fbpx
Preps and Solutions
(Sponsored Ads)
Silver
Recently Posted Articles and Videos
Ready Nutrition - Homesteading and Preparedness
Ready Gardens - A Ready Nutrition Company
SGT Report
The Daily Sheeple
The Prepper Website
The Daily Coin
Strategic Relocation
top Prepper Web Sites
Featured Destinations
The Liberty Mill
Web Destinations

Clarocet for Kids

WATCH: Hidden Cam Shows Anti-Gun Congressman and Staffers Refusing To Promote Homes As “Gun Free Zones”

Mac Slavo
July 12th, 2016
SHTFplan.com
Comments (62)
Read by 8,437 people
THC-free CBD Formula - Zero High Brand

gunfree

Dirtbag politician Charlie Rangel explained last month that regular people simply don’t need firearms for self defense, but that politicians like himself should most certainly be allowed to carry protection because they “deserve” it.

But Rangel isn’t alone in his hypocrisy. As you’ll see in the latest hidden camera video from Project Veritas, many a gun grabber would gladly disarm you and restrict your ability to defend yourself, but there’s no way in hell they’d put up a sign in front of their own homes announcing that it is a “gun free zone.”

As one congressional staffer  who is in favor of European-style gun control noted:

You know, the concern is, oh if there’s no gun, let me just kick down the door.


(Watch at Youtube)

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.
CBD Oils, Isolates, Supplements And Information
Please Spread The Word And Share This Post

Author: Mac Slavo
Views: Read by 8,437 people
Date: July 12th, 2016
Website: www.SHTFplan.com

Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.

62 Comments...

Vote: Click here to vote for SHTF Plan as a Top Prepper Web Site
  1. So they do not want the gun free zone signs LOL

  2. Lone wolvercine says:

    These are all Jews . Like it or not

    • Infidel Extroidinair says:

      My wife is Jewish. That makes our children Jewish.
      My in laws are Jews and the best people on earth, kind, generous, loving, accepting.

      So what is your point LW?

      By the way, my Grandfather liberated Nazi Death Camps in WW2.
      Non of the Nazi guards or Commanders survived those that he helped liberate.
      They “resisted”. ALL of them. No one saw the guards put hands up? Oops.

      I am similar to him, but “MUCH Less civilized”. You or those like you that go after Jews will be meant by me. My Grandfather taught me how to deal with those like you.

      LW-
      “Take you sh@t and wipe your ass with your hand. Moron.”
      You and muslim have many of the same views. You should be dealt with in similar fashion.

      Tyrants and morons always have scapegoat to blame.

      Now Police can murder you without anyone knowing.
      Tyrants ALWAYS hate the media and things they do coming to light of day.
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-carolina-police-camera-footage_us_57850a43e4b0ed2111d7952a

  3. Christopher Edwards says:

    Rules for them and rules for all of us little people (subjects). Nobody in their right mind will advertise that there are no consequences whatsoever for breaking into their house. We have 535 paid-off employees of the NWO running this Country.

  4. LOL

    Picture a house with that gun free sign. The yard has holes with pointed bamboo sticking out, reminiscent of the traps put out in jungle warfare. Bows and knives tied to them to give a clear message. It doesn’t take a gun to kill.

    Guns need to be in the possession of every law abiding citizen. There needs to be a push to get a law on the books requiring every such citizen to get said gun and train to use. The purpose of pushing for such a law is to change from defense to offense in the arena of public debate. When or lose, we win.

    • Apache54 says:

      YUP, and we been asking for that for years and some how they all seem to ignore it! so what does that tell you, they ALL need to be removed from office!!

    • “There needs to be a push to get a law on the books requiring every such citizen to get said gun and train to use.”

      There is, it is the supreme law of our land that ALL laws/regulations/codes/etc are REQUIRED to follow (“be in Pursuance thereof…”).

