Preps and Solutions
(Sponsored Ads)
Block Cubed - Cryptocurrency and Blockchain News
  • 9 Predictions For Bitcoin And Cryptocurrency For The Second Half Of 2018
  • “This News Is Massive” Unikoin Gold (UKG) CEO Responds To Supreme Court Ruling That Legalizes Sports Betting
  • Blockchain Smart Contracts
  • Silver
    Strategic Relocation
    Recently Posted Articles and Videos
    Ready Nutrition - Homesteading and Preparedness
    Ready Gardens - A Ready Nutrition Company
    The Daily Sheeple
    The Prepper Website
    SGT Report
    The Daily Coin
    top Prepper Web Sites
    Featured Destinations
    The Liberty Mill
    Web Destinations

    Clarocet for Kids

    Banned: No Children in Public Park

    Mac Slavo
    October 9th, 2009
    Comments (7)
    Read by 140 people

    Today we highlight yet another asinine attempt by government to enact a law that makes one wonder if we still live in America. The City of Kensington, Maryland has banned kids from public parks:

    Public parks are usually the places where children go to have fun. But the town of Kensington just passed a new rule that bans kids over five years old from playgrounds during the daytime.


    The town council unanimously passed a resolution this week saying only caretakers with children five years old and younger can be in Reinhardt Park from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.

    Since that resolution passed, Brookewood students have gone elsewhere for recess. “We like to use the park because it’s big and we like to run around and play games,” said Basia Syski, a fifth-grade student.

    The town manager says students using the park for recess created maintenance issues and damage. The town council asked the school to pay $4,000 a year to help with upkeep but never heard back.

    “Do a clean through trash pickup, lay mulch around the swings — we could do that,” said McPherson. “But pay $4,000? We just don’t have it. We just don’t have it in our budget.”

    Brookewood’s headmaster tells ABC 7 News it’s a public park for all too use but Kensington’s mayor disagrees. By phone he said the park is for taxpaying citizens — not abuse by a private non-profit school.

    Tracy Wagner brings her toddler to the park — a park she describes as rarely used.

    The last time I checked, the parents of children in private schools still have to pay taxes to a city whether or not their children receive public education. Thus, the children are, in fact, tax paying citizens by proxy. If the parents of the children allow the children to play in the park, and their caregivers (school) are willing to watch them, then what’s the problem?

    We welcome your comments below, but just in case you feel like sending an email to the Mayor of Kensington or the city council, here’s the link!

    Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.
    The Most Trusted Tactical Gas Mask In The World
    Please Spread The Word And Share This Post

    Author: Mac Slavo
    Views: Read by 140 people
    Date: October 9th, 2009

    Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.


    Vote: Click here to vote for SHTF Plan as a Top Prepper Web Site
    1. Tony Rea says:

      Comments…..I agree with the town council. Have you ever been to Kensinton MD? Believe me, you dont what the parks to look like the houses. I see parents that let kids throw trash on the ground and not say a word. The older kids are dirty, but the parents are worse. 2 generations of litter bugs. I clean up when I go there with my 2 yr old.

    2. BlackieChan says:

      America, land of the free…

    3. stromm says:

      Being a parent and a teacher I don’t have a problem with this.  If the school is responsible for so much abuse that normal care can’t keep up with it, then they should be held accountable.

      It sounds like the school doesn’t want to have recess on their own property.  One could infer that the reason is they know they’ll have to clean up after their kids.  So, they go somewhere else and let the kids get away with things they shouldn’t get away with and then ignore the end result.


      By the same token, if parents taught their kids to respect what’s not theirs, then this wouldn’t be a problem.  Just because you pay taxes, doesn’t give you are your brats the right to trash public property.  It’s PUBLIC, not YOUR’S!

    4. TIM says:


    5. Ray says:

      The parents of the children are tax payers and thus the children are entitled to use the city park. Otherwise, the equal protection clause of the constitution is violated and the parents of the children are no longer required to pay city taxes in my opinion.

      Sounds like the government didn’t like the competition from a private school and are trying to shut it down. Sad because prive school and home school children do so much better than the schools run by government employees.

      The law is clearly illegal but then everything Hitler did was “legal”.

    6. Steve says:

      You don’t ban the kids, you penalize the parents forcing them to take responsibility for the actions of their kids. Quite simple to have an enforcement officer patrolling the park, issuing citations as needed to help deter the issue.

    7. Something fishy about this says:

      Sounds like there is more to why the council wants to ban Brookewood school.  Could it be that the council doesn’t like the school for what it teaches?  This can not simply be about the park.  


    Web Design and Content Copyright 2007 - 2015 SHTF Plan - When It Hits The Fan, Don't Say We Didn't Warn You - All Rights Reserved

    Our Supercharged Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 Octo-Core Dual Servers are Powered By Liquid Web

    Dedicated IP Address:

    The content on this site is provided as general information only. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a financial interest in any company or advertiser referenced. Any action taken as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately the responsibility of the reader.

    SHTFplan is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to