never serve a day behind bars. If nothing has happened to them by now, nothing ever will.

    As long as they do what they are told they can collect the payoff and nothing will ever happen to them. Like Trump “I could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and nothing would happen to me”. Well guess what? Same for the Clinton’s. Nothing will happen to any of the protected ones.

    Trump knew all that as he listened to us repeatedly chanting over and over “LOCK HER UP!!!” at the rallies. Throughout all the chanting he knew all along she’d never be locked up.