      You, and hopefully others, might want to read it. You might want to consider this that flat out names both the state and federal governments to NOT be armed.

      Joel Barlow, Revolutionary War veteran, wrote “Advice to the Privileged Orders, in the Several States of Europe”, and American whose political writings were debated on the floor of Parliament said of the US Constitution: “… not only permitting every man to arm, but obliging him to arm.”

      Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is NOT in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” (caps mine)

      George Washington: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.” (“Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”)

      What you might find more interesting is that those who serve within our governments are required to use the Militias (not military forces or other “law” forces) to;
      — Enforce the US Constitution (supreme LAW of this nation) and each state’s Constitution (highest LAW of the state),
      — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
      — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

      That is found within the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

      Clause 16 lays out the duties both the state and federal governments have TO the Militias: “To provide for organizing, arming and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

      If you are questioning who is the Militia?

      Richard Henry Lee, First Senate: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …”

      George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

      That terrorism here in the USA in 28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

      That we are to have our own manufacturing of weapons of war because we should never rely on those who serve within our governments.

      George Washington: “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

      Samuel Adams: “Under every government the last resort of the people, is an appeal to the sword; whether to defend themselves against the open attacks of a foreign enemy, or to check the insidious encroachments of domestic foes. Whenever a people … entrust the defence of their country to a regular, standing army, composed of mercenaries, the power of that country will remain under the direction of the most wealthy citizens.
      And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peaceable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions”.
      “It is always dangerous to the liberties of the people to have an army stationed among them, over which they have no control … The Militia is composed of free Citizens. There is therefore no danger of their making use of their Power to the destruction of their own Rights, or suffering others to invade them.” (end quote)

      Cockrum v. State: “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power”.

      Bliss v. Commonwealth: “Arms restrictions – even concealed weapons bans – are unconstitutional, since arms bearing is an individual right and the legislature may not restrict any aspect of such a right.”

      Nunn vs. State: “‘The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right”.

      • markinaz says:

        and that is a FACT jack!

        thanks Cal

      • vocalpatriot says:

        mostly correct, hwever…the militia referred to in the second amendment is the military. To paraphrase:
        “because govt controls the military, the right of the people to have arms shall not be infringed”
        It means simply that and nothing more.
        Oh if only proper english were taught in school…

        • TwoWords says:

          vocalpatriot said:
          ….mostly correct, hwever…the militia referred to in the second amendment is the military. To paraphrase:
          “because govt controls the military, the right of the people to have arms shall not be infringed”
          It means simply that and nothing more.
          Oh if only proper english were taught in school

          Let me guess, you saw that on TV? Heard it on the radio? Read in a magazine? What? Or could it be just your opinion?

          As a reminder, this is what it really says:

          A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
          —Amendment II

          Now, there are thousands of citations on the meaning of each word in this, but we are looking for just one in particular. The word this time is: Militia

          Start here:

          Militia (United States)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_%28United_States%29

          Educate yourself some more:

          The Second Amendment and the Inalienable Right to Self-Defense
          http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/04/the-second-amendment-and-the-inalienable-right-to-self-defense

          Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms: The Common Law
          Tradition

          http://www.constitution.org/mil/maltrad.htm

          Oh, one more thing:
          Please learn to spell…

  5. grandee says:

    He was just concerned with OPSEC.

  6. Mountain Trekker says:

    Every politican that promotes gun control should be put on a “No Buy List” and if ever found with or using a gun they should be convicted of a felony. Trekker Out.

    • WhoWTFKnows... says:

      Mt Treker, You have a really Great Point there. Those who want to ban Guns need to register on the NO GUNS Ever List. If caught with a Gun, yes they are punished with a Felony and mandatory Jail time. That’s how you beat these dipsticks at their own game. I suggest everybody sends this suggestion to the Pro 2nd Amendment Legislatures, and get this into writing as a Bill and signed into Law. And they also need to place a Gun-Free Zone Sign in their Yards at home.

      ~WWTI…

    • Mountain Trekker
      No guns list and a definite felony if caught with a gun. Mandatory 2 year sentence.

  7. If this Creature Really Believe’s in Gun Free Zone’s NO Armed Body Guard’s for him that Will Go Over like A Lead Balloon.

    • Sarge says:

      Sam,
      When Rangel was reminded that he and other members of Congress are protected by armed members of the U.S. Capitol Police, he said,
      “Well that’s a little different. I think we deserve it, I think we need to be protected down here.”

      • Enemy of the State says:

        The reason they feel they need to be protected is because they know they have gone through life pissing off the people they are supposed to work FOR
        And that they have gone around the world piesing off everyone else and killing innocent people with their resource wars

        Not to mention making laws for us , and ignoring the laws for them

        It’s totally out of fear of retribution

  8. smokey says:

    They’ll also drive their BMW to the Global Warming Rally to pander for votes.

  9. TEST says:

    The cause of violent crime isn’t gun policy–it’s family policy. And until Americans step back and examine the real problem, the President will continue exploiting these tragedies to accomplish his ultimate goal: expanding government at the expense of personal freedom.”

    • Over the past thirty years, the rise in violent crime parallels the rise in families abandoned by fathers.
    • High-crime neighborhoods are characterized by high concentrations of families abandoned by fathers.
    • State-by-state analysis by Heritage scholars indicates that a 10 percent increase in the percentage of children living in single-parent homes leads typically to a 17 percent increase in juvenile crime.
    • The rate of violent teenage crime corresponds with the number of families abandoned by fathers.
    • The type of aggression and hostility demonstrated by a future criminal often is foreshadowed in unusual aggressiveness as early as age five or six.
    • The future criminal tends to be an individual rejected by other children as early as the first grade who goes on to form his own group of friends, often the future delinquent gang.

    African-American columnist Larry Elder, in his Gun Culture’ — What About the ‘Fatherless Culture? goes even further, discussing race and the absence of fathers in the black family (the problem which is also increasing in other races – while in fact, many don’t even see this as a problem!).Elder says the face of gun violence is not Sandy Hook, but Chicago. Half of the gun murders each year involve both black killers and black victims, mostly in the city and – tellingly – gang related. It has been a half century since Daniel Patrick Moynihan The Negro Family: A Case for National Action. When he wrote this, 25% of blacks were born out of wedlock, and it was a national scandal. Today? That number is 72%,of blacks, 36% of white children and 53% of Hispanic children born outside of marriage. Elder quotes Rutgers University sociology professor David Popenoe, who wrote “Life Without Father” in 1996,”where he describes the ‘massive erosion’ of fathers in America. Popenoe concluded that boys raised without fathers were more likely to have problems with drugs, alcohol, behavior and social interactions. Several studies during the ’90s found that disruption in family structures was a predictor of children’s gang involvement”.

    How many of these mass murder types came from broken homes, such as Adam Lanza did? Elder concludes with the story of Tupac Shakur, who stated before his death, “I know for a fact that had I had a father, I’d have some discipline. I’d have more confidence.” He stated he hung out with gangs because he wanted to belong to a family structure, and it offered structure, support and protection — the kind of thing we once expected home and from a father. (See also Elder’s article on violence and fatherlessness at http://townhall.com/columnists/larryelder/2013/02/21/on-guns-obama-finally-talks-about-the-culture-of-fatherlessness-n1516828?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl )
    As a matter of fact, as Human Events points out at http://www.humanevents.com/2013/03/13/coulter-trouble-in-the-nanny-state/, “Controlling for socioeconomic status, race and place of residence, the strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison is that he was raised by a single mother. At least 70 percent of juvenile murderers, pregnant teenagers, high school dropouts, teen suicides, runaways and juvenile delinquents were raised by single mothers. A study back in 1990 by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that, absent single motherhood, there would be no difference in black and white crime rates.”

  10. Jim in Va. says:

    Switzerland sets the example,do as they do. Turn us back into a polite society again. Until criminals do not exist everyone should train on weapons and have one for self defense. I thought the 2nd amendment was from the east coast to the west coast and from Mexico to Canada. Every gun control law in between should be null and void.

    • DevilMayCry says:

      Simply and cleanly spoken Jim.

    • WhoWTFKnows... says:

      Every Gun Law out there right now is in violation of the 2nd Amendment. It is an infringement.

      There also needs to be a Ban on all Sales Taxes for all Guns and Ammunition purchases, which is also a added burden and infringement to make guns UN-affordable for every one.

      Anyone who infringes the 2nd Amendment period, will be punished with a Felony and Mandatory Prison time. Its time to enforce the Constitution as it is original stated and intended.

      I believe it was Tennessee that came up with a new law that states, that is a Lawful Gun Owner is denied his 2nd amendment rights, and the disarmed gun owner is hurt, the establishment who denied his right to carry a gun in their premises, can be sued by the victim for damages like medical bills, and even up to death by the estate beneficiaries.

      ~WWTI…

  11. Kevin2 says:

    I found it interesting that the staffers were so willing to accept these people as brethren allied in the anti gun cause. A few key words and its, “I’m with you”. Rangel, a snake himself seen through it rather quickly as one phony can more easily spot another.

    Not one was willing to put the sign in front of their domain speaks volumes.

  12. Anonymous says:

    I don’t have guns in my house but I don’t wanna put a no gun sign out. Ha ha ha. This is a fake it till make it strategy to get people to hate guns. It’s not working obummer iIsis the best gun salesman of all time. Gun free is the way to be that is the gayest jingle I’ve ever heard. Their target audience is kids. How about rock out with your glock out. That’s much cooler. The demoncrats are the biggest hippocrites. They got guns but want everyone else not too.

  13. Hoosierally says:

    William Howard Taft was the first president to serve as POTUS and later Chief Justice of the Supreme Court …. Do you know who the second will be???…………..

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA sorry couldn’t keep a straight face.

    • Frank says:

      That’s enough to gag a maggot. Slick Willie for SC(r)OTUS? Sounds about right. And don’t think she won’t try to nominate him. Hell, she’s already been told that she doesn’t have to obey the laws that us peasants have to follow to the letter or risk jail.

  14. Gonetoolong says:

    All I can say is, “Damn”. That little speaks volumes about these dumbasses at work on the hill. Not as stupid as one would think. They know the deal and don’t give a fuck about the peasants that they “serve”.

  15. Ever notice how those who would deny us the right to defend our own lives, never deny themselves the same right? And yet they claim to be champions of equal rights.

  16. Braveheart1776 says:

    BC, our rights come from God, not from any manmade govt. disregard what any govt. official says.

    • The Rule of Law: rule by those who write the law, interpret the law, and enforce the law. https://anenemyofthestate.wordpress.com/quotations-from-chairman-zhu/

    • WhoWTFKnows... says:

      Hey BraveH. Where in the Bible does it say, “God says you have a right to own and carry a gun??” What verse it that? Book of Ballony, Chapter BS, verse #2 ???

      Seriously, it cracks me up the BS people interpret from the Buybull. Then turn around and drop 5000 Lb daisy cutter bombs on innocent villages across the Globe, to bring them freedom and democracy.

      ~WWTI…

    • Sarge says:

      Braveheart,
      Amen, our rights come from God, and that Truth is reflected in our Constitution.
      No matter what laws the federal government or the states might want to pass, they have to stay within the boundaries of the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land.
      Politicians cannot change things as they see fit. This is by design of our wise Founders.
      However, the Constitution doesn’t enforce itself. It takes the dedication of individuals and local representatives to hold federal officials accountable.

  17. eppe says:

    Very interesting read…
    ht tp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-12/ordained-african-american-minister-asks-what-if-whites-strike-back

  18. NorseMan says:

    Odd how in Switzerland nearly every male receives military training and has a weapon – yet they seem to have few troubles with immigrants and can easily pass anti-Burqa laws?

  19. Plan twice, prep once says:

    On a brighter note I picked up some super optics for my rifle on the Tuesday Amazon prime sale day. The item I wanted was discounted plus I got free speedy shipping! I also used my Discover card that gave me extra cash back this quarter on all Amazon purchases. I win!

    I’m really happy, though the wife was pissed when she saw how much I spent, but what the hey, next comes the kissing, hugging and making up. The goodies will arrive in a couple days, can’t wait?

    • Kulafarmer says:

      Well, whatd ya get?

      • Plan twice, prep once says:

        Smart day/night optics. It can see by clear sky starlight, and works even better in the daylight. plus I added a high intensity IR illuminator for really dark nights.

        It’ll be really fun when I visit my buddy that is overrun with feral pigs. There’s an all you can eat limit in his state!

      • skittle shittin unicorn says:

        he bought cheap chinese junk
        and a gimmick too boot
        really live hd streaming to face book ?
        do you really need an HD camera live streaming GPS
        give me a break

        but hey support china all you can
        while you can

        it breaks after 2 uses and freezes in 40 degree weather
        read the reviews before spending $ 700.00 on an optic
        or at least buy American

        OR don’t bitch about china taking over America

  20. La.Maniac says:

    No that’s a man speaking as a man!This is heading in the wrong direction –we know it and can’t stop it.
    May God guide us all!Choose wisely young man!
    Thank god for well water,hate hot shine!
    Maniac –out

  21. Connecting the dots; BLM are the ‘useful idiots’ for Obama’s and Soro’s excuse for their bigger plan:

    Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S.

    Pamela Geller 2 Oct 2015

    (‘Extremists’; constitutionalists, conservatives, Christians, Tea Party, complaining about anything the government does, gun owners and the NRA, property owners, home schoolers, gardeners, etc.)

    “The Sheriff is the last hope for America.”

    GPF will be Obama’s tool to end the Office of the Sheriff

    Gun ban (for law abiding citizens only) through Federalization of Local Police… and the plan is in the works.

    (Coinciding with importation of many hundreds of thousands of, mostly, military aged Muslim males and open borders for Mexican drug gangs and ‘other’ illegal invaders).

    The Federalization of Local Police

    Ultimate goal: “… Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis released a document entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalism and Recruitment,” which listed war veterans, anti-abortion activists, small-government advocates, and those concerned about immigration as terrorist risks.

    “Thousands of police chiefs and sheriffs who understand their role as public servants and protectors of the Constitution will be powerless to oppose these edicts, and if they dare, they will simply be fired by the federal or international body that has already assumed control of personnel decisions. The Second Amendment would be dead. Which amendment would be next?”

    As envisioned by the UN and the internationalists in the U.S. government, PPP will dissolve local police departments and county sheriffs’ offices, replacing them with pseudo-private agencies made up of a mish-mash of federal agents and bureaucratic overseers adhering to global government regulations.

    Police Consolidation: The End of Local Law Enforcement?

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/ usnews/ crime/ item/ 1293…

    Sep 25, 2012

    Once the USA is ‘toast’, the rest of the world will be a ‘piece of cake’.

    The County Guard: Defenders of the Constitution and Common Law!

    http://www.thecountyguard.org

    The U.S. Constitution guarantees natural rights, and that the People of the several … As Sheriff Richard Mack states it, “The Sheriff is the last hope for America. … CSPOA members understand that the Office of Sheriff exists to protect citizens.

  22. The solution?

    Guns –

    In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

    In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States, who later died from the wound.

    In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

    In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

    In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States .

    In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonald’s restaurant.

    In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

    In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

    In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby’s cafeteria in Killeen, TX.

    In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

    In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

    In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the United States.

    In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

    In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung – Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

    In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

    In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

    In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

    In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.

    As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.

    •US citizen Omar Mateen, 29, A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, opened fire inside Pulse gay club in Orlando in the early hours of Sunday morning
    •Mateen, from Port St. Lucie in Florida, killed at least 50 people, injured 53.

    Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

    Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.

    SOLUTION:

    It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

    We don’t need gun control, we need Democrat control.

    Guns don’t kill people, Democrats do!

    • 2isone says:

      Never knew the Luby’s shooter was a Democrat. Your list reminds me of a professor I knew who snapped and killed his in-law. He was a poster child liberal who had made a fortune from a biofeedback computer program he developed to help people learn how to calm down. Not kidding. You can’t make this stuff up.

    • exautoshopowner says:

      In 1865 a Patriot shot Lincoln.

      In 1963 we have hardly any idea who actually launched projectiles at Kennedy.

      “Democrat” and “Republican” are meaningless labels.

  23. SR 1020 Gun Crime Rising in “Gun Free” Ireland

    https://youtu.be/AVIMXROFWbc

    NCPA: Australia: More violent crime despite gun ban:

    * During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.

    * Sexual assault — Australia’s equivalent term for rape — increased 29.9 percent.

    * Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.

    * Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.

    Gun Control – An Australian Case Study
    https://youtu.be/_dLmOaf4JjA

    With Knife Murders Spiking After Gun Ban, UK Urges “Save a Life–Surrender Your Knife”

    by Mac Slavo
    SHTF Plan

    Don’t try to think this one through.

    The logic fail and sheer volume of absurdity might just make you sick if you do.

    For the UK – whose laws and policies all-too-often influence those of the U.S. – gun control isn’t enough. Probably nothing will ever be enough.

    Now a call to surrender knives, ongoing for years, is in full swing. Via Citizen Action:

    The right to bear arms might be under attack here in America–but in the United Kingdom, police are trying to do something even more ridiculous: they’re attempting to ban knives.

    Continue Reading at SHTFPlan.com…

    …Published: June 26th, 2015

    Ban guns, then knives, then cars, then rocks?

  24. aljamo says:

    Many of those shot and murdered were by hired assassins, many were patsies such as Oswald. I highly doubt they were all shot by leftists or Democrats or whatever description you might label them. Closer to the truth would be the existing monied class ordered the killing.

  25. 2isone says:

    People in general are dumb as rocks. They don’t see the paradox in what they want for themselves as opposed to what they want for others. And… we all have our blind spots. We will all be well obliged to exercise self control over the next few months. OPSEC is really key going into Fall. Signs or bumper stickers that mark you and your family in one way or another, are a dangerous luxury right now. Time to be grey. WISE as serpents… innocent as doves.

  26. Nam/redux/amsoil says:

    Wonder how long it would take if the pavement apes really went crazy in their neighborhoods to be looking for some form of weapon when their daughters and sons would become targets. Low life democrat scum, they live in la la land if they think they would be safe if weapons were banned. If the pavement apes devolved into a new form of the Mau Mau’s with their machettes how would these worm ridden demonrats protect their own oh yea they can call 911. Perhaps like in the pansy land of Sweden they can put on bracelets that say stop to not harm low level white scum wearing this bracelet.

  27. pupster says:

    What this hilarious video tell us is how incredibly stupid congressional staffers are.

    They had absolutely no clue that they were being played.

    These aides are scary dumb.

 
THC-free CBD Formula - Zero High Brand

Web Design and Content Copyright 2007 - 2015 SHTF Plan - When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You - All Rights Reserved

Our Supercharged Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 Octo-Core Dual Servers are Powered By Liquid Web

Dedicated IP Address: 69.167.174.108

The content on this site is provided as general information only. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader.

SHTFplan is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